Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 4/2010

01-08-2010 | Original Paper

Electronic compliance monitoring of topical treatment after ophthalmic surgery

Authors: Manuel Marcel Hermann, Can Üstündag, Michael Diestelhorst

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The success of many medical treatments is built on compliance. Electronic monitoring is the most accurate tool to quantify compliance by measuring adherence. In order to assess the efficiency of a recently introduced miniature monitoring device for eye drop application, we evaluated adherence in ophthalmic patients undergoing post-operative short-term topical treatment. This pilot study enrolled 30 outpatients (mean age 61.8 ± 18.5 years) after cataract (n = 24) and glaucoma filtration surgery (n = 6) applying fixed-combination eye drops containing prednisolone and gentamicin five times daily for 2 weeks. Patients received eye drops in conventional bottles each equipped with a miniature monitoring device recording events of application. Two patients failed to bring back the monitoring device; therefore data collected from only 28 patients could be examined. Data showed highly variable results with a mean dose compliance of 50.2%. Dose compliance was below 25% in approximately one out of five patients. Four cataract patients, but no glaucoma patient, discontinued therapy prematurely. The observed mean dosage interval was calculated for each patient and ranged 4.6–19.7 h. Thirty percent of analysed dosage intervals exceeded 12.0 h. Different patterns of compliance behaviour-like early non-persistence, drug holiday and low treatment frequency could be identified and illustrated using electronic data. Age or gender did not significantly influence compliance rates. Our pilot study demonstrates successful electronic compliance monitoring using a technology capable of continuous data recording over weeks of treatment. The low compliance rate for a relevant part of the patients demonstrates the necessity to study and improve compliance in ophthalmology. In future, new application methods and electronic application devices may improve treatment response in eye care.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Olthoff CM, Schouten JS, van de Borne BW, Webers CA (2005) Noncompliance with ocular hypotensive treatment in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension an evidence-based review. Ophthalmology 112:953–961CrossRefPubMed Olthoff CM, Schouten JS, van de Borne BW, Webers CA (2005) Noncompliance with ocular hypotensive treatment in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension an evidence-based review. Ophthalmology 112:953–961CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Friedman DS, Quigley HA, Gelb L, Tan J, Margolis J, Shah SN, Kim EE, Zimmerman T, Hahn SR (2007) Using pharmacy claims data to study adherence to glaucoma medications: methodology and findings of the Glaucoma Adherence and Persistency Study (GAPS). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:5052–5057CrossRefPubMed Friedman DS, Quigley HA, Gelb L, Tan J, Margolis J, Shah SN, Kim EE, Zimmerman T, Hahn SR (2007) Using pharmacy claims data to study adherence to glaucoma medications: methodology and findings of the Glaucoma Adherence and Persistency Study (GAPS). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:5052–5057CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Nordstrom BL, Friedman DS, Mozaffari E, Quigley HA, Walker AM (2005) Persistence and adherence with topical glaucoma therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 140:598–606PubMed Nordstrom BL, Friedman DS, Mozaffari E, Quigley HA, Walker AM (2005) Persistence and adherence with topical glaucoma therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 140:598–606PubMed
5.
go back to reference Wilensky J, Fiscella RG, Carlson AM, Morris LS, Walt J (2006) Measurement of persistence and adherence to regimens of IOP-lowering glaucoma medications using pharmacy claims data. Am J Ophthalmol 141:S28–S33CrossRefPubMed Wilensky J, Fiscella RG, Carlson AM, Morris LS, Walt J (2006) Measurement of persistence and adherence to regimens of IOP-lowering glaucoma medications using pharmacy claims data. Am J Ophthalmol 141:S28–S33CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kass MA, Gordon M, Meltzer DW (1986) Can ophthalmologists correctly identify patients defaulting from pilocarpine therapy? Am J Ophthalmol 101:524–530PubMed Kass MA, Gordon M, Meltzer DW (1986) Can ophthalmologists correctly identify patients defaulting from pilocarpine therapy? Am J Ophthalmol 101:524–530PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kass MA, Meltzer DW, Gordon M, Cooper D, Goldberg J (1986) Compliance with topical pilocarpine treatment. Am J Ophthalmol 101:515–523PubMed Kass MA, Meltzer DW, Gordon M, Cooper D, Goldberg J (1986) Compliance with topical pilocarpine treatment. Am J Ophthalmol 101:515–523PubMed
8.
go back to reference Robin AL, Novack GD, Covert DW, Crockett RS, Marcic TS (2007) Adherence in glaucoma: objective measurements of once-daily and adjunctive medication use. Am J Ophthalmol 144:533–540CrossRefPubMed Robin AL, Novack GD, Covert DW, Crockett RS, Marcic TS (2007) Adherence in glaucoma: objective measurements of once-daily and adjunctive medication use. Am J Ophthalmol 144:533–540CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sleath B, Robin AL, Covert D, Byrd JE, Tudor G, Svarstad B (2006) Patient-reported behavior and problems in using glaucoma medications. Ophthalmology 113:431–436CrossRefPubMed Sleath B, Robin AL, Covert D, Byrd JE, Tudor G, Svarstad B (2006) Patient-reported behavior and problems in using glaucoma medications. Ophthalmology 113:431–436CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Tsai JC, McClure CA, Ramos SE, Schlundt DG, Pichert JW (2003) Compliance barriers in glaucoma: a systematic classification. J Glaucoma 12:393–398CrossRefPubMed Tsai JC, McClure CA, Ramos SE, Schlundt DG, Pichert JW (2003) Compliance barriers in glaucoma: a systematic classification. J Glaucoma 12:393–398CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference de Klerk E, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, van der Tempel H, van der Linden SJEF (2003) The compliance-questionnaire-rheumatology compared with electronic medication event monitoring: a validation study. J Rheumatol 30:2469–2475PubMed de Klerk E, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, van der Tempel H, van der Linden SJEF (2003) The compliance-questionnaire-rheumatology compared with electronic medication event monitoring: a validation study. J Rheumatol 30:2469–2475PubMed
12.
go back to reference Schwartz GF (2005) Compliance and persistency in glaucoma follow-up treatment. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16:114–121CrossRefPubMed Schwartz GF (2005) Compliance and persistency in glaucoma follow-up treatment. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16:114–121CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kass MA, Gordon M, Morley RE Jr, Meltzer DW, Goldberg JJ (1987) Compliance with topical timolol treatment. Am J Ophthalmol 103:188–193PubMed Kass MA, Gordon M, Morley RE Jr, Meltzer DW, Goldberg JJ (1987) Compliance with topical timolol treatment. Am J Ophthalmol 103:188–193PubMed
14.
go back to reference Hermann MM, Diestelhorst M (2006) Microprocessor controlled compliance monitor for eye drop medication. Br J Ophthalmol 90:830–832CrossRefPubMed Hermann MM, Diestelhorst M (2006) Microprocessor controlled compliance monitor for eye drop medication. Br J Ophthalmol 90:830–832CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Boden C, Sit A, Weinreb RN (2006) Accuracy of an electronic monitoring and reminder device for use with travoprost eye drops. J Glaucoma 15:30–34CrossRefPubMed Boden C, Sit A, Weinreb RN (2006) Accuracy of an electronic monitoring and reminder device for use with travoprost eye drops. J Glaucoma 15:30–34CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Norell SE, Granstrom PA, Wassen R (1980) A medication monitor and fluorescein technique designed to study medication behaviour. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 58:459–467CrossRef Norell SE, Granstrom PA, Wassen R (1980) A medication monitor and fluorescein technique designed to study medication behaviour. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 58:459–467CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kahook MY (2007) Developments in dosing aids and adherence devices for glaucoma therapy: current and future perspectives. Expert Rev Med Devices 4:261–266CrossRefPubMed Kahook MY (2007) Developments in dosing aids and adherence devices for glaucoma therapy: current and future perspectives. Expert Rev Med Devices 4:261–266CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ho LY, Camejo L, Kahook MY, Noecker R (2008) Effect of audible and visual reminders on adherence in glaucoma patients using a commercially available dosing aid. Clin Ophthalmol 2:769–772PubMed Ho LY, Camejo L, Kahook MY, Noecker R (2008) Effect of audible and visual reminders on adherence in glaucoma patients using a commercially available dosing aid. Clin Ophthalmol 2:769–772PubMed
19.
go back to reference Buller AJ, Connell B, Spencer AF (2005) Compliance: clear communication’s critical. Br J Ophthalmol 89:1370CrossRefPubMed Buller AJ, Connell B, Spencer AF (2005) Compliance: clear communication’s critical. Br J Ophthalmol 89:1370CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tsai JC (2006) Medication adherence in glaucoma: approaches for optimizing patient compliance. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17:190–195PubMed Tsai JC (2006) Medication adherence in glaucoma: approaches for optimizing patient compliance. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17:190–195PubMed
Metadata
Title
Electronic compliance monitoring of topical treatment after ophthalmic surgery
Authors
Manuel Marcel Hermann
Can Üstündag
Michael Diestelhorst
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-010-9362-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

International Ophthalmology 4/2010 Go to the issue