Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 2/2016

01-12-2016 | Case Report

Embryo Implantation in the Region of a Previous Caesarean Section Scar and Scar Dehiscence in Second Trimester: A Rare Case Report

Authors: Shikha Jain, Neha Jain, Swati Chaudhary

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Special Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

The first case of a Caesarean scar site ectopic pregnancy was reported in 1978 [1]. Implantation of a pregnancy within a caesarean fibrous tissue scar is considered to be the rarest form of ectopic pregnancy and a life-threatening condition. This is because of the very high risk of uterine rupture and the maternal complications related to it. The most probable mechanism that can explain scar implantation is that there is invasion of the myometrium through a microtubular tract between the caesarean section scar and the endometrial canal. A recent case series estimates an incidence of 1:2226 of all pregnancies, with a rate of 0.15 % in women with a previous caesarean section and a rate of 6.1 % of all ectopic pregnancies in women who had at least one caesarean delivery [2]. Although expectant and medical management have been reported in early pregnancy, termination of a caesarean scar pregnancy by laparotomy and hysterotomy, with repair of the accompanying uterine scar dehiscence, may be the best treatment option in later weeks of pregnancy. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Larsen JV, Solomon MH. Pregnancy in a uterine scar sacculus: an unusual cause of postabortal haemorrhage. S Afr Med J. 1978;53:142–3.PubMed Larsen JV, Solomon MH. Pregnancy in a uterine scar sacculus: an unusual cause of postabortal haemorrhage. S Afr Med J. 1978;53:142–3.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Seow K-M, Huang L-W, Lin YH, et al. Caesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:247–53.CrossRef Seow K-M, Huang L-W, Lin YH, et al. Caesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:247–53.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Smith A, Maxwell D, Ash A. Sonographic diagnosis of caesarean scar pregnancy at 16 weeks. J Clin Ultrasound. 2007;35(4):212–5.CrossRef Smith A, Maxwell D, Ash A. Sonographic diagnosis of caesarean scar pregnancy at 16 weeks. J Clin Ultrasound. 2007;35(4):212–5.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG. 2007;114(3):253–63.CrossRef Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG. 2007;114(3):253–63.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2002;57(8):537–43.CrossRef Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2002;57(8):537–43.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Stevens EE, Ogburn P. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a case report of combination local and systemic methotrexate management requiring surgical intervention. J Reprod Med. 2011;56(7–8):356–8.PubMed Stevens EE, Ogburn P. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a case report of combination local and systemic methotrexate management requiring surgical intervention. J Reprod Med. 2011;56(7–8):356–8.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Embryo Implantation in the Region of a Previous Caesarean Section Scar and Scar Dehiscence in Second Trimester: A Rare Case Report
Authors
Shikha Jain
Neha Jain
Swati Chaudhary
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue Special Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0874-2

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2016

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 2/2016 Go to the issue