Top

Surgical Endoscopy

Published in:

01-04-2021 | Enterostomy

From keyhole to sandwich: change in laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias at a single centre

Authors: C. Bertoglio, L. Morini, M. Maspero, A. Zironda, B. Alampi, M. Mazzola, C. Magistro, G. Ferrari

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2021

Abstract

Background

Nearly 50% of patients with an ostomy will develop a parastomal hernia (PSH). Its repair remains a surgical challenge. Both laparoscopic “modified Sugarbaker” (SB) and Keyhole (KH) repair are currently in use, frequently with unsatisfactory results.‘‘Sandwich Repair’’ (SR) may be an alternative to reduce recurrence rates. We present the change of our technique from KH to SR.

Methods

We collected data from all consecutive laparoscopic PSH repairs at our institution from 2004 until now (from 2004 to 2013 treated with KH, from 2014 with SR) and compared the results of the two groups. Primary endpoint was recurrence rate at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were operative time, PO length of hospital stay (LOS), and short and long-term complications.

Results

13 patients underwent SR. Main changes in surgical technique concerned primary defect closure, no stay sutures, use of glue for first mesh fixation, and partial lateral covering of the underlying mesh with a peritoneal flap. Early postoperative course after SR was uneventful and no recurrence at 1 year was recorded. In the KH group (19 patients), short-term complications occurred in two cases (10%), with one parietal hematoma and one case of intensive pain; we had four recurrences at 1 year (21%). LOS was shorter in the SR group (mean 4 days vs 6, p = 0.004). The KH group had 2 (10%) occurrences of chronic seroma and one bowel perforation (5%), while the SR group had one (8%) occurrence of chronic pain. Median follow-up was 26 months (range 13–78) for the SR group and 47 months (12–105) for the KH group.

Conclusion

SR is safe and effective in expert hands and provides promising preliminary results.

Shah NR, Craft RO, Harold KL (2013) Parastomal hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 93:1185–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2013.06.011CrossRefPubMed

Leslie D (1984) The parastomal hernia. Surg Clin North Am 64:407–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6109(16)43294-9CrossRefPubMed

Cheung MT (1995) Complications of an abdominal stoma: an analysis of 322 stomas. Aust N Z J Surg 65:808–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1995.tb00566.xCrossRefPubMed

Hansson BME, Slater NJ, Schouten Van Der Velden A, Groenewoud HMM, Buyne OR, De Hingh IHJT, Bleichrodt RP (2012) Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824b44b1CrossRefPubMed

Carne PWG, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA (2003) Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 90:784–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4220CrossRefPubMed

Klinge U, Binnebösel M, Rosch R, Mertens P (2006) Hernia recurrence as a problem of biology and collagen. Journal of minimal access surgery. Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, pp 151–154

Ripoche J, Basurko C, Fabbro-Perray P, Prudhomme M (2011) Éventrations péristomiales. Étude de la Fédération des stomisés de France. J Chir Viscerale 148:493–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.10.006CrossRef

Israelsson LA (2005) Preventing and treating parastomal hernia. World J Surg 29:1086–1089CrossRef

Horgan K, Hughes LE (1986) Para-ileostomy hernia: failure of a local repair technique. Br J Surg 73:439–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800730607CrossRefPubMed

10.

MacKeigan JM, Cataldo PA (2004) Intestinal stomas: principles, techniques, and management. Marcel Dekker, New York

11.

Halabi WJ, Jafari MD, Carmichael JC, Nguyen VQ, Mills S, Phelan M, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2013) Laparoscopic versus open repair of parastomal hernias: an ACS-NSQIP analysis of short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 27:4067–4072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3062-9CrossRefPubMed

12.

Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, Seiler CM, Miserez M (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007781.pub2CrossRefPubMed

13.

Sugarbaker PH (1985) Peritoneal approach to prosthetic mesh repair of paraostomy hernias. Ann Surg 201:344–346. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198503000-00015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Hansson BME, Van Nieuwenhoven EJ, Bleichrodt RP (2003) Promising new technique in the repair of parastomal hernia. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 17:1789–1791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-9249-0CrossRef

15.

Hansson BME, Bleichrodt ARP, De Hingh AIH (2009) Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a keyhole technique results in a high recurrence rate. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0253-xCrossRefPubMed

16.

Olmi S, Oldani A, Uccelli M, Scotto B, Cesana G, Ciccarese F, Villa R, Giorgi R (2019) Laparoscopic modified keyhole technique with coated polyester mesh for treatment of parastomal hernia: measures for improving the outcome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 29:681–684. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0730CrossRef

17.

Berger D, Bientzle M (2007) Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a single surgeon’s experience in 66 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9028-zCrossRefPubMed

18.

Śmietański M, Szczepkowski M, Alexandre JA, Berger D, Bury K, Conze J, Hansson B, Janes A, Miserez M, Mandala V, Montgomery A, Morales Conde S, Muysoms F (2014) European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1162-zCrossRefPubMed

19.

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef

20.

Rajapandian S, Jankar SV, Dey S, Annamaneni V, Sabnis SC, Sathiymurthy S, Parthsarathi R, Raj P, Senthilnathan P, Palanivelu C (2017) A case report of modified laparoscopic keyhole plus repair for parastomal hernia following ileal conduit. J Minim Access Surg 13:312–314. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_249_16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Morales-Conde S (2012) A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 16:261–267CrossRef

22.

