Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Endoscopy | Research

Comparison of the clinical outcome of endoscopic push-through myringoplasty and microscopic overlay myringoplasty: matching co-variated designs

Authors: Kanokkarn Mahawerawat, Pornthep Kasemsiri

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The conventional microscopic overlayer myringoplasty is preferred because it allows a both hands technique, not reducing middle ear space, increasing the blood supply in the repaired area, and providing graft support; however, this technique may be troublesome for the novice surgeon during tympanomeatal flap elevation. Recently, the endoscopic push-through myringoplasty technique has developed. It provides better visualization of the hidden areas and does not require raising tympanomeatal flap. Therefore, the comparison of clinical outcomes between endoscopic push-through myringoplasty and conventional microscopic overlay myringoplasty technique was investigated.

Methods

A retrospective case–control hospital-based study was conducted using archival data from the patients who underwent myringoplasty between January 2015 and May 2021 at Srinagarind Hospital and Khon Kaen Hospital, Thailand. The medical records of patients who underwent endoscopic push-through technique or microscopic overlayer technique were chosen by simple randomization and matched 1:1 based on the air conduction threshold, air-bone gap, size of perforation, and experience of the surgeon. The two techniques were compared for clinical outcome success, including tympanic membrane closure, improved air conduction threshold, air-bone gap closure, and operation time duration.

Results

Medical records of 70 patients were retrieved and classified into 35 patients who underwent endoscopic push-through and 35 patients who underwent microscopic overlayer myringoplasty. The size of tympanic membrane perforation and preoperative audiometry were not significantly different between both groups (p > 0.05). The postoperative outcome in endoscopic technique revealed that the air-bone gap and the success rate of tympanic membrane closure were comparable with microscopic techniques (p = 0.420 and p = 0.156, respectively). The operation time was significantly shorter in the endoscopic technique (p < 0.05). Complications were found in one patient with otitis externa in the endoscopic technique group and one patient with graft lateralization in the microscopic technique group.

