Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2008

01-09-2008 | Supportive Care International

Effectiveness of cosmetic rehabilitation on the body image of oral cancer patients in Taiwan

Authors: Sharen Huang, Hsueh-Erh Liu

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 9/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Goals of the work

Oral tumors and their treatment cause obvious changes in disfigurement and functions of cancer patients. Therefore, some kind of strategy to improve personal appearance is important in nursing care. This prospective study intended to verify the effects of a cosmetic rehabilitation program on the body image of oral cancer patients.

Materials and methods

A single-blind quasi-experimental design with repeated-measures design was used in this study. The experimental group received instruction on cosmetic rehabilitation, whereas the control group received regular nursing care. The experimental group and control group each had 22 subjects who were requested to complete the questionnaires throughout the regular follow-up (during admission, after 6 weeks, and after 12 weeks). The Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire-Appearance Scales (MBSRQ-AS) was selected for data collection.

Main results

The results showed that subjects in both experimental and control groups reported similar levels of body image in each subscale of MBSRQ-AS before conducting cosmetic rehabilitation. The appearance evaluation subscale was the only one that changed significantly in both the experimental and control groups during the research period. Nevertheless, results of item comparison showed that cosmetic rehabilitation had improved the scores of “I like the way I am,” “most people think that I am good looking,” “body weight,” and “face” in the experimental group.

Conclusion

Present study confirmed that cosmetic rehabilitation had similar effects on the body image of oral cancer patients. Integration of cosmetic program into the routine nursing care for oral cancer patients is highly recommended.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Baker CA (1992) Factors associated with rehabilitation in head and neck cancer. Cancer Nurs 15:395–400PubMedCrossRef Baker CA (1992) Factors associated with rehabilitation in head and neck cancer. Cancer Nurs 15:395–400PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Boehncke WH, Ochsendorf F, Kaufmann R, Zollner TM (2002) Decorative cosmetics improve the quality of life in patients with disfiguring skin diseases. Eur J Dermatol 12(6):577–580PubMed Boehncke WH, Ochsendorf F, Kaufmann R, Zollner TM (2002) Decorative cosmetics improve the quality of life in patients with disfiguring skin diseases. Eur J Dermatol 12(6):577–580PubMed
4.
go back to reference Cash TF (2000) The multidimensional Body-self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ) Users’ Manual (3rd Ed.) Cash TF (2000) The multidimensional Body-self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ) Users’ Manual (3rd Ed.)
6.
go back to reference Chaturvedi SK, Shenoy A, Prasad KMR, Senthilnathan SM, Premlatha BS (1996) Concerns, coping and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 4(3):168–190CrossRef Chaturvedi SK, Shenoy A, Prasad KMR, Senthilnathan SM, Premlatha BS (1996) Concerns, coping and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 4(3):168–190CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Holme SA, Beattie PE, Fleming CJ (2002) Cosmetic camouflage advice improves quality of life. Br J Dermatol 147(55):946–949PubMedCrossRef Holme SA, Beattie PE, Fleming CJ (2002) Cosmetic camouflage advice improves quality of life. Br J Dermatol 147(55):946–949PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference List MA, Siston A, Haraf D, Schumm P, Kies M, Stenson K, Vokes EE (1999) Quality of life and performance in advanced head and neck cancer patients on concomitant chemoradiotherapy: A prospective examination. J Clin Oncol 17(3):1020–1028PubMed List MA, Siston A, Haraf D, Schumm P, Kies M, Stenson K, Vokes EE (1999) Quality of life and performance in advanced head and neck cancer patients on concomitant chemoradiotherapy: A prospective examination. J Clin Oncol 17(3):1020–1028PubMed
10.
go back to reference Lockhart JS (2000) Nurses’ perceptions of head and neck oncology patients after surgery: Severity of facial disfigurement and patient gender. Plast Surg Nurs 20(2):68–80 Lockhart JS (2000) Nurses’ perceptions of head and neck oncology patients after surgery: Severity of facial disfigurement and patient gender. Plast Surg Nurs 20(2):68–80
11.
go back to reference Manne SL, Girasek D, Ambrosino J (1994) An evaluation of the impact of a cosmetics class on breast cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol 12(1–2):83–99CrossRef Manne SL, Girasek D, Ambrosino J (1994) An evaluation of the impact of a cosmetics class on breast cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol 12(1–2):83–99CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mast BA (1999) Functional outcomes of microsurgical reconstruction of delayed complications following head and neck cancer ablation. Ann Plast Surg 42(1):40–45PubMedCrossRef Mast BA (1999) Functional outcomes of microsurgical reconstruction of delayed complications following head and neck cancer ablation. Ann Plast Surg 42(1):40–45PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Matsuoka Y, Yoneda K, Sadahira C, Moriue T, Kubota Y (2006) Effects of skin care and makeup under instructions from dermatologists on the quality of