Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 4/2011

01-08-2011 | PHASE I STUDIES

Escalating weekly doses of cetuximab and correlation with skin toxicity: A phase I study

Authors: Cheryl Ho, Randeep Sangha, Laurel Beckett, Michael Tanaka, Derick H. Lau, Daniel B. Eisen, Rachel A. Burich, Paul Luciw, Imran Khan, Philip C. Mack, David R. Gandara, Angela M. Davies

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Summary

Background Cetuximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The recommended dosage is an initial load of 400 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) followed by a weekly maintenance dose of 250 mg/m2. It has been reported retrospectively that cetuximab efficacy was correlated with dose-related severity of skin rash. This study was prospectively designed to examine the safety and feasibility of escalating weekly doses of cetuximab, testing the hypothesis of the relationship of dose-dependent skin toxicity and efficacy. Methods Four dose levels were tested: Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 IV loading dose and 250, 300, 350, 400 mg/m2 weekly IV maintenance. There was no intra-patient dose escalation. Standard dose limiting toxicity criteria were used. Rash was evaluated using two additional validated dermatology methods: global acne grading scale (GAGS) and acne lesion counting (ALC). Tumor specimens and blood samples were obtained for correlative analyses. Results Twenty seven patients with solid tumors were enrolled: five head and neck, three pancreas, four gall bladder, two each of prostate, breast, colorectal, lung, and esophagus, and five others. Planned dose escalation was completed without reaching dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The highest dose level was expanded to a total of 17 patients. Gr 3/4 toxicities included: lymphopenia (2), fatigue (2), and hypomagnesemia (2). One patient experienced a grade 3 rash (350 mg/m2). Sixty five percent of pts had a ≥ Gr 2 rash that was not dose dependent. In 22 evaluable patients, there was one partial response (PR) in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma (400 mg/m2) and seven patients had stable disease (SD). ALC and GAGS demonstrated no correlation with dose or response. Correlative studies evaluating k-ras, EGFR FISH status and immunologic correlatives were conducted on available tumor samples. Conclusions Cetuximab administered at 400 mg/m2 IV as a loading dose with weekly maintenance dose of 400 mg/m2 is feasible and well tolerated. There was no direct correlation of the grade of rash with dose in this group of patients with heterogenous solid tumors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mendelsohn J, Baselga J (2003) Status of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in the biology and treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:2787–2799PubMedCrossRef Mendelsohn J, Baselga J (2003) Status of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in the biology and treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:2787–2799PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tos APD, Ellis I (2005) Assessing epidermal growth factor receptor expression in tumours: what is the value of current test methods? Eur J Cancer 41:1383–1392CrossRef Tos APD, Ellis I (2005) Assessing epidermal growth factor receptor expression in tumours: what is the value of current test methods? Eur J Cancer 41:1383–1392CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fan Z, Masui H, Altas I et al (1993) Blockade of epidermal growth factor receptor function by bivalent and monovalent fragments of 225 anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Res 53:4322–4328PubMed Fan Z, Masui H, Altas I et al (1993) Blockade of epidermal growth factor receptor function by bivalent and monovalent fragments of 225 anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Res 53:4322–4328PubMed
4.
go back to reference Sato JD, Kawamoto T, Le AD et al (1983) Biological effects in vitro of monoclonal antibodies to human epidermal growth factor receptors. Mol Biol Med 1:511–529PubMed Sato JD, Kawamoto T, Le AD et al (1983) Biological effects in vitro of monoclonal antibodies to human epidermal growth factor receptors. Mol Biol Med 1:511–529PubMed
5.
go back to reference Perez-Soler R, Saltz L (2005) Cutaneous adverse effects with HER1/EGFR-targeted agents: is there a silver lining? J Clin Oncol 23:5235–5246PubMedCrossRef Perez-Soler R, Saltz L (2005) Cutaneous adverse effects with HER1/EGFR-targeted agents: is there a silver lining? J Clin Oncol 23:5235–5246PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European organization for research and treatment of cancer, national cancer institute of the United States, national cancer institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European organization for research and treatment of cancer, national cancer institute of the United States, national cancer institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Witkowski JA, Parish LC (1999) From other ghosts of the past: acne lesion counting. J Am Acad Dermatol 40:131PubMed Witkowski JA, Parish LC (1999) From other ghosts of the past: acne lesion counting. J Am Acad Dermatol 40:131PubMed
8.
go back to reference Lucky AW, Barber BL, Girman CJ et al (1996) A multirater validation study to assess the reliability of acne lesion counting. J Am Acad Dermatol 35:559–565PubMedCrossRef Lucky AW, Barber BL, Girman CJ et al (1996) A multirater validation study to assess the reliability of acne lesion counting. J Am Acad Dermatol 35:559–565PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Doshi A, Zaheer A, Stiller MJ (1997) A comparison of current acne grading systems and proposal of a novel system. Int J Dermatol 36:416–418PubMedCrossRef Doshi A, Zaheer A, Stiller MJ (1997) A comparison of current acne grading systems and proposal of a novel system. Int J Dermatol 36:416–418PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Khan IH, Krishnan VV, Ziman M et al (2009) A comparison of multiplex suspension array large-panel kits for profiling cytokines and chemokines in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 76:159–168PubMed Khan IH, Krishnan VV, Ziman M et al (2009) A comparison of multiplex suspension array large-panel kits for profiling cytokines and chemokines in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 76:159–168PubMed
11.
go back to reference US Department of Health and Human Services: Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 3.0. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 2003 US Department of Health and Human Services: Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 3.0. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 2003
12.
go back to reference Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS et al (2007) Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 357:2040–2048PubMedCrossRef Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS et al (2007) Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 357:2040–2048PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Koza I Sr, Wrba F, Vrbanec D et al (2009) Correlation of KRAS status with clinical outcome in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated first-line with FOLFOX6 + cetuximab (FX+C) or FOLFIRI + cetuximab (FF+C): The CECOG/CORE1.2.001 trial. ASCO Meeting Abstracts 27:4055 Koza I Sr, Wrba F, Vrbanec D et al (2009) Correlation of KRAS status with clinical outcome in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated first-line with FOLFOX6 + cetuximab (FX+C) or FOLFIRI + cetuximab (FF+C): The CECOG/CORE1.2.001 trial. ASCO Meeting Abstracts 27:4055
14.
go back to reference Burtness B, Goldwasser MA, Flood W et al (2005) Phase III randomized trial of cisplatin plus placebo compared with cisplatin plus cetuximab in Metastatic/Recurrent head and neck cancer: an eastern cooperative oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 23:8646–8654PubMedCrossRef Burtness B, Goldwasser MA, Flood W et al (2005) Phase III randomized trial of cisplatin plus placebo compared with cisplatin plus cetuximab in Metastatic/Recurrent head and neck cancer: an eastern cooperative oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 23:8646–8654PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Saltz L, Kies M, Abbruzzese L et al (2003) The presence and intensity of the cetuximab-induced acne-like rash predicts increased survival in studies across multiple malignancies. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:204 Saltz L, Kies M, Abbruzzese L et al (2003) The presence and intensity of the cetuximab-induced acne-like rash predicts increased survival in studies across multiple malignancies. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:204
Metadata
Title
Escalating weekly doses of cetuximab and correlation with skin toxicity: A phase I study
Authors
Cheryl Ho
Randeep Sangha
Laurel Beckett
Michael Tanaka
Derick H. Lau
Daniel B. Eisen
Rachel A. Burich
Paul Luciw
Imran Khan
Philip C. Mack
David R. Gandara
Angela M. Davies
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-010-9396-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Investigational New Drugs 4/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine