Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 8/2015

01-08-2015 | Glaucoma

Effects of mydriasis and miosis on kinetic perimetry findings in normal participants

Authors: Kazunori Hirasawa, Nobuyuki Shoji, Chieko Kobashi, Ayaka Yamanashi

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effects of pharmacologically induced mydriasis and miosis on kinetic perimetry findings in normal participants.

Methods

Thirty-eight eyes of 38 healthy young participants underwent kinetic perimetry (Octopus 900 perimeter) with III4e, I4e, I3e, I2e, and I1e stimuli. For each participant, 24 predetermined meridians with 15° intervals were automatically tested with a velocity of 3°/s under normal, mydriatic, and miotic conditions. Mydriasis and miosis were induced by one drop of 0.4 % tropicamide and 2 % pilocarpine hydrochloride, respectively. The isopter area and kinetic sensitivity were compared between the three pupil conditions.

Results

The average pupil size in the normal condition was 5.6 ± 0.9 mm, and it significantly increased to 8.5 ± 0.7 mm after mydriasis (p < 0.01) and decreased to 3.4 ± 0.8 mm after miosis (p < 0.01). Compared to the normal pupil, the isopter area of the dilated pupil was not significantly different under the III4e stimulus; however, it significantly decreased under the I4e, I3e, I2e, and I1e stimuli (p < 0.01). Compared to the normal pupil, the isopter area of the constricted pupil significantly decreased (p < 0.01) with the III4e stimulus and significantly increased with the I3e and I2e stimuli (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

For both pupil conditions, kinetic sensitivity at each meridian showed a similar trend to the isopter area under each stimulus. The isopter area of the dilated pupil generally decreased, whereas the isopter area of the constricted pupil showed various findings. Therefore, careful attention should be paid to changes in the isopter area associated with changes in the pupil size.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Trobe JD, Acosta PC, Shuster JJ, Krischer JP (1980) An evaluation of the accuracy of community-based perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 90:654–660PubMedCrossRef Trobe JD, Acosta PC, Shuster JJ, Krischer JP (1980) An evaluation of the accuracy of community-based perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 90:654–660PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Weinreb RN, Perlman JP (1986) The effect of refractive correction on automated perimetric thresholds. Am J Ophthalmol 101:706–709PubMedCrossRef Weinreb RN, Perlman JP (1986) The effect of refractive correction on automated perimetric thresholds. Am J Ophthalmol 101:706–709PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Johnson CA, Keltner JL (1987) Optimal rates of movement for kinetic perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 105:73–75PubMedCrossRef Johnson CA, Keltner JL (1987) Optimal rates of movement for kinetic perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 105:73–75PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lindenmuth KA, Skuta GL, Rabbani R, Musch DC (1989) Effects of pupillary constriction on automated perimetry in normal eyes. Ophthalmology 96:1298–1301PubMedCrossRef Lindenmuth KA, Skuta GL, Rabbani R, Musch DC (1989) Effects of pupillary constriction on automated perimetry in normal eyes. Ophthalmology 96:1298–1301PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kudrna GR, Stanley MA, Remington LA (1995) Pupillary dilation and its effects on automated perimetry results. J Am Optom Assoc 66:675–680PubMed Kudrna GR, Stanley MA, Remington LA (1995) Pupillary dilation and its effects on automated perimetry results. J Am Optom Assoc 66:675–680PubMed
7.
go back to reference Park HJ, Youn DH (1994) Quantitative analysis of changes of automated perimetric thresholds after pupillary dilation and induced myopia in normal subjects. Korean J Ophthalmol 8:53–60PubMedCrossRef Park HJ, Youn DH (1994) Quantitative analysis of changes of automated perimetric thresholds after pupillary dilation and induced myopia in normal subjects. Korean J Ophthalmol 8:53–60PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mendivil A (1997) Influence of a dilated pupil on the visual field in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 6:217–220PubMed Mendivil A (1997) Influence of a dilated pupil on the visual field in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 6:217–220PubMed
9.
go back to reference Wood JM, Wild JM, Bullimore MA, Gilmartin B (1988) Factors affecting the normal perimetric profile derived by automated static threshold LED perimetry. I. Pupil size. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 8:26–31PubMedCrossRef Wood JM, Wild JM, Bullimore MA, Gilmartin B (1988) Factors affecting the normal perimetric profile derived by automated static threshold LED perimetry. I. Pupil size. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 8:26–31PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Herse PR (1992) Factors influencing normal perimetric thresholds obtained using the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:611–617PubMed Herse PR (1992) Factors influencing normal perimetric thresholds obtained using the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:611–617PubMed
11.
go back to reference Edgar DF, Crabb DP, Rudnicka AR, Lawrenson JG, Guttridge NM, O’Brien CJ (1999) Effects of dipivefrin and pilocarpine on pupil diameter, automated perimetry and LogMAR acuity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 237:117–124PubMedCrossRef Edgar DF, Crabb DP, Rudnicka AR, Lawrenson JG, Guttridge NM, O’Brien CJ (1999) Effects of dipivefrin and pilocarpine on pupil diameter, automated perimetry and LogMAR acuity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 237:117–124PubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference McCluskey DJ, Douglas JP, O’Connor PS, Story K, Ivy LM, Harvey JS (1986) The effect of pilocarpine on the visual field in normals. Ophthalmology 93:843–846PubMedCrossRef McCluskey DJ, Douglas JP, O’Connor PS, Story K, Ivy LM, Harvey JS (1986) The effect of pilocarpine on the visual field in normals. Ophthalmology 93:843–846PubMedCrossRef
14.
17.
go back to reference Schiefer U, Strasburger H, Becker ST, Vonthein R, Schiller J, Dietrich TJ, Hart W (2001) Reaction time in automated kinetic perimetry: effects of stimulus luminance, eccentricity, and movement direction. Vis Res 41:2157–2164PubMedCrossRef Schiefer U, Strasburger H, Becker ST, Vonthein R, Schiller J, Dietrich TJ, Hart W (2001) Reaction time in automated kinetic perimetry: effects of stimulus luminance, eccentricity, and movement direction. Vis Res 41:2157–2164PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lindenmuth KA, Skuta GL, Rabbani R, Musch DC, Bergstrom TJ (1990) Effects of pupillary dilation on automated perimetry in normal patients. Ophthalmology 97:367–370PubMedCrossRef Lindenmuth KA, Skuta GL, Rabbani R, Musch DC, Bergstrom TJ (1990) Effects of pupillary dilation on automated perimetry in normal patients. Ophthalmology 97:367–370PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Freeman MH, Hull CC, Charman WN (2003) Chapter 15: the eye as an optical instrument. Butterworth Heinemann, Edinburgh Freeman MH, Hull CC, Charman WN (2003) Chapter 15: the eye as an optical instrument. Butterworth Heinemann, Edinburgh
Metadata
Title
Effects of mydriasis and miosis on kinetic perimetry findings in normal participants
Authors
Kazunori Hirasawa
Nobuyuki Shoji
Chieko Kobashi
Ayaka Yamanashi
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3048-5

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 8/2015 Go to the issue