Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Original Scientific Report

Enhanced REVENUE After Surgery? A Cost-Standardized Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Mastectomy Decreases Length of Stay

Authors: Robert S. Ackerman, Michael Hirschi, Brandon Alford, Trip Evans, John V. Kiluk, Sephalie Y. Patel

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been shown to improve surgical, anesthetic, and economic outcomes in intermediate-to-high-risk surgeries. Its influence on length of stay and cost of low-risk surgeries has yet to be robustly studied. As value-based patient care comes to the forefront of anesthesiology research, the focus shifts to strategies that maintain quality while effectively containing cost.

Methods

In July 2016, we implemented an ERAS for mastectomy protocol consisting of limiting fasting state, preoperative multimodal analgesia, and pectoralis I and II blocks. After 1 year, patient records were retrospectively reviewed for length of stay, opioid consumption, pain scores, and hospital charges.

Results

Implementation of an ERAS protocol for mastectomies led to a decrease in opioid consumption, and statistically significant decrease in length of stay (1.19 vs. 1.44, p = 0.01). No significant change in hospital charges was observed ($25,787 vs. $25,863, p = 0.97); however, the variance of charges was significantly decreased (6.8 × 107 vs. 1.5 × 108, p = 0.002). The decrease in length of stay translated to an extra 100 hospital bed days which can provide up to an additional $2,100,000 in gross patient service revenue from additional mastectomy volume.

