Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Implementation Science
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Systematic review

Effectiveness of implementation strategies for clinical guidelines to community pharmacy: a systematic review

Authors: Kim Watkins, Helen Wood, Carl R. Schneider, Rhonda Clifford

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The clinical role of community pharmacists is expanding, as is the use of clinical guidelines in this setting. However, it is unclear which strategies are successful in implementing clinical guidelines and what outcomes can be achieved. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise the literature on the implementation of clinical guidelines to community pharmacy. The objectives are to describe the implementation strategies used, describe the resulting outcomes and to assess the effectiveness of the strategies.

Methods

A systematic search was performed in six electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Informit, Cochrane Library) for relevant articles. Studies were included if they reported on clinical guidelines implementation strategies in the community pharmacy setting. Two researchers completed the full-search strategy, data abstraction and quality assessments, independently. A third researcher acted as a moderator. Quality assessments were completed with three validated tools. A narrative synthesis was performed to analyse results.

Results

A total of 1937 articles were retrieved and the titles and abstracts were screened. Full-text screening was completed for 36 articles resulting in 19 articles (reporting on 22 studies) included for review. Implementation strategies were categorised according to a modified version of the EPOC taxonomy. Educational interventions were the most commonly utilised strategy (n = 20), and computerised decision support systems demonstrated the greatest effect (n = 4). Most studies were multifaceted and used more than one implementation strategy (n = 18). Overall outcomes were moderately positive (n = 17) but focused on process (n = 22) rather than patient (n = 3) or economic outcomes (n = 3). Most studies (n = 20) were rated as being of low methodological quality and having low or very low quality of evidence for outcomes.

Conclusions

Studies in this review did not generally have a well thought-out rationale for the choice of implementation strategy. Most utilised educational strategies, but the greatest effect on outcomes was demonstrated using computerised clinical decision support systems. Poor methodology, in the majority of the research, provided insufficient evidence to be conclusive about the best implementation strategies or the benefit of clinical guidelines in this setting. However, the generally positive outcomes across studies and strategies indicate that implementing clinical guidelines to community pharmacy might be beneficial. Improved methodological rigour in future research is required to strengthen the evidence for this hypothesis.

Protocol registration

PROSPERO 2012:CRD42012003019.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJ, Mistiaen P. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making. 2008;8(38) doi: 10.​1186/​1472-6947-8-38.
2.
Grimshaw J, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay C, Vale L, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(6):iii–iv.PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1999;318(7182):527–30.CrossRef
5.
Field MJ, Lohr KN. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. vol IOM publication; 90–08. Washington D.C: National Academy Press; 1990.
6.
Grimshaw J, Russell I. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993;342(88883):1317–22.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Runciman WB, Hunt TD, Hannaford NA, Hibbert PD, Westbrook JI, Coiera EW, et al. CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia. Med J Aust. 2012;197(2):100–5.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Grol R, Buchan H. Clinical guidelines: what can we do to increase their use? Med J Aust. 2006;185(6):301–2.PubMed
9.
Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225–30.PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
Fretheim A, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 15. Disseminating and implementing guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
National Health and Medical Research Council. In: A guide to the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. 1999. Canberra: AusInfo Government Info Bookshops.
13.
Thomas L, Cullum N, McColl E, Rousseau N, Soutter J, Steen N. Guidelines in professions allied to medicine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD000349.
14.
15.
Wensing M, van der Weijden T, Grol R. Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective? Br J Gen Pract. 1998;48(427):991–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Hakkennes S, Dodd K. Guideline implementation in allied health professions: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(4):296–300.PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
Galgliardi AR, Alhabib S. Members of the Guidelines International Network Implementation Working Group. Trends in guideline implementation: a scoping systematic review. Implement Sci. 2015;10:54. doi:10.​1186/​s13012-015-0247-8.CrossRef
19.
20.
ICEBeRG Research Group. Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implement Sci. 2006;1:4.CrossRef
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
Worrall G, Chaulk P, Freake D. The effects of clinical practice guidelines on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review. CMAJ. 1997;156(12):1705–12.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Habeeb Ibrahim AR, Deepak J, Jegan RS. Pharmacists in the wider public health workforce. Arch Pharm Pract. 2012;3(2):166–9.CrossRef
28.
29.
30.
31.
Watkins K, Wood H, Schneider C, Clifford R. Clinical guideline implementation in community pharmacy. (PROSPERO) International prospective register of systematic reviews, 2012 CRD42012003019.
32.
33.
Huang X, Lin J, Demner-Fushman D. Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions. AMIA. [Evaluation Studies]. 2006;Annual Symposium Proceedings/AMIA Symposium 2006 359-63. Available from: MEDLINE.
34.
35.
Armour C, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Brillant M, Burton D, Emmerton L, Krass I, et al. Pharmacy Asthma Care Program (PACP) improves outcomes for patients in the community. Thorax. 2007;62(6):496–502.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
37.
38.
39.
Benrimoj SC, Gilbert A, Quintrell N, Neto AC. Non-prescription medicines: a process for standards development and testing in community pharmacy. Pharm World Sci. 2007;29(4):386–94.PubMedCrossRef
40.
41.
Mestrovic A, Stanicic Z, Hadziabdic MO, Mucalo I, Bates I, Duggan C, et al. Individualized education and competency development of Croatian community pharmacists using the general level framework. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76(2):23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Paphassarang C, Wahlstrom R, Phoummalaysith B, Boupha B, Tomson G. Building the national drug policy on evidence—a cross sectional study on assessing implementation in Lao PDR. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2002;33(3):647–53.PubMed
43.
44.
Rothstein JM. On defining subjective and objective measurements. Phys Ther. 1989;69(7):577–9.PubMed
45.
Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N, Group T. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(3):361–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, et al. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(27):iii–x. 1-173.PubMedCrossRef
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
De Almeida Neto AC, Benrimoj SI, Kavanagh DJ, Boakes RA. Novel educational training programme for community pharmacists. Am J Pharmaceut Educ. 2000;64(Fall 2000):302–7.
56.
De Almeida Neto AC, Kelly F, Benrimoj SI. Shaping practice behaviour: novel training methodology (study 1). Int J Pharm Pract. 2001;9(3):203–10.CrossRef
57.
Kradjan WA. Patients’ perceived benefit from and satisfaction with asthma-related pharmacy services. J Am Pharm Assoc. 1999;39(5):658.CrossRef
58.
59.
Raisch DW. Effect of a pharmacist-education initiative on ketorolac use and costs in a Medicaid program. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1998;55(12):1274.PubMed
60.
61.
62.
Watson MC, Bond CM, Grimshaw JM, Mollison J, Ludbrook A, Walker AE. Educational strategies to promote evidence-based community pharmacy practice: a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT). Fam Pract. 2002;19(5):529–36.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Watson MC, Cleland J, Inch J, Bond CM, Francis J. Theory-based communication skills training for medicine counter assistants to improve consultations for non-prescription medicines. Med Educ. 2007;41(5):450–9.PubMedCrossRef
64.
De Almeida Neto AC, Kelly F, Benrimoj SI. Shaping practice behaviour: novel training methodology (study 3). Int J Pharm Pract. 2001;9(3):203–10.CrossRef
65.
Naunton M, Peterson GM, Jones G, Griffin GM, Bleasel MD. Multifaceted educational program increases prescribing of preventive medication for corticosteroid induced osteoporosis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(3):550–6.PubMed
66.
67.
68.
De Almeida Neto AC, Kelly F, Benrimoj SI. Shaping practice behaviour: novel training methodology (study 5). Int J Pharm Pract. 2001;9(3):203–10.CrossRef
69.
De Almeida Neto AC, Kelly F, Benrimoj SI. Shaping practice behaviour: novel training methodology (study 5A). Int J Pharm Pract. 2001;9(3):203–10.CrossRef
70.
Egen V, Hasford J. Prevention of neural tube defects: effect of an intervention aimed at implementing the official recommendations. Soz Praventivmed. 2003;48(1):24–32.PubMedCrossRef
71.
72.
Koster ES, Walgers JCD, van Grinsven MCJ, Winters NA, Bouvy ML. Adherence to national recommendations for safe Methotrexate dispensing in community pharmacies. J Manag Care Pharm. 2014;20(2):194–200.PubMed
73.
74.
Puumalainen I, Kansanaho H, Varunki M, Ahonen R, Airaksinen M. Usefulness of the USP medication counselling behavior guidelines. Pharm World Sci. 2005;27(6):465–8.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Thornley T, Gray N, Anderson C, Eastham S. A study to investigate the extent of delivery of an intervention in asthma, in a UK national community pharmacy chain, using mystery customers. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(2):246–52.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Grimshaw J, Campbell M, Eccles M, Steen N. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for evaluating guideline implementation strategies. Fam Pract. 2000;17(Supplement):s11–6.PubMedCrossRef
77.
78.
Watson M, Skelton J, Bond C, Croft P, Wiskin C, Grimshaw J, et al. Simulated patients in the community pharmacy setting. Pharm World Sci. 2004;26:32–7.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Peterson G, Tenni P, Jackson S, Bereznicki L, Hughes J, Kong D, et al. Documenting Clinical Interventions in Community Pharmacy: PROMISe III 2010.
80.
81.
82.
83.
French SD, Green SE, O’Connor DA, McKenzie JE, Francis JJ, Michie S et al. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7:38. http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​1748-5908-7-38.
84.
85.
86.
Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223–38.PubMedCrossRef
87.
88.
Schneider CR, Everett AW, Geelhoed E, Kendall PA, Murray K, Garnett P, et al. Provision of primary care to patients with chronic cough in the community pharmacy setting. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45(3):402–8.PubMedCrossRef
89.
Watson M, Bond C, Grimshaw J, Johnston M. Factors predicting the guideline compliant supply (or nonsupply) of non-prescription medicines in the community pharmacy setting. Quality Safety Health Care. 2006;15:53–7. doi:10.​1136/​qshc.​2005.​014720.CrossRef
90.
Foy R, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Why does primary care need more implementation research? Fam Pract. 2001;18(4):353–5.PubMedCrossRef
91.
92.
Tavender EJ, Bosch M, Gruen RL, Green SE, Michie S, Brennan SE et al. Developing a targeted, theory-informed implementation intervention using two theoretical frameworks to address health professional and organisational factors: a case study to improve the management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department. Implement Sci. 2015;10:74. http://​dx.​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13012-015-0264-7.
93.
94.
95.
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of implementation strategies for clinical guidelines to community pharmacy: a systematic review
Authors
Kim Watkins
Helen Wood
Carl R. Schneider
Rhonda Clifford
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0337-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Implementation Science 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research

Evaluating the QUIT-PRIMO clinical practice ePortal to increase smoker engagement with online cessation interventions: a national hybrid type 2 implementation study

Study protocol

Assisted partner notification services to augment HIV testing and linkage to care in Kenya: study protocol for a cluster randomized trial

Systematic review

Exploring the function and effectiveness of knowledge brokers as facilitators of knowledge translation in health-related settings: a systematic review and thematic analysis

Erratum

Erratum to: A cluster randomized trial of a multifaceted quality improvement intervention in Brazilian intensive care units: study protocol

Methodology

Developing standards for reporting implementation studies of complex interventions (StaRI): a systematic review and e-Delphi

Research

The gas cylinder, the motorcycle and the village health team member: a proof-of-concept study for the use of the Microsystems Quality Improvement Approach to strengthen the routine immunization system in Uganda