Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2015

01-12-2015

Efficacy of intracorporeal reinforcing sutures for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer

Authors: Kiyoshi Maeda, Hisashi Nagahara, Masatsune Shibutani, Hiroshi Ohtani, Katsunobu Sakurai, Takahiro Toyokawa, Kazuya Muguruma, Hiroaki Tanaka, Ryosuke Amano, Kenjiro Kimura, Kenji Sugano, Teturo Ikeya, Yasuhito Iseki, Kosei Hirakawa

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of intracorporeal reinforcing sutures for preventing anastomotic leakage (AL) after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Methods

This was a retrospective single-institution study consisting of 201 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic proctectomy with double-stapling anastomosis for primary rectal cancer between August 2007 and December 2013. The data for patients who received intracorporeal reinforcing sutures were compared with those of patients who did not receive reinforcing sutures. Patient-, tumor- and surgery-related variables were collected and examined using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

The overall incidence of AL was 9.0 % (18/201). No significant correlations were observed between the various clinicopathological factors and the use of reinforcing sutures. The multivariate analyses revealed the distance of the tumor from the anal verge, tumor size and presence of reinforcing sutures to be independent risk factors for AL. We classified the patients into two risk groups using a combination of the tumor site and tumor size: a low-risk group (patients without any risk factors, n = 134) and a high-risk group (patients with one or two risk factors, n = 67). The frequency of AL was significantly lower (p < 0.02) in the patients treated with reinforcing sutures than in those treated without reinforcing sutures in the high-risk group. However, no significant differences were observed in the low-risk group.

