Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emergency Radiology 6/2013

01-12-2013 | Original Article

Emergency imaging discrepancy rates at a level 1 trauma center: identifying the most common on-call resident “misses”

Authors: Jennifer Tomich, Michele Retrouvey, Sarah Shaves

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The focus of our research is to identify the most frequently reported on-call discrepancies at our hospital by modality and level of resident training. Our intent is to identify specific areas of concern that may be amenable to improvement through initiation of dedicated resident training in the field of emergency radiology. Our study included 648 significant discrepancies from 193,722 studies ordered through the emergency department over a 7-year period. The overall discrepancy rates were calculated for each resident level of training and modality type. Significance was determined using χ2 testing with α = 0.05. The most common types of discrepancies were identified. The overall rate of reported discrepancies was low for all levels of training (0.23–0.42 %) with a small, but statistically significant, decrease in rate for the senior residents. Common categories of discrepancies for all residents included fractures on radiographs (XR) and computed tomography (CT), masses and hemorrhage on CT, and lung nodules and pulmonary infiltrates on radiographs. Specific discrepancies reported more frequently for new call-takers included phalangeal fractures on XR as well as white matter disease, hepatic lacerations, pyelonephritis, peritoneal fluid, lymphadenopathy, and pneumothoraces on CT. It is our recommendation that radiology resident training programs ensure that the common discrepancies illustrated herein are specifically addressed as part of a dedicated emergency radiology course.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Strub WM, Leach JL, Tomsick T, Vagal A (2007) Overnight preliminary head CT interpretations provided by residents: locations of misidentified intracranial hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28(9):1679–1682PubMedCrossRef Strub WM, Leach JL, Tomsick T, Vagal A (2007) Overnight preliminary head CT interpretations provided by residents: locations of misidentified intracranial hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28(9):1679–1682PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cooper VF, Goodhartz LA, Nemcek AA, Ryu RK (2008) Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies. Acad Radiol 15(9):1198–1204PubMedCrossRef Cooper VF, Goodhartz LA, Nemcek AA, Ryu RK (2008) Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies. Acad Radiol 15(9):1198–1204PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Miyakoshi A, Nguyen QT, Cohen WA, Talner LB, Anzai Y (2009) Accuracy of preliminary interpretation of neurologic CT examinations by on-call radiology residents and assessment of patient outcomes at a level I trauma center. J Am Coll Radiol 6(12):864–870PubMedCrossRef Miyakoshi A, Nguyen QT, Cohen WA, Talner LB, Anzai Y (2009) Accuracy of preliminary interpretation of neurologic CT examinations by on-call radiology residents and assessment of patient outcomes at a level I trauma center. J Am Coll Radiol 6(12):864–870PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ruchman RB, Jaeger J, Wiggins EF 3rd, Seinfeld S, Thakral V, Bolla S, Wallach S (2007) Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(3):523–526PubMedCrossRef Ruchman RB, Jaeger J, Wiggins EF 3rd, Seinfeld S, Thakral V, Bolla S, Wallach S (2007) Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(3):523–526PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ruma J, Klein KA, Chong S, Wesolowski J, Kazerooni EA, Ellis JH, Myles JD (2011) Cross-sectional examination interpretation discrepancies between on-call diagnostic radiology residents and subspecialty faculty radiologists: analysis by imaging modality and subspecialty. J Am Coll Radiol 8(6):409–414PubMedCrossRef Ruma J, Klein KA, Chong S, Wesolowski J, Kazerooni EA, Ellis JH, Myles JD (2011) Cross-sectional examination interpretation discrepancies between on-call diagnostic radiology residents and subspecialty faculty radiologists: analysis by imaging modality and subspecialty. J Am Coll Radiol 8(6):409–414PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Stevens KJ, Griffiths KL, Rosenberg J, Mahadevan S, Zatz LM, Leung AN (2008) Discordance rates between preliminary and final radiology reports on cross-sectional imaging studies at a level 1 trauma center. Acad Radiol 15(10):1217–1226PubMedCrossRef Stevens KJ, Griffiths KL, Rosenberg J, Mahadevan S, Zatz LM, Leung AN (2008) Discordance rates between preliminary and final radiology reports on cross-sectional imaging studies at a level 1 trauma center. Acad Radiol 15(10):1217–1226PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Strub WM, Vagal AA, Tomsick T, Moulton JS (2006) Overnight resident preliminary interpretations on CT examinations: should the process continue? Emerg Radiol 13(1):19–23PubMedCrossRef Strub WM, Vagal AA, Tomsick T, Moulton JS (2006) Overnight resident preliminary interpretations on CT examinations: should the process continue? Emerg Radiol 13(1):19–23PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Walls J, Hunter N, Brasher PM, Ho SG (2009) The DePICTORS Study: discrepancies in preliminary interpretation of CT scans between on-call residents and staff. Emerg Radiol 16(4):303–308PubMedCrossRef Walls J, Hunter N, Brasher PM, Ho SG (2009) The DePICTORS Study: discrepancies in preliminary interpretation of CT scans between on-call residents and staff. Emerg Radiol 16(4):303–308PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wechsler RJ, Spettell CM, Kurtz AB, Lev-Toaff AS, Halpern EJ, Nazarian LN, Feld RI, Needleman L, Alexander AA (1996) Effects of training and experience in interpretation of emergency body CT scans. Radiology 199(3):717–720PubMed Wechsler RJ, Spettell CM, Kurtz AB, Lev-Toaff AS, Halpern EJ, Nazarian LN, Feld RI, Needleman L, Alexander AA (1996) Effects of training and experience in interpretation of emergency body CT scans. Radiology 199(3):717–720PubMed
10.
go back to reference Bilow RM, Schnier BR (2001) Resident vs. attending interpretation of on-call studies: clinical impact. Emerg Radiol 8(1):35–38CrossRef Bilow RM, Schnier BR (2001) Resident vs. attending interpretation of on-call studies: clinical impact. Emerg Radiol 8(1):35–38CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Emergency imaging discrepancy rates at a level 1 trauma center: identifying the most common on-call resident “misses”
Authors
Jennifer Tomich
Michele Retrouvey
Sarah Shaves
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Emergency Radiology / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-013-1146-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

Emergency Radiology 6/2013 Go to the issue