Published in:
Open Access 01-12-2016 | Erratum
Erratum to: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for uncontrolled haemorrahgic shock as an adjunct to haemostatic procedures in the acute care setting
Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2016
Login to get accessExcerpt
After publication of the original article [1], it came to the authors’ attention that there were some errors affecting Tables 1 and 3. These errors do not affect the scientific conclusion of the study presented in the original article.
Table 1
Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients
|
Variables
|
Trauma (n = 16)
|
Non-trauma (n = 9)
|
Total (n = 25)
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age (y), median (IQR)
|
72 (39–82)
|
69 (63–72)
|
69 (45–80)
|
|
Male, n (%)
|
6 (38)
|
9 (100)*
|
15 (75)
|
|
Shock index, median (IQR)
|
1.4 (1.1 − 1.5)
|
1.6 (1.0 - 2.1)
|
1.4 (1.1 − 1.6)
|
|
Injury severity score, median (IQR)
|
41 (33–49)
|
−
|
−
|
|
Glasgow-Blatchford score, median (IQR)
|
−
|
12 (11–14)
|
−
|
|
Systolic blood pressure before REBOA (mmHg), median (IQR)
|
78 (67–87)
|
64 (61–77)
|
71 (62–87)
|
|
Base excess (mmol/L), median (IQR)
|
−9.0 (−18.7 − -6.3)
|
−11.5 (−14.6 − -9.2)
|
−9.4 (−15.1 − -6.4)
|
|
pH, median (IQR)
|
7.33 (7.25 − 7.41)
|
7.30 (7.23 − 7.38)
|
7.32 (7.23 − 7.39)
|
|
Lactate (mg/dL), median (IQR)
|
4.3 (3.2 − 9.0)
|
6.3 (5.6 − 11.0)
|
5.7 (3.7 − 11.0)
|
|
Prothrombin time (%), median (IQR)
|
64.5 (46.5 − 79.5)
|
67.0 (51.0 − 73.0)
|
67.0 (48.0 − 77.0)
|
|
Activated partial thromboplastin time (sec), median (IQR)
|
56.3 (41.4 − 75.9)
|
39.3 (35.3 − 64.5)
|
53.4 (38.2 − 75.7)
|
|
Insertion at the ER, n (%)
|
16 (100)
|
6 (67)
|
22 (88)
|
|
Failed REBOA, n (%)
|
3 (19)
|
0
|
3 (12)
|
|
Total occlusion time of REBOA (min), median (IQR)
|
65 (57–99)
|
55 (50–95)
|
61 (51–98)
|
|
PRBC transfusion within 24 h (mL), median (IQR)
|
1540 (840–2590)
|
1960 (1400–2800)
|
−
|
|
FFP transfusion within 24 h (mL), median (IQR) Outcomes, n (%)
|
720 (360–1440)
|
900 (720–1440)
|
−
|
|
Died at the ER
|
5 (31)
|
0
|
5 (20)
|
|
Died within 24 h
|
4 (25)
|
1 (11)
|
5 (20)
|
|
Died within 2 months
|
1 (6)
|
2 (22)
|
3 (12)
|
Table 3
Characteristics of non-trauma patients
|
No.
|
Age
|
Sex
|
SI
|
Glasgow- Blatchford score
|
Clinical Rock all score
|
Diagnosis
|
Treatment
|
Sheath insertion
|
Position (Zone)
|
CPA during procedure
|
Intervals for REBOA (miri)
|
REBOA-related complications
|
Outcome
|
Cause of death
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ER
|
24 h>
|
3monts>
|
||||||||||||||
|
17
|
69
|
M
|
1.6
|
13
|
3
|
Gastric ulcer
|
Surgery
|
Success
|
I
|
No
|
46
|
None
|
Alive
|
.Alive
|
.Alive
|
-
|
|
18
|
50
|
M
|
1.0
|
12
|
2
|
Duodenal ulcer
|
AE (failed endoscopy)
|
Success
|
I
|
No
|
50
|
None
|
Alive
|
Alive
|
Alive
|
-
|
|
19
|
64
|
M
|
2.1
|
11
|
3
|
Pseudoaneurysm by pancreatic fistula
|
AE
|
Success
|
I
|
Yes
|
54
|
None
|
Alive
|
Alive
|
Alive
|
-
|
|
20
|
S3
|
M
|
2.1
|
19
|
4
|
Duodenal ticer
|
Endoscopy
|
Success
|
I
|
No
|
140
|
None
|
Alive
|
Alive
|
Alive
|
-
|
|
21
|
36
|
M
|
0.7
|
7
|
3
|
Gastric ulcer
|
Endoscopy
|
Success
|
I
|
No
|
20
|
None
|
Alive
|
Alive
|
Alive
|
-
|
|
22
|
69
|
M
|
2.8
|
17
|
3
|
Gastric ulcer
|
Endoscopy
|
Success
|
I
|
No
|
57
|
None
|
Alive
|
Alive
|
Alive
|
-
|
|
23
|
72
|
M
|
1.2
|
9
|
3
|
Gastric ulcer/ Cerebral infarction
|
AE (failed endoscopy)
|
Success
|
I
|
Yes
|
55
|
None
|
Alive
|
Alive
|
Dead
|
Exsanguination
|
|
24
|
69
|
M
|
1.7
|
12
|
3
|
Duodenal ulcer
|
AE (failed endoscopy)
|
Success
|
I
|
Yes
|
95
|
None
|
Alive
|
.Alive
|
Dead
|
Ischemic encephalopathy
|
|
25
|
78
|
M
|
0.8
|
14
|
5
|
Duodenal ulcer
|
AE (failed endoscopy)
|
Success
|
I
|
No
|
145
|
None
|
Alive
|
Dead
|
-
|
Exsanguination
|