Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Erratum

Erratum to: What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies?

Authors: Kath Wright, Su Golder, Kate Lewis-Light

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2015

Excerpt

After publication of [1] it came to the authors’ attention that three percentage (%) symbols were missed upon publication of their manuscript. The incorrect statement present in the Abstract and Results is “The median number of unique studies was 9.09; while the range had a lowest value of 5.0 to the highest value of 33.0”. The correct statement is “The median % of unique studies was 9.09%; while the range had a lowest value of 5.0% to the highest value of 33.0%”. This has been updated in the original article. …

Wright K, Golder S, Lewis-Light K. What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies? Systematic Reviews. 2015;4:104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Erratum to: What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies?
Authors: Kath Wright
Su Golder
Kate Lewis-Light
Publication date: 01-12-2015
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0128-x

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Erratum to: What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies?

Excerpt

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Excerpt

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

A systematic review protocol for measuring comorbidity in inpatient rehabilitation for non-traumatic brain injury

Methods of a multi-faceted rapid knowledge synthesis project to inform the implementation of a new health service model: Collaborative Emergency Centres

Interventions for preventing, delaying the onset, or decreasing the burden of frailty: an overview of systematic reviews

Patient navigators for people with chronic disease: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

The role of high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy with haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children with central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Effectiveness of probiotic in preventing and treating antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and/or Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in patients with spinal cord injury: a protocol of systematic review of randomised controlled trials