Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Scientific Report

Effects of Intra-abdominally Instilled Isotonic Saline on Pain, Recovery, and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Prospective Double-Blind Controlled Study

Authors: C. Barthelsson, G. Sandblom, S. Ljesevic-Nikoletic, F. Hammarqvist

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The postoperative installation of isotonic saline in the abdomen has been suggested as a method to reduce the effect of local toxins, thereby reducing postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this randomized prospective double-blind trial was to assess whether installation of isotonic saline can reduce postoperative pain and nausea following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

Altogether 71 LC patients were randomized to either intra-abdominal instillation of isotonic saline group (S) (n = 36) or no saline (NS) group (n = 35) at the end of surgery. Data were collected by means of questionnaires. The postoperative recovery profile questionnaire was answered prior to surgery and 1 week postoperatively, SF-36 prior to surgery and at 1 month postoperatively, and a pain diary recording a Visual Analogue Scale score each day during the first week.

Results

The overall response rate was 94 %. No significant differences were seen between the groups regarding abdominal and shoulder pain. However, the NS group reported more pain (NS = 53 %, S = 29 %) and fatigue (NS = 50 %, S = 35 %) than the S group postoperative day 7. Moreover, the most frequently reported problem in both groups 7 days after surgery was getting back to normal life (60 %). Females reported a slower recovery profile than males and also more postoperative symptoms day 7. HRQoL results were similar between the groups.

Conclusion

Instillation of isotonic saline does not improve recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Postoperative pain was more often reported in the NS group than in the S group, though the difference was not significant.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Finan KR et al (2006) Improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life after cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 192(2):196–202CrossRefPubMed Finan KR et al (2006) Improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life after cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 192(2):196–202CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Mentes BB et al (2001) Gastrointestinal quality of life in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic cholelithiasis before and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 15(11):1267–1272CrossRefPubMed Mentes BB et al (2001) Gastrointestinal quality of life in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic cholelithiasis before and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 15(11):1267–1272CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Callesen T et al (1999) Short convalescence after inguinal herniorrhaphy with standardised recommendations: duration and reasons for delayed return to work. Eur J Surg 165(3):236–241CrossRefPubMed Callesen T et al (1999) Short convalescence after inguinal herniorrhaphy with standardised recommendations: duration and reasons for delayed return to work. Eur J Surg 165(3):236–241CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Apfelbaum JL et al (2003) Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg 97(2):40–534 table of contentsCrossRef Apfelbaum JL et al (2003) Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg 97(2):40–534 table of contentsCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bisgaard T et al (1999) Multi-regional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multi-modal analgesia: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg 89(4):1017–1024PubMed Bisgaard T et al (1999) Multi-regional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multi-modal analgesia: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg 89(4):1017–1024PubMed
6.
go back to reference Bisgaard T et al (2001) Factors determining convalescence after uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 136(8):917–921CrossRefPubMed Bisgaard T et al (2001) Factors determining convalescence after uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 136(8):917–921CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Barthelsson CN, Norberg Å, Nordström G (2009) Longitudinal changes in health and symptoms following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ambul Surg, pp 87–92 Barthelsson CN, Norberg Å, Nordström G (2009) Longitudinal changes in health and symptoms following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ambul Surg, pp 87–92
9.
go back to reference Ahmed BH et al (2008) Post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain: effects of intraperitoneal local anesthetics on pain control—a randomized prospective double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. Am Surg 74(3):201–209PubMed Ahmed BH et al (2008) Post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain: effects of intraperitoneal local anesthetics on pain control—a randomized prospective double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. Am Surg 74(3):201–209PubMed
10.
go back to reference Gupta A et al (2002) Postoperative pain relief using intermittent injections of 0.5% ropivacaine through a catheter after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 95(2):450–456 table of contentsPubMed Gupta A et al (2002) Postoperative pain relief using intermittent injections of 0.5% ropivacaine through a catheter after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 95(2):450–456 table of contentsPubMed
11.
go back to reference Szem JW, Hydo L, Barie PS (1996) A double-blinded evaluation of intraperitoneal bupivacaine vs saline for the reduction of postoperative pain and nausea after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 10(1):44–48CrossRefPubMed Szem JW, Hydo L, Barie PS (1996) A double-blinded evaluation of intraperitoneal bupivacaine vs saline for the reduction of postoperative pain and nausea after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 10(1):44–48CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Clarke PRF, Spear FG (1964) Reliability and sensitivity in the self-assessment of well-being. Bull Br Psychol Soc 18:18 Clarke PRF, Spear FG (1964) Reliability and sensitivity in the self-assessment of well-being. Bull Br Psychol Soc 18:18
13.
go back to reference Allvin R et al (2009) Development of a questionnaire to measure patient-reported postoperative recovery: content validity and intra-patient reliability. J Eval Clin Pract 15(3):411–419CrossRefPubMed Allvin R et al (2009) Development of a questionnaire to measure patient-reported postoperative recovery: content validity and intra-patient reliability. J Eval Clin Pract 15(3):411–419CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Allvin R et al (2011) The Postoperative Recovery Profile (PRP)—a multidimensional questionnaire for evaluation of recovery profiles. J Eval Clin Pract 17(2):236–243CrossRefPubMed Allvin R et al (2011) The Postoperative Recovery Profile (PRP)—a multidimensional questionnaire for evaluation of recovery profiles. J Eval Clin Pract 17(2):236–243CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE (1993) The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 31(3):247–263CrossRefPubMed McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE (1993) The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 31(3):247–263CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sullivan M, Karlsson J (1998) The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population. J Clin Epidemiol 51(11):1105–1113CrossRefPubMed Sullivan M, Karlsson J (1998) The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population. J Clin Epidemiol 51(11):1105–1113CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr (1995) The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey–I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 41(10):1349–1358CrossRefPubMed Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr (1995) The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey–I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 41(10):1349–1358CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ (1997) The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain 72(1–2):95–97CrossRefPubMed Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ (1997) The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain 72(1–2):95–97CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Palsson SH et al (2011) Registration of health-related quality of life in a cohort of patients undergoing cholecystectomy. ISRN Gastroenterol 2011:507389PubMedCentralPubMed Palsson SH et al (2011) Registration of health-related quality of life in a cohort of patients undergoing cholecystectomy. ISRN Gastroenterol 2011:507389PubMedCentralPubMed
21.
go back to reference Shi HY et al (2008) Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences after cholecystectomy: GIQLI versus SF-36. J Gastrointest Surg 12(7):1275–1282CrossRefPubMed Shi HY et al (2008) Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences after cholecystectomy: GIQLI versus SF-36. J Gastrointest Surg 12(7):1275–1282CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Lien HH et al (2010) Changes in quality-of-life following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adult patients with cholelithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg 14(1):126–130CrossRefPubMed Lien HH et al (2010) Changes in quality-of-life following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adult patients with cholelithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg 14(1):126–130CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tsimoyiannis EC et al (1998) Intraperitoneal normal saline and bupivacaine infusion for reduction of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8(6):416–420CrossRefPubMed Tsimoyiannis EC et al (1998) Intraperitoneal normal saline and bupivacaine infusion for reduction of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8(6):416–420CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Quintana JM et al (2005) Influence of age and gender on quality-of-life outcomes after cholecystectomy. Qual Life Res 14(3):815–825CrossRefPubMed Quintana JM et al (2005) Influence of age and gender on quality-of-life outcomes after cholecystectomy. Qual Life Res 14(3):815–825CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Quintana JM et al (2005) Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 241(1):110–118PubMedCentralPubMed Quintana JM et al (2005) Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 241(1):110–118PubMedCentralPubMed
27.
go back to reference Shi HY et al (2009) Post-cholecystectomy quality of life: a prospective multicenter cohort study of its associations with preoperative functional status and patient demographics. J Gastrointest Surg 13(9):1651–1658CrossRefPubMed Shi HY et al (2009) Post-cholecystectomy quality of life: a prospective multicenter cohort study of its associations with preoperative functional status and patient demographics. J Gastrointest Surg 13(9):1651–1658CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effects of Intra-abdominally Instilled Isotonic Saline on Pain, Recovery, and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Prospective Double-Blind Controlled Study
Authors
C. Barthelsson
G. Sandblom
S. Ljesevic-Nikoletic
F. Hammarqvist
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-2978-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

World Journal of Surgery 6/2015 Go to the issue