Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2021

01-01-2021 | Endoscopy

Simulation training for the endoscopic management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a nationwide survey of rural surgeons’ needs and preferences analysis

Authors: Shawn M. Purnell, Daniel J. Vargo, Michael Sarap, John J. Nguyen-Lee, Chelsea Allen, Brian J. Dunkin

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Published needs analyses of rural surgeons have identified a need for training in the endoscopic management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). The study aim was to survey rural surgeons regarding their requirements and preferences for a simulation model on which they could rehearse the endoscopic management of NVUGIB.

Methods

Rural surgeons were contacted via the American College of Surgery Advisory Council listserv and invited to complete an online survey.

Results

A total of 66 responses were received, representing all 4 US regional divisions. Seventy-seven percent of respondents perform > 100 endoscopy cases per year. A majority have no experience with simulation models (77%), citing cost, time, and access to training courses as the three most limiting factors. Thirty-three percent lacked confidence in managing UGIBs, and 73% were interested in receiving additional training. Preference analysis revealed that respondents preferred a portable simulation model (81%) that costs between $500 and $1000 (46%), and requires 1–2 weeks of training (34%). Verbal feedback from an expert was viewed as the most helpful type of feedback (61%).

Conclusion

Rural surgeons frequently perform flexible endoscopy in their practice and are interested in further training for the endoscopic management of NVUGIB. These results will be used to develop a simulation platform for training in the endoscopic management of NVUGIB that meets rural surgeons’ needs.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Sarap M (2014) Advanced surgical techniques for rural surgeons. Springer, New York. Sarap M (2014) Advanced surgical techniques for rural surgeons. Springer, New York.
6.
go back to reference Zuckerman R, Doty B, Bark K, Heneghan S (2007) Rural versus non-rural differences in surgeon performed endoscopy: results of a national survey. Am Surg 73:903–905.CrossRef Zuckerman R, Doty B, Bark K, Heneghan S (2007) Rural versus non-rural differences in surgeon performed endoscopy: results of a national survey. Am Surg 73:903–905.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hochberger J, Matthes K, Maiss J, Koebnick C, Hahn EG, Cohen J (2005) Training with the compactEASIE biologic endoscopy simulator significantly improves hemostatic technical skill of gastroenterology fellows: a randomized controlled comparison with clinical endoscopy training alone. Gastrointest Endosc 61:204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02471-XCrossRefPubMed Hochberger J, Matthes K, Maiss J, Koebnick C, Hahn EG, Cohen J (2005) Training with the compactEASIE biologic endoscopy simulator significantly improves hemostatic technical skill of gastroenterology fellows: a randomized controlled comparison with clinical endoscopy training alone. Gastrointest Endosc 61:204–215. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0016-5107(04)02471-XCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Simulation training for the endoscopic management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a nationwide survey of rural surgeons’ needs and preferences analysis
Authors
Shawn M. Purnell
Daniel J. Vargo
Michael Sarap
John J. Nguyen-Lee
Chelsea Allen
Brian J. Dunkin
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07405-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2021 Go to the issue