Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Endometrial Cancer | Research

Registry-derived stage (RD-Stage) for capturing cancer stage at diagnosis for endometrial cancer

Authors: S. M. Evans, K. Ivanova, R. Rome, D. Cossio, CHC Pilgrim, J. Zalcberg, Y. Antill, L. Blake, A. Du Guesclin, A. Garrett, D. Giffard, N. Golobic, D. Moir, S. Parikh, A. Parisi, K. Sanday, C. Shadbolt, M. Smith, L. Te Marvelde, K. Williams

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Capture of cancer stage at diagnosis is important yet poorly reported by health services to population-based cancer registries. In this paper we describe current completeness of stage information for endometrial cancer available in Australian cancer registries; and develop and validate a set of rules to enable cancer registry medical coders to calculate stage using data available to them (registry-derived stage or ‘RD-Stage’).

Methodology

Rules for deriving RD-stage (Endometrial carcinoma) were developed using the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) TNM (tumour, nodes, metastasis) Staging System (8th Edition). An expert working group comprising cancer specialists responsible for delivering cancer care, epidemiologists and medical coders reviewed and endorsed the rules. Baseline completeness of data fields required to calculate RD-Stage, and calculation of the proportion of cases for whom an RD stage could be assigned, was assessed across each Australian jurisdiction. RD-Stage (Endometrial cancer) was calculated by Victorian Cancer Registry (VCR) medical coders and compared with clinical stage recorded by the patient’s treating clinician and captured in the National Gynae-Oncology Registry (NGOR).

Results

The necessary data completeness level for calculating RD-Stage (Endometrial carcinoma) across various Australian jurisdictions varied from 0 to 89%. Three jurisdictions captured degree of spread of cancer, rendering RD-Stage unable to be calculated. RD-Stage (Endometrial carcinoma) could not be derived for 64/485 (13%) cases and was not captured for 44/485 (9%) cases in NGOR. At stage category level (I, II, III, IV), there was concordance between RD-Stage and NGOR captured stage in 393/410 (96%) of cases (95.8%, Kendall’s coefficient = 0.95).