Yang X, He K, Hua R, Shen Q, Yao Q (2017) Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia. Ann Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.02.03CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Fox SS, Janczyk R, Warren JA, Carbonell AM, Poulose BK, Rosen MJ, Hope WW (2017) An evaluation of parastomal hernia repair using the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative. Am Surg 83:881–886CrossRef

24.

McLemore EC, Harold KL, Efron JE, Laxa BU, Young-Fadok TM, Heppell JP (2007) Parastomal hernia: short-term outcome after laparoscopic and conventional repairs. Surg Innov 14:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350607307275CrossRefPubMed

25.

Moisidis E, Curiskis JI, Brooke-Cowden GL (2000) Improving the reinforcement of parastomal tissues with Marlex mesh: laboratory study identifying solutions to stomal aperture distortion. Dis Colon Rectum 43:55–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02237244CrossRefPubMed

26.

Mizrahi H, Bhattacharya P, Parker MC (2012) Laparoscopic slit mesh repair of parastomal hernia using a designated mesh: long-term results. Surg Endosc 26:267–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1866-zCrossRefPubMed

27.

Muysoms FE, Hauters PJ, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Huten N, Claeys DA (2008) Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a multi-centre retrospective review and shift in technique. Acta Chir Belg 108:400–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2008.11680249CrossRefPubMed

28.

Banerjee A, Beck C, Narula VK, Linn J, Noria S, Zagol B, Mikami DJ (2012) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: does primary repair in addition to placement of mesh decrease recurrence? Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2024-3CrossRef

29.

Franklin ME, Gonzalez JJ, Glass JL, Manjarrez A (2004) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair: an 11-year experience. Hernia 8:23–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-003-0163-8CrossRefPubMed

30.

Tandon A, Pathak S, Lyons NJR, Nunes QM, Daniels IR, Smart NJ (2016) Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. Br J Surg 103:1598–1607CrossRef

31.

Muysoms F (2007) Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias with a modified sugarbaker technique. Acta Chir Belg 107:476–480CrossRef

32.

DeAsis FJ (2015) Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8670CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Yan Z, Zhang H, Zhan H, Wu D, Cheng Y, Wu Q, Zhang G (2018) The modified laparoscopic keyhole parastomal hernia repair with in situ re-ostomy has low recurrence rate. Hernia 22:685–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1789-xCrossRefPubMed

34.

Rajapandian S, Jankar SV, Kakkilaya H, Sabnis S, Ramkrishana P, Palanivelu P, Chinnusamy P (2020) Modified laparoscopic keyhole plus repair to manage a parastomal hernia: a single-center experience. Asian J Endosc Surg 13:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12686CrossRefPubMed

35.

Mancini GJ, McClusky DA, Khaitan L, Goldenberg EA, Heniford BT, Novitsky YW, Park AE, Kavic S, LeBlanc KA, Elieson MJ, Voeller GR, Ramshaw BJ (2007) Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a nonslit mesh technique. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 21:1487–1491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9419-1CrossRef

36.

Asif A, Ruiz M, Yetasook A, Denham W, Linn J, Carbray J, Ujiki MB (2012) Laparoscopic modified sugarbaker technique results in superior recurrence rate. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2358-5CrossRef

37.

Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, Berger D, Berrevoet F, Brandsma HT, Bury K, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, Dietz UA, Fortelny RH, Frei-Lanter C, Hansson B, Helgstrand F, Hotouras A, Jänes A, Kroese LF, Lambrecht JR, Kyle-Leinhase I, López-Cano M, Maggiori L, Mandalà V, Miserez M, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Prudhomme M, Rautio T, Smart N, Śmietański M, Szczepkowski M, Stabilini C, Muysoms FE (2018) European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias. Hernia 22:183–198CrossRef

38.

Berger D (2010) Laparoskopische reparation der parastomalen hernie. Chirurg 81:988–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-010-1933-3CrossRefPubMed

39.

Wiessner R, Vorwerk T, Gehring A (2019) Laparoscopic repair for parastomal hernia with ongoing barbed suture followed by sandwich-technique: “sandwich-plus-technique”. J Minim Access Surg 15:148–153. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_236_17CrossRefPubMedCentral

40.

Hoyuela C, Juvany M, Carvajal F, Veres A, Troyano D, Trias M, Martrat A, Ardid J, Obiols J, López-Cano M (2017) Randomized clinical trial of mesh fixation with glue or sutures for Lichtenstein hernia repair. Br J Surg 104:688–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10488CrossRefPubMed

41.

Berger D, Bientzle M (2009) Polyvinylidene fluoride: a suitable mesh material for laparoscopic incisional and parastomal hernia repair. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0435-4CrossRefPubMed

Title: From keyhole to sandwich: change in laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias at a single centre
Authors: C. Bertoglio
L. Morini
M. Maspero
A. Zironda
B. Alampi
M. Mazzola
C. Magistro
G. Ferrari
Publication date: 01-04-2021
Publisher: Springer US
Keywords: Enterostomy
Enterostomy
Parastomale Hernie
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07589-2

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

From keyhole to sandwich: change in laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias at a single centre

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Safety and effectiveness of high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery for cancer of the descending colon under indocyanine green fluorescence imaging: a pilot study

Linear-array EUS improves the accuracy of predicting deep submucosal invasion in non-pedunculated rectal polyps compared with radial EUS: a prospective observational study

Intraoperative conversion from laparoscopic gastrectomy to an open procedure: a decade of experience in a Japanese high-volume center

Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy

Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Establishment and validation of a model to determine the progression risk of low grade intraepithelial neoplasia