Conclusion

ERAS protocols for mastectomies may prove beneficial by allowing growing hospitals to increase bed capacity and consequently surgical volume. Despite no change in hospital charges, we predict a potential increase in gross patient service revenue of $2.1 million due to saved hospital bed days.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 152:292–298CrossRefPubMed Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 152:292–298CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Stowers MDJ, Lemanu DP, Hill AG (2015) Health economics in enhanced recovery after surgery programs. Can J Anaesth 62:219–230CrossRefPubMed Stowers MDJ, Lemanu DP, Hill AG (2015) Health economics in enhanced recovery after surgery programs. Can J Anaesth 62:219–230CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Stone AB, Grant MC, Pio Roda C et al (2016) Implementation costs of an enhanced recovery after surgery program in the United States: a financial model and sensitivity analysis based on a quaternary academic medical center. J Am Coll Surg 222:219–225CrossRefPubMed Stone AB, Grant MC, Pio Roda C et al (2016) Implementation costs of an enhanced recovery after surgery program in the United States: a financial model and sensitivity analysis based on a quaternary academic medical center. J Am Coll Surg 222:219–225CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Duriaud HM, Kroman N, Kehlet H (2018) Feasibility and safety of outpatient breast cancer surgery. Dan Med J 65:pii:A5458 Duriaud HM, Kroman N, Kehlet H (2018) Feasibility and safety of outpatient breast cancer surgery. Dan Med J 65:pii:A5458
6.
go back to reference Bowen ME, Mone CM, Buys SS, Sheng X, Nelson EW (2017) Surgical outcome for mastectomy patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg 265:448–456CrossRefPubMed Bowen ME, Mone CM, Buys SS, Sheng X, Nelson EW (2017) Surgical outcome for mastectomy patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg 265:448–456CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Astanehe A, Temple-Oberle C, Nielsen M et al (2018) An enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for microvascular breast reconstruction is safe and effective. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 6:e1634CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Astanehe A, Temple-Oberle C, Nielsen M et al (2018) An enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for microvascular breast reconstruction is safe and effective. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 6:e1634CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Batdorf NJ, Lemaine V, Lovely JK et al (2015) Enhanced recovery after surgery in microvascular breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68:395–402CrossRefPubMed Batdorf NJ, Lemaine V, Lovely JK et al (2015) Enhanced recovery after surgery in microvascular breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68:395–402CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dirks J, Fredensborg BB, Christensen D et al (2002) A randomized study of the effects of gabapentin versus placebo on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after mastectomy. Anesthesiology 97:560–564CrossRefPubMed Dirks J, Fredensborg BB, Christensen D et al (2002) A randomized study of the effects of gabapentin versus placebo on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after mastectomy. Anesthesiology 97:560–564CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bhashandy GM, Abbas DN (2015) Pectoral nerves I and II blocks in multimodal analgesia for breast cancer surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 40:68–74CrossRef Bhashandy GM, Abbas DN (2015) Pectoral nerves I and II blocks in multimodal analgesia for breast cancer surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 40:68–74CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Arsalani-Zadeh R, Elfadl D, Yassin N, MacFie J (2011) Evidence-based review of enhancing postoperative recovery after breast surgery. Br J Surg 98:181–186CrossRefPubMed Arsalani-Zadeh R, Elfadl D, Yassin N, MacFie J (2011) Evidence-based review of enhancing postoperative recovery after breast surgery. Br J Surg 98:181–186CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Anderson RSJ, Abram S, Schlicht C (2001) Accuracy in Equianalgesic Dosing. J Pain Symptom Manag 21:397–406CrossRef Anderson RSJ, Abram S, Schlicht C (2001) Accuracy in Equianalgesic Dosing. J Pain Symptom Manag 21:397–406CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sun SX, Leung AN, Dillon PW, Hollenbeak CS (2015) Length of stay and readmission in mastectomy patients. Breast J 21:526–532CrossRefPubMed Sun SX, Leung AN, Dillon PW, Hollenbeak CS (2015) Length of stay and readmission in mastectomy patients. Breast J 21:526–532CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Coopey SB, Spechy MC, Warren L, Smith BL, Winograd JM, Fleischmann K (2013) Use of preoperative paravertebral block decreases length of stay in patients undergoing mastectomy plus immediate reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1282–1286CrossRefPubMed Coopey SB, Spechy MC, Warren L, Smith BL, Winograd JM, Fleischmann K (2013) Use of preoperative paravertebral block decreases length of stay in patients undergoing mastectomy plus immediate reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1282–1286CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Chipollini J, Tang DH, Hussein K et al (2017) Does implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol increase hospital charges? Comparison from a radical cystectomy program at a specialty cancer center. Urology 105:108–112CrossRefPubMed Chipollini J, Tang DH, Hussein K et al (2017) Does implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol increase hospital charges? Comparison from a radical cystectomy program at a specialty cancer center. Urology 105:108–112CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Wakeam E, Molina G, Shah N et al (2017) Variation in the cost of 5 common operations in the United States. Surgery 162:592–604CrossRefPubMed Wakeam E, Molina G, Shah N et al (2017) Variation in the cost of 5 common operations in the United States. Surgery 162:592–604CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Nilsson H, Angera U, Bock D et al (2016) Is preoperative physical activity related to post-surgery recovery? A cohort study of patients with breast cancer. BMJ Open 6:e007997CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nilsson H, Angera U, Bock D et al (2016) Is preoperative physical activity related to post-surgery recovery? A cohort study of patients with breast cancer. BMJ Open 6:e007997CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Fassoulaki A, Triga A, Melemeni A, Sarantopoulos C (2005) Multimodal analgesia with gabapentin and local anesthetics prevents acute and chronic pain after breast surgery. Anesth Analg 101:1427–1432CrossRefPubMed Fassoulaki A, Triga A, Melemeni A, Sarantopoulos C (2005) Multimodal analgesia with gabapentin and local anesthetics prevents acute and chronic pain after breast surgery. Anesth Analg 101:1427–1432CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Enhanced REVENUE After Surgery? A Cost-Standardized Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Mastectomy Decreases Length of Stay
Authors
Robert S. Ackerman
Michael Hirschi
Brandon Alford
Trip Evans
John V. Kiluk
Sephalie Y. Patel
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4850-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

World Journal of Surgery 3/2019 Go to the issue

Original Scientific Report (including Papers Presented at Surgical Conferences)

Enterothorax After Hepatic Surgery: A Single-Center Experience