Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 2/2022

01-04-2022 | Enterostomy | Original Article

Is absorbable mesh useful in preventing parastomal hernia after emergency surgery? The PARTHENOPE study

Authors: F. Pizza, D. D’Antonio, F. S. Lucido, P. Del Rio, C. Dell’Isola, L. Brusciano, S. Tolone, L. Docimo, C. Gambardella

Published in: Hernia | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Colostomy is a frequent event in oncological or inflammatory bowel diseases. Its related morbidity includes retraction, infection and parastomal hernia (PH), which is a quite common late complication. Several surgical options are available for PH repair, the majority including mesh. However, results are often disappointing with relevant recurrence rates, up to 33%. The study aim was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of prophylactic biosynthetic mesh (BIO-A®, polyglycolide-trimethylene carbonate copolymer) placed during colostomy fashioning, in reducing PH. A prospective randomized controlled double-blind trial was conducted from January 2014 to December 2019 to compare conventional end-colostomy with end-colostomy reinforced with BIO-A mesh in ante-rectus position in patients undergoing colon diversion in emergency surgery.

Methods

Patients were clinically followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months and received a CT scan at 6 and 12 months. The postoperative morbidity and wound events were also evaluated.

Results

55 patients receiving conventional colostomy considered as Control Group and 55 patients receiving BIO-A mesh supported colostomy (Mesh Group) were included in the study. At 12 months, the incidence of PH was 9 (12.7%) and 24 (43.6%) in the Mesh Group and Control Group, respectively (p < 0.05). Postoperative morbidity was similar between Mesh Group and Control Group (7 [12.7%] vs 4 [7.3%], respectively; p = 0.340). The multivariable analysis showed that not using a mesh (p = 0.042), age > 70 years (p = 0.041), diabetes (p < 0.001), colon dilation > 7 cm (p < 0.0001) and COPD (p = 0.009) were all related with postoperative PH.

Conclusions

The prophylactic BIO-A mesh positioning during colostomy is an effective procedure reducing PH incidence at a 1 years follow-up guaranteeing low postoperative morbidity.

