Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Dermatology 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Enzymatic debridement for the treatment of severely burned upper extremities – early single center experiences

Authors: Tomke Cordts, Johannes Horter, Julian Vogelpohl, Thomas Kremer, Ulrich Kneser, Jochen-Frederick Hernekamp

Published in: BMC Dermatology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Severe burns of hands and arms are complex and challenging injuries. The Standard of care (SOC) – necrosectomy with skin grafting – is often associated with poor functional or aesthetic outcome. Enzymatic debridement (ED) is considered one promising alternative but, until recently, results proved to be highly variable.

Methods

Between 04/2014 and 04/2015, 16 patients with deep partial- to full-thickness burns of the upper extremities underwent enzymatic debridement (ED) in our Burn Center and were evaluated for extent of additional surgery, wound healing, pain management and functional parameters.

Results

Following ED, no further surgical intervention was required in 53.8 % of the study population. In patients who required surgical treatment, the the skin-grafted area could be reduced by 37.0 % when compared to initial assessment. Time from injury to ED was 24.4 h and patients were able to start physical therapy after 2.0 days but suffered from prolonged wound closure (28.0 days). Regionally administered anesthesia proved to be superior to pain medication alone as pain levels and consumed morphine-equivalent were lower. Post-demission follow-up showed good functional results and pain levels with low scores in two self-report questionnaires (DASH, PRWE-G) but 3 patients reported increased susceptibility to shear stress. Based on these early experiences, we developed a 3-step algorithm for consecutive patients allowing appropriate and individualized treatment selection.

Conclusions

We see a potential benefit for ED in the treatment of severely burned hands and forearms but further investigations and proper prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to statistically support any outlined assumptions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference German Burn Society. Excerpt from the 2013 Statistic for Adult Burn Centers. 2014. German Burn Society. Excerpt from the 2013 Statistic for Adult Burn Centers. 2014.
2.
go back to reference Krieger Y, Bogdanov-Berezovsky A, Gurfinkel R, Silberstein E, Sagi A, Rosenberg L. Efficacy of enzymatic debridement of deeply burned hands. Burns. 2012;38:108–12.CrossRefPubMed Krieger Y, Bogdanov-Berezovsky A, Gurfinkel R, Silberstein E, Sagi A, Rosenberg L. Efficacy of enzymatic debridement of deeply burned hands. Burns. 2012;38:108–12.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Luce EA. The acute and subacute management of the burned hand. Clin Plast Surg. 2000;27:49–63.PubMed Luce EA. The acute and subacute management of the burned hand. Clin Plast Surg. 2000;27:49–63.PubMed
4.
go back to reference van Zuijlen PP, Kreis RW, Vloemans AF, Groenevelt F, Mackie DP. The prognostic factors regarding long-term functional outcome of full-thickness hand burns. Burns. 1999;25:709–14.CrossRefPubMed van Zuijlen PP, Kreis RW, Vloemans AF, Groenevelt F, Mackie DP. The prognostic factors regarding long-term functional outcome of full-thickness hand burns. Burns. 1999;25:709–14.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pham TN, Gibran NS, Heimbach DM. Evaluation of the burn wound. management decisions. In: Herndon D, editor. Total Burn Care. 3rd ed. London: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. p. 119–26.CrossRef Pham TN, Gibran NS, Heimbach DM. Evaluation of the burn wound. management decisions. In: Herndon D, editor. Total Burn Care. 3rd ed. London: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. p. 119–26.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Klasen HJ. A review on the nonoperative removal of necrotic tissue from burn wounds. Burns. 2000;26:207–22.CrossRefPubMed Klasen HJ. A review on the nonoperative removal of necrotic tissue from burn wounds. Burns. 2000;26:207–22.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference MediWound Germany GmbH. NexoBrid 2 G Powder and Gel for Gel Summary of Product Characteristics. 2014. MediWound Germany GmbH. NexoBrid 2 G Powder and Gel for Gel Summary of Product Characteristics. 2014.
8.
go back to reference Rosenberg L, Krieger Y, Bogdanov-Berezovsky A, Silberstein E, Shoham Y, Singer AJ. A novel rapid and selective enzymatic debridement agent for burn wound management: a multi-center RCT. Burns. 2014;40:466–74.CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg L, Krieger Y, Bogdanov-Berezovsky A, Silberstein E, Shoham Y, Singer AJ. A novel rapid and selective enzymatic debridement agent for burn wound management: a multi-center RCT. Burns. 2014;40:466–74.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pfeiffer K, Weiss O, Krodel U, Hurtienne N, Kloss J, Heuser D. Ultrasound-guided perivascular axillary brachial plexus block. A simple, effective and efficient procedure. Anaesthesist. 2008;57:670–6.CrossRefPubMed Pfeiffer K, Weiss O, Krodel U, Hurtienne N, Kloss J, Heuser D. Ultrasound-guided perivascular axillary brachial plexus block. A simple, effective and efficient procedure. Anaesthesist. 2008;57:670–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Enzymatic debridement for the treatment of severely burned upper extremities – early single center experiences
Authors
Tomke Cordts
Johannes Horter
Julian Vogelpohl
Thomas Kremer
Ulrich Kneser
Jochen-Frederick Hernekamp
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Dermatology / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-5945
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895-016-0045-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Dermatology 1/2016 Go to the issue