Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2021

Open Access 01-07-2021 | Esophageal Rupture

Early diagnosis is associated with improved clinical outcomes in benign esophageal perforation: an individual patient data meta-analysis

Authors: Bram D. Vermeulen, Britt van der Leeden, Jawad T. Ali, Tomas Gudbjartsson, Michael Hermansson, Donald E. Low, Douglas G. Adler, Abraham J. Botha, Xavier B. D’Journo, Atila Eroglu, Lorenzo E. Ferri, Christoph Gubler, Jan Willem Haveman, Lileswar Kaman, Richard A. Kozarek, Simon Law, Gunnar Loske, Joerg Lindenmann, Jung-Hoon Park, J. David Richardson, Paulina Salminen, Ho-Yong Song, Jon A. Søreide, Manon C. W. Spaander, Jeffrey N. Tarascio, Jon A. Tsai, Tim Vanuytsel, Camiel Rosman, Peter D. Siersema, the Benign Esophageal Perforation Collaborative Group

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Time of diagnosis (TOD) of benign esophageal perforation is regarded as an important risk factor for clinical outcome, although convincing evidence is lacking. The aim of this study is to assess whether time between onset of perforation and diagnosis is associated with clinical outcome in patients with iatrogenic esophageal perforation (IEP) and Boerhaave’s syndrome (BS).

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane library through June 2018 to identify studies. Authors were invited to share individual patient data and a meta-analysis was performed (PROSPERO: CRD42018093473). Patients were subdivided in early (≤ 24 h) and late (> 24 h) TOD and compared with mixed effects multivariable analysis while adjusting age, gender, location of perforation, initial treatment and center. Primary outcome was overall mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, re-interventions and ICU admission.

Results

Our meta-analysis included IPD of 25 studies including 576 patients with IEP and 384 with BS. In IEP, early TOD was not associated with overall mortality (8% vs. 13%, OR 2.1, 95% CI 0.8–5.1), but was associated with a 23% decrease in ICU admissions (46% vs. 69%, OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2–7.2), a 22% decrease in re-interventions (23% vs. 45%, OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.2–6.7) and a 36% decrease in length of hospital stay (14 vs. 22 days, p < 0.001), compared with late TOD. In BS, no associations between TOD and outcomes were found. When combining IEP and BS, early TOD was associated with a 6% decrease in overall mortality (10% vs. 16%, OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1–3.9), a 19% decrease in re-interventions (26% vs. 45%, OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.2) and a 35% decrease in mean length of hospital stay (16 vs. 22 days, p = 0.001), compared with late TOD.

Conclusions

This individual patient data meta-analysis confirms the general opinion that an early (≤ 24 h) compared to a late diagnosis (> 24 h) in benign esophageal perforations, particularly in IEP, is associated with improved clinical outcome.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ryom P et al (2011) Aetiology, treatment and mortality after oesophageal perforation in Denmark. Dan Med Bul 58(5):1–4 Ryom P et al (2011) Aetiology, treatment and mortality after oesophageal perforation in Denmark. Dan Med Bul 58(5):1–4
2.
go back to reference Desai M et al (2017) Efficacy and safety outcomes of multimodal endoscopic eradication therapy in Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 85(3):482–495CrossRef Desai M et al (2017) Efficacy and safety outcomes of multimodal endoscopic eradication therapy in Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 85(3):482–495CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yang D et al (2018) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early Barrett's neoplasia: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 87(6):1383–1393CrossRef Yang D et al (2018) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early Barrett's neoplasia: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 87(6):1383–1393CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lynch KL et al (2012) Major complications of pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy for achalasia: single-center experience and systematic review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol 107(12):1817–1825CrossRef Lynch KL et al (2012) Major complications of pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy for achalasia: single-center experience and systematic review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol 107(12):1817–1825CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Søreide JA, Viste A (2011) Esophageal perforation: diagnostic work-up and clinical decision-making in the first 24 hours. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 19(1):1–7CrossRef Søreide JA, Viste A (2011) Esophageal perforation: diagnostic work-up and clinical decision-making in the first 24 hours. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 19(1):1–7CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Markar SR et al (2015) Management and Outcomes of Esophageal Perforation: A National Study of 2,564 Patients in England. Am J Gastroenterol 110(11):1559–1566CrossRef Markar SR et al (2015) Management and Outcomes of Esophageal Perforation: A National Study of 2,564 Patients in England. Am J Gastroenterol 110(11):1559–1566CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Biancari F et al (2013) Current treatment and outcome of esophageal perforations in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of 75 studies. World J Surg 37(5):1051–1059CrossRef Biancari F et al (2013) Current treatment and outcome of esophageal perforations in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of 75 studies. World J Surg 37(5):1051–1059CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brinster CJ et al (2004) Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 77(4):1475–1483CrossRef Brinster CJ et al (2004) Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 77(4):1475–1483CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Shaker H et al (2010) The influence of the 'golden 24-h rule' on the prognosis of oesophageal perforation in the modern era. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 38(2):216–222CrossRef Shaker H et al (2010) The influence of the 'golden 24-h rule' on the prognosis of oesophageal perforation in the modern era. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 38(2):216–222CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Muir AD et al (2003) Treatment and outcomes of oesophageal perforation in a tertiary referral centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:799–804CrossRef Muir AD et al (2003) Treatment and outcomes of oesophageal perforation in a tertiary referral centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:799–804CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Reeder LB, DeFilippi VJ, Ferguson MK (1995) Current results of therapy for esophageal perforation. Am J Surg 169:615–617CrossRef Reeder LB, DeFilippi VJ, Ferguson MK (1995) Current results of therapy for esophageal perforation. Am J Surg 169:615–617CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Griffin SM et al (2008) Spontaneous rupture of the oesophagus. Br J Surg 95(9):1115–1120CrossRef Griffin SM et al (2008) Spontaneous rupture of the oesophagus. Br J Surg 95(9):1115–1120CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kuppusamy MK et al (2011) Impact of endoscopic assessment and treatment on operative and non-operative management of acute oesophageal perforation. Br J Surg 98(6):818–824CrossRef Kuppusamy MK et al (2011) Impact of endoscopic assessment and treatment on operative and non-operative management of acute oesophageal perforation. Br J Surg 98(6):818–824CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stewart LA, Tierney JF (2002) TO IPD OR NOT TO IPD? Advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews using individual patient data. Eval Health Prof 25(1):76–97CrossRef Stewart LA, Tierney JF (2002) TO IPD OR NOT TO IPD? Advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews using individual patient data. Eval Health Prof 25(1):76–97CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Stewart LA et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD statement. JAMA 313(16):1657–1665CrossRef Stewart LA et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD statement. JAMA 313(16):1657–1665CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Slim K et al (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716CrossRef Slim K et al (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716CrossRef
17.
