Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drug Safety 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Original Research Article

Enrollment and Retention in 34 United States Pregnancy Registries Contrasted with the Manufacturer’s Capture of Spontaneous Reports for Exposed Pregnancies

Authors: Steven T. Bird, Kate Gelperin, Lockwood Taylor, Leyla Sahin, Hoda Hammad, Susan E. Andrade, Mohamed A. Mohamoud, Sengwee Toh, Christian Hampp

Published in: Drug Safety | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Pregnancy registries and spontaneous reports are essential pharmacovigilance tools to evaluate drug safety during pregnancy.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate postmarket capture of exposed pregnancies.

Methods

Pregnancy registries for drugs and biologics were identified in a systematic review. Through a standardized questionnaire, manufacturers provided information on (1) pregnancy registry enrollment and retention, and (2) worldwide receipt of spontaneous reports for exposed pregnancies. A validated algorithm for live-birth pregnancies allowed calculation of exposure rates per 100,000 live births using claims data.

Results

Among 34 products with a pregnancy registry, median (interquartile range) registry enrollment was 36 pregnancies (5–258) and median spontaneous report capture was 450 pregnancies (89–1192). Products used in >20/100,000 live births had a median registry enrollment of 490 pregnancies and median capture of 1061 spontaneously reported exposed pregnancies. Lower median registry enrollment and spontaneous report capture was observed for products used in 0.5–20/100,000 live births (36 from registries, 541 spontaneous reports) and <0.5/100,000 live births (3 from registries, 41 spontaneous reports). Among 24 registries enrolling ≥10 pregnancies, median capture of pregnancy outcomes (e.g. live birth, spontaneous abortion) was 83.9%. For 19 registries enrolling ≥10 infants, the median proportion of infants achieving protocol-specified follow-up was 89.9% for up to 4 weeks post-birth, 75.0% for 1–5 months, and 57.1% for ≥6 months.

Conclusions

Relatively higher product utilization among pregnant women predicted greater pregnancy registry enrollment. For products rarely used during pregnancy, registry enrollment was low and differences in registry enrollment compared with worldwide spontaneous report receipt were most pronounced. Products with very low utilization levels during pregnancy may require a combination of worldwide pharmacovigilance, pregnancy registries, and additional study methods to achieve adequate surveillance.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Vannappagari V, Albano JD, Koram N, Tilson H, Scheuerle AE, Napier MD. Prenatal exposure to zidovudine and risk for ventricular septal defects and congenital heart defects: data from the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;197:6–10.CrossRefPubMed Vannappagari V, Albano JD, Koram N, Tilson H, Scheuerle AE, Napier MD. Prenatal exposure to zidovudine and risk for ventricular septal defects and congenital heart defects: data from the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;197:6–10.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hernández-Díaz S, Smith CR, Shen A, Mittendorf R, Hauser WA, Yerby M, Holmes LB. North American AED Pregnancy Registry. Comparative safety of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy. Neurology. 2012;78(21):1692–9.CrossRefPubMed Hernández-Díaz S, Smith CR, Shen A, Mittendorf R, Hauser WA, Yerby M, Holmes LB. North American AED Pregnancy Registry. Comparative safety of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy. Neurology. 2012;78(21):1692–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Zagouri F, Sergentanis TN, Chrysikos D, Papadimitriou CA, Dimopoulos MA, Bartsch R. Trastuzumab administration during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137:349–57.CrossRefPubMed Zagouri F, Sergentanis TN, Chrysikos D, Papadimitriou CA, Dimopoulos MA, Bartsch R. Trastuzumab administration during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137:349–57.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dai WS, LaBraico JM, Stern RS. Epidemiology of isotretinoin exposure during pregnancy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26(4):599–606.CrossRefPubMed Dai WS, LaBraico JM, Stern RS. Epidemiology of isotretinoin exposure during pregnancy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26(4):599–606.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gelperin K, Hammad H, Leishear K, Bird ST, Taylor L, Hampp C, Sahin L. A systematic review of pregnancy exposure registries: examination of protocol-specified pregnancy outcomes, target sample size, and comparator selection. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26(2):208–14.CrossRefPubMed Gelperin K, Hammad H, Leishear K, Bird ST, Taylor L, Hampp C, Sahin L. A systematic review of pregnancy exposure registries: examination of protocol-specified pregnancy outcomes, target sample size, and comparator selection. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26(2):208–14.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Behrman RE, Benner JS, Brown JS, McClellan M, Woodcock J, Platt R. Developing the sentinel system: a national resource for evidence development. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(6):498–9.CrossRefPubMed Behrman RE, Benner JS, Brown JS, McClellan M, Woodcock J, Platt R. Developing the sentinel system: a national resource for evidence development. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(6):498–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Li Q, Andrade SE, Cooper WO, et al. Validation of an algorithm to estimate gestational age in electronic health plan databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(5):524–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li Q, Andrade SE, Cooper WO, et al. Validation of an algorithm to estimate gestational age in electronic health plan databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(5):524–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Raebel MA, Ellis JL, Andrade SE. Evaluation of gestational age and admission date assumptions used to determine prenatal drug exposure from administrative data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14(12):829–36.CrossRefPubMed Raebel MA, Ellis JL, Andrade SE. Evaluation of gestational age and admission date assumptions used to determine prenatal drug exposure from administrative data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14(12):829–36.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Andrade SE, Toh S, Houstoun M, et al. Surveillance of medication use during pregnancy in the mini-sentinel program. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(4):895–903.CrossRefPubMed Andrade SE, Toh S, Houstoun M, et al. Surveillance of medication use during pregnancy in the mini-sentinel program. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(4):895–903.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference McGraw D, Rosati K, Evans B. A policy framework for public health uses of electronic health data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(Suppl 1):18–22.CrossRefPubMed McGraw D, Rosati K, Evans B. A policy framework for public health uses of electronic health data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(Suppl 1):18–22.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cunnington MC, Weil JG, Messenheimer JA, Ferber S, Yerby M, Tennis P. Final results from 18 years of the International Lamotrigine Pregnancy Registry. Neurology. 2011;76(21):1817–23.CrossRefPubMed Cunnington MC, Weil JG, Messenheimer JA, Ferber S, Yerby M, Tennis P. Final results from 18 years of the International Lamotrigine Pregnancy Registry. Neurology. 2011;76(21):1817–23.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry Steering Committee. Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry International Interim Report for 1 January 1989 through 31 January 2017. Wilmington: Registry Coordinating Center; 2017. Available at: http://www.APRegistry.com. Accessed 20 July 2017. Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry Steering Committee. Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry International Interim Report for 1 January 1989 through 31 January 2017. Wilmington: Registry Coordinating Center; 2017. Available at: http://​www.​APRegistry.​com. Accessed 20 July 2017.
18.
go back to reference Chavez N. The key role of social media in registry recruitment [abstract no. S5]. In: Presented at the 57th Annual Meeting of the Teratology Society: Denver; 24–28 June 2017. Chavez N. The key role of social media in registry recruitment [abstract no. S5]. In: Presented at the 57th Annual Meeting of the Teratology Society: Denver; 24–28 June 2017.
Metadata
Title
Enrollment and Retention in 34 United States Pregnancy Registries Contrasted with the Manufacturer’s Capture of Spontaneous Reports for Exposed Pregnancies
Authors
Steven T. Bird
Kate Gelperin
Lockwood Taylor
Leyla Sahin
Hoda Hammad
Susan E. Andrade
Mohamed A. Mohamoud
Sengwee Toh
Christian Hampp
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drug Safety / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-017-0591-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Drug Safety 1/2018 Go to the issue