Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 4/2021

01-08-2021 | Electrocardiography | Editorial

Myocardial infarction assessment by surface electrocardiography

Authors: Haren Patel, MD, Harish Doppalapudi, MD, Fadi G. Hage, MD, MASNC

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Excerpt

Surface electrocardiography (ECG) is often used clinically for the detection of myocardial infarction (MI). Although prior guidelines used to classify MI as Q-wave and non-Q-wave MIs, current guidelines rely on ST segment shift on the ECG to differentiate ST-elevation MI from non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome since that has direct impact on clinical management1. Further, we now realize that transmural MI may occur without Q waves on the ECG and non-transmural MIs may be accompanied by Q waves2. Nevertheless, the presence of Q waves on an ECG is helpful to suggest the presence of prior MI. In this regards, not all Q waves on ECG tracings are pathologic; pathologic Q waves are defined in the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction as the presence of Q wave in leads V2-V3 > 0.02 s or QS complex in leads V2-V3; Q wave ≥ 0.03 s and ≥ 1 mm deep or QS complex in leads I, II, aVL, aVF, or V4-V6 in any 2 leads of a contiguous lead grouping (I, aVL; V3-V6; II, III, aVF); or an R wave > 0.04 s in V1-V2 and R/S > 1 with a concordant positive T wave in absence of conduction defect3. Even pathologic Q waves may be present in the absence of MI. Notoriously, lead misplacement can result in the misdiagnosis of MI by ECG. Any condition that induces a shift in the position of the heart in relation to the surface ECG leads can have similar consequences. Other conditions that have been associated with Q waves in the absence of MI include Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, amyloid heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, left bundle branch block, and paced rhythm2. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014;130:2354–94.CrossRef Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014;130:2354–94.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow R, et al. Braunwald’s heart disease: A textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2019. Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow R, et al. Braunwald’s heart disease: A textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2019.
3.
go back to reference Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:2231–64.CrossRef Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:2231–64.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hage FG, Ghimire G, Lester D, et al. The prognostic value of regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2015;22:1214–21.CrossRef Hage FG, Ghimire G, Lester D, et al. The prognostic value of regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2015;22:1214–21.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hage FG, Venkataraman R, Aljaroudi W, et al. The impact of viability assessment using myocardial perfusion imaging on patient management and outcome. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:378–89.CrossRef Hage FG, Venkataraman R, Aljaroudi W, et al. The impact of viability assessment using myocardial perfusion imaging on patient management and outcome. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:378–89.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dilsizian V, Bacharach SL, Beanlands RS, et al. ASNC imaging guidelines/SNMMI procedure standard for positron emission tomography (PET) nuclear cardiology procedures. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:1187–226.CrossRef Dilsizian V, Bacharach SL, Beanlands RS, et al. ASNC imaging guidelines/SNMMI procedure standard for positron emission tomography (PET) nuclear cardiology procedures. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:1187–226.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Arrighi JA, Dilsizian V. Multimodality imaging for assessment of myocardial viability: Nuclear, echocardiography, MR, and CT. Curr Cardiol Rep 2012;14:234–43.CrossRef Arrighi JA, Dilsizian V. Multimodality imaging for assessment of myocardial viability: Nuclear, echocardiography, MR, and CT. Curr Cardiol Rep 2012;14:234–43.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Markendorf S, Benz DC, Messerli M, et al. Value of 12-lead electrocardiogram to predict myocardial scar on FDG PET in heart failure patients. J Nucl Cardiol 2019 Markendorf S, Benz DC, Messerli M, et al. Value of 12-lead electrocardiogram to predict myocardial scar on FDG PET in heart failure patients. J Nucl Cardiol 2019
9.
go back to reference Uusitupa M, Pyörälä K, Raunio H, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of Minnesota Code Q-QS abnormalities in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction verified at autopsy. Am Heart J 1983;106:753–7.CrossRef Uusitupa M, Pyörälä K, Raunio H, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of Minnesota Code Q-QS abnormalities in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction verified at autopsy. Am Heart J 1983;106:753–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Martinez-Rios MA, Da Costa BC, Cecena-Seldner FA, et al. Normal electrocardiogram in the presence of severe coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1970;25:320–4.CrossRef Martinez-Rios MA, Da Costa BC, Cecena-Seldner FA, et al. Normal electrocardiogram in the presence of severe coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1970;25:320–4.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bär FW, Brugada P, Dassen WR, et al. Prognostic value of Q waves, R/S ratio, loss of R wave voltage, ST-T segment abnormalities, electrical axis, low voltage and notching: correlation of electrocardiogram and left ventriculogram. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;4:17–27.CrossRef Bär FW, Brugada P, Dassen WR, et al. Prognostic value of Q waves, R/S ratio, loss of R wave voltage, ST-T segment abnormalities, electrical axis, low voltage and notching: correlation of electrocardiogram and left ventriculogram. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;4:17–27.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jaarsma C, Bekkers SC, Haidari Z, et al. Comparison of different electrocardiographic scoring systems for detection of any previous myocardial infarction as assessed with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 2013;112:1069–74.CrossRef Jaarsma C, Bekkers SC, Haidari Z, et al. Comparison of different electrocardiographic scoring systems for detection of any previous myocardial infarction as assessed with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 2013;112:1069–74.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kakhi VR, Ayati N, Zakavi SR, et al. Comparison between fragmented QRS and Q waves in myocardial scar detection using myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Kardiol Pol 2015;73:437–44.CrossRef Kakhi VR, Ayati N, Zakavi SR, et al. Comparison between fragmented QRS and Q waves in myocardial scar detection using myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Kardiol Pol 2015;73:437–44.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Asch FM, Shah S, Rattin C, et al. Lack of sensitivity of the electrocardiogram for detection of old myocardial infarction: A cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study. Am Heart J 2006;152:742–8.CrossRef Asch FM, Shah S, Rattin C, et al. Lack of sensitivity of the electrocardiogram for detection of old myocardial infarction: A cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study. Am Heart J 2006;152:742–8.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nadour W, Doyle M, Williams RB, et al. Does the presence of Q waves on the EKG accurately predict prior myocardial infarction when compared to cardiac magnetic resonance using late gadolinium enhancement? A cross-population study of noninfarct vs infarct patients. Heart Rhythm 2014;11:2018–26.CrossRef Nadour W, Doyle M, Williams RB, et al. Does the presence of Q waves on the EKG accurately predict prior myocardial infarction when compared to cardiac magnetic resonance using late gadolinium enhancement? A cross-population study of noninfarct vs infarct patients. Heart Rhythm 2014;11:2018–26.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sandler LL, Pinnow EE, Lindsay J. The accuracy of electrocardiographic Q waves for the detection of prior myocardial infarction as assessed by a novel standard of reference. Clin Cardiol 2004;27:97–100.CrossRef Sandler LL, Pinnow EE, Lindsay J. The accuracy of electrocardiographic Q waves for the detection of prior myocardial infarction as assessed by a novel standard of reference. Clin Cardiol 2004;27:97–100.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Taneja AK, Hayat S, Swinburn J, et al. Usefulness of Q waves on ECG for the prediction of contractile reserve after acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 2010;145:265–6.CrossRef Taneja AK, Hayat S, Swinburn J, et al. Usefulness of Q waves on ECG for the prediction of contractile reserve after acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 2010;145:265–6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Al-Mohammad A, Norton MY, Mahy IR, et al. Can the surface electrocardiogram be used to predict myocardial viability? Heart 1999;82:663–7.CrossRef Al-Mohammad A, Norton MY, Mahy IR, et al. Can the surface electrocardiogram be used to predict myocardial viability? Heart 1999;82:663–7.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gibson CM, Nafee T, Kerneis M. Silent myocardial infarction: Listen to the evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:9–11.CrossRef Gibson CM, Nafee T, Kerneis M. Silent myocardial infarction: Listen to the evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:9–11.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Zhang ZM, Rautaharju PM, Prineas RJ, et al. Race and sex differences in the incidence and prognostic significance of silent myocardial infarction in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Circulation 2016;133:2141–8.CrossRef Zhang ZM, Rautaharju PM, Prineas RJ, et al. Race and sex differences in the incidence and prognostic significance of silent myocardial infarction in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Circulation 2016;133:2141–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Farag AA, AlJaroudi W, Neill J, et al. Prognostic value of silent myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease being evaluated for kidney transplantation. Int J Cardiol 2017;249:377–82.CrossRef Farag AA, AlJaroudi W, Neill J, et al. Prognostic value of silent myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease being evaluated for kidney transplantation. Int J Cardiol 2017;249:377–82.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Soliman EZ. Electrocardiographic definition of silent myocardial infarction in population studies: A call to standardize the standards. J Electrocardiol 2019;55:128–32.CrossRef Soliman EZ. Electrocardiographic definition of silent myocardial infarction in population studies: A call to standardize the standards. J Electrocardiol 2019;55:128–32.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Myocardial infarction assessment by surface electrocardiography
Authors
Haren Patel, MD
Harish Doppalapudi, MD
Fadi G. Hage, MD, MASNC
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01903-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 4/2021 Go to the issue