Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2012

01-09-2012 | Case Report

Emergency and weekend robotic surgery are feasible

Authors: Ranjan Sudan, Sapan S. Desai

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Robotic surgery has made a minimally invasive approach feasible for many complex operations that were previously performed by the open approach. Because of the complexity of its technology and the need for specially trained personnel, robotic operations have been limited to elective cases during weekdays. As more surgeons from different specialties perform robotic operations, the chances of scheduling conflicts and the possibility of complications needing a re-operation at night or during a weekend (defined as after hours) are also increasing. Until now, complications have been salvaged by conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy but we were able to demonstrate that, with appropriately trained staff, robotic surgery is feasible after hours and in emergencies. Use of the robot after hours could help alleviate scheduling conflicts for the operating room. For patients, it could potentially avoid laparotomy with its associated morbidity. As far as we are aware, use of the robot for emergency surgery has previously not been reported in the literature.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Orvieto MA, Patel VR (2009) Evolution of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Scand J Surg 98(2):76–88PubMed Orvieto MA, Patel VR (2009) Evolution of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Scand J Surg 98(2):76–88PubMed
2.
go back to reference Wilson EB (2009) The evolution of robotic general surgery. Scand J Surg 98(2):125–129PubMed Wilson EB (2009) The evolution of robotic general surgery. Scand J Surg 98(2):125–129PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS (2011) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 54(2):151–156PubMedCrossRef Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS (2011) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 54(2):151–156PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lim PC, Kang E, do Park H (2011) A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Gynecol Oncol 120(3):413–418PubMedCrossRef Lim PC, Kang E, do Park H (2011) A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Gynecol Oncol 120(3):413–418PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Hagen ME, Talamini M, Horgan S, Wagner OJ (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot 6(2):125–131PubMed Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Hagen ME, Talamini M, Horgan S, Wagner OJ (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot 6(2):125–131PubMed
7.
go back to reference Lehr EJ, Rodriguez E, Chitwood WR (2011) Robotic cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 24(1):77–85PubMedCrossRef Lehr EJ, Rodriguez E, Chitwood WR (2011) Robotic cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 24(1):77–85PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 16(10):1389–1402PubMedCrossRef Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 16(10):1389–1402PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E et al (2004) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama 292((14)):1724–1737PubMedCrossRef Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E et al (2004) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama 292((14)):1724–1737PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kim WW, Gagner M, Kini S et al (2003) Laparoscopic vs. open biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a comparative study. J Gastrointest Surg 7(4):552–557PubMedCrossRef Kim WW, Gagner M, Kini S et al (2003) Laparoscopic vs. open biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a comparative study. J Gastrointest Surg 7(4):552–557PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M (2000) Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg 10(6):514–523; discussion 524PubMedCrossRef Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M (2000) Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg 10(6):514–523; discussion 524PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sudan RSD (2002) Development of a totally intracorporeal robotic assisted biliary pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Obes Surg (12):205 Sudan RSD (2002) Development of a totally intracorporeal robotic assisted biliary pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Obes Surg (12):205
13.
go back to reference Sudan R, Puri V, Sudan D (2007) Robotically assisted biliary pancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch: a new technique. Surg Endosc 21(5):729–733PubMedCrossRef Sudan R, Puri V, Sudan D (2007) Robotically assisted biliary pancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch: a new technique. Surg Endosc 21(5):729–733PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sudan R, Kasotakis G, Betof A, Wright A (2010) Sleeve gastrectomy strictures: technique for robotic-assisted strictureplasty. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6(4):434–436PubMedCrossRef Sudan R, Kasotakis G, Betof A, Wright A (2010) Sleeve gastrectomy strictures: technique for robotic-assisted strictureplasty. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6(4):434–436PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Judd JP, Siddiqui NY, Barnett JC, Visco AG, Havrilesky LJ, Wu JM (2010) Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(4):493–499PubMedCrossRef Judd JP, Siddiqui NY, Barnett JC, Visco AG, Havrilesky LJ, Wu JM (2010) Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(4):493–499PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Snyder BE, Wilson T, Leong BY, Klein C, Wilson EB (2010) Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass: minimizing morbidity and mortality. Obes Surg 20(3):265–270PubMedCrossRef Snyder BE, Wilson T, Leong BY, Klein C, Wilson EB (2010) Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass: minimizing morbidity and mortality. Obes Surg 20(3):265–270PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Emergency and weekend robotic surgery are feasible
Authors
Ranjan Sudan
Sapan S. Desai
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0289-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2012 Go to the issue