Conclusions

The use of intracorporeal reinforcing sutures may reduce the incidence of AL. A prospective randomized trial is required to evaluate the effects of reinforcing sutures in preventing AL.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192CrossRefPubMed Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional vs laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicenter, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 350:2050–2059 Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional vs laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicenter, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 350:2050–2059
3.
go back to reference Patankar SK, Larach SW, Ferrara A, Willamson PR, Gallagher JT, Dejesus S, Narayanan S (2003) Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period. Dis Colon Rectum 46:601–611CrossRefPubMed Patankar SK, Larach SW, Ferrara A, Willamson PR, Gallagher JT, Dejesus S, Narayanan S (2003) Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period. Dis Colon Rectum 46:601–611CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, Lei WZ, Yu YY, Cheng Z, Li L, Shu Y, Wang TC (2004) Laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18:1211–1215CrossRefPubMed Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, Lei WZ, Yu YY, Cheng Z, Li L, Shu Y, Wang TC (2004) Laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18:1211–1215CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kujan J, Valero G, Hernmandez Q, Sanchez A, Frutos MD, Parrilla P (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:982–989CrossRef Kujan J, Valero G, Hernmandez Q, Sanchez A, Frutos MD, Parrilla P (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:982–989CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Milson JW, de Oliveria O, Trencheva KI Jr, Panddey S, Lee SW, Sonoda T (2009) Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing curative laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1215–1222CrossRef Milson JW, de Oliveria O, Trencheva KI Jr, Panddey S, Lee SW, Sonoda T (2009) Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing curative laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1215–1222CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Taflamps P, Christodoulakins M, Tsiftsis D (2009) Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: facts, Obscurity and Fiction. Surg Today 39:183–188CrossRef Taflamps P, Christodoulakins M, Tsiftsis D (2009) Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: facts, Obscurity and Fiction. Surg Today 39:183–188CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M, Mancuso CA, Lee SW, Sonoda T, Michelassi F, Charlson ME, Milson JW (2013) Identifying important predictors of anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients. Ann Surg 257:108–113CrossRefPubMed Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M, Mancuso CA, Lee SW, Sonoda T, Michelassi F, Charlson ME, Milson JW (2013) Identifying important predictors of anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients. Ann Surg 257:108–113CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Caulfield H, Hyman NH (2013) Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection: a spectrum of clinical entities. JAMA Surg 148:177–182CrossRefPubMed Caulfield H, Hyman NH (2013) Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection: a spectrum of clinical entities. JAMA Surg 148:177–182CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, Nagayama S, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Kuroyanagi H, Yamaguchi T (2012) Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intra corporeal rectal transaction and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 202:259–264CrossRef Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, Nagayama S, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Kuroyanagi H, Yamaguchi T (2012) Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intra corporeal rectal transaction and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 202:259–264CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Inada R, Moriya Y, Yamamoto S (2012) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer using a stapling technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Perctan Tech 22:239–243CrossRef Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Inada R, Moriya Y, Yamamoto S (2012) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer using a stapling technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Perctan Tech 22:239–243CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Hida K, Hirai K, Okoshi K, Nomura A, Kawamura J, Nagayama S, Sakai Y (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc 28:2988–2995PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Hida K, Hirai K, Okoshi K, Nomura A, Kawamura J, Nagayama S, Sakai Y (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc 28:2988–2995PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Park JS, Choi GS, Kim SH, Kim HR, Kim NK, Lee KY, Kang SB, Kim JY, Lee KY, Kim BC, Bae BN, Son GM, Lee SH, Kang H (2013) Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision. Ann Surg 257:665–671CrossRefPubMed Park JS, Choi GS, Kim SH, Kim HR, Kim NK, Lee KY, Kang SB, Kim JY, Lee KY, Kim BC, Bae BN, Son GM, Lee SH, Kang H (2013) Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision. Ann Surg 257:665–671CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kim JS, Cho SY, Min BS, Kim NK (2009) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with double stapling technique. J Am Coll Surg 209:694–701CrossRefPubMed Kim JS, Cho SY, Min BS, Kim NK (2009) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with double stapling technique. J Am Coll Surg 209:694–701CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Branagan P, Finnis D (2005) Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1021–1026CrossRefPubMed Branagan P, Finnis D (2005) Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1021–1026CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ (2004) Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after anterior resection after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240:255–259PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ (2004) Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after anterior resection after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240:255–259PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Krarup PM, Nordholm-Carstensen A, Jorgensen LN, Harling H (2014) Anastomotic leak increases distant recurrence and long-term mortality after curative resection for colonic cancer—a nationwide cohort study. Ann Surg 259:930–938CrossRefPubMed Krarup PM, Nordholm-Carstensen A, Jorgensen LN, Harling H (2014) Anastomotic leak increases distant recurrence and long-term mortality after curative resection for colonic cancer—a nationwide cohort study. Ann Surg 259:930–938CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW (2009) Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:462–472CrossRefPubMed Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW (2009) Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:462–472CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Tsunoda Y, Saito N (2008) Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:703–707CrossRefPubMed Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Tsunoda Y, Saito N (2008) Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:703–707CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Xiao L, Zhang WB, Jiang PC, Bu XF, Yan Q, Zhang YJ, Yu F (2010) Can transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma reduce anastomotic leakage rate? A single-institution prospective randomized study. World J Surg 35:1367–1377CrossRef Xiao L, Zhang WB, Jiang PC, Bu XF, Yan Q, Zhang YJ, Yu F (2010) Can transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma reduce anastomotic leakage rate? A single-institution prospective randomized study. World J Surg 35:1367–1377CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zhao WT, Hu FL, Li YY, Li HJ, Luo WM, Sun F (2013) Use of a transanal drainage tube for prevention of anastomotic leakage and bleeding after anterior resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg 37:227–232CrossRefPubMed Zhao WT, Hu FL, Li YY, Li HJ, Luo WM, Sun F (2013) Use of a transanal drainage tube for prevention of anastomotic leakage and bleeding after anterior resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg 37:227–232CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Nishigori H, Ito M, NIshizawa Y, Kobayashi A, Sugito M, Saito N (2014) Effectiveness of a transanal tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancers surgery. World J Surg 38:1843–1851CrossRefPubMed Nishigori H, Ito M, NIshizawa Y, Kobayashi A, Sugito M, Saito N (2014) Effectiveness of a transanal tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancers surgery. World J Surg 38:1843–1851CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Gadiot RPM, Dunker MS, Mearadji A, Hannaerts GHH (2011) Reduction of anastomotic failure in laparoscopic antitraction sutures. Surg Endosc 25:68–71CrossRefPubMed Gadiot RPM, Dunker MS, Mearadji A, Hannaerts GHH (2011) Reduction of anastomotic failure in laparoscopic antitraction sutures. Surg Endosc 25:68–71CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy of intracorporeal reinforcing sutures for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
Authors
Kiyoshi Maeda
Hisashi Nagahara
Masatsune Shibutani
Hiroshi Ohtani
Katsunobu Sakurai
Takahiro Toyokawa
Kazuya Muguruma
Hiroaki Tanaka
Ryosuke Amano
Kenjiro Kimura
Kenji Sugano
Teturo Ikeya
Yasuhito Iseki
Kosei Hirakawa
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4104-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2015 Go to the issue