Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 4/2015

01-12-2015

Effects of Patient Navigation on Patient Satisfaction Outcomes

Authors: Douglas M. Post, Ann Scheck McAlearney, Gregory S. Young, Jessica L. Krok-Schoen, Jesse J. Plascak, Electra D. Paskett

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Patient navigation (PN) may reduce cancer health disparities. Few studies have investigated the effects of PN on patient-reported satisfaction with care or assessed patients’ satisfaction with navigators. The objectives of this study are to test the effects of PN on patient satisfaction with cancer care, assess patients’ satisfaction with navigators, and examine the impact of barriers to care on satisfaction for persons with abnormal cancer-related screening tests or symptoms. Study participants included women and men with abnormal breast, cervical, or colorectal cancer screening tests and/or symptoms receiving care at 18 clinics. Navigated (n = 416) and non-navigated (n = 292) patients completed baseline and end-of-study measures. There was no significant difference between navigated and non-navigated patients in change in patient satisfaction with cancer care from baseline to exit. African-American (p < 0.001), single (p = 0.03), low income (p < 0.01), and uninsured patients (p < 0.001) were significantly less likely to report high patient satisfaction at baseline. A significant effect was found for change in satisfaction over time by employment status (p = 0.04), with full-time employment showing the most improvement. The interaction between satisfaction with navigators and satisfaction with care over time was marginally significant (p = 0.08). Baseline satisfaction was lower for patients who reported a barrier to care (p = 0.02). Patients reporting other-focused barriers (p = 0.03), including transportation (p = 0.02), had significantly lower increases in satisfaction over time. Overall, results suggested that assessing barriers to cancer care and tailoring navigation to barrier type could enhance patients’ experiences with health care. PN may have positive effects for healthcare organizations struggling to enhance quality of care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brenner H, Gondos A, Arndt V (2007) Recent major progress in long-term cancer patient survival disclosed by modeled period analysis. J Clin Oncol 25:3274–3280CrossRefPubMed Brenner H, Gondos A, Arndt V (2007) Recent major progress in long-term cancer patient survival disclosed by modeled period analysis. J Clin Oncol 25:3274–3280CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Byers T (2010) Two decades of declining cancer mortality: progress with disparity. Annu Rev Public Health 31:121–132CrossRefPubMed Byers T (2010) Two decades of declining cancer mortality: progress with disparity. Annu Rev Public Health 31:121–132CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Koh C, Nelson JM, Cook PF (2011) Evaluation of a patient navigation program. Clin J Oncol Nurs 15:41–48CrossRefPubMed Koh C, Nelson JM, Cook PF (2011) Evaluation of a patient navigation program. Clin J Oncol Nurs 15:41–48CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lin CJ, Schwaderer KA, Morgenlander KH et al (2008) Factors associated with patient navigators’ time spent on reducing barriers to cancer treatment. J Natl Med Assoc 100:1290–1297PubMed Lin CJ, Schwaderer KA, Morgenlander KH et al (2008) Factors associated with patient navigators’ time spent on reducing barriers to cancer treatment. J Natl Med Assoc 100:1290–1297PubMed
5.
go back to reference Battaglia TA, Burhansstipanov L, Murrell SS, Dwyer AJ, Caron SE (2011) Assessing the impact of patient navigation: prevention and early detection metrics. Cancer 117:3553–3564PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Battaglia TA, Burhansstipanov L, Murrell SS, Dwyer AJ, Caron SE (2011) Assessing the impact of patient navigation: prevention and early detection metrics. Cancer 117:3553–3564PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Freeman HP (2012) The origin, evolution, and principles of patient navigation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21(10):1614–1617CrossRefPubMed Freeman HP (2012) The origin, evolution, and principles of patient navigation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21(10):1614–1617CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Burstein HJ Jr (2009) What is a patient navigator, and should we have them in major cancer centers? J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 7:90–95 Burstein HJ Jr (2009) What is a patient navigator, and should we have them in major cancer centers? J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 7:90–95
9.
go back to reference Phillips CE, Rothstein JD, Beaver K, Sherman BJ, Freund KM, Battaglia TA (2010) Patient navigation to increase mammography screening among inner city women. J Gen Intern Med 26:123–129PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Phillips CE, Rothstein JD, Beaver K, Sherman BJ, Freund KM, Battaglia TA (2010) Patient navigation to increase mammography screening among inner city women. J Gen Intern Med 26:123–129PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mason TA, Wilkins Thompson W, Zallen D, Rogers D, Gabram-Mendola S, Arriola KRJ (2013) Evaluation of the Avon Foundation community education and outreach initiative community patient navigation program. Health Promot Pract 14:105–112CrossRefPubMed Mason TA, Wilkins Thompson W, Zallen D, Rogers D, Gabram-Mendola S, Arriola KRJ (2013) Evaluation of the Avon Foundation community education and outreach initiative community patient navigation program. Health Promot Pract 14:105–112CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Donelan K, Mailhot JR, Dutwin D et al (2010) Patient perspectives of clinical care and patient navigation in follow-up of abnormal mammography. J Gen Intern Med 26:116–122PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Donelan K, Mailhot JR, Dutwin D et al (2010) Patient perspectives of clinical care and patient navigation in follow-up of abnormal mammography. J Gen Intern Med 26:116–122PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Ell K, Vourlekis B, Lee PJ, Xie B (2007) Patient navigation and case management following an abnormal mammogram: a randomized clinical trial. Prev Med 44:26–33CrossRefPubMed Ell K, Vourlekis B, Lee PJ, Xie B (2007) Patient navigation and case management following an abnormal mammogram: a randomized clinical trial. Prev Med 44:26–33CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ferrante JM, Chen PH, Kim S (2008) The effect of patient navigation on time to diagnosis, anxiety, and satisfaction in urban minority women with abnormal mammograms: a randomized controlled trial. J Urban Health Bull N Y Acad Med 85:114–124CrossRef Ferrante JM, Chen PH, Kim S (2008) The effect of patient navigation on time to diagnosis, anxiety, and satisfaction in urban minority women with abnormal mammograms: a randomized controlled trial. J Urban Health Bull N Y Acad Med 85:114–124CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Campbell C, Craig J, Eggert J, Bailey-Dorton C (2010) Implementing and measuring the impact of patient navigation at a comprehensive community cancer center. Oncol Nurs Forum 37:61–68CrossRefPubMed Campbell C, Craig J, Eggert J, Bailey-Dorton C (2010) Implementing and measuring the impact of patient navigation at a comprehensive community cancer center. Oncol Nurs Forum 37:61–68CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hook A, Ware L, Siler B, Packard A (2012) Breast cancer navigation and patient satisfaction: exploring a community-based patient navigation model in a rural setting. Oncol Nurs Forum 39:379–385CrossRefPubMed Hook A, Ware L, Siler B, Packard A (2012) Breast cancer navigation and patient satisfaction: exploring a community-based patient navigation model in a rural setting. Oncol Nurs Forum 39:379–385CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Palos GR, Hare M (2011) Patients, family caregivers, and patient navigators: a partnership approach. Cancer 117:3590–3600CrossRef Palos GR, Hare M (2011) Patients, family caregivers, and patient navigators: a partnership approach. Cancer 117:3590–3600CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Freund KM, Battaglia TA, Calhoun E et al (2008) The national cancer institute patient navigation research program: methods, protocol, and measures. Cancer 113:3391–3399PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Freund KM, Battaglia TA, Calhoun E et al (2008) The national cancer institute patient navigation research program: methods, protocol, and measures. Cancer 113:3391–3399PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wagner EH, Bennett SM, Austin BT, Greene SM, Schaefer JK, Vonkorff M (2005) Finding common ground: patient-centeredness and evidence based chronic illness care. J Altern Complement Med 11(Suppl 1):S7–S15PubMed Wagner EH, Bennett SM, Austin BT, Greene SM, Schaefer JK, Vonkorff M (2005) Finding common ground: patient-centeredness and evidence based chronic illness care. J Altern Complement Med 11(Suppl 1):S7–S15PubMed
20.
go back to reference Heaney CA, Israel B (2008) Social networks and social support. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K (eds) Health behavior and health education theory, research, and practice, 4th edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 189–207 Heaney CA, Israel B (2008) Social networks and social support. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K (eds) Health behavior and health education theory, research, and practice, 4th edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 189–207
21.
go back to reference Rosenstock I (1974) The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Educ Monogr 2:354–386 Rosenstock I (1974) The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Educ Monogr 2:354–386
22.
go back to reference Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Freund KM et al (2011) Structural and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a multisite patient navigation research program study. Cancer 117:854–861PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Freund KM et al (2011) Structural and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a multisite patient navigation research program study. Cancer 117:854–861PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Winters PC et al (2012) Psychometric development and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with interpersonal relationship with navigator measure: a multi-site patient navigation research program study. Psychooncology 21:986–992PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Winters PC et al (2012) Psychometric development and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with interpersonal relationship with navigator measure: a multi-site patient navigation research program study. Psychooncology 21:986–992PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Winters PC et al (2012) Cross-cultural validation of a patient satisfaction with interpersonal relationship with navigator measure: a multi-site patient navigation research study. Psychooncology 21:1309–1315PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Winters PC et al (2012) Cross-cultural validation of a patient satisfaction with interpersonal relationship with navigator measure: a multi-site patient navigation research study. Psychooncology 21:1309–1315PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Steinberg ML, Fremont A, Khan DC et al (2006) Lay patient navigator program implementation for equal access to cancer care and clinical trials: essential steps and initial challenges. Cancer 107:2669–2677CrossRefPubMed Steinberg ML, Fremont A, Khan DC et al (2006) Lay patient navigator program implementation for equal access to cancer care and clinical trials: essential steps and initial challenges. Cancer 107:2669–2677CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Reid RJ, Coleman K, Johnson EA et al (2010) The group health medical home at year two: cost savings, higher patient satisfaction, and less burnout for providers. Health Aff 29:835–843CrossRef Reid RJ, Coleman K, Johnson EA et al (2010) The group health medical home at year two: cost savings, higher patient satisfaction, and less burnout for providers. Health Aff 29:835–843CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Meyers D, Peikes D, Dale S, Lundquist E, Genevro J (2011) Improving evaluations of the medical home. AHRQ publication no. 11-0091. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville Meyers D, Peikes D, Dale S, Lundquist E, Genevro J (2011) Improving evaluations of the medical home. AHRQ publication no. 11-0091. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville
Metadata
Title
Effects of Patient Navigation on Patient Satisfaction Outcomes
Authors
Douglas M. Post
Ann Scheck McAlearney
Gregory S. Young
Jessica L. Krok-Schoen
Jesse J. Plascak
Electra D. Paskett
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0772-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Journal of Cancer Education 4/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine