Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Original research article

Efficiency and equity considerations in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel

Authors: Amir Shmueli, Ofra Golan, Francesco Paolucci, Emmanouil Mentzakis

Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is a traditional tension in public policy between the maximization of welfare from given resources (efficiency) and considerations related to the distribution of welfare among the population and to social justice (equity). The aim of this paper is to measure the relative weights of the efficiency- and equity-enhancing criteria in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel, and to compare the Israeli results with those of other countries.

Methods

We used the criteria of efficiency and equity which were adopted in a previous international study, adapted to Israel. The equity criteria, as defined in the international study, are: severity of the disease, age (young vs. elderly), and the extent to which the poor are subsidized. Efficiency is represented by the criteria: the potential number of beneficiaries, the extent of the health benefits to the patient, and the results of economic assessments (cost per QALY gained). We contacted 147 policy-makers, 65 of whom completed the survey (a response rate of 44%). Using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) methodology by 1000Minds software, we estimated the relative weights of these seven criteria, and predicted the desirability of technologies characterized by profiles of the criteria.

Results

The overall weight attached to the four efficiency criteria was 46% and that of the three equity criteria was 54%. The most important criteria were “financing of the technology is required so that the poor will be able to receive it” and the level of individual benefit. “The technology is intended to be used by the elderly” criterion appeared as the least important, taking the seventh place. Policy-makers who had experience as members of the Basket Committee appear to prefer efficiency criteria more than those who had never participated in the Basket Committee deliberations. While the efficiency consideration gained preference in most countries studied, Israel is unique in its balance between the weights attached to equity and efficiency considerations by health policy-makers.

Discussion

The study explored the trade-off between efficiency and equity considerations in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel. The way these declarative preferences have been expressed in actual policy decisions remains to be explored.
Footnotes
1
Based on the final report which was submitted to the National Institute for Health Policy Research, as was given to us by courtesy of the researchers and of the National Institute.
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference Culyer AJ. The bogus conflict between efficiency and vertical equity. Health Econ. 2006;15:1155–8.CrossRefPubMed Culyer AJ. The bogus conflict between efficiency and vertical equity. Health Econ. 2006;15:1155–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Williams A, Tsuchiya A, Dolan P. Eliciting equity efficiency trade-offs in health. In: Smith P, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, editors. Health Policy and Economics: Opportunities and Challenges. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005. p. 64–87. Williams A, Tsuchiya A, Dolan P. Eliciting equity efficiency trade-offs in health. In: Smith P, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, editors. Health Policy and Economics: Opportunities and Challenges. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005. p. 64–87.
4.
go back to reference Mirelman A, et al. Decision making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency. Value Health. 2012;15:534–9.CrossRefPubMed Mirelman A, et al. Decision making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency. Value Health. 2012;15:534–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mentzakis E, Paolucci F, Rubicko G. Priority setting in the Austrian healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment and implications for mental health. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2014;17(2):61–73.PubMed Mentzakis E, Paolucci F, Rubicko G. Priority setting in the Austrian healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment and implications for mental health. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2014;17(2):61–73.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Paolucci F. et al. Equity and efficiency preferences of health policy makers in China—a stated preference analysis. Health Policy and Planning. 2015;30(8):1059–66. Paolucci F. et al. Equity and efficiency preferences of health policy makers in China—a stated preference analysis. Health Policy and Planning. 2015;30(8):1059–66.
9.
go back to reference Baji P. et al. Comparative analysis of decision makers preferences for equity/efficiency attributes in reimbursement decisions in three European countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(7):791–9. Baji P. et al. Comparative analysis of decision makers preferences for equity/efficiency attributes in reimbursement decisions in three European countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(7):791–9.
10.
go back to reference Golan O, et al. Health technology prioritization: which criteria for prioritizing new technologies and what are their relative weights? Health Policy. 2011;102:126–35.CrossRefPubMed Golan O, et al. Health technology prioritization: which criteria for prioritizing new technologies and what are their relative weights? Health Policy. 2011;102:126–35.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tal O, Kidar N. On Equity in the Health System – Perceptions and Attitudes in Israel. The National Institute of Health Policy Research, Tel HaShomer, Research report; 2011. Tal O, Kidar N. On Equity in the Health System – Perceptions and Attitudes in Israel. The National Institute of Health Policy Research, Tel HaShomer, Research report; 2011.
12.
go back to reference Ryan M, et al., editors. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Amsterdam: Springer; 2008. Ryan M, et al., editors. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Amsterdam: Springer; 2008.
13.
go back to reference Hansen P, Ombler F. A New Method for Scoring Multi-Attribute Value Models Using Pairwise Rankings of Alternatives”. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal. 2008;15:87–107.CrossRef Hansen P, Ombler F. A New Method for Scoring Multi-Attribute Value Models Using Pairwise Rankings of Alternatives”. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal. 2008;15:87–107.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Efficiency and equity considerations in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel
Authors
Amir Shmueli
Ofra Golan
Francesco Paolucci
Emmanouil Mentzakis
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2045-4015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-017-0142-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2017 Go to the issue