Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 6/2014

01-12-2014 | Clinical Investigation

Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Cryoablation for Stage 1A/B Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Prospective, Single-Arm, 5-Year Study

Authors: Christos S. Georgiades, Ron Rodriguez

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Percutaneous cryoablation is gaining in popularity as a viable treatment option for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We present the 5-year oncologic outcomes of a prospective trial.

Methods

Over a 5-year period, we treated 134 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven RCC with CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation. All were treated while under conscious sedation. Technical objective was for the ice ball to cover the lesion plus a 5-mm margin. Hydro- or air dissection was utilized to aid in technical success as needed. Efficacy was defined as the lack of enhancement and/or enlargement of a previously enhancing lesion on follow-up imaging. Safety was assessed by the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), version 4.0.

Results

The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation for RCC was 99.2, 99.2, 98.9, 98.5, and 97.0 %, respectively. Median tumor size was 2.8 ± 1.4 cm. All-cause mortality during the study period was 3 (none from RCC), yielding an overall 5-year survival of 97.8 %. The cancer-specific 5-year survival was 100 %. No patient developed metastatic disease during the follow-up period. The overall significant CTCAE version 4.0 complication rate was 6 %, with the most frequent being transfusion-requiring hemorrhage, at 1.6 %. There was one 30-day mortality unrelated to the procedure.

Conclusion

CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation for renal cancer offers very high efficacy, approaching that of the gold standard, with a more favorable safety profile.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rodriguez R, Cizman Z, Hong K, Koliatsos A et al (2011) Prospective analysis of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation for pT1NxMx biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 34:573–578PubMedCrossRef Rodriguez R, Cizman Z, Hong K, Koliatsos A et al (2011) Prospective analysis of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation for pT1NxMx biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 34:573–578PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Park S, Anderson JK, Matsumoto ED et al (2006) Radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors: intermediate-term results. J Endourol 20:569–573PubMedCrossRef Park S, Anderson JK, Matsumoto ED et al (2006) Radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors: intermediate-term results. J Endourol 20:569–573PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tracy CR, Raman JD, Donnally C et al (2010) Durable oncologic outcomes after radiofrequency ablation: experience from treating 243 small renal masses over 7.5 years. Cancer 116:3135–3142PubMedCrossRef Tracy CR, Raman JD, Donnally C et al (2010) Durable oncologic outcomes after radiofrequency ablation: experience from treating 243 small renal masses over 7.5 years. Cancer 116:3135–3142PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Guan W, Bai J, Liu J et al (2012) Microwave ablation versus partial nephrectomy for small renal tumors: intermediate-term results. J Surg Oncol 106:316–321PubMedCrossRef Guan W, Bai J, Liu J et al (2012) Microwave ablation versus partial nephrectomy for small renal tumors: intermediate-term results. J Surg Oncol 106:316–321PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Long CJ, Kutikov A, Canter DJ et al (2011) Percutaneous vs surgical cryoablation of the small renal mass: is efficacy compromised? BJU Int 107:1376–1380PubMedCrossRef Long CJ, Kutikov A, Canter DJ et al (2011) Percutaneous vs surgical cryoablation of the small renal mass: is efficacy compromised? BJU Int 107:1376–1380PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Joniau S, Tsivian M, Gontero P (2011) Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of small renal masses: safety and oncologic efficacy. Minerva Urol Nefrol 63:227–236PubMed Joniau S, Tsivian M, Gontero P (2011) Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of small renal masses: safety and oncologic efficacy. Minerva Urol Nefrol 63:227–236PubMed
7.
go back to reference Schmit GD, Atwell TD, Callstrom MR et al (2010) Percutaneous cryoablation of renal masses > or =3 cm: efficacy and safety in treatment of 108 patients. J Endourol 24:1255–1262PubMedCrossRef Schmit GD, Atwell TD, Callstrom MR et al (2010) Percutaneous cryoablation of renal masses > or =3 cm: efficacy and safety in treatment of 108 patients. J Endourol 24:1255–1262PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Goyal J, Verma P, Sidana A et al (2012) Single-center comparative oncologic outcomes of surgical and percutaneous cryoablation for treatment of renal tumors. J Endourol 26:1413–1419PubMedCrossRef Goyal J, Verma P, Sidana A et al (2012) Single-center comparative oncologic outcomes of surgical and percutaneous cryoablation for treatment of renal tumors. J Endourol 26:1413–1419PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hillyer SP, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME et al (2013) Robotic partial nephrectomy for solitary kidney: a multi-institutional analysis. Urology 81:93–97PubMedCrossRef Hillyer SP, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME et al (2013) Robotic partial nephrectomy for solitary kidney: a multi-institutional analysis. Urology 81:93–97PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Bertolo R, Scarpa RM (2011) Does tumour size really affect the safety of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy? BJU Int 108:268–273PubMedCrossRef Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Bertolo R, Scarpa RM (2011) Does tumour size really affect the safety of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy? BJU Int 108:268–273PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yao K, Zhou LQ, Li XS et al (2010) Analysis of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for small renal cell carcinoma. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 48:372–374PubMed Yao K, Zhou LQ, Li XS et al (2010) Analysis of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for small renal cell carcinoma. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 48:372–374PubMed
12.
go back to reference Atwell TD, Schmit GD, Boorjian SA et al (2013) Percutaneous ablation for renal masses measuring 3.0 cm and smaller: comparative local control and complications after radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. Am J Roentgenol 200:461–466CrossRef Atwell TD, Schmit GD, Boorjian SA et al (2013) Percutaneous ablation for renal masses measuring 3.0 cm and smaller: comparative local control and complications after radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. Am J Roentgenol 200:461–466CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Atwell TD, Carter RE, Schmit GD et al (2012) Complications following 573 percutaneous renal radiofrequency and cryoablation procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:48–54PubMedCrossRef Atwell TD, Carter RE, Schmit GD et al (2012) Complications following 573 percutaneous renal radiofrequency and cryoablation procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:48–54PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Truesdale CM, Soulen MC, Clark TW et al (2013) Percutaneous computed tomography–guided renal mass radiofrequency ablation versus cryoablation: doses of sedation medication used. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:347–350PubMedCrossRef Truesdale CM, Soulen MC, Clark TW et al (2013) Percutaneous computed tomography–guided renal mass radiofrequency ablation versus cryoablation: doses of sedation medication used. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:347–350PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jilg CA, Neumann HP, Gläsker S et al (2012) Growth kinetics in von Hippel–Lindau-associated renal cell carcinoma. Urol Int 88:71–78PubMedCrossRef Jilg CA, Neumann HP, Gläsker S et al (2012) Growth kinetics in von Hippel–Lindau-associated renal cell carcinoma. Urol Int 88:71–78PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Cryoablation for Stage 1A/B Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Prospective, Single-Arm, 5-Year Study
Authors
Christos S. Georgiades
Ron Rodriguez
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0831-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 6/2014 Go to the issue