Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 5/2021

01-05-2021 | Enterostomy | Original Article

Management and 1-year outcomes of anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery

Authors: Felice Borghi, Marco Migliore, Desirée Cianflocca, Giacomo Ruffo, Alberto Patriti, Paolo Delrio, Marco Scatizzi, Stefano Mancini, Gianluca Garulli, Andrea Lucchi, Alessandro Carrara, Felice Pirozzi, Stefano Scabini, Andrea Liverani, Gianluca Baiocchi, Roberto Campagnacci, Andrea Muratore, Graziano Longo, Marco Caricato, Raffaele Macarone Palmieri, Nereo Vettoretto, Paolo Ciano, Michele Benedetti, Elisa Bertocchi, Marcello Ceccaroni, Ugo Pace, Lorenzo Pandolfini, Andrea Sagnotta, Basilio Pirrera, Vincenzo Alagna, Giacomo Martorelli, Giuseppe Tirone, Michele Motter, Antonio Sciuto, Antonio Martino, Andrea Scarinci, Sarah Molfino, Angela Maurizi, Patrizia Marsanic, Federico Tomassini, Simone Santoni, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo, Pietro Amodio, Elisa Arici, Simone Cicconi, Irene Marziali, Gianluca Guercioni, Marco Catarci, The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze different types of management and one-year outcomes of anastomotic leakage (AL) after elective colorectal resection.

Methods

All patients with anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery with anastomosis (76/1,546; 4.9%), with the exclusion of cases with proximal diverting stoma, were followed-up for at least one year. Primary endpoints were as follows: composite outcome of one-year mortality and/or unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission and additional morbidity rates. Secondary endpoints were as follows: length of stay (LOS), one-year persistent stoma rate, and rate of return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT).

Results

One-year mortality rate was 10.5% and unplanned ICU admission rate was 30.3%. Risk factors of the composite outcome included age (aOR = 1.08 per 1-year increase, p = 0.002) and anastomotic breakdown with end stoma at reoperation (aOR = 2.77, p = 0.007). Additional morbidity rate was 52.6%: risk factors included open versus laparoscopic reoperation (aOR = 4.38, p = 0.03) and ICU admission (aOR = 3.63, p = 0.05). Median (IQR) overall LOS was 20 days (14–26), higher in the subgroup of patients reoperated without stoma. At 1 year, a stoma persisted in 32.0% of patients, higher in the open (41.2%) versus laparoscopic (12.5%) reoperation group (p = 0.04). Only 4 out of 18 patients (22.2%) were able to RIOT.

