Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2020

01-11-2020 | Esophageal Cancer

Short- and long-term outcomes of prophylactic thoracic duct ligation during thoracoscopic–laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

Authors: Tao Bao, Ying-Jian Wang, Kun-Kun Li, Xue-Hai Liu, Wei Guo

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Chylothorax remains a challenging and potentially life-threatening postoperative complication after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). The effect of intraoperative prophylactic thoracic duct ligation on preventing postoperative chylothorax still remains controversial. Moreover, the potential impact of thoracic duct ligation on long-term outcome after MIE has not been well established.

Methods

From September 2009 to July 2018, a total of 600 consecutive patients suffering from thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent thoracoscopic–laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy in the Department of Thoracic surgery at Daping hospital were eligible. Among them, 559 patients received esophagectomy with preventive thoracic duct ligation and 41 patients did not. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to improve comparability between the two groups. Log-rank test was used to assess the survival differences between groups.

Results

Postoperative chylothorax occurred in five patients in the preservation group (PG) and in seven patients in the ligation group (LG) (12.2% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.001). The median age of the patients in the preservation group (PG) was 57.78 (range, 37–76) years, while the median age in the ligation group (LG) was 62.75 (range, 39–87) years. The PG had more patients with tumor located in middle thoracic esophagus and stage T3 than LG, 82.9% vs. 55.6%, 70.7% vs. 45.6%, respectively. After PSM (40 matched patients in PG and 134 in LG), there was no significant between-group difference with respect to age, tumor location, and T stage. The median survival times for patients in the PG and LG were 69.5 months (95% interval confidence, CI 54.6–84.3) and 65.2 months (95% CI 56.3–74.1), respectively (P = 0.977). The 5-year survival rates were comparable between PG and LG (54.9% vs. 54.4%, P = 0.977).

Conclusion

On the basis of the present results, routine thoracic duct ligation during minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for cancer is an effective and safe method for prevention of postoperative chylothorax, and does not exert unfavourable effect on long-term survival.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M, MacIntyre MF, Allen C, Hansen G, Woodbrook R, Wolfe C, Hamadeh RR, Moore A, Werdecker A, Gessner BD, Te Ao B et al (2015) The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol 4:505–527 Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M, MacIntyre MF, Allen C, Hansen G, Woodbrook R, Wolfe C, Hamadeh RR, Moore A, Werdecker A, Gessner BD, Te Ao B et al (2015) The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol 4:505–527
2.
go back to reference Hofstetter W, Swisher SG, Correa AM, Hess K, Putnam JB Jr, Ajani JA, Dolormente M, Francisco R, Komaki RR, Lara A, Martin F, Rice DC, Sarabia AJ, Smythe WR, Vaporciyan AA, Walsh GL, Roth JA (2002) Treatment outcomes of resected esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 236:376–384CrossRef Hofstetter W, Swisher SG, Correa AM, Hess K, Putnam JB Jr, Ajani JA, Dolormente M, Francisco R, Komaki RR, Lara A, Martin F, Rice DC, Sarabia AJ, Smythe WR, Vaporciyan AA, Walsh GL, Roth JA (2002) Treatment outcomes of resected esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 236:376–384CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sihag S, Kosinski AS, Gaissert HA, Wright CD, Schipper PH (2016) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of early surgical outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons national database. Ann Thorac Surg 101:1281–1288CrossRef Sihag S, Kosinski AS, Gaissert HA, Wright CD, Schipper PH (2016) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of early surgical outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons national database. Ann Thorac Surg 101:1281–1288CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, Schauer PR, Close JM, Fernando HC (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–495PubMedPubMedCentral Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, Schauer PR, Close JM, Fernando HC (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–495PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Wemyss-Holden SA, Launois B, Maddern GJ (2001) Management of thoracic duct injuries after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 88:1442–1448CrossRef Wemyss-Holden SA, Launois B, Maddern GJ (2001) Management of thoracic duct injuries after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 88:1442–1448CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sukumaran K, Matus P, Martin P (2007) Aetiology and management of chylothorax in adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 32:362–369CrossRef Sukumaran K, Matus P, Martin P (2007) Aetiology and management of chylothorax in adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 32:362–369CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nicola M, Maura T, Gaetano R (2015) Postoperative chylothorax. Thorac Surg Clin 25:523–528CrossRef Nicola M, Maura T, Gaetano R (2015) Postoperative chylothorax. Thorac Surg Clin 25:523–528CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Guo W, Zhao YP, Jiang YG, Niu HJ, Liu XH, Ma Z, Wang RW (2012) Prevention of postoperative chylothorax with thoracic duct ligation during video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer. Surg Endosc 26:1332–1336CrossRef Guo W, Zhao YP, Jiang YG, Niu HJ, Liu XH, Ma Z, Wang RW (2012) Prevention of postoperative chylothorax with thoracic duct ligation during video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer. Surg Endosc 26:1332–1336CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lai FC, Chen L, Tu YR, Lin M, Li X (2011) Prevention of chylothorax complicating extensive esophageal resection by mass ligation of thoracic duct: a random control study. Ann Thorac Surg 91:1770–1774CrossRef Lai FC, Chen L, Tu YR, Lin M, Li X (2011) Prevention of chylothorax complicating extensive esophageal resection by mass ligation of thoracic duct: a random control study. Ann Thorac Surg 91:1770–1774CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cagol M, Ruol A, Castoro C, Alfieri R, Michieletto S, Ancona E (2009) Prophylactic thoracic duct mass ligation prevents chylothorax after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. World J Surg 33:1684–1686CrossRef Cagol M, Ruol A, Castoro C, Alfieri R, Michieletto S, Ancona E (2009) Prophylactic thoracic duct mass ligation prevents chylothorax after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. World J Surg 33:1684–1686CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hou X, Fu J-H, Wang X, Zhang L-J, Liu Q-W, Luo K-J, Lin P, Yang HX (2014) Prophylactic thoracic duct ligation has unfavorable impact on overall survival in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:1756–1762CrossRef Hou X, Fu J-H, Wang X, Zhang L-J, Liu Q-W, Luo K-J, Lin P, Yang HX (2014) Prophylactic thoracic duct ligation has unfavorable impact on overall survival in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:1756–1762CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Crucitti P, Mangiameli G, Petitti T, Condoluci A, Rocco R, Gallo IF, Longo F, Rocco G (2016) Does prophylactic ligation of the thoracic duct reduce chylothorax rates in patients undergoing oesophagectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 50:1019–1024CrossRef Crucitti P, Mangiameli G, Petitti T, Condoluci A, Rocco R, Gallo IF, Longo F, Rocco G (2016) Does prophylactic ligation of the thoracic duct reduce chylothorax rates in patients undergoing oesophagectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 50:1019–1024CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fu JH, Hu Y, Huang WZ, Yang H, Zhu ZH, Zheng B (2006) Evaluating prophylactic ligation of thoracic duct during radical resection of esophageal carcinoma. Ai Zheng 25:728–730PubMed Fu JH, Hu Y, Huang WZ, Yang H, Zhu ZH, Zheng B (2006) Evaluating prophylactic ligation of thoracic duct during radical resection of esophageal carcinoma. Ai Zheng 25:728–730PubMed
14.