Study dataset is available on ClinicalTrials.gov ID

NCT04436887.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A et al (2006) Enterostomysite hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1559–1563CrossRefPubMed Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A et al (2006) Enterostomysite hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1559–1563CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ, Matthews JB (1994) Parastomal hernia: is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg 129:413–419CrossRefPubMed Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ, Matthews JB (1994) Parastomal hernia: is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg 129:413–419CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hansson BME, Slater NJ, vander Velden AS et al (2012) Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair. Ann Surg 255:685–695CrossRefPubMed Hansson BME, Slater NJ, vander Velden AS et al (2012) Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair. Ann Surg 255:685–695CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Borab ZM, Shakir S, Lanni MA et al (2017) Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 161:1149–1163CrossRefPubMed Borab ZM, Shakir S, Lanni MA et al (2017) Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 161:1149–1163CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Odensten C, Strigård K, Rutegård J et al (2019) Use of prophylactic mesh when creating a colostomy does not prevent parastomal hernia: a randomized controlled trial-STOMAMESH. Ann Surg 269(3):427–431CrossRefPubMed Odensten C, Strigård K, Rutegård J et al (2019) Use of prophylactic mesh when creating a colostomy does not prevent parastomal hernia: a randomized controlled trial-STOMAMESH. Ann Surg 269(3):427–431CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kokotovic D, Bisgaard T, Helgstrand F (2016) Long-term recurrence and complications associated with elective incisional hernia repair. JAMA 316(15):1575–1582CrossRefPubMed Kokotovic D, Bisgaard T, Helgstrand F (2016) Long-term recurrence and complications associated with elective incisional hernia repair. JAMA 316(15):1575–1582CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pizza F, D’Antonio D, Arcopinto M et al (2020) Safety and efficacy of prophylactic resorbable biosynthetic mesh following midline laparotomy in clean/contemned field: preliminary results of a randomized double blind prospective trial. Hernia 24(1):85–92CrossRefPubMed Pizza F, D’Antonio D, Arcopinto M et al (2020) Safety and efficacy of prophylactic resorbable biosynthetic mesh following midline laparotomy in clean/contemned field: preliminary results of a randomized double blind prospective trial. Hernia 24(1):85–92CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference van den Hil LCL, van Steensel S, Schreinemacher MHF et al (2019) Prophylactic mesh placement to avoid incisional hernias after stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 23(4):733–741CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van den Hil LCL, van Steensel S, Schreinemacher MHF et al (2019) Prophylactic mesh placement to avoid incisional hernias after stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 23(4):733–741CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Costa G, Ruscelli P, Balducci G et al (2016) Clinical strategies for the management of intestinal obstruction and pseudo-obstruction. A Delphi Consensus study of SICUT (Società Italiana di Chirurgia d’Urgenza e del Trauma). Ann Ital Chir 87:105–117PubMed Costa G, Ruscelli P, Balducci G et al (2016) Clinical strategies for the management of intestinal obstruction and pseudo-obstruction. A Delphi Consensus study of SICUT (Società Italiana di Chirurgia d’Urgenza e del Trauma). Ann Ital Chir 87:105–117PubMed
13.
go back to reference Śmietański M, Szczepkowski M, Alexandre JA et al (2014) European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias. Hernia 18(1):1–6CrossRefPubMed Śmietański M, Szczepkowski M, Alexandre JA et al (2014) European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias. Hernia 18(1):1–6CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin J et al (2009) The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinic-radiological classification. Colorectal Dis 11:173–177CrossRefPubMed Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin J et al (2009) The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinic-radiological classification. Colorectal Dis 11:173–177CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hodgkinson JD, Worley G, Warusavitarne J et al (2021) Evaluation of the Ventral Hernia Working Group classification for long-term outcome using English Hospital Episode Statistics: a population study. Hernia 25:977–984CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hodgkinson JD, Worley G, Warusavitarne J et al (2021) Evaluation of the Ventral Hernia Working Group classification for long-term outcome using English Hospital Episode Statistics: a population study. Hernia 25:977–984CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML et al (1999) Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 27(2):97–132 (quiz 133–134; discussion 96)CrossRefPubMed Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML et al (1999) Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 27(2):97–132 (quiz 133–134; discussion 96)CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Morales-Conde S (2012) A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 16(3):261–267 (Erratum in: Hernia. 2013 Feb;17(1):153)CrossRefPubMed Morales-Conde S (2012) A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 16(3):261–267 (Erratum in: Hernia. 2013 Feb;17(1):153)CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O et al (2018) A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: which to use? Am J Emerg Med 36(4):707–714CrossRefPubMed Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O et al (2018) A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: which to use? Am J Emerg Med 36(4):707–714CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE (1993) The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 31(3):247–263CrossRefPubMed McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE (1993) The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 31(3):247–263CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Serra-Aracil X, Bombardo-Junca J et al (2009) Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Ann Surg 249:583–587CrossRefPubMed Serra-Aracil X, Bombardo-Junca J et al (2009) Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Ann Surg 249:583–587CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference De Raet J, Delvaux G, Haentjens P et al (2008) Waist circumference is an independent risk factor for the development of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1806–1809CrossRefPubMed De Raet J, Delvaux G, Haentjens P et al (2008) Waist circumference is an independent risk factor for the development of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1806–1809CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hansson BM, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS et al (2012) Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg 255:685–695CrossRefPubMed Hansson BM, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS et al (2012) Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg 255:685–695CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Kallinowski F, Ludwig Y, Löffler T et al (2021) Biomechanics applied to incisional hernia repair—Considering the critical and the gained resistance towards impacts related to pressure. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 82:105253CrossRef Kallinowski F, Ludwig Y, Löffler T et al (2021) Biomechanics applied to incisional hernia repair—Considering the critical and the gained resistance towards impacts related to pressure. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 82:105253CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Petro CC, Como JJ, Yee S, Prabhu AS, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2015) Posterior component separation and transversus abdominis muscle release for complex incisional hernia repair in patients with a history of an open abdomen. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78(2):422–429CrossRefPubMed Petro CC, Como JJ, Yee S, Prabhu AS, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ (2015) Posterior component separation and transversus abdominis muscle release for complex incisional hernia repair in patients with a history of an open abdomen. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78(2):422–429CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hauters P, Cardin JL, Lepere M et al (2016) Long-term assessment of parastomal hernia prevention by intra-peritoneal mesh reinforcement according to the modified Sugarbaker technique. Surg Endosc 30(12):5372–5379CrossRefPubMed Hauters P, Cardin JL, Lepere M et al (2016) Long-term assessment of parastomal hernia prevention by intra-peritoneal mesh reinforcement according to the modified Sugarbaker technique. Surg Endosc 30(12):5372–5379CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Is absorbable mesh useful in preventing parastomal hernia after emergency surgery? The PARTHENOPE study
Authors
F. Pizza
D. D’Antonio
F. S. Lucido
P. Del Rio
C. Dell’Isola
L. Brusciano
S. Tolone
L. Docimo
C. Gambardella
Publication date
01-04-2022
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-022-02579-w

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Hernia 2/2022 Go to the issue