Conclusion

A lack of consistency in data captured by, and data sources reporting to, population-based cancer registries meant that it was not possible to provide national endometrial carcinoma stage data at diagnosis. In a sample of Victorian cases, where surgical pathology was available, there was very good concordance between RD-Stage (Endometrial carcinoma) and clinician-recorded stage data available from NGOR. RD-Stage offers promise in capturing endometrial cancer stage at diagnosis for population epidemiological purposes when it is not provided by health services, but requires more extensive validation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Gress D, Edge S, Greene F, Washington M, Asare E, Brierley JE, Byrd D, Compton C, Jessup M, Winchester D et al: Principles of Cancer Staging. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th edn. Edited by Amin ME-i-C. Chicago, Ill: Springer Nature; 2017. Gress D, Edge S, Greene F, Washington M, Asare E, Brierley JE, Byrd D, Compton C, Jessup M, Winchester D et al: Principles of Cancer Staging. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th edn. Edited by Amin ME-i-C. Chicago, Ill: Springer Nature; 2017.
4.
go back to reference Cone EB, Marchese M, Paciotti M, Nguyen D-D, Nabi J, Cole AP, Molina G, Molina RL, Minami CA, Mucci LA, et al. Assessment of time-to-treatment initiation and survival in a cohort of patients with common cancers. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):e2030072–e2030072.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cone EB, Marchese M, Paciotti M, Nguyen D-D, Nabi J, Cole AP, Molina G, Molina RL, Minami CA, Mucci LA, et al. Assessment of time-to-treatment initiation and survival in a cohort of patients with common cancers. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):e2030072–e2030072.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Yabroff KR, Lund J, Kepka D, Mariotto A. Economic burden of cancer in the United States: estimates, projections, and future research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(10):2006–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yabroff KR, Lund J, Kepka D, Mariotto A. Economic burden of cancer in the United States: estimates, projections, and future research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(10):2006–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd D. Brookland ReaE: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. Chicago, IL: Springer International Publishing; 2017.CrossRef Amin M, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd D. Brookland ReaE: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. Chicago, IL: Springer International Publishing; 2017.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pung L, Moorin R, Trevithick R, Taylor K, Chai K, Garcia Gewerc C, Ha N, Smith S. Determining cancer stage at diagnosis in population-based cancer registries: a rapid scoping review. Front Health Serv. 2023;3:1039266.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pung L, Moorin R, Trevithick R, Taylor K, Chai K, Garcia Gewerc C, Ha N, Smith S. Determining cancer stage at diagnosis in population-based cancer registries: a rapid scoping review. Front Health Serv. 2023;3:1039266.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Esteban D, Whelan S, Laudico A, Parkin D: Manual for Cancer Registry Personnel. In. Lyon, France; 1995. Esteban D, Whelan S, Laudico A, Parkin D: Manual for Cancer Registry Personnel. In. Lyon, France; 1995.
10.
go back to reference Holden RJ. What stands in the way of technology-mediated patient safety improvements? A study of facilitators and barriers to physicians’ use of electronic health records. J Patient Saf. 2011;7(4):193–203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Holden RJ. What stands in the way of technology-mediated patient safety improvements? A study of facilitators and barriers to physicians’ use of electronic health records. J Patient Saf. 2011;7(4):193–203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Ratwani R, Fairbanks T, Savage E, Adams K, Wittie M, Boone E, Hayden A, Barnes J, Hettinger Z, Gettinger A. Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation. Appl Clin Inform. 2016;7(4):1069–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ratwani R, Fairbanks T, Savage E, Adams K, Wittie M, Boone E, Hayden A, Barnes J, Hettinger Z, Gettinger A. Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation. Appl Clin Inform. 2016;7(4):1069–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Sinaiko AD, Barnett ML, Gaye M, Soriano M, Mulvey T, Hochberg E. Association of peer comparison emails with electronic health record documentation of cancer stage by oncologists. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(10):e2015935.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sinaiko AD, Barnett ML, Gaye M, Soriano M, Mulvey T, Hochberg E. Association of peer comparison emails with electronic health record documentation of cancer stage by oncologists. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(10):e2015935.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Abernethy AP, Herndon JE, Wheeler JL, Rowe K, Marcello J, Patwardhan M. Poor documentation prevents adequate assessment of quality metrics in colorectal cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2009;5(4):167–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abernethy AP, Herndon JE, Wheeler JL, Rowe K, Marcello J, Patwardhan M. Poor documentation prevents adequate assessment of quality metrics in colorectal cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2009;5(4):167–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Lawrance S, Bui C, Mahindra V, Arcorace M, Cooke-Yarborough C. Assessing a modified-AJCC TNM staging system in the New South Wales Cancer Registry, Australia. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):850.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lawrance S, Bui C, Mahindra V, Arcorace M, Cooke-Yarborough C. Assessing a modified-AJCC TNM staging system in the New South Wales Cancer Registry, Australia. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):850.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Victorian Cancer Registry: Cancer in Victoria 2021. In. Melbourne, Vic; 2022. Victorian Cancer Registry: Cancer in Victoria 2021. In. Melbourne, Vic; 2022.
23.
go back to reference Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin LH, Parkin DM, Whelan S, al. reWHO: International classification of diseases for oncology (ICD-0)- 3rd edition Geneva: World Health Organization,; 2000 with 1st (2013) and 2nd (2019) revisions. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin LH, Parkin DM, Whelan S, al. reWHO: International classification of diseases for oncology (ICD-0)- 3rd edition Geneva: World Health Organization,; 2000 with 1st (2013) and 2nd (2019) revisions.
24.
go back to reference Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care: Framework for Australain Clinical Quality Registries. In. Sydney, NSW; 2014. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care: Framework for Australain Clinical Quality Registries. In. Sydney, NSW; 2014.
25.
go back to reference Heriot N, Brand A, Cohen P, Hegarty S, Hyde S, Leung Y, Zalcberg JR, Rome R. Developing an Australian multi-module clinical quality registry for gynaecological cancers: a protocol paper. BMJ Open. 2020;10(2):e034579.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heriot N, Brand A, Cohen P, Hegarty S, Hyde S, Leung Y, Zalcberg JR, Rome R. Developing an Australian multi-module clinical quality registry for gynaecological cancers: a protocol paper. BMJ Open. 2020;10(2):e034579.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference National Gynae-Oncology Registry: Ovarian Cancer Registry Annual Report: July 2022- December 2021. In. Melbourne, Vic; 2022. National Gynae-Oncology Registry: Ovarian Cancer Registry Annual Report: July 2022- December 2021. In. Melbourne, Vic; 2022.
27.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Incidence and Relative Survival by Stage at Diagnosis for Common Cancers. In., vol. USCS Data Brief, no. 25. Atlanta, GA; 2021. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Incidence and Relative Survival by Stage at Diagnosis for Common Cancers. In., vol. USCS Data Brief, no. 25. Atlanta, GA; 2021.
31.
go back to reference Piñeros M, Parkin DM, Ward K, Chokunonga E, Ervik M, Farrugia H, Gospodarowicz M, O’Sullivan B, Soerjomataram I, Swaminathan R, et al. Essential TNM: a registry tool to reduce gaps in cancer staging information. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(2):e103–11.CrossRefPubMed Piñeros M, Parkin DM, Ward K, Chokunonga E, Ervik M, Farrugia H, Gospodarowicz M, O’Sullivan B, Soerjomataram I, Swaminathan R, et al. Essential TNM: a registry tool to reduce gaps in cancer staging information. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(2):e103–11.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Parkin DM, Liu B, Adoubi I, Makouanzi AS, Masalu N, Mrema C, Ndlovu N, Omonisi A, Traore B, Joko-Fru Y. Enhancing information on stage at diagnosis of cancer in Africa. Acta Oncol. 2023;62(4):335–41.CrossRefPubMed Parkin DM, Liu B, Adoubi I, Makouanzi AS, Masalu N, Mrema C, Ndlovu N, Omonisi A, Traore B, Joko-Fru Y. Enhancing information on stage at diagnosis of cancer in Africa. Acta Oncol. 2023;62(4):335–41.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Walters S, Maringe C, Butler J, Brierley JD, Rachet B, Coleman MP. Comparability of stage data in cancer registries in six countries: lessons from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(3):676–85.CrossRefPubMed Walters S, Maringe C, Butler J, Brierley JD, Rachet B, Coleman MP. Comparability of stage data in cancer registries in six countries: lessons from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(3):676–85.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Nguyen AN, Moore J, O’Dwyer J, Philpot S. Assessing the utility of automatic cancer registry notifications data extraction from free-text pathology reports. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015;2015:953–62.PubMedPubMedCentral Nguyen AN, Moore J, O’Dwyer J, Philpot S. Assessing the utility of automatic cancer registry notifications data extraction from free-text pathology reports. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015;2015:953–62.PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference McCluggage WG, Colgan T, Duggan M, Hacker NF, Mulvany N, Otis C, Wilkinson N, Zaino RJ, Hirschowitz L. Data set for reporting of endometrial carcinomas: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) between United Kingdom, United States, Canada, and Australasia. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2013;32(1):45–65.CrossRefPubMed McCluggage WG, Colgan T, Duggan M, Hacker NF, Mulvany N, Otis C, Wilkinson N, Zaino RJ, Hirschowitz L. Data set for reporting of endometrial carcinomas: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) between United Kingdom, United States, Canada, and Australasia. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2013;32(1):45–65.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Matias-Guiu X, Selinger CI, Anderson L, Buza N, Ellenson LH, Fadare O, Ganesan R, Ip PPC, Palacios J, Parra-Herran C, et al. Data set for the reporting of endometrial cancer: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2022;41(Suppl 1):S90-s118.CrossRefPubMed Matias-Guiu X, Selinger CI, Anderson L, Buza N, Ellenson LH, Fadare O, Ganesan R, Ip PPC, Palacios J, Parra-Herran C, et al. Data set for the reporting of endometrial cancer: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2022;41(Suppl 1):S90-s118.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference National Pathology Accreditation Advisory Council: Requirements for Information Communication and Reporting (Fourth Edition 2020). In. Edited by Department of Health and Aged Care AG. Canberra, ACT; 2021. National Pathology Accreditation Advisory Council: Requirements for Information Communication and Reporting (Fourth Edition 2020). In. Edited by Department of Health and Aged Care AG. Canberra, ACT; 2021.
44.
go back to reference Cancer Australia: The Australian Cancer Plan: building the future. Consultation Draft. In. Surry Hills, NSW; 2022. Cancer Australia: The Australian Cancer Plan: building the future. Consultation Draft. In. Surry Hills, NSW; 2022.
Metadata
Title
Registry-derived stage (RD-Stage) for capturing cancer stage at diagnosis for endometrial cancer
Authors
S. M. Evans
K. Ivanova
R. Rome
D. Cossio
CHC Pilgrim
J. Zalcberg
Y. Antill
L. Blake
A. Du Guesclin
A. Garrett
D. Giffard
N. Golobic
D. Moir
S. Parikh
A. Parisi
K. Sanday
C. Shadbolt
M. Smith
L. Te Marvelde
K. Williams
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11615-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Cancer 1/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine