Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Article

Efficacy of Lafutidine Versus Famotidine in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-inferiority Phase III Trial

Authors: Eun Hye Kim, Yong Chan Lee, Young Woon Chang, Jong-Jae Park, Hoon Jai Chun, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Hyun-Soo Kim, Hyun Yong Jeong, Sang-Young Seol, Sok Won Han, Myung-Gyu Choi, Soo-Heon Park, Ok-Jae Lee, Jin Tae Jung, Dong Ho Lee, Hyun Chae Jung, Soo Teik Lee, Jae Gyu Kim, Sei Jin Youn, Hak Yang Kim, Sang Woo Lee

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There has been no study on the efficacy of lafutidine for patients with reflux esophagitis in Korea.

Aim

To evaluate the efficacy of a new-generation histamine-2 receptor antagonist, lafutidine, in comparison with famotidine in patients with reflux esophagitis.

Methods

This was a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial enrolling patients with erosive esophagitis. The efficacy and safety of 20 mg lafutidine (treatment group) were compared with those of 40 mg famotidine (control group) and 20 mg omeprazole (reference group). The primary endpoint was the complete healing rates of reflux esophagitis on endoscopy after 8 weeks of treatment. The non-inferiority margin was assumed to be −15 %.

Results

The healing rates of reflux esophagitis on endoscopy after 8 weeks of treatment were 70.14 % (101/144) in the lafutidine, 63.45 % (92/145) in the famotidine, and 85.71 % (126/147) in the omeprazole group. The difference in healing rates between the lafutidine and famotidine groups was 6.69 % (95 % confidence interval = [−4.14 to 17.52]). In addition, lafutidine was superior to famotidine in clinical improvement (53.73 % vs. 39.55 %, P = 0.0200).