go back to reference D'Journo XB et al (2006) Long-term observation and functional state of the esophagus after primary repair of spontaneous esophageal rupture. Ann Thorac Surg 81(5):1858–1862CrossRef D'Journo XB et al (2006) Long-term observation and functional state of the esophagus after primary repair of spontaneous esophageal rupture. Ann Thorac Surg 81(5):1858–1862CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Eroglu A et al (2009) Current management of esophageal perforation: 20 years experience. Dis Esophagus 22(4):374–380CrossRef Eroglu A et al (2009) Current management of esophageal perforation: 20 years experience. Dis Esophagus 22(4):374–380CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gubler C, Bauerfeind P (2014) Self-expandable stents for benign esophageal leakages and perforations: long-term single-center experience. Scand J Gastroenterol 49(1):23–29CrossRef Gubler C, Bauerfeind P (2014) Self-expandable stents for benign esophageal leakages and perforations: long-term single-center experience. Scand J Gastroenterol 49(1):23–29CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Haveman JW et al (2011) Adequate debridement and drainage of the mediastinum using open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for Boerhaave's syndrome. Surg Endosc 25(8):2492–2497CrossRef Haveman JW et al (2011) Adequate debridement and drainage of the mediastinum using open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for Boerhaave's syndrome. Surg Endosc 25(8):2492–2497CrossRef
21.
go back to reference van Heel NC et al (2010) Short-term esophageal stenting in the management of benign perforations. Am J Gastroenterol 105(7):1515–1520CrossRef van Heel NC et al (2010) Short-term esophageal stenting in the management of benign perforations. Am J Gastroenterol 105(7):1515–1520CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ben-David K et al (2011) Minimally invasive treatment of esophageal perforation using a multidisciplinary treatment algorithm: a case series. Endoscopy 43(2):160–162CrossRef Ben-David K et al (2011) Minimally invasive treatment of esophageal perforation using a multidisciplinary treatment algorithm: a case series. Endoscopy 43(2):160–162CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schweigert M et al (2016) Spotlight on esophageal perforation: a multinational study using the Pittsburgh esophageal perforation severity scoring system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151(4):1002–1009CrossRef Schweigert M et al (2016) Spotlight on esophageal perforation: a multinational study using the Pittsburgh esophageal perforation severity scoring system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 151(4):1002–1009CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Abbas G et al (2009) Contemporaneous management of esophageal perforation. Surgery 146(4):749–755CrossRef Abbas G et al (2009) Contemporaneous management of esophageal perforation. Surgery 146(4):749–755CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hermansson M et al (2010) Esophageal perforation in South of Sweden Results of surgical treatment in 125 consecutive patients. BMC Surg 10:1–7CrossRef Hermansson M et al (2010) Esophageal perforation in South of Sweden Results of surgical treatment in 125 consecutive patients. BMC Surg 10:1–7CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ali JT et al (2017) Perforated esophageal intervention focus (PERF) study: a multi-center examination of contemporary treatment. Dis Esophagus 30(11):1–8CrossRef Ali JT et al (2017) Perforated esophageal intervention focus (PERF) study: a multi-center examination of contemporary treatment. Dis Esophagus 30(11):1–8CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Markar SR et al (2018) Influence of national centralization of oesophagogastric cancer on management and clinical outcome from emergency upper gastrointestinal conditions. Br J Surg 105(1):113–120CrossRef Markar SR et al (2018) Influence of national centralization of oesophagogastric cancer on management and clinical outcome from emergency upper gastrointestinal conditions. Br J Surg 105(1):113–120CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bisschops R et al (2016) Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy 48(9):843–864CrossRef Bisschops R et al (2016) Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy 48(9):843–864CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Jain D et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of flexible endoscopic management of Zenker's diverticulum. J Clin Gastroenterol 52(5):369–385CrossRef Jain D et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of flexible endoscopic management of Zenker's diverticulum. J Clin Gastroenterol 52(5):369–385CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Tsujii Y et al (2017) Risk of perforation in balloon dilation associated with steroid injection for preventing esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endosc Int Open 5(7):E573–E579CrossRef Tsujii Y et al (2017) Risk of perforation in balloon dilation associated with steroid injection for preventing esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endosc Int Open 5(7):E573–E579CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Walker WS, Cameron EWJ, Walbaum PR (1985) Diagnosis and management of spontaneous transmural rupture of the oesophagus (Boerhaave's syndrome). Br J Surg 72:204–207CrossRef Walker WS, Cameron EWJ, Walbaum PR (1985) Diagnosis and management of spontaneous transmural rupture of the oesophagus (Boerhaave's syndrome). Br J Surg 72:204–207CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Vanuytsel T et al (2012) Conservative management of esophageal perforations during pneumatic dilation for idiopathic esophageal achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 10(2):142–149CrossRef Vanuytsel T et al (2012) Conservative management of esophageal perforations during pneumatic dilation for idiopathic esophageal achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 10(2):142–149CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Corbett MS et al (2016) Randomization methods in emergency setting trials: a descriptive review. Res Synth Methods 7(1):46–54CrossRef Corbett MS et al (2016) Randomization methods in emergency setting trials: a descriptive review. Res Synth Methods 7(1):46–54CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Early diagnosis is associated with improved clinical outcomes in benign esophageal perforation: an individual patient data meta-analysis
Authors
Bram D. Vermeulen
Britt van der Leeden
Jawad T. Ali
Tomas Gudbjartsson
Michael Hermansson
Donald E. Low
Douglas G. Adler
Abraham J. Botha
Xavier B. D’Journo
Atila Eroglu
Lorenzo E. Ferri
Christoph Gubler
Jan Willem Haveman
Lileswar Kaman
Richard A. Kozarek
Simon Law
Gunnar Loske
Joerg Lindenmann
Jung-Hoon Park
J. David Richardson
Paulina Salminen
Ho-Yong Song
Jon A. Søreide
Manon C. W. Spaander
Jeffrey N. Tarascio
Jon A. Tsai
Tim Vanuytsel
Camiel Rosman
Peter D. Siersema
the Benign Esophageal Perforation Collaborative Group
Publication date
01-07-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07806-y

Other articles of this Issue 7/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2021 Go to the issue