Conclusion

Mortality and/or unplanned ICU admission rates after AL are influenced by increasing age and by anastomotic breakdown at reoperation; additional morbidity rates are influenced by unplanned ICU admission and by laparoscopic approach to reoperation, the latter also reducing permanent stoma and failure to RIOT rates.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.​gov # NCT03560180
Literature
1.
go back to reference McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC (2015) Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 102:462–479CrossRef McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC (2015) Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 102:462–479CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kingham TP, Pachter HL (2009) Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 208:269–278CrossRef Kingham TP, Pachter HL (2009) Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 208:269–278CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Luchtefeld MA, Milsom JW, Senagore A, Surrell JA, Mazier WP (1989) Colorectal anastomotic stenosis. Results of a survey of the ASCRS membership. Dis Colon Rectum 32:733–736CrossRef Luchtefeld MA, Milsom JW, Senagore A, Surrell JA, Mazier WP (1989) Colorectal anastomotic stenosis. Results of a survey of the ASCRS membership. Dis Colon Rectum 32:733–736CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ha GW, Kim JH, Lee MR (2017) Oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage following colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 24:3289–3299CrossRef Ha GW, Kim JH, Lee MR (2017) Oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage following colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 24:3289–3299CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Biagi JJ, Raphael MJ, Mackillop WJ, Kong W, King WD, Booth CM (2011) Association between time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 305:2335–2342CrossRef Biagi JJ, Raphael MJ, Mackillop WJ, Kong W, King WD, Booth CM (2011) Association between time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 305:2335–2342CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Klein M, Azaquoun N, Jensen BV, Gögenur I (2015) Improved survival with early adjuvant chemotherapy after colonic resection for stage III colonic cancer: a nationwide study. J Surg Oncol 112:538–543CrossRef Klein M, Azaquoun N, Jensen BV, Gögenur I (2015) Improved survival with early adjuvant chemotherapy after colonic resection for stage III colonic cancer: a nationwide study. J Surg Oncol 112:538–543CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kim IY, Kim BR, Kim YW (2015) The impact of anastomotic leakage on oncologic outcomes and the receipt and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after colorectal cancer surgery. Int J Surg 22:3–9CrossRef Kim IY, Kim BR, Kim YW (2015) The impact of anastomotic leakage on oncologic outcomes and the receipt and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after colorectal cancer surgery. Int J Surg 22:3–9CrossRef
8.
go back to reference The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) Study Group (2020) Anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery: a prospective multicentre observational study on use of the Dutch leakage score, serum procalcitonin and serum C-reactive protein for diagnosis. BJS Open 4:499–507CrossRef The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) Study Group (2020) Anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery: a prospective multicentre observational study on use of the Dutch leakage score, serum procalcitonin and serum C-reactive protein for diagnosis. BJS Open 4:499–507CrossRef
9.
go back to reference The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group (2019) Colorectal surgery in Italy: a snapshot from the iCral study group. Updates Surg 71:339–347CrossRef The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group (2019) Colorectal surgery in Italy: a snapshot from the iCral study group. Updates Surg 71:339–347CrossRef
10.
go back to reference The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group (2020) Risk factors for adverse events after elective colorectal surgery: beware of blood transfusions. Updates Surg 72:811–819CrossRef The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group (2020) Risk factors for adverse events after elective colorectal surgery: beware of blood transfusions. Updates Surg 72:811–819CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Büchler MW (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339–351CrossRef Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Büchler MW (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339–351CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vennix S, Abegg R, Bakker OJ, van den Boezem PB, Brokelman WJA, Sietses C, Bosscha K, Lips DJ, Prins HA (2013) Surgical re-interventions following colorectal surgery: open versus laparoscopic management of anastomotic leakage. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:739–744CrossRef Vennix S, Abegg R, Bakker OJ, van den Boezem PB, Brokelman WJA, Sietses C, Bosscha K, Lips DJ, Prins HA (2013) Surgical re-interventions following colorectal surgery: open versus laparoscopic management of anastomotic leakage. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:739–744CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lee CM, Huh JW, Yun SH, Kim HC, Lee WY, Park YA, Cho YB, Chun HK (2015) Laparoscopic versus open reintervention for anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 29:931–936CrossRef Lee CM, Huh JW, Yun SH, Kim HC, Lee WY, Park YA, Cho YB, Chun HK (2015) Laparoscopic versus open reintervention for anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 29:931–936CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wind J, Koopman AG, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Slors JFM, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2007) Laparoscopic reintervention for anastomotic leakage after primary laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 94:1562–1566CrossRef Wind J, Koopman AG, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Slors JFM, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2007) Laparoscopic reintervention for anastomotic leakage after primary laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 94:1562–1566CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Eriksen JR, Ovesen H, Gögenur I (2018) Short- and long-term outcomes after colorectal anastomotic leakage is affected by surgical approach at reoperation. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1097–1105CrossRef Eriksen JR, Ovesen H, Gögenur I (2018) Short- and long-term outcomes after colorectal anastomotic leakage is affected by surgical approach at reoperation. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1097–1105CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Saur NM, Paulson EC (2019) Operative management of anastomotic leaks after colorectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 32:190–195CrossRef Saur NM, Paulson EC (2019) Operative management of anastomotic leaks after colorectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 32:190–195CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gessler B, Eriksson O, Angenete E (2017) Diagnosis, treatment, and consequences of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:549–556CrossRef Gessler B, Eriksson O, Angenete E (2017) Diagnosis, treatment, and consequences of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:549–556CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Khan AA, Wheeler JMD, Cunningham C, George B, Kettlewell M, Mortensen NJM (2008) The management and outcome of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10:587–592CrossRef Khan AA, Wheeler JMD, Cunningham C, George B, Kettlewell M, Mortensen NJM (2008) The management and outcome of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10:587–592CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rickert A, Willeke F, Kienle P, Post S (2010) Management and outcome of anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery. Colorectal Dis 12:e216–e223CrossRef Rickert A, Willeke F, Kienle P, Post S (2010) Management and outcome of anastomotic leakage after colonic surgery. Colorectal Dis 12:e216–e223CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Fraccalvieri D, Biondo S, Saez J, Millan M, Kreisler E, Golda T, Frago R, Miguel B (2012) Management of colorectal anastomotic leakage: differences between salvage and anastomotic takedown. Am J Surg 204:671–676CrossRef Fraccalvieri D, Biondo S, Saez J, Millan M, Kreisler E, Golda T, Frago R, Miguel B (2012) Management of colorectal anastomotic leakage: differences between salvage and anastomotic takedown. Am J Surg 204:671–676CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Blumetti J, Chaudhry V, Cintron JR, Park JJ, Marecik S, Harrison JL, Prasad LM, Abcarian H (2014) Management of anastomotic leak: lessons learned from a large colon and rectal surgery training program. World J Surg 38:985–991CrossRef Blumetti J, Chaudhry V, Cintron JR, Park JJ, Marecik S, Harrison JL, Prasad LM, Abcarian H (2014) Management of anastomotic leak: lessons learned from a large colon and rectal surgery training program. World J Surg 38:985–991CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Phitayakorn R, Delaney CP, Reynolds HL, Champagne BJ, Heriot AG, Neary P, Senagore AJ, International Anastomotic Leak Study Group (2008) Standardized algorithms for management of anastomotic leaks and related abdominal and pelvic abscesses after colorectal surgery. World J Surg 32:1147–1156CrossRef Phitayakorn R, Delaney CP, Reynolds HL, Champagne BJ, Heriot AG, Neary P, Senagore AJ, International Anastomotic Leak Study Group (2008) Standardized algorithms for management of anastomotic leaks and related abdominal and pelvic abscesses after colorectal surgery. World J Surg 32:1147–1156CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Ramsch C, Uter W, Guigoz Y, Cederholm T, Thomas DR, Anthony P, Charlton KE, Maggio M, Tsai AC, Grathwohl D, Vellas B, Sieber CC, MNA-International Group (2009) Validation of the Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA-SF): a practical tool for identification of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging 13:782CrossRef Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Ramsch C, Uter W, Guigoz Y, Cederholm T, Thomas DR, Anthony P, Charlton KE, Maggio M, Tsai AC, Grathwohl D, Vellas B, Sieber CC, MNA-International Group (2009) Validation of the Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA-SF): a practical tool for identification of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging 13:782CrossRef
24.
go back to reference den Dulk M, Noter SL, Hendriks ER, Brouwers MA, van der Vlies CH, Oostenbroek RJ, Menon AG, Steup WH, van de Velde CJ (2009) Improved diagnosis and treatment of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:420–426CrossRef den Dulk M, Noter SL, Hendriks ER, Brouwers MA, van der Vlies CH, Oostenbroek RJ, Menon AG, Steup WH, van de Velde CJ (2009) Improved diagnosis and treatment of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:420–426CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Aloia TA, Zimmitti G, Conrad C, Gottumukalla V, Kopetz S, Vauthey JN (2014) Return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT): a novel metric for evaluating the quality of oncosurgical therapy for malignancy. J Surg Oncol 110:107–114CrossRef Aloia TA, Zimmitti G, Conrad C, Gottumukalla V, Kopetz S, Vauthey JN (2014) Return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT): a novel metric for evaluating the quality of oncosurgical therapy for malignancy. J Surg Oncol 110:107–114CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bakker IS, Grossmann I, Henneman D, Havenga K, Wiggers T (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit. Br J Surg 101:424–432CrossRef Bakker IS, Grossmann I, Henneman D, Havenga K, Wiggers T (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit. Br J Surg 101:424–432CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Choi H-K, Law W-L, Ho JWC (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1719–1725CrossRef Choi H-K, Law W-L, Ho JWC (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1719–1725CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodríguez JLR, Granero-Castro P, Hervás D, Alvarez Rico MA, Brao MJ, Sánchez González JM, Garcia-Granero E, ANACO Study Groupe (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 262:321–330. Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodríguez JLR, Granero-Castro P, Hervás D, Alvarez Rico MA, Brao MJ, Sánchez González JM, Garcia-Granero E, ANACO Study Groupe (2015) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 262:321–330.
29.
go back to reference Midura EF, Hanseman D, Davis BR, Atkinson SJ, Abbott DE, Shah SA, Paquette IM (2015) Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58:333–338CrossRef Midura EF, Hanseman D, Davis BR, Atkinson SJ, Abbott DE, Shah SA, Paquette IM (2015) Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58:333–338CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Zaimi I, Sparreboom CL, Lingsma HF, Doornebosch PG, Menon AG, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Wouters MWJM, Lange JF, On Behalf of the Dutch ColoRectal Audit Group (2018) The effect of age on anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer surgery: a population-based study. J Surg Oncol 118:113–120CrossRef Zaimi I, Sparreboom CL, Lingsma HF, Doornebosch PG, Menon AG, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Wouters MWJM, Lange JF, On Behalf of the Dutch ColoRectal Audit Group (2018) The effect of age on anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer surgery: a population-based study. J Surg Oncol 118:113–120CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Branagan G, Finnis D, Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group (2005) Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1021–1026CrossRef Branagan G, Finnis D, Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group (2005) Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1021–1026CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Sciuto A, Merola G, De Palma GD, Sodo M, Pirozzi F, Bracale UM, Bracale U (2018) Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 24:2247–2260CrossRef Sciuto A, Merola G, De Palma GD, Sodo M, Pirozzi F, Bracale UM, Bracale U (2018) Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 24:2247–2260CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Onwochei DN, Fabes J, Walker D, Kumar G, Moonesinghe SR (2020) Critical care after major surgery: a systematic review of risk factors for unplanned admission. Anaesthesia 75(suppl 1):e62–e74PubMed Onwochei DN, Fabes J, Walker D, Kumar G, Moonesinghe SR (2020) Critical care after major surgery: a systematic review of risk factors for unplanned admission. Anaesthesia 75(suppl 1):e62–e74PubMed
34.
go back to reference Gillies MA, Harrison EM, Pearse RM, Garrioch S, Haddow C, Smyth L, Parks R, Walsh TS, Lone NI (2017) Intentive care utilization and outcomes after high-risk surgery in Scotland: a population-based cohort study. Br J Anaesth 118:123–131CrossRef Gillies MA, Harrison EM, Pearse RM, Garrioch S, Haddow C, Smyth L, Parks R, Walsh TS, Lone NI (2017) Intentive care utilization and outcomes after high-risk surgery in Scotland: a population-based cohort study. Br J Anaesth 118:123–131CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Jannasch O, Klinge T, Otto R, Chiapponi C, Udelnow A, Lippert H, Bruns CJ, Mroczkowski P (2015) Risk factors, short and long term outcome of anastomotic leaks in rectal cancer. Oncotarget 6:36884–36893CrossRef Jannasch O, Klinge T, Otto R, Chiapponi C, Udelnow A, Lippert H, Bruns CJ, Mroczkowski P (2015) Risk factors, short and long term outcome of anastomotic leaks in rectal cancer. Oncotarget 6:36884–36893CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Jung SH, Yu CS, Choi PW, Kim DD, Park IJ, Kim HC, Kim JC (2008) Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 51:902–908CrossRef Jung SH, Yu CS, Choi PW, Kim DD, Park IJ, Kim HC, Kim JC (2008) Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 51:902–908CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Krarup P-M, Jorgensen LN, Andreasen AH, Harling H, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (2012) A nationwide study on anastomotic leakage after colonic cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 14:e661–e667CrossRef Krarup P-M, Jorgensen LN, Andreasen AH, Harling H, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (2012) A nationwide study on anastomotic leakage after colonic cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 14:e661–e667CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Sherman KL, Wexner SD (2017) Considerations in stoma reversal. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 30:172–177CrossRef Sherman KL, Wexner SD (2017) Considerations in stoma reversal. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 30:172–177CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Floodeen H, Lindgren R, Matthiessen P (2013) When are defunctioning stomas in rectal cancer surgery really reversed? Results from a population-based single center experience. Scand J Surg 102:246–250CrossRef Floodeen H, Lindgren R, Matthiessen P (2013) When are defunctioning stomas in rectal cancer surgery really reversed? Results from a population-based single center experience. Scand J Surg 102:246–250CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253:890–899CrossRef Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253:890–899CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Management and 1-year outcomes of anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery
Authors
Felice Borghi
Marco Migliore
Desirée Cianflocca
Giacomo Ruffo
Alberto Patriti
Paolo Delrio
Marco Scatizzi
Stefano Mancini
Gianluca Garulli
Andrea Lucchi
Alessandro Carrara
Felice Pirozzi
Stefano Scabini
Andrea Liverani
Gianluca Baiocchi
Roberto Campagnacci
Andrea Muratore
Graziano Longo
Marco Caricato
Raffaele Macarone Palmieri
Nereo Vettoretto
Paolo Ciano
Michele Benedetti
Elisa Bertocchi
Marcello Ceccaroni
Ugo Pace
Lorenzo Pandolfini
Andrea Sagnotta
Basilio Pirrera
Vincenzo Alagna
Giacomo Martorelli
Giuseppe Tirone
Michele Motter
Antonio Sciuto
Antonio Martino
Andrea Scarinci
Sarah Molfino
Angela Maurizi
Patrizia Marsanic
Federico Tomassini
Simone Santoni
Gabriella Teresa Capolupo
Pietro Amodio
Elisa Arici
Simone Cicconi
Irene Marziali
Gianluca Guercioni
Marco Catarci
The Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group
Publication date
01-05-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03777-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 5/2021 Go to the issue