Conclusions

Lafutidine was non-inferior to famotidine in healing of reflux esophagitis. Lafutidine, however, was superior to famotidine in terms of symptom relief of reflux esophagitis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cho YS, Choi MG, Jeong JJ, et al. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Asan-si, Korea. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:747–753.CrossRefPubMed Cho YS, Choi MG, Jeong JJ, et al. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Asan-si, Korea. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:747–753.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bai Y, Du Y, Zou D, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ) in real-world practice: a national multicenter survey on 8065 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:626–631.CrossRefPubMed Bai Y, Du Y, Zou D, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ) in real-world practice: a national multicenter survey on 8065 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:626–631.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cho YK, Kim GH, Kim JH, et al. Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2010;55:279–295.CrossRefPubMed Cho YK, Kim GH, Kim JH, et al. Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2010;55:279–295.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wong BC, Kinoshita Y. Systematic review on epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Asia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:398–407.CrossRefPubMed Wong BC, Kinoshita Y. Systematic review on epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Asia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:398–407.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Khan M, Santana J, Donnellan C, et al. Medical treatments in the short term management of reflux oesophagitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;18:CD003244. Khan M, Santana J, Donnellan C, et al. Medical treatments in the short term management of reflux oesophagitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;18:CD003244.
7.
go back to reference Gray SL, LaCroix AZ, Larson J, et al. Proton pump inhibitor use, hip fracture, and change in bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the Women’s Health Initiative. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:765–771.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Gray SL, LaCroix AZ, Larson J, et al. Proton pump inhibitor use, hip fracture, and change in bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the Women’s Health Initiative. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:765–771.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
8.
go back to reference Herzig SJ, Howell MD, Ngo LH, et al. Acid-suppressive medication use and the risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia. JAMA. 2009;301:2120–2128.CrossRefPubMed Herzig SJ, Howell MD, Ngo LH, et al. Acid-suppressive medication use and the risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia. JAMA. 2009;301:2120–2128.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hess MW, Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ, et al. Systematic review: hypomagnesaemia induced by proton pump inhibition. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;36:405–413.CrossRefPubMed Hess MW, Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ, et al. Systematic review: hypomagnesaemia induced by proton pump inhibition. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;36:405–413.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Howell MD, Novack V, Grgurich P, et al. Iatrogenic gastric acid suppression and the risk of nosocomial Clostridium difficile infection. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:784–790.CrossRefPubMed Howell MD, Novack V, Grgurich P, et al. Iatrogenic gastric acid suppression and the risk of nosocomial Clostridium difficile infection. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:784–790.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sierra F, Suarez M, Rey M, et al. Systematic review: proton pump inhibitor-associated acute interstitial nephritis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:545–553.CrossRefPubMed Sierra F, Suarez M, Rey M, et al. Systematic review: proton pump inhibitor-associated acute interstitial nephritis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:545–553.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Inamori M, Togawa J, Iwasaki T, et al. Early effects of lafutidine or rabeprazole on intragastric acidity: which drug is more suitable for on-demand use? J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:453–458.CrossRefPubMed Inamori M, Togawa J, Iwasaki T, et al. Early effects of lafutidine or rabeprazole on intragastric acidity: which drug is more suitable for on-demand use? J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:453–458.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nakano M, Ajioka H, Abe M, et al. Possible involvement of host defense mechanism in the suppression of rat acute reflux esophagitis by the particular histamine H2 receptor antagonist lafutidine. Pharmacology. 2012;90:205–211.CrossRefPubMed Nakano M, Ajioka H, Abe M, et al. Possible involvement of host defense mechanism in the suppression of rat acute reflux esophagitis by the particular histamine H2 receptor antagonist lafutidine. Pharmacology. 2012;90:205–211.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Saegusa Y, Ichikawa T, Iwai T, et al. Effects of acid antisecretory drugs on mucus barrier of the rat against 5-fluorouracil-induced gastrointestinal mucositis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:531–537.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Saegusa Y, Ichikawa T, Iwai T, et al. Effects of acid antisecretory drugs on mucus barrier of the rat against 5-fluorouracil-induced gastrointestinal mucositis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:531–537.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
15.
go back to reference Edelsbrunner ME, Nakano M, Holzer P. Afferent signalling from the acid-challenged rat stomach is inhibited and gastric acid elimination is enhanced by lafutidine. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009;9:40.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Edelsbrunner ME, Nakano M, Holzer P. Afferent signalling from the acid-challenged rat stomach is inhibited and gastric acid elimination is enhanced by lafutidine. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009;9:40.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nakano M, Kitano S, Nanri M, et al. Lafutidine, a unique histamine H2-receptor antagonist, inhibits distention-induced gastric acid secretion through an H2 receptor-independent mechanism. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;658:236–241.CrossRefPubMed Nakano M, Kitano S, Nanri M, et al. Lafutidine, a unique histamine H2-receptor antagonist, inhibits distention-induced gastric acid secretion through an H2 receptor-independent mechanism. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;658:236–241.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Higuchi K, Watanabe T, Tominaga K, et al. Lafutidine can improve the quality of gastric ulcer healing in humans: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. Inflammopharmacology. 2006;14:226–230.CrossRefPubMed Higuchi K, Watanabe T, Tominaga K, et al. Lafutidine can improve the quality of gastric ulcer healing in humans: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. Inflammopharmacology. 2006;14:226–230.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ohara S, Haruma K, Kinoshita Y, et al. A double-blind, controlled study comparing lafutidine with placebo and famotidine in Japanese patients with mild reflux esophagitis. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:1219–1227.CrossRefPubMed Ohara S, Haruma K, Kinoshita Y, et al. A double-blind, controlled study comparing lafutidine with placebo and famotidine in Japanese patients with mild reflux esophagitis. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:1219–1227.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, et al. The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:85–92.CrossRefPubMed Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, et al. The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:85–92.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Boeckxstaens GE, Rohof WO. Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2014;43:15–25.CrossRefPubMed Boeckxstaens GE, Rohof WO. Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2014;43:15–25.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference DeVault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:190–200.CrossRefPubMed DeVault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:190–200.CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
24.
go back to reference Fass R, Fennerty MB, Vakil N. Nonerosive reflux disease–current concepts and dilemmas. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:303–314.PubMed Fass R, Fennerty MB, Vakil N. Nonerosive reflux disease–current concepts and dilemmas. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:303–314.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Habu Y, Maeda K, Kusuda T, et al. “Proton-pump inhibitor-first” strategy versus “step-up” strategy for the acute treatment of reflux esophagitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:1029–1035.CrossRefPubMed Habu Y, Maeda K, Kusuda T, et al. “Proton-pump inhibitor-first” strategy versus “step-up” strategy for the acute treatment of reflux esophagitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:1029–1035.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Reynolds JC. Individualized acute treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1995;213:17–24.PubMed Reynolds JC. Individualized acute treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1995;213:17–24.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy of Lafutidine Versus Famotidine in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-inferiority Phase III Trial
Authors
Eun Hye Kim
Yong Chan Lee
Young Woon Chang
Jong-Jae Park
Hoon Jai Chun
Hwoon-Yong Jung
Hyun-Soo Kim
Hyun Yong Jeong
Sang-Young Seol
Sok Won Han
Myung-Gyu Choi
Soo-Heon Park
Ok-Jae Lee
Jin Tae Jung
Dong Ho Lee
Hyun Chae Jung
Soo Teik Lee
Jae Gyu Kim
Sei Jin Youn
Hak Yang Kim
Sang Woo Lee
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3489-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine