Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2/2005

01-06-2005 | Research Article

Electrode Interaction in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Subjects

Authors: Marc D. Eisen, Kevin H. Franck

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 2/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Multielectrode cochlear implants rely on differential stimulation of the cochlear nerve for presenting the brain with the spectral and timing information required to understand speech. In implant patients, the degree of overlap among cochlear nerve fibers stimulated by the different electrodes constitutes the electrode interaction. Electrode interaction degrades the spectral resolution of the implant’s stimulus. We sought to define electrode interaction in a cohort of pediatric cochlear implant subjects as a function of both stimulus intensity and electrode location along the array. The 27 pediatric subjects that completed the study were implanted with either the Clarion Hi-Focus array with or without positioner, the Nucleus 24 Contour array, or the Nucleus 24 Straight array. All but two of the patients had congenital hearing loss, and none of the patients had meningitis prior to the onset of deafness. The cochlear nerve response was measured with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP). A forward masking protocol was used such that a probe stimulus electrode remained fixed while a preceding masker was moved across the array. Electrode interaction was estimated by measuring the unmasked probe response minus the masked probe response. Three probe locations and three probe intensities were examined for each subject. At all probe locations, electrode interaction increased as probe intensity increased (p < 0.05). Interaction at the basal probe was less than that at either the middle or apical probe locations (p < 0.05), and significant correlation found between probe distance from the basal end of the array and electrode interaction (p < 0.001). These results demonstrate that in this cohort of pediatric subjects, electrode interaction depended on both stimulus intensity and probe location. Implications of these findings on future implant array design and current implant fitting strategies are discussed. The impact of electrode interaction on implant performance is yet to be elucidated.
Literature
go back to reference Abbas, PJ, Hughes, ML, Brown, CJ, Miller, CA, South, H 2004Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potentialAudiol. Neuro-otol.9203213CrossRef Abbas, PJ, Hughes, ML, Brown, CJ, Miller, CA, South, H 2004Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potentialAudiol. Neuro-otol.9203213CrossRef
go back to reference Adamson, CL, Reid, MA, Davis, RL 2002Opposite actions of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3 on firing features and ion channel composition of murine spiral ganglion neuronsJ. Neurosci.2213851396PubMed Adamson, CL, Reid, MA, Davis, RL 2002Opposite actions of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3 on firing features and ion channel composition of murine spiral ganglion neuronsJ. Neurosci.2213851396PubMed
go back to reference Ariyasu, L, Galey, FR, Hilsinger, RJ, Byl, FM 1989Computer-generated three-dimensional reconstruction of the cochleaOtolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.1008791PubMed Ariyasu, L, Galey, FR, Hilsinger, RJ, Byl, FM 1989Computer-generated three-dimensional reconstruction of the cochleaOtolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.1008791PubMed
go back to reference Balkany, TJ, Eshraghi, AA, Yang, N 2002Modiolar proximity of three perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodesActa Otolaryngol.122363369PubMed Balkany, TJ, Eshraghi, AA, Yang, N 2002Modiolar proximity of three perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodesActa Otolaryngol.122363369PubMed
go back to reference Bierer, JA, Middlebrooks, JC 2004Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactionsJaro53248PubMed Bierer, JA, Middlebrooks, JC 2004Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactionsJaro53248PubMed
go back to reference Black, RC, Clark, GM 1980Differential electrical excitation of the auditory nerveJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.67868874PubMed Black, RC, Clark, GM 1980Differential electrical excitation of the auditory nerveJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.67868874PubMed
go back to reference Boex, C, Kos, M, Pelizzone, M 2003Forward masking in different cochlear implant systemsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.11420582065PubMed Boex, C, Kos, M, Pelizzone, M 2003Forward masking in different cochlear implant systemsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.11420582065PubMed
go back to reference Brown, CJ, Abbas, PJ, Gantz, B 1990Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant usersJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.8813851391PubMed Brown, CJ, Abbas, PJ, Gantz, B 1990Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant usersJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.8813851391PubMed
go back to reference Busby, PA, Clark, GM 1996Electrode discrimination by early-deafened cochlear implant patientsAudiol.35822 Busby, PA, Clark, GM 1996Electrode discrimination by early-deafened cochlear implant patientsAudiol.35822
go back to reference Carlyon, RP, Geurts, L, Wouters, J 2000Detection of small across-channel timing differences by cochlear implanteesHear. Res.141140154PubMed Carlyon, RP, Geurts, L, Wouters, J 2000Detection of small across-channel timing differences by cochlear implanteesHear. Res.141140154PubMed
go back to reference Cohen, LT, Busby, PA, Clark, GM 1996aCochlear implant place psychophysics. 2. Comparison of forward masking and pitch estimation dataAudiol. Neuro-otol.1278292 Cohen, LT, Busby, PA, Clark, GM 1996aCochlear implant place psychophysics. 2. Comparison of forward masking and pitch estimation dataAudiol. Neuro-otol.1278292
go back to reference Cohen, LT, Xu, J, Xu, SA, Clark, GM 1996bImproved and simplified methods for specifying positions of the electrode bands of a cochlear implant arrayAm. J. Otol.17859865 Cohen, LT, Xu, J, Xu, SA, Clark, GM 1996bImproved and simplified methods for specifying positions of the electrode bands of a cochlear implant arrayAm. J. Otol.17859865
go back to reference Cohen, LT, Richardson, LM, Saunders, E, Cowan, RS 2003Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: Comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward maskingHear. Res.1797287PubMed Cohen, LT, Richardson, LM, Saunders, E, Cowan, RS 2003Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: Comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward maskingHear. Res.1797287PubMed
go back to reference Collins, LM, Zwolan, TA, Wakefield, GH 1997Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjectsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.101440455PubMed Collins, LM, Zwolan, TA, Wakefield, GH 1997Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjectsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.101440455PubMed
go back to reference Dawson, PW, McKay, CM, Busby, PA, Grayden, DB, Clark, GM 2000Electrode discrimination and speech perception in young children using cochlear implantsEar Hear.21597607PubMed Dawson, PW, McKay, CM, Busby, PA, Grayden, DB, Clark, GM 2000Electrode discrimination and speech perception in young children using cochlear implantsEar Hear.21597607PubMed
go back to reference Balthasar, C, Boex, C, Cosendai, G, Valentini, G, Sigrist, A, Pelizzone, M 2003Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjectsHear. Res.1827787PubMed Balthasar, C, Boex, C, Cosendai, G, Valentini, G, Sigrist, A, Pelizzone, M 2003Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjectsHear. Res.1827787PubMed
go back to reference Dorman, MF, Smith, LM, Smith, M, Parkin, JL 1996Frequency discrimination and speech recognition by patients who use the Ineraid and continuous interleaved sampling cochlear-implant signal processorsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9911741184PubMed Dorman, MF, Smith, LM, Smith, M, Parkin, JL 1996Frequency discrimination and speech recognition by patients who use the Ineraid and continuous interleaved sampling cochlear-implant signal processorsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9911741184PubMed
go back to reference Eisen, MD, Franck, KH 2004ECAP amplitude growth functions and high resolution programming levels in pediatric CII implant subjectsEar Hear.25528538PubMed Eisen, MD, Franck, KH 2004ECAP amplitude growth functions and high resolution programming levels in pediatric CII implant subjectsEar Hear.25528538PubMed
go back to reference Favre, E, Pelizzone, M 1993Channel interactions in patients using the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implantHear. Res.66150156PubMed Favre, E, Pelizzone, M 1993Channel interactions in patients using the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implantHear. Res.66150156PubMed
go back to reference Fayad, JN, Luxford, W, Linthicum, FH 2000The Clarion electrode positioner: temporal bone studiesAm. J. Otol.21226229PubMed Fayad, JN, Luxford, W, Linthicum, FH 2000The Clarion electrode positioner: temporal bone studiesAm. J. Otol.21226229PubMed
go back to reference Franck, KH 2002A model of a nucleus 24 cochlear implant fitting protocol based on the electrically evoked whole nerve action potentialEar Hear.2367S71SPubMed Franck, KH 2002A model of a nucleus 24 cochlear implant fitting protocol based on the electrically evoked whole nerve action potentialEar Hear.2367S71SPubMed
go back to reference Franck, KH, Norton, SJ 2001Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation’s CI24M DeviceEar Hear.22289299PubMed Franck, KH, Norton, SJ 2001Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation’s CI24M DeviceEar Hear.22289299PubMed
go back to reference Friesen, LM, Shannon, RV, Baskent, D, Wang, X 2001Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implantsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.11011501163PubMed Friesen, LM, Shannon, RV, Baskent, D, Wang, X 2001Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implantsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.11011501163PubMed
go back to reference Frijns, JHM, Briaire, JJ, Grote, JJ 2001The importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results with modiolus hugging multi-channel cochlear implantsOtol. Neurotol.22340349PubMed Frijns, JHM, Briaire, JJ, Grote, JJ 2001The importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results with modiolus hugging multi-channel cochlear implantsOtol. Neurotol.22340349PubMed
go back to reference Haenggeli, A, Zhang, JS, Vischer, MW, Pelizzone, M, Rouiller, EM 1998Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high ratesAudiol.37353371 Haenggeli, A, Zhang, JS, Vischer, MW, Pelizzone, M, Rouiller, EM 1998Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high ratesAudiol.37353371
go back to reference Kral, A, Hartmann, R, Mortazavi, D, Klinke, R 1998Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferentsHear. Res.1211128CrossRefPubMed Kral, A, Hartmann, R, Mortazavi, D, Klinke, R 1998Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferentsHear. Res.1211128CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Miller, AL, Arenberg, JG, Middlebrooks, JC, Pfingst, BE 2001Cochlear implant thresholds: comparison of middle latency responses with psychophysical and cortical-spike-activity thresholdsHear. Res.1525566CrossRefPubMed Miller, AL, Arenberg, JG, Middlebrooks, JC, Pfingst, BE 2001Cochlear implant thresholds: comparison of middle latency responses with psychophysical and cortical-spike-activity thresholdsHear. Res.1525566CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nadol, JB,Jr 1997Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantationOtolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.117220228PubMed Nadol, JB,Jr 1997Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantationOtolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.117220228PubMed
go back to reference Pfingst, BE, Xu, L 2004Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implantsJaro51124PubMed Pfingst, BE, Xu, L 2004Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implantsJaro51124PubMed
go back to reference Shannon, RV 1983Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interactionHear. Res.12116CrossRefPubMed Shannon, RV 1983Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interactionHear. Res.12116CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shannon, RV 1990Forward masking in patients with cochlear implantsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.88741744PubMed Shannon, RV 1990Forward masking in patients with cochlear implantsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.88741744PubMed
go back to reference Throckmorton, CS, Collins, LM 2002The effect of channel interactions on speech recognition in cochlear implant subjects: predictions from an acoustic modelJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.112285296CrossRefPubMed Throckmorton, CS, Collins, LM 2002The effect of channel interactions on speech recognition in cochlear implant subjects: predictions from an acoustic modelJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.112285296CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference White, MW, Merzenich, MM, Gardi, JN 1984Multichannel cochlear implants. Channel interactions and processor designArch. Otolaryngol.110493501PubMed White, MW, Merzenich, MM, Gardi, JN 1984Multichannel cochlear implants. Channel interactions and processor designArch. Otolaryngol.110493501PubMed
go back to reference Wilson, BS, Finley, CC, Farmer, JC,Jr, Lawson, DT, Weber, BA, Wolford, RD, Kenan, PD, White, MW, Merzenich, MM, Schindler, RA 1988Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implantsLaryngoscope9810691077PubMed Wilson, BS, Finley, CC, Farmer, JC,Jr, Lawson, DT, Weber, BA, Wolford, RD, Kenan, PD, White, MW, Merzenich, MM, Schindler, RA 1988Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implantsLaryngoscope9810691077PubMed
go back to reference Wilson, BS, Finley, CC, Lawson, DT, Wolford, RD, Eddington, DK, Rabinowitz, WM 1991Better speech recognition with cochlear implantsNature352236238PubMed Wilson, BS, Finley, CC, Lawson, DT, Wolford, RD, Eddington, DK, Rabinowitz, WM 1991Better speech recognition with cochlear implantsNature352236238PubMed
go back to reference Xu, J, Xu, SA, Cohen, LT, Clark, GM 2000Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantationAm. J. Otol.214956PubMed Xu, J, Xu, SA, Cohen, LT, Clark, GM 2000Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantationAm. J. Otol.214956PubMed
Metadata
Title
Electrode Interaction in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Subjects
Authors
Marc D. Eisen
Kevin H. Franck
Publication date
01-06-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 2/2005
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-005-5057-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2005

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2/2005 Go to the issue