Conclusions

Endoscopic push-through myringoplasty is an alternative minimally invasive technique that may allow the potential outcomes comparable with the microscopic overlayer myringoplasty and with a significantly shorter operation time.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sarkar S. A review on the history of tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;65(Suppl 3):455–60.CrossRef Sarkar S. A review on the history of tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;65(Suppl 3):455–60.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dornhoffer JL. Hearing results with cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:1094–9.CrossRef Dornhoffer JL. Hearing results with cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:1094–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Choi N, Noh Y, Park W, Lee JJ, Yook S, Choi JE, et al. Comparison of endoscopic tympanoplasty to microscopic tympanoplasty. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;10:44–9.CrossRef Choi N, Noh Y, Park W, Lee JJ, Yook S, Choi JE, et al. Comparison of endoscopic tympanoplasty to microscopic tympanoplasty. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;10:44–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kang HS, Ahn SK, Jeon SY, Hur DG, Kim JP, Park JJ, et al. Sensation recovery of auricle following chronic ear surgery by retroauricular incision. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269:101–6.CrossRef Kang HS, Ahn SK, Jeon SY, Hur DG, Kim JP, Park JJ, et al. Sensation recovery of auricle following chronic ear surgery by retroauricular incision. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269:101–6.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tarabichi M. Endoscopic middle ear surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999;108:39–46.CrossRef Tarabichi M. Endoscopic middle ear surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999;108:39–46.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sergi B, Galli J, De Corso E, Parrilla C, Paludetti G. Overlay versus underlay myringoplasty: report of outcomes considering closure of perforation and hearing function. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2011;31:366–71.PubMedPubMedCentral Sergi B, Galli J, De Corso E, Parrilla C, Paludetti G. Overlay versus underlay myringoplasty: report of outcomes considering closure of perforation and hearing function. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2011;31:366–71.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Shakya D, Kc A, Nepal A. A comparative study of endoscopic versus microscopic cartilage type I tympanoplasty. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;24:e80–5.CrossRef Shakya D, Kc A, Nepal A. A comparative study of endoscopic versus microscopic cartilage type I tympanoplasty. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;24:e80–5.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lou Z. Use of endoscopic cartilage graft myringoplasty without tympanomeatal flap elevation to repair posterior marginal perforations. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;100(Suppl10):953-7. Lou Z. Use of endoscopic cartilage graft myringoplasty without tympanomeatal flap elevation to repair posterior marginal perforations. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;100(Suppl10):953-7.
9.
go back to reference Kozin ED, Gulati S, Kaplan AB, Lehmann A, Remenschneider AK, Landegger LD, et al. Systematic review of outcomes following observational and operative endoscopic middle ear surgery. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:1205–14.CrossRef Kozin ED, Gulati S, Kaplan AB, Lehmann A, Remenschneider AK, Landegger LD, et al. Systematic review of outcomes following observational and operative endoscopic middle ear surgery. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:1205–14.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Marchioni D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Gioacchini FM, Bonali M, Presutti L. Transcanal endoscopic treatment of benign middle ear neoplasms. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270:2997–3004.CrossRef Marchioni D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Gioacchini FM, Bonali M, Presutti L. Transcanal endoscopic treatment of benign middle ear neoplasms. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270:2997–3004.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lee SY, Lee DY, Seo Y, Kim YH. Can endoscopic tympanoplasty be a good alternative to microscopic tympanoplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;12:145–55.CrossRef Lee SY, Lee DY, Seo Y, Kim YH. Can endoscopic tympanoplasty be a good alternative to microscopic tympanoplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;12:145–55.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nardone M, Sommerville R, Bowman J, Danesi G. Myringoplasty in simple chronic otitis media: critical analysis of long-term results in a 1,000-adult patient series. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33:48–53.CrossRef Nardone M, Sommerville R, Bowman J, Danesi G. Myringoplasty in simple chronic otitis media: critical analysis of long-term results in a 1,000-adult patient series. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33:48–53.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Plodpai Y. Endoscopic vs microscopic overlay tympanoplasty for correcting large tympanic membrane perforations: a randomized clinical trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;159:879–86.CrossRef Plodpai Y. Endoscopic vs microscopic overlay tympanoplasty for correcting large tympanic membrane perforations: a randomized clinical trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;159:879–86.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Raj A, Meher R. Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty—a study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;53:47–9.CrossRef Raj A, Meher R. Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty—a study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;53:47–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Erden B, Gülşen S. Evaluation of surgical and audiological outcomes of push-through myringoplasty and underlay cartilage tympanoplasty in repairing anterior tympanic membrane perforations. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31:1709–12.CrossRef Erden B, Gülşen S. Evaluation of surgical and audiological outcomes of push-through myringoplasty and underlay cartilage tympanoplasty in repairing anterior tympanic membrane perforations. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31:1709–12.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference El-Hennawi DEM, Ahmed MR, Abou-Halawa AS, Al-Hamtary MA. Endoscopic push-through technique compared to microscopic underlay myringoplasty in anterior tympanic membrane perforations. J Laryngol Otol. 2018;132:509–13.CrossRef El-Hennawi DEM, Ahmed MR, Abou-Halawa AS, Al-Hamtary MA. Endoscopic push-through technique compared to microscopic underlay myringoplasty in anterior tympanic membrane perforations. J Laryngol Otol. 2018;132:509–13.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kozin ED, Lehmann A, Carter M, Hight E, Cohen M, Nakajima HH, et al. Thermal effects of endoscopy in a human temporal bone model: implications for endoscopic ear surgery. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:E332–9.CrossRef Kozin ED, Lehmann A, Carter M, Hight E, Cohen M, Nakajima HH, et al. Thermal effects of endoscopy in a human temporal bone model: implications for endoscopic ear surgery. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:E332–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of the clinical outcome of endoscopic push-through myringoplasty and microscopic overlay myringoplasty: matching co-variated designs
Authors
Kanokkarn Mahawerawat
Pornthep Kasemsiri
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Endoscopy
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01504-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue