Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

Effects of postural specific sensorimotor training in patients with chronic low back pain: study protocol for randomised controlled trial

Authors: Michael A. McCaskey, Corina Schuster-Amft, Brigitte Wirth, Eling D. de Bruin

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Sensorimotor training (SMT) is popularly applied as a preventive or rehabilitative exercise method in various sports and rehabilitation settings. Yet, there is only low-quality evidence on its effect on pain and function. This randomised controlled trial will investigate the effects of a theory-based SMT in rehabilitation of chronic (>3 months) non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) patients.

Methods/Design

A pilot study with a parallel, single-blinded, randomised controlled design. Twenty adult patients referred to the clinic for CNLBP treatment will be included, randomised, and allocated to one of two groups. Each group will receive 9 x 30 minutes of standard physiotherapy (PT) treatment. The experimental group will receive an added 15 minutes of SMT. For SMT, proprioceptive postural exercises are performed on a labile platform with adjustable oscillation to provoke training effects on different entry levels. The active comparator group will perform 15 minutes of added sub-effective low-intensity endurance training. Outcomes are assessed on 4 time-points by a treatment blinded tester: eligibility assessment at baseline (BL) 2–4 days prior to intervention, pre-intervention assessment (T0), post-intervention assessment (T1), and at 4 weeks follow-up (FU). At BL, an additional healthy control group (n = 20) will be assessed to allow cross-sectional comparison with symptom-free participants. The main outcomes are self-reported pain (Visual Analogue Scale) and functional status (Oswestry Disability Index). For secondary analysis, postural control variables after an externally perturbed stance on a labile platform are analysed using a video-based marker tracking system and a pressure plate (sagittal joint-angle variability and centre of pressure confidence ellipse). Proprioception is measured as relative cervical joint repositioning error during a head-rotation task. Effect sizes and mixed-model MANOVA (2 groups × 4 measurements for 5 dependent variables) will be calculated.

Discussion

This is the first attempt to systematically investigate effects of a theory-based sensorimotor training in patients with CNLBP. It will provide analysis of several postural segments during a dynamic task for quantitative analysis of quality and change of the task performance in relation to changes in pain and functional status.

Trial registration

Trial registry number on cliniclatrials.gov is NCT02304120, first registered on 17 November 2014.
Literature
1.
Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:s192–300.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
4.
Janda V, Frank C, Liebenson C. Evaluation of muscular imbalance. In: Liebenson C, editor. Rehabilitation of the spine: a practitioner’s manual. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 203–25.
5.
Page P. Sensorimotor training: a ‘global’ approach for balance training. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2006;10:77–84.CrossRef
6.
Otte C, Rašev E. Postural aspects of pain therapy of the locomotor system. Man Med. 2010;48:267–74.CrossRef
7.
Andersen JH, Haahr JP, Frost P. Risk factors for more severe regional musculoskeletal symptoms: a two-year prospective study of a general working population. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:1355–64.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Macfarlane GJ, Thomas E, Papageorgiou AC, Croft PR, Jayson MI, Silman AJ. Employment and physical work activities as predictors of future low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22:1143–9.CrossRef
9.
Roelen CA, Schreuder KJ, Koopmans PC, Groothoff JW. Perceived job demands relate to self-reported health complaints. Occup Med (Lond). 2008;58:58–63.CrossRef
10.
Horak FB. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing. 2006;35:ii7–ii11.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Nordin M, Carragee EJ, Hogg-Johnson S, Weiner SS, Hurwitz EL, Peloso PM, et al. Assessment of neck pain and its associated disorders: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:S101–22.CrossRef
12.
Hodges PW. Pain and motor control: from the laboratory to rehabilitation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011;21:220–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Langevin HM, Sherman KJ. Pathophysiological model for chronic low back pain integrating connective tissue and nervous system mechanisms. Med Hypotheses. 2007;68:74–80.CrossRefPubMed
14.
McCaskey MA, Schuster-Amft C, Wirth B, Suica Z, de Bruin ED. Effects of proprioceptive exercises on pain and function in chronic neck- and low back pain rehabilitation: a systematic literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:382.
15.
Clark NC, Röijezon U, Treleaven J. Proprioception in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Part 2: clinical assessment and intervention. Man Ther. 2015:20:378–87.
16.
Röijezon U, Clark NC, Treleaven J. Proprioception in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Part 1: Basic science and principles of assessment and clinical interventions. Man Ther. 2015:20:368–77.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Ashton-Miller JA, Wojtys EM, Huston LJ, Fry-Welch D. Can proprioception really be improved by exercises? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Art. 2001;9:128–36.CrossRef
18.
19.
Kim D, Van Ryssegem G, Hong J. Overcoming the myth of proprioceptive training. Clin Kinesiol (Spring). 2011;65:18–28.
20.
Kent P, Mjsund HL, Petersen DH. Does targeting manual therapy and/or exercise improve patient outcomes in nonspecific low back pain? A systematic review. BMC Med. 2010;8:22.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
Scholz JP, Schöner G. The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res. 1999;126:289–306.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P, Grp C. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:295–309.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:200.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Unequal group sizes in randomised trials: guarding against guessing. Lancet. 2002;359:966–70.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Waddell G. 1987 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences: a new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine. 1987;12:632.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee I-M, et al. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1334–59.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Kaptchuk TJ. The placebo effect in alternative medicine: can the performance of a healing ritual have clinical significance? Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:817–25.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Boeer J, Mueller O, Krauss I, Haupt G, Horstmann T. Reliability of a measurement technique to characterise standing properties and to quantify balance capabilities of healthy subjects on an unstable oscillatory platform (Posturomed). Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2010;24:40–5.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens A, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine. 1998;23:2003–13.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Mannion AF, Junge A, Fairbank JCT, Dvorak J, Grob D. Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Eur Spine J. 2005;15:55–65.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
33.
Mannion AF, Junge A, Grob D, Dvorak J, Fairbank JCT. Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 2: sensitivity to change after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J. 2005;15:66–73.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
34.
Oesch P. Assessments in Der Muskuloskelettalen Rehabilitation. Bern: Huber-Hans Verlag; 2007.
35.
Horak FB. Clinical measurement of postural control in adults. Phys Ther. 1987;67:1881–5.PubMed
36.
37.
Palmieri RM, Ingersoll CD, Stone MB, Krause BA. Center-of-pressure parameters used in the assessment of postural control. J Sport Rehabil. 2002;11:51–66.
38.
Rocchi MBL, Sisti D, Ditroilo M, Calavalle A, Panebianco R. The misuse of the confidence ellipse in evaluating statokinesigram. Italian J Sport Sci. 2005;12:169–72.
39.
Harbourne RT, Stergiou N. Movement variability and the use of nonlinear tools: principles to guide physical therapist practice. Phys Ther. 2009;89:267–82.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
40.
Scholz JP, Schöner G, Hsu WL, Jeka JJ, Horak F, Martin V. Motor equivalent control of the center of mass in response to support surface perturbations. Exp Brain Res. 2007;180:163–79.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Revel M, Minguet M, Gregoy P, Vaillant J, Manuel JL. Changes in cervicocephalic kinesthesia after a proprioceptive rehabilitation program in patients with neck pain: a randomized controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:895–9.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Jull G, Falla D, Treleaven J, Hodges P, Vicenzino B. Retraining cervical joint position sense: The effect of two exercise regimes. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:404–12.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Black DP, Smith BA, Wu J, Ulrich BD. Uncontrolled manifold analysis of segmental angle variability during walking. preadolescents with and without Down syndrome. Exp Brain Res. 2007;183:511–21.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Steiger F, Wirth B, de Bruin ED, Mannion AF. Is a positive clinical outcome after exercise therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain contingent upon a corresponding improvement in the targeted aspect(s) of performance? A systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:575–98.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
45.
Beinert K, Taube W. The effect of balance training on cervical sensorimotor function and neck pain. J Mot Behav. 2013;45:271–8.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Chung S, Lee J, Yoon J. Effects of stabilization exercise using a ball on mutifidus cross-sectional area in patients with chronic low back pain. J Sports Sci Med. 2013;12:533–41.PubMedCentralPubMed
47.
Paolucci T, Fusco A, Iosa M, Grasso MR, Spadini E, Paolucci S, et al. The efficacy of a perceptive rehabilitation on postural control in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Int J Rehabil Res. 2012;35:360–6.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Marshall PW, Murphy BA. Muscle activation changes after exercise rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1305–13.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Krishnamoorthy V, Latash ML, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM. Muscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons. Exp Brain Res. 2003;152:281–92.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Latash ML. Neurophysiological basis of movement. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2008.
51.
Demoulin C, Distrée V, Tomasella M, Crielaard JM, Vanderthommen M. Lumbar functional instability: a critical appraisal of the literature. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2007;50:677–84.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Luoto S, Aalto H, Taimela S, Hurri H, Pyykko I, Alaranta H. One-footed and externally disturbed two-footed postural control in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects. A controlled study with follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23:2081–9. discussion 2089–90.CrossRef
53.
Mientjes MI, Frank JS. Balance in chronic low back pain patients compared to healthy people under various conditions in upright standing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999;14:710–6.CrossRef
54.
Radebold A, Cholewicki J, Polzhofer GK, Greene HS. Impaired postural control of the lumbar spine is associated with delayed muscle response times in patients with chronic idiopathic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:724–30.CrossRef
55.
Cholewicki J, Greene HS, Polzhofer GK, Galloway MT, Shah RA, Radebold A. Neuromuscular function in athletes following recovery from a recent acute low back injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002;32:568–75.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Sipko T, Kuczynski M. Intensity of chronic pain modifies postural control in low back patients. Eur J Pain. 2013;17:612–620.CrossRefPubMed
57.
58.
Luomajoki H, Kool J, de Bruin ED, Airaksinen O. Movement control tests of the low back; evaluation of the difference between patients with low back pain and healthy controls. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:170.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
59.
Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378:1560–71.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
60.
Foster NE, Hill JC, Hay EM. Subgrouping patients with low back pain in primary care: are we getting any better at it? Man Ther. 2011;16:3–8.CrossRefPubMed
61.
van Tulder M, Malmivaara A, Esmail R, Koes B. Exercise therapy for low back pain - A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration back review group. Spine 2000;25:2784–796.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effects of postural specific sensorimotor training in patients with chronic low back pain: study protocol for randomised controlled trial
Authors
Michael A. McCaskey
Corina Schuster-Amft
Brigitte Wirth
Eling D. de Bruin
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1104-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Trials 1/2015 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Effectiveness of a transdiagnostic internet-based protocol for the treatment of emotional disorders versus treatment as usual in specialized care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Letter

Attention placebo control in randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions: theory and practice

Methodology

“I never expected that it would happen, coming to ask me such questions”:Ethical aspects of asking children about violence in resource poor settings

Study protocol

The PREEMPT study - evaluating smartphone-assisted n-of-1 trials in patients with chronic pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

FitForLife: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

The Beyond Ageing Project Phase 2 - a double-blind, selective prevention, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of omega-3 fatty acids and sertraline in an older age cohort at risk for depression: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial