Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2008

01-06-2008

Endoscopic and symptomatic assessment of anastomotic strictures following esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy

Authors: V. A. Williams, T. J. Watson, S. Zhovtis, O. Gellersen, D. Raymond, C. Jones, J. H. Peters

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Dysphagia following esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is common and often can be attributed to anastomotic stricture. The prevalence, risk factors, symptomatic and endoscopic severity, and response to dilation of such strictures, however, are poorly defined.

Methods

In the present study the population consisted of 42 patients undergoing esophagectomy with gastric pull-up and cervical anastomosis. Any complaint of postoperative dysphagia was investigated with upper endoscopy. Patients undergoing endoscopy were entered into a prospective randomized trial of graduated balloon versus bougie-over-a-guidewire dilation that will be part of a future report. Dysphagia was assigned a standardized severity score, and stricture diameter pre-dilation was classified as minimal (>12 mm), mild (9–12 mm), moderate (5–8 mm), or severe (<5 mm). Outcome measures included the incidence, time to first dilation, symptomatic and endoscopic severity of anastomotic strictures, number of dilations, and influence of co-morbidities and anastomotic technique on stricture occurrence.

Results

Twenty-seven of 41 (66%) surviving patients underwent endoscopy and dilation. Median time to presentation was 2.4 months (min, 27 days; max, 11 months). Most patients (63%) with stricture complained of dysphagia with every meal. The majority (93%) of strictures were mild to moderate (5–12 mm), and there was no correlation between dysphagia frequency and stricture size. Tolerance of an unrestricted diet decreased with increasing stricture severity. In all, 98 dilation sessions were performed without complication. A higher stricture rate was noted following handsewn anastomoses as compared to combined stapled and handsewn anastomoses (85.7% versus 55.5%; p = 0.044).

Conclusions

Most patients with symptomatic anastomotic strictures following esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastrostomy present within the first few months following surgery. Half of such strictures are minimal to mild as endoscopically assessed. Dilation is safe, and most patients experience symptomatic relief after only a few dilation sessions. A combined handsewn and stapled anastomosis may decrease the risk of stricture formation relative to a two-layer handsewn technique.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E, Peters JH, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR (2004) Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg 198:536–541PubMedCrossRef Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E, Peters JH, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR (2004) Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg 198:536–541PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Goncette L, Otte J-B, Kestens P-J (1998) Terminalized semimechanical side-to-side suture technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy. Ann Thorac Surg 65:814–817PubMedCrossRef Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Goncette L, Otte J-B, Kestens P-J (1998) Terminalized semimechanical side-to-side suture technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy. Ann Thorac Surg 65:814–817PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Craig SR, Walker WS, Cameron EW, Wightman A (1996) A prospective randomized study comparing stapled with handsewn oesophagogastric anastomoses. J R Coll Surg Edinb 41:17–19PubMed Craig SR, Walker WS, Cameron EW, Wightman A (1996) A prospective randomized study comparing stapled with handsewn oesophagogastric anastomoses. J R Coll Surg Edinb 41:17–19PubMed
5.
go back to reference Dewar L, Gelfand G, Finley RJ, et al. (1992) Factors affecting cervical anastomotic leak and stricture formation following esophagogastrectomy and gastric tube interposition. Am J Surg 163:484–489PubMedCrossRef Dewar L, Gelfand G, Finley RJ, et al. (1992) Factors affecting cervical anastomotic leak and stricture formation following esophagogastrectomy and gastric tube interposition. Am J Surg 163:484–489PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Earlam R, Cunha-Melo JR (1980) Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: I. A critical review of surgery. Br J Surg 67:381–390PubMedCrossRef Earlam R, Cunha-Melo JR (1980) Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: I. A critical review of surgery. Br J Surg 67:381–390PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ercan S, Rice TW, Murthy SC, Rybicki L, Blackstone EH (2005) Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:623–31PubMedCrossRef Ercan S, Rice TW, Murthy SC, Rybicki L, Blackstone EH (2005) Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:623–31PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Honkoop P, Siersema PD, Tilanus HW, Stassen LPS, Hop WCJ, van Blankenstein M (1996) Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111:1141–1146PubMedCrossRef Honkoop P, Siersema PD, Tilanus HW, Stassen LPS, Hop WCJ, van Blankenstein M (1996) Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111:1141–1146PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hsu HH, Chen JS, Huang PM, Lee J-M, Lee Y-C (2004) Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous call carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:1097–1101PubMedCrossRef Hsu HH, Chen JS, Huang PM, Lee J-M, Lee Y-C (2004) Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous call carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:1097–1101PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Laterza E, de’Manzoni G, Veraldi GF, Guglielmi A, Tedesco P, Cordiano C (1999) Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial. Eur J Surg 165:1051–1054PubMedCrossRef Laterza E, de’Manzoni G, Veraldi GF, Guglielmi A, Tedesco P, Cordiano C (1999) Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial. Eur J Surg 165:1051–1054PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J (1997) Comparison of handsewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 22:169–173CrossRef Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J (1997) Comparison of handsewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 22:169–173CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Liebermann-Meffert DMI, Meier R, Siewert JR (1992) Vascular anatomy of the gastric tube used for esophageal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 54:1110–1115PubMedCrossRef Liebermann-Meffert DMI, Meier R, Siewert JR (1992) Vascular anatomy of the gastric tube used for esophageal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 54:1110–1115PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD (1999) Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 230:392–403PubMedCrossRef Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD (1999) Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 230:392–403PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Orringer MB, Lemmer JH (1986) Early dilatation in the treatment of esophageal disruption. Ann Thorac Surg 42:536–539PubMedCrossRef Orringer MB, Lemmer JH (1986) Early dilatation in the treatment of esophageal disruption. Ann Thorac Surg 42:536–539PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD (2000) Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:277–288PubMedCrossRef Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD (2000) Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:277–288PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pierie JP, DeGraaf PW, Poen H, van der Tweel I, Obertop H (1994) Impaired healing of cervical oesophagogastrostomies can be predicted by estimation of gastric serosal blood perfusion by laser Doppler flowmetry. Eur J Surg 160:599–603PubMed Pierie JP, DeGraaf PW, Poen H, van der Tweel I, Obertop H (1994) Impaired healing of cervical oesophagogastrostomies can be predicted by estimation of gastric serosal blood perfusion by laser Doppler flowmetry. Eur J Surg 160:599–603PubMed
17.
go back to reference Portale G, Hagen JA, Peters JH, Chan LS, DeMeester SR, Gandamihardja TA, DeMeester TR (2006) Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients. J Am Coll Surg 202:588–596PubMedCrossRef Portale G, Hagen JA, Peters JH, Chan LS, DeMeester SR, Gandamihardja TA, DeMeester TR (2006) Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients. J Am Coll Surg 202:588–596PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Santos RS, Raftopoulos Y, Singh D, De Hoyos A, Fernando H, Keenan R, Luketich J, Landreneau R (2004) Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques. Surgery 136:917–925PubMedCrossRef Santos RS, Raftopoulos Y, Singh D, De Hoyos A, Fernando H, Keenan R, Luketich J, Landreneau R (2004) Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques. Surgery 136:917–925PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Urshel JD, Blewett CJ, Bennett WF, Miller JD, Young EM (2001) Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Esophagus 14:212–217CrossRef Urshel JD, Blewett CJ, Bennett WF, Miller JD, Young EM (2001) Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Esophagus 14:212–217CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Watson TJ, DeMeester TR, Kauer WK, Peters JH, Hagen JA (1998) Esophageal replacement for end-stage benign esophageal disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:1241–1247PubMedCrossRef Watson TJ, DeMeester TR, Kauer WK, Peters JH, Hagen JA (1998) Esophageal replacement for end-stage benign esophageal disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:1241–1247PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Endoscopic and symptomatic assessment of anastomotic strictures following esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy
Authors
V. A. Williams
T. J. Watson
S. Zhovtis
O. Gellersen
D. Raymond
C. Jones
J. H. Peters
Publication date
01-06-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9653-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2008 Go to the issue