Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Eradicating female genital mutilation and cutting in Tanzania: an observational study

Authors: Moses Galukande, Joseph Kamara, Violet Ndabwire, Elisabeth Leistey, Cecilia Valla, Sam Luboga

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Female genital mutilation and cutting (FGM/C) has long been practiced in various parts of the world. The practice is still prevalent in 29 countries on the African continent despite decades of campaigning to eradicate it. The approaches for eradication have been multi-pronged, including but not limited to, health risk campaigns teaching about the health consequences for the girls and the women, recruitment of change agents from within the communities and the enforcement of legal mechanisms.
The purpose of this study was to analyse the impact of an 18 month long campaign to eradicate or reduce FGM/C in a rural predominantly Masai community.

Methods

An observational study involving mixed methods, quantitative and qualitative was conducted in Arusha region, Tanzania. A household survey, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, school children's group discussions and project document reviews for both baseline and endline assessments were used. Same tools were used for both baseline and endline assessements. Comparison of baseline and endline findings and conclusions were drawn.

Results

The prevalence of self reported FGM/C at endline was 69.2 %. However, physical obstetric examination of women in labour revealed a prevalence of over 95 % FGM/C among women in labour.
Those in favour of FGM/C eradication were 88 %. Nearly a third of the 100 FGM practitioners had denounced the practice; they also formed a peer group that met regularly comparing baseline and endline. Knowledge about FGM/C health risks increased from 16 to 30 % (p < 0.001). The practice is currently done secretly to an uncertain extent.

Conclusion

This multifaceted educational campaign achieved moderate success in increasing knowledge of the health risks and changing attitudes despite a short period of intervention. However, its effectiveness in reducing FGM/C prevalence was uncertain.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Yoder S, Wang S, Johansen REB. Female genital mutilation/cutting: estimates of numbers from national surveys in 28 countries with national surveys, Studies in Family Planning. In press. Yoder S, Wang S, Johansen REB. Female genital mutilation/cutting: estimates of numbers from national surveys in 28 countries with national surveys, Studies in Family Planning. In press.
6.
go back to reference Morison L, Scherf C, Ekpo G, Paine K, West B, Coleman R, et al. The long term reproductive health consequences of female genital cutting in rural Gambia: a community based survey. Trop Med Int Health. 2001;6(8):643–53.CrossRefPubMed Morison L, Scherf C, Ekpo G, Paine K, West B, Coleman R, et al. The long term reproductive health consequences of female genital cutting in rural Gambia: a community based survey. Trop Med Int Health. 2001;6(8):643–53.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Almroth L, Elmusharaf S, El Hadi N, Obeid A, El Mohamed SAA, Elfadil MS, et al. Primary infertility after genital mutilation in girlhood in Sudan: a case–control study. Lancet. 2005;366:385–91.CrossRefPubMed Almroth L, Elmusharaf S, El Hadi N, Obeid A, El Mohamed SAA, Elfadil MS, et al. Primary infertility after genital mutilation in girlhood in Sudan: a case–control study. Lancet. 2005;366:385–91.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Johansen REB, Diop NJ, Laverack G, Leye E. What works and what does not: A discussion of popular approaches for the abandonment of FGM. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013. doi:10.115s/2013/348248. Johansen REB, Diop NJ, Laverack G, Leye E. What works and what does not: A discussion of popular approaches for the abandonment of FGM. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013. doi:10.115s/2013/348248.
16.
go back to reference WHO study group on female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome. Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. Lancet. 2006;367:1835–41.CrossRef WHO study group on female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome. Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries. Lancet. 2006;367:1835–41.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Glanz K, Bishop DB. The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annu Rev Publ Health. 2010;31:399–418.CrossRef Glanz K, Bishop DB. The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annu Rev Publ Health. 2010;31:399–418.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Eradicating female genital mutilation and cutting in Tanzania: an observational study
Authors
Moses Galukande
Joseph Kamara
Violet Ndabwire
Elisabeth Leistey
Cecilia Valla
Sam Luboga
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2439-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue