Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2021

01-07-2021 | Esophageal Cancer

Initial management of esophageal anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with dilations up to 18–20 mm

Authors: Robert Cubas, Robert Andres, Shravan Chintalapani, Estefania Roldan, Andrea Marcadis, Valerie Wu Chao Ying, Robert Bowles, Jose Martinez

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Esophageal anastomotic stricture is a well-known complication after transhiatal esophagectomy (THE), but there is limited data regarding the initial management and subsequent outcomes after stricture dilation. There is concern that dilating to larger diameters upon the initial encounter, specifically with high-grade strictures, will lead to increased risk for complications. We therefore reviewed one surgeon’s experience with esophageal dilations after THE and provided data and treatment recommendations based upon these findings.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who underwent esophageal dilations ≥ 18 mm up to 20 mm after THE between 2006 and 2019 at our institution was performed. Patient demographics were n = 97, age = 70, 81 males.

Results

For all cases, the mean location, length, diameter of the stricture, and number of days from surgery and initial dilation were 20 cm, 1.9 cm, 6.7 mm, and 106 days, respectively. Most dilations (79%) occurred within 2 weeks to 3 months from surgery. 29.9% were dilated up to 18 mm, 10.3% were dilated up to 19 mm, and 59.8% were dilated up to 20 mm upon initial dilation. Even 1-mm-diameter lesions could be safely dilated upon 18–20 mm. In this study group there were no complications after endoscopic dilation that required hospitalization or further surgical or endoscopic interventions.

Conclusion

These results suggest that early aggressive endoscopic management of esophageal anastomotic strictures after THE can be safely performed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Napier KJ, Scheerer M, Misra S (2014) Esophageal cancer: a review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, staging workup and treatment modalities. World J Gastrointest Oncol 6(5):112–120CrossRef Napier KJ, Scheerer M, Misra S (2014) Esophageal cancer: a review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, staging workup and treatment modalities. World J Gastrointest Oncol 6(5):112–120CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Park JY, Song HY, Kim JH, Park JH, Na HK, Kim YH, Park SI (2012) Benign anastomotic strictures after esophagectomy: long-term effectiveness of balloon dilation and factors affecting recurrence in 155 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(5):1208–1213CrossRef Park JY, Song HY, Kim JH, Park JH, Na HK, Kim YH, Park SI (2012) Benign anastomotic strictures after esophagectomy: long-term effectiveness of balloon dilation and factors affecting recurrence in 155 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(5):1208–1213CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Egan JV, Baron TH, Adler DG, Davila R, Faigel DO, Gan S-L et al (2006) Esophageal dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 63(6):755–760CrossRef Egan JV, Baron TH, Adler DG, Davila R, Faigel DO, Gan S-L et al (2006) Esophageal dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 63(6):755–760CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Grooteman KV, Wong Kee Song LM, Vleggaar FP, Siersema PD, Baron TH (2017) Non-adherence to the rule of 3 does not increase the risk of adverse events in esophageal dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 85(2):332–337CrossRef Grooteman KV, Wong Kee Song LM, Vleggaar FP, Siersema PD, Baron TH (2017) Non-adherence to the rule of 3 does not increase the risk of adverse events in esophageal dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 85(2):332–337CrossRef
5.
go back to reference van Halsema EE, Noordzij IC, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Fockens P, Bergman JJ, van Hooft JE (2017) Endoscopic dilation of benign esophageal anastomotic strictures over 16 mm has a longer lasting effect. Surg Endosc 31(4):1871–1881CrossRef van Halsema EE, Noordzij IC, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Fockens P, Bergman JJ, van Hooft JE (2017) Endoscopic dilation of benign esophageal anastomotic strictures over 16 mm has a longer lasting effect. Surg Endosc 31(4):1871–1881CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Briel JWL, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E, Peters JH, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR (2004) Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg 198(4):536–541 discussion 541–2CrossRef Briel JWL, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E, Peters JH, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR (2004) Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg 198(4):536–541 discussion 541–2CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ahmed Z, Elliott JA, King S, Donohoe CL, Ravi N, Reynolds JV (2017) Risk factors for anastomotic stricture post-esophagectomy with a standardized sutured anastomosis. World J Surg 41:487–497CrossRef Ahmed Z, Elliott JA, King S, Donohoe CL, Ravi N, Reynolds JV (2017) Risk factors for anastomotic stricture post-esophagectomy with a standardized sutured anastomosis. World J Surg 41:487–497CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lew RJ, Kochman ML (2002) A review of endoscopic methods of esophageal dilation. J Clin Gastroenterol 35(2):117–126CrossRef Lew RJ, Kochman ML (2002) A review of endoscopic methods of esophageal dilation. J Clin Gastroenterol 35(2):117–126CrossRef
9.
go back to reference McCain RS, McCain S, Mackle EJ, Tham TCK (2016) Balloon versus bougie for dilatation of benign oesophageal strictures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016(9):CD012343PubMedCentral McCain RS, McCain S, Mackle EJ, Tham TCK (2016) Balloon versus bougie for dilatation of benign oesophageal strictures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016(9):CD012343PubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Pasha SF, Acosta RD, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi KV, Decker GA, Early DS et al (2014) The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of dysphagia. Gastrointest Endosc 79(2):191–201CrossRef Pasha SF, Acosta RD, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi KV, Decker GA, Early DS et al (2014) The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of dysphagia. Gastrointest Endosc 79(2):191–201CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Langdon DF (1997) The rule of three in esophageal dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 45(1):111PubMed Langdon DF (1997) The rule of three in esophageal dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 45(1):111PubMed
12.
go back to reference Riley SA, Attwood SE (2004) Guidelines on the use of oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice. Gut 53(Suppl 1):i1–i6CrossRef Riley SA, Attwood SE (2004) Guidelines on the use of oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice. Gut 53(Suppl 1):i1–i6CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yoda Y, Yano T, Kaneko K, Tsuruta S, Oono Y, Kojima T et al (2012) Endoscopic balloon dilatation for benign fibrotic strictures after curative nonsurgical treatment for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 26:2877–2883CrossRef Yoda Y, Yano T, Kaneko K, Tsuruta S, Oono Y, Kojima T et al (2012) Endoscopic balloon dilatation for benign fibrotic strictures after curative nonsurgical treatment for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 26:2877–2883CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kim CG, Choi IJ, Lee JY, Cho SJ, Lee JH, Ryu KW et al (2009) Effective diameter of balloon dilation for benign esophagojejunal anastomotic stricture after total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 23(8):1775–1780CrossRef Kim CG, Choi IJ, Lee JY, Cho SJ, Lee JH, Ryu KW et al (2009) Effective diameter of balloon dilation for benign esophagojejunal anastomotic stricture after total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 23(8):1775–1780CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Early DS, Evans J, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA et al (2012) Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 76(4):707–718CrossRef Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Early DS, Evans J, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA et al (2012) Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 76(4):707–718CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Marjanovic G, Schrag HJ, Fischer E, Hopt UT, Fischer A (2008) Endoscopic bougienage of benign anastomotic strictures in patients after esophageal resection: the effect of the extent of stricture on bougienage results. Dis Esophagus 21(6):551–557CrossRef Marjanovic G, Schrag HJ, Fischer E, Hopt UT, Fischer A (2008) Endoscopic bougienage of benign anastomotic strictures in patients after esophageal resection: the effect of the extent of stricture on bougienage results. Dis Esophagus 21(6):551–557CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Initial management of esophageal anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with dilations up to 18–20 mm
Authors
Robert Cubas
Robert Andres
Shravan Chintalapani
Estefania Roldan
Andrea Marcadis
Valerie Wu Chao Ying
Robert Bowles
Jose Martinez
Publication date
01-07-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07801-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2021 Go to the issue