go back to reference Imamura M, Shimada Y, Kanda T, Miyahara T, Hashimoto M, Tobe T, Arai T, Hatano Y (1992) Hemodynamic changes after resection of thoracic duct for en bloc resection of esophageal cancer. Surg Today 22:226–232CrossRef Imamura M, Shimada Y, Kanda T, Miyahara T, Hashimoto M, Tobe T, Arai T, Hatano Y (1992) Hemodynamic changes after resection of thoracic duct for en bloc resection of esophageal cancer. Surg Today 22:226–232CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yoshida N, Nagai Y, Baba Y, Miyamoto Y, Iwagami S, Iwatsuki M, Hiyoshi Y, Eto K, Ishimoto T, Kiyozumi Y, Nomoto D, Akiyama T, Imamura Y, Watanabe M, Baba H (2019) Effect of resection of the thoracic duct and surrounding lymph nodes on short- and long-term and nutritional outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 26:1893–1900CrossRef Yoshida N, Nagai Y, Baba Y, Miyamoto Y, Iwagami S, Iwatsuki M, Hiyoshi Y, Eto K, Ishimoto T, Kiyozumi Y, Nomoto D, Akiyama T, Imamura Y, Watanabe M, Baba H (2019) Effect of resection of the thoracic duct and surrounding lymph nodes on short- and long-term and nutritional outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 26:1893–1900CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Patterson GA, Todd TR, Delarue NC, Ilves R, Pearson FG, Cooper JD (1981) Supradiaphragmatic ligation of the thoracic duct in intractable chylous fistula. Ann Thorac Surg 32:44–49CrossRef Patterson GA, Todd TR, Delarue NC, Ilves R, Pearson FG, Cooper JD (1981) Supradiaphragmatic ligation of the thoracic duct in intractable chylous fistula. Ann Thorac Surg 32:44–49CrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Merigliano S, Molena D, Ruol A, Zaninotto G, Cagol M, Scappin S, Ancona E (2000) Chylothorax complicating esophagectomy for cancer: a plea for early thoracic duct ligation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:453–457CrossRef Merigliano S, Molena D, Ruol A, Zaninotto G, Cagol M, Scappin S, Ancona E (2000) Chylothorax complicating esophagectomy for cancer: a plea for early thoracic duct ligation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:453–457CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bolger C, Walsh TN, Tanner WA, Hennessy TP (1991) Chylothorax after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 78:587–588CrossRef Bolger C, Walsh TN, Tanner WA, Hennessy TP (1991) Chylothorax after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 78:587–588CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dougenis D, Walker WS, Cameron EW, Walbaum ER (1992) Management of chylothorax complicating extensive oesophageal surgery. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174:501–506PubMed Dougenis D, Walker WS, Cameron EW, Walbaum ER (1992) Management of chylothorax complicating extensive oesophageal surgery. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174:501–506PubMed
21.
go back to reference Dugue L, Sauvanet A, Farges O, Goharin A, Le Mee J, Belghiti J (1998) Output of chyle as an indicator of treatment for chylothorax complicating oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 85:1147–1149CrossRef Dugue L, Sauvanet A, Farges O, Goharin A, Le Mee J, Belghiti J (1998) Output of chyle as an indicator of treatment for chylothorax complicating oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 85:1147–1149CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cerfolio RJ, Allen MS, Deschamps C, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC (1996) Postoperative chylothorax. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:1361–1366CrossRef Cerfolio RJ, Allen MS, Deschamps C, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC (1996) Postoperative chylothorax. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:1361–1366CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Alexiou C, Watson M, Beggs D, Salama FD, Morgan WE (1998) Chylothorax following oesophagogastrectomy for malignant disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 14(5):460–466CrossRef Alexiou C, Watson M, Beggs D, Salama FD, Morgan WE (1998) Chylothorax following oesophagogastrectomy for malignant disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 14(5):460–466CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rizk NP, Bach PB, Schrag D, Bains MS, Turnbull AD, Karpeh M, Brennan MF, Rusch VW (2004) The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 198(1):42–50CrossRef Rizk NP, Bach PB, Schrag D, Bains MS, Turnbull AD, Karpeh M, Brennan MF, Rusch VW (2004) The impact of complications on outcomes after resection for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 198(1):42–50CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD (2001) Transhiatal esophagectomy for treatment of benign and malignant esophageal disease. World J Surg 25(2):196–203CrossRef Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD (2001) Transhiatal esophagectomy for treatment of benign and malignant esophageal disease. World J Surg 25(2):196–203CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Shibakita M, Tonomoto Y, Dhar DK, Nagasue N (2005) Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg 189(1):98–109CrossRef Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Shibakita M, Tonomoto Y, Dhar DK, Nagasue N (2005) Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg 189(1):98–109CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Smithers BM, Gotley DC, McEwan D, Martin I, Bessell J, Doyle L (2001) Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus. A 6 year experience. Surg Endosc 15(2):176–182CrossRef Smithers BM, Gotley DC, McEwan D, Martin I, Bessell J, Doyle L (2001) Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus. A 6 year experience. Surg Endosc 15(2):176–182CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Dexter SPL, Martin IG, McMahonz MJ (1996) Radical thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer. Surg Endosc 10:147–151CrossRef Dexter SPL, Martin IG, McMahonz MJ (1996) Radical thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer. Surg Endosc 10:147–151CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Short- and long-term outcomes of prophylactic thoracic duct ligation during thoracoscopic–laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
Authors
Tao Bao
Ying-Jian Wang
Kun-Kun Li
Xue-Hai Liu
Wei Guo
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07297-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2020 Go to the issue