Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 6/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original Article

Emergency resuscitative thoracotomy performed in European civilian trauma patients with blunt or penetrating injuries: a systematic review

Authors: J. K. Narvestad, M. Meskinfamfard, K. Søreide

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Emergency resuscitative thoracotomy (ERT) is a lifesaving procedure in selected patients. Indications are still being debated, but outcome in blunt trauma is believed to be poor. Recent reports from European populations, where blunt trauma predominates, have suggested favorable outcome also in blunt trauma. Our aim was to identify all European studies reported over the last decade and compare reported outcomes to existing knowledge.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search according to PRISMA guidelines (January 1st, 2004 to December 31st, 2014). The “grey literature” was included by searching Google Scholar. Qualitative comparison of studies and outcomes was done.

Results

A total of 8 articles from Europe were included originating from Croatia, Norway (n = 2), Denmark, Iceland, the Netherlands, Scotland, and Switzerland. Of 376 resuscitative thoracotomies, 193 (51.3 %) were for blunt trauma. Male:female distribution was 3.5:1. The collectively reported overall survival was 42.8 % (n = 161), with 25.4 % (49 of 193) blunt trauma and 61.2 % (112 of 183) penetrating injuries. When strictly including those ERTs designated as done in the emergency department for blunt mechanism (n = 139) only, a total of 18 patients survived (12.9 %). Survival after EDTs for penetrating trauma was 41.6 % (37 of 89). Neurological outcome (reported in 5 of 8 studies) reported favorable neurological long-term outcome in the majority of survivors, even after blunt trauma. None referred to Glasgow Outcome Score. Heterogeneity in the studies prevented outcome analyses by formal quantitative meta-analysis.

Conclusion

The reported outcome after ERT in European civilian trauma populations is favorable, with one in every four ERTs in the ED surviving. Notably, outcome is at variance with previously reported collective data, in particular for blunt trauma. Multicenter, prospective, observational data are needed to validate the modern role of ERT in blunt trauma.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Working Group, Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Outcomes, American College of Surgeons-Committee on Trauma. Practice management guidelines for emergency department thoracotomy. Working Group, Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Outcomes, American College of Surgeons-Committee on Trauma. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193(3):303–9. Working Group, Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Outcomes, American College of Surgeons-Committee on Trauma. Practice management guidelines for emergency department thoracotomy. Working Group, Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Outcomes, American College of Surgeons-Committee on Trauma. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193(3):303–9.
4.
go back to reference Søreide K, Petrone P, Asensio JA. Emergency thoracotomy in trauma: rationale, risks, and realities. Scand J Surg. 2007;96(1):4–10.PubMed Søreide K, Petrone P, Asensio JA. Emergency thoracotomy in trauma: rationale, risks, and realities. Scand J Surg. 2007;96(1):4–10.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Moore EE, Knudson MM, Burlew CC, Inaba K, Dicker RA, Biffl WL, et al. Defining the limits of resuscitative emergency department thoracotomy: a contemporary Western Trauma Association perspective. J Trauma. 2011;70(2):334–9. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182077c35.CrossRefPubMed Moore EE, Knudson MM, Burlew CC, Inaba K, Dicker RA, Biffl WL, et al. Defining the limits of resuscitative emergency department thoracotomy: a contemporary Western Trauma Association perspective. J Trauma. 2011;70(2):334–9. doi:10.​1097/​TA.​0b013e3182077c35​.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Asensio JA, Berne JD, Demetriades D, Chan L, Murray J, Falabella A, et al. One hundred five penetrating cardiac injuries: a 2-year prospective evaluation. J Trauma. 1998;44(6):1073–82.CrossRefPubMed Asensio JA, Berne JD, Demetriades D, Chan L, Murray J, Falabella A, et al. One hundred five penetrating cardiac injuries: a 2-year prospective evaluation. J Trauma. 1998;44(6):1073–82.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14(3):187–96.CrossRefPubMed Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14(3):187–96.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma. 1987;27(4):370–8.CrossRefPubMed Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma. 1987;27(4):370–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
21.
go back to reference Hudorovic N. Emergency department thoracotomy and middle income countries. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2008;7(5):848–9.CrossRefPubMed Hudorovic N. Emergency department thoracotomy and middle income countries. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2008;7(5):848–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
30.
go back to reference Capote A, Michael A, Almodovar J, Chan P, Skinner R, Martin M. Emergency department thoracotomy: too little, too much, or too late. Am Surg. 2013;79(10):982–6.PubMed Capote A, Michael A, Almodovar J, Chan P, Skinner R, Martin M. Emergency department thoracotomy: too little, too much, or too late. Am Surg. 2013;79(10):982–6.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Brenner M, Hoehn M, Rasmussen TE. Endovascular therapy in trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014;40(6):671–8.PubMed Brenner M, Hoehn M, Rasmussen TE. Endovascular therapy in trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014;40(6):671–8.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Logters T, Lefering R, Schneppendahl J, Alldinger I, Witte I, Windolf J, et al. Interruption of the diagnostic algorithm and immediate surgical intervention after major trauma—incidence and clinical relevance. Analysis of the Trauma Register of the German Society for Trauma Surgery. Unfallchirurg. 2010;113(10):832–8. doi:10.1007/s00113-010-1772-1.CrossRefPubMed Logters T, Lefering R, Schneppendahl J, Alldinger I, Witte I, Windolf J, et al. Interruption of the diagnostic algorithm and immediate surgical intervention after major trauma—incidence and clinical relevance. Analysis of the Trauma Register of the German Society for Trauma Surgery. Unfallchirurg. 2010;113(10):832–8. doi:10.​1007/​s00113-010-1772-1.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Emergency resuscitative thoracotomy performed in European civilian trauma patients with blunt or penetrating injuries: a systematic review
Authors
J. K. Narvestad
M. Meskinfamfard
K. Søreide
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-015-0559-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 6/2016 Go to the issue