Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2014

01-04-2014 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Efficacy, safety, and trends in assisted reproductive technology in Japan-analysis of four-year data from the national registry system

Authors: Kazumi Takeshima, Hidekazu Saito, Aritoshi Nakaza, Akira Kuwahara, Osamu Ishihara, Minoru Irahara, Humiki Hirahara, Yasunori Yoshimura, Tetsuro Sakumoto

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and trends in assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Japan.

Methods

Data pertaining to treatment cycles, pregnancy rate, live birth rate, age distribution, single embryo transfer rate, and multiple pregnancy rate were analyzed for patients registered in the national ART registry system of Japan from 2007 to 2010.

Results

The total number of treatment cycles was 161,164, 190,613, 213,800, and 242,161 in 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively. The number of ART treatments administered to patients aged ≥40 years was 31.2 %, 32.1 %, 33.4 %, and 35.7 %, respectively, showing an increasing trend from 2007 to 2010. In each of these years, the total pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 24.4 %, 21.9 %, 22.3 %, and 21.9 % for fresh cycles, respectively, and 32.0 %, 32.1 %, 32.5 %, and 33.7 % for frozen cycles, respectively. The single embryo transfer rate was 49.9 %, 63.6 %, 70.6 %, and 73.0 %, respectively, showing an increasing trend, while the multiple pregnancy rate was 11.5 %, 6.8 %, 5.3 %, and 4.8 %, respectively, showing a decreasing trend.

Conclusions

From 2007 to 2010 in Japan, the number of ART treatment cycles, number of elderly patients treated, and the single embryo transfer rate increased, while the multiple pregnancy rate decreased. However, the overall pregnancy rate remained stable during the study period.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978;2:312–66. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978;2:312–66.
2.
go back to reference Suzuki M, Hoshi K, Hoshiai H, Saito A, Momono K, Mori R, et al. Pregnancy obtained by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Jpn J Fertil Steril. 1983;28:439–43. Suzuki M, Hoshi K, Hoshiai H, Saito A, Momono K, Mori R, et al. Pregnancy obtained by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Jpn J Fertil Steril. 1983;28:439–43.
8.
go back to reference Nakashima A, Araki R, Tani H, Ishihara O, Kuwahara A, Irahara M, et al. Implications of assisted reproductive technologies on term singleton birth weight; an analysis of 25777 children in the national assisted reproduction registry Japan. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:450–5.PubMedCrossRef Nakashima A, Araki R, Tani H, Ishihara O, Kuwahara A, Irahara M, et al. Implications of assisted reproductive technologies on term singleton birth weight; an analysis of 25777 children in the national assisted reproduction registry Japan. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:450–5.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference de Mouzon J, Goosens V, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Ferraretti AP, Korsak V, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe 2007; results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:954–66.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef de Mouzon J, Goosens V, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Ferraretti AP, Korsak V, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe 2007; results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:954–66.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, de Mouzon J, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Kosak V, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe 2008; results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2571–84.PubMedCrossRef Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, de Mouzon J, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Kosak V, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe 2008; results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2571–84.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Georgina M, Elizabeth A, Ishihara O, Michael G, David G. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology; a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2281–94.CrossRef Georgina M, Elizabeth A, Ishihara O, Michael G, David G. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology; a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2281–94.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sullivan EA, Wang YA, Hayward I, Chambers GM, Illingworth P, McBain J, et al. Single embryo transfer reduces the risk of perinatal mortality, a population study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:3609–15.PubMedCrossRef Sullivan EA, Wang YA, Hayward I, Chambers GM, Illingworth P, McBain J, et al. Single embryo transfer reduces the risk of perinatal mortality, a population study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:3609–15.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference McLernon DJ, Harrild K, Bergh C, Davies MJ, de Neubourg D, Dumoulin JC, et al. Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials. BMJ. 2010. doi:10.1136/bmj.c6945.PubMedCentralPubMed McLernon DJ, Harrild K, Bergh C, Davies MJ, de Neubourg D, Dumoulin JC, et al. Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials. BMJ. 2010. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​c6945.PubMedCentralPubMed
20.
go back to reference Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, Jablonowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell A, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2392–402.PubMedCrossRef Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, Jablonowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell A, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2392–402.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:835–42.CrossRef American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:835–42.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pandian Z, Marjoribanks J, Ozturk O, Serour G, Bhattacharya S. Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilization or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. doi:10.1002/14651858. CD003416.pub4.PubMed Pandian Z, Marjoribanks J, Ozturk O, Serour G, Bhattacharya S. Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilization or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. doi:10.​1002/​14651858. CD003416.pub4.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy, safety, and trends in assisted reproductive technology in Japan-analysis of four-year data from the national registry system
Authors
Kazumi Takeshima
Hidekazu Saito
Aritoshi Nakaza
Akira Kuwahara
Osamu Ishihara
Minoru Irahara
Humiki Hirahara
Yasunori Yoshimura
Tetsuro Sakumoto
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0181-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2014 Go to the issue