Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2011

01-10-2011

Endoscopic findings and outcomes of revisional procedures for patients with weight recidivism after gastric bypass

Authors: Panot Yimcharoen, Helen M. Heneghan, Manish Singh, Stacy Brethauer, Philip Schauer, Tomasz Rogula, Matthew Kroh, Bipan Chand

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Significant weight regain occurs for 10% to 20% of patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Potential causative factors include anatomic abnormalities such as enlargement of the gastric pouch and gastrojejunostomy (GJ). This report describes endoscopic findings for patients referred for investigation of weight regain and presents the outcomes of revisional therapy for patients with abnormal anatomy.

Methods

To evaluate gastric pouch and stoma size, RYGB patients referred for weight regain underwent upper endoscopy. A GJ was defined as enlarged if it had a diameter greater than 2 cm in any dimension, and a pouch was defined as enlarged if its length exceeded 6 cm long or its width exceeded 5 cm. Patients with abnormal anatomy who subsequently underwent revisional procedures were arbitrarily categorized into three groups based on the interval from RYGB to endoscopic evaluation: less than 5 years (group 1), 5 to 10 years (group 2), longer than 10 years (group 3). The percentage of regained weight lost (%RWL) after revision was compared between the groups.

Results

In this study, 205 RYGB patients (176 women with a mean age of 47 ± 10 years and a current body mass index [BMI] of 43.4 ± 8.4 kg/m2) were evaluated. The mean time from primary RYGB was 6.9 ± 3.7 years, and the increase in BMI from its nadir was 9.78 ± 5.80 kg/m2. Abnormal endoscopic findings (n = 146, 71.2%) included large GJ (n = 86, 58.9%), large pouch (n = 42, 28.8%), or both (n = 18, 12.3%). Of the 205 patients, 51 (24.9%) underwent a revisional surgical or endoluminal procedure. At a mean follow-up assessment 13 months after revision, group 1 (n = 12) had a mean %RWL of 103% ± 89.3%, and 62% of these patients lost all their regained weight. The mean %RWL was 45% ± 12.6% in group 2 (n = 30) and 40% ± 13.6% in group 3 (n = 9).

Conclusion

Endoscopy is a valuable tool for evaluating weight regain after bariatric surgery that can identify abnormal post-RYGB anatomy in a majority of patients. Revisional procedures to restore normal RYGB anatomy appear to be most successful if performed within 5 years after the primary procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD (2006) Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg 244:734–740PubMedCrossRef Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD (2006) Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg 244:734–740PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Magro DO, Geloneze B, Delfini R, Pareja BC, Callejas F, Pareja JC (2008) Long-term weight regain after gastric bypass: a 5-year prospective study. Obes Surg 18:648–651PubMedCrossRef Magro DO, Geloneze B, Delfini R, Pareja BC, Callejas F, Pareja JC (2008) Long-term weight regain after gastric bypass: a 5-year prospective study. Obes Surg 18:648–651PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Meguid MM, Glade MJ, Middleton FA (2008) Weight regain after Roux-en-Y: a significant 20% complication related to PYY. Nutrition 24:832–842PubMedCrossRef Meguid MM, Glade MJ, Middleton FA (2008) Weight regain after Roux-en-Y: a significant 20% complication related to PYY. Nutrition 24:832–842PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Flanagan L (1996) Measurement of functional pouch volume following the gastric bypass procedure. Obes Surg 6:38–43PubMedCrossRef Flanagan L (1996) Measurement of functional pouch volume following the gastric bypass procedure. Obes Surg 6:38–43PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Herron DM, Birkett DH, Thompson CC, Bessler M, Swanstrom LL (2008) Gastric bypass pouch and stoma reduction using a transoral endoscopic anchor placement system: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc 22:1093–1099PubMedCrossRef Herron DM, Birkett DH, Thompson CC, Bessler M, Swanstrom LL (2008) Gastric bypass pouch and stoma reduction using a transoral endoscopic anchor placement system: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc 22:1093–1099PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Muller MK, Wildi S, Scholz T, Clavien PA, Weber M (2005) Laparoscopic pouch resizing and redo of gastrojejunal anastomosis for pouch dilatation following gastric bypass. Obes Surg 15:1089–1095PubMedCrossRef Muller MK, Wildi S, Scholz T, Clavien PA, Weber M (2005) Laparoscopic pouch resizing and redo of gastrojejunal anastomosis for pouch dilatation following gastric bypass. Obes Surg 15:1089–1095PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schwartz RW, Strodel WE, Simpson WS, Griffen WO Jr (1988) Gastric bypass revision: lessons learned from 920 cases. Surgery 104:806–812PubMed Schwartz RW, Strodel WE, Simpson WS, Griffen WO Jr (1988) Gastric bypass revision: lessons learned from 920 cases. Surgery 104:806–812PubMed
8.
go back to reference Thompson CC, Slattery J, Bundga ME, Lautz DB (2006) Peroral endoscopic reduction of dilated gastrojejunal anastomosis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a possible new option for patients with weight regain. Surg Endosc 20:1744–1748PubMedCrossRef Thompson CC, Slattery J, Bundga ME, Lautz DB (2006) Peroral endoscopic reduction of dilated gastrojejunal anastomosis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a possible new option for patients with weight regain. Surg Endosc 20:1744–1748PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bessler M, Daud A, DiGiorgi MF, Olivero-Rivera L, Davis D (2005) Adjustable gastric banding as a revisional bariatric procedure after failed gastric bypass. Obes Surg 15:1443–1448PubMedCrossRef Bessler M, Daud A, DiGiorgi MF, Olivero-Rivera L, Davis D (2005) Adjustable gastric banding as a revisional bariatric procedure after failed gastric bypass. Obes Surg 15:1443–1448PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brethauer SA, Pryor AD, Chand B, Schauer P, Rosenthal R, Richards W, Bessler M (2009) Endoluminal procedures for bariatric patients: expectations among bariatric surgeons. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:231–236PubMedCrossRef Brethauer SA, Pryor AD, Chand B, Schauer P, Rosenthal R, Richards W, Bessler M (2009) Endoluminal procedures for bariatric patients: expectations among bariatric surgeons. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:231–236PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ellsmere JC, Thompson CC, Brugge WR, Chuttani R, Desilets DJ, Rattner DW, Tarnoff EM, Kaplan LM (2009) Endoscopic interventions for weight loss surgery. Obes Silver Spring 17:929–933 Ellsmere JC, Thompson CC, Brugge WR, Chuttani R, Desilets DJ, Rattner DW, Tarnoff EM, Kaplan LM (2009) Endoscopic interventions for weight loss surgery. Obes Silver Spring 17:929–933
12.
go back to reference Borao F, Gorcey S, Capuano A (2010) Prospective single-site case series utilizing an endolumenal tissue anchoring system for revision of post-RYGB stomal and pouch dilatation. Surg Endosc 24:2308–2313PubMedCrossRef Borao F, Gorcey S, Capuano A (2010) Prospective single-site case series utilizing an endolumenal tissue anchoring system for revision of post-RYGB stomal and pouch dilatation. Surg Endosc 24:2308–2313PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Brethauer SA, Nfonsam V, Sherman V, Udomsawaengsup S, Schauer PR, Chand B (2006) Endoscopy and upper gastrointestinal contrast studies are complementary in evaluation of weight regain after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2:643–648 (discussion 649–650) Brethauer SA, Nfonsam V, Sherman V, Udomsawaengsup S, Schauer PR, Chand B (2006) Endoscopy and upper gastrointestinal contrast studies are complementary in evaluation of weight regain after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2:643–648 (discussion 649–650)
14.
15.
go back to reference Tice JA, Karliner L, Walsh J, Petersen AJ, Feldman MD (2008) Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures. Am J Med 121:885–893PubMedCrossRef Tice JA, Karliner L, Walsh J, Petersen AJ, Feldman MD (2008) Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures. Am J Med 121:885–893PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lim CS, Liew V, Talbot ML, Jorgensen JO, Loi KW (2009) Revisional bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 19:827–832PubMedCrossRef Lim CS, Liew V, Talbot ML, Jorgensen JO, Loi KW (2009) Revisional bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 19:827–832PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fobi MA (2004) Surgical treatment of obesity: a review. J Natl Med Assoc 96:61–75PubMed Fobi MA (2004) Surgical treatment of obesity: a review. J Natl Med Assoc 96:61–75PubMed
18.
go back to reference Powers MA, Pappas TN (1989) Physiologic approaches to the control of obesity. Ann Surg 209:255–260PubMedCrossRef Powers MA, Pappas TN (1989) Physiologic approaches to the control of obesity. Ann Surg 209:255–260PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Catalano MF, Rudic G, Anderson AJ, Chua TY (2007) Weight gain after bariatric surgery as a result of a large gastric stoma: endotherapy with sodium morrhuate may prevent the need for surgical revision. Gastrointest Endosc 66:240–245PubMedCrossRef Catalano MF, Rudic G, Anderson AJ, Chua TY (2007) Weight gain after bariatric surgery as a result of a large gastric stoma: endotherapy with sodium morrhuate may prevent the need for surgical revision. Gastrointest Endosc 66:240–245PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ryou M, Mullady DK, Lautz DB, Thompson CC (2009) Pilot study evaluating technical feasibility and early outcomes of second-generation endosurgical platform for treatment of weight regain after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:450–454PubMedCrossRef Ryou M, Mullady DK, Lautz DB, Thompson CC (2009) Pilot study evaluating technical feasibility and early outcomes of second-generation endosurgical platform for treatment of weight regain after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:450–454PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Spaulding L, Osler T, Patlak J (2007) Long-term results of sclerotherapy for dilated gastrojejunostomy after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3:623–626PubMedCrossRef Spaulding L, Osler T, Patlak J (2007) Long-term results of sclerotherapy for dilated gastrojejunostomy after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3:623–626PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Carpenter RO, Williams DB, Richards WO (2010) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding after previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:93–95PubMedCrossRef Carpenter RO, Williams DB, Richards WO (2010) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding after previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:93–95PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mikami D, Needleman B, Narula V, Durant J, Melvin WS (2010) Natural orifice surgery: initial U.S. experience utilizing the StomaphyX device to reduce gastric pouches after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 24:223–228PubMedCrossRef Mikami D, Needleman B, Narula V, Durant J, Melvin WS (2010) Natural orifice surgery: initial U.S. experience utilizing the StomaphyX device to reduce gastric pouches after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 24:223–228PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Morales MP, Wheeler AA, Ramaswamy A, Scott JS, de la Torre RA (2010) Laparoscopic revisional surgery after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:485–490PubMedCrossRef Morales MP, Wheeler AA, Ramaswamy A, Scott JS, de la Torre RA (2010) Laparoscopic revisional surgery after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6:485–490PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Valezi AC, Mali Junior J, de Menezes MA, de Brito EM, de Souza SA (2010) Weight loss outcome after silastic ring Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 8 years of follow-up. Obes Surg 20:1491–1495PubMedCrossRef Valezi AC, Mali Junior J, de Menezes MA, de Brito EM, de Souza SA (2010) Weight loss outcome after silastic ring Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 8 years of follow-up. Obes Surg 20:1491–1495PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Schauer P, Chand B, Brethauer S (2007) New applications for endoscopy: the emerging field of endoluminal and transgastric bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 21:347–356PubMedCrossRef Schauer P, Chand B, Brethauer S (2007) New applications for endoscopy: the emerging field of endoluminal and transgastric bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 21:347–356PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Spyropoulos C, Kehagias I, Panagiotopoulos S, Mead N, Kalfarentzos F (2010) Revisional bariatric surgery: 13-year experience from a tertiary institution. Arch Surg 145:173–177PubMedCrossRef Spyropoulos C, Kehagias I, Panagiotopoulos S, Mead N, Kalfarentzos F (2010) Revisional bariatric surgery: 13-year experience from a tertiary institution. Arch Surg 145:173–177PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Thompson CC, Roslin MS, Chand B, Chen YK, de Marco DC, Miller LS, Schweitzer M, Rothstein RL, Lautz DB, Ryan MB, Brethauer SA, Schauer PR, Mitchell MC, Starpoli AA, Haber GB, Catalano MF, Edmundowicz SA, Fagnant A, Kaplan LM (2010) RESTORe: randomized evaluation of endoscopic suturing transorally for anastomotic outlet reduction: a double-blinded, sham-controlled multicenter study for treatment of inadequate weight loss or weight regain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Gastroenterology (2010 DDW Abstract Suppl) 138:S-388 Thompson CC, Roslin MS, Chand B, Chen YK, de Marco DC, Miller LS, Schweitzer M, Rothstein RL, Lautz DB, Ryan MB, Brethauer SA, Schauer PR, Mitchell MC, Starpoli AA, Haber GB, Catalano MF, Edmundowicz SA, Fagnant A, Kaplan LM (2010) RESTORe: randomized evaluation of endoscopic suturing transorally for anastomotic outlet reduction: a double-blinded, sham-controlled multicenter study for treatment of inadequate weight loss or weight regain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Gastroenterology (2010 DDW Abstract Suppl) 138:S-388
29.
go back to reference Fogel R, De Fogel J, Bonilla Y, De La Fuente R (2008) Clinical experience of transoral suturing for an endoluminal vertical gastroplasty: 1-year follow-up in 64 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 68:51–58PubMedCrossRef Fogel R, De Fogel J, Bonilla Y, De La Fuente R (2008) Clinical experience of transoral suturing for an endoluminal vertical gastroplasty: 1-year follow-up in 64 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 68:51–58PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Reinhold RB (1982) Critical analysis of long-term weight loss following gastric bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet 155:385–394PubMed Reinhold RB (1982) Critical analysis of long-term weight loss following gastric bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet 155:385–394PubMed
31.
go back to reference Fried M, Peskova M (1996) Does laparoscopic gastric banding demand sophisticated measurement devices? Obes Surg 6:336–340PubMedCrossRef Fried M, Peskova M (1996) Does laparoscopic gastric banding demand sophisticated measurement devices? Obes Surg 6:336–340PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Nishie A, Brown B, Barloon T, Kuehn D, Samuel I (2007) Comparison of size of proximal gastric pouch and short-term weight loss following routine upper gastrointestinal contrast study after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 17:1183–1188PubMedCrossRef Nishie A, Brown B, Barloon T, Kuehn D, Samuel I (2007) Comparison of size of proximal gastric pouch and short-term weight loss following routine upper gastrointestinal contrast study after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 17:1183–1188PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Roberts K, Duffy A, Kaufman J, Burrell M, Dziura J, Bell R (2007) Size matters: gastric pouch size correlates with weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 21:1397–1402PubMedCrossRef Roberts K, Duffy A, Kaufman J, Burrell M, Dziura J, Bell R (2007) Size matters: gastric pouch size correlates with weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 21:1397–1402PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Endoscopic findings and outcomes of revisional procedures for patients with weight recidivism after gastric bypass
Authors
Panot Yimcharoen
Helen M. Heneghan
Manish Singh
Stacy Brethauer
Philip Schauer
Tomasz Rogula
Matthew Kroh
Bipan Chand
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1723-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2011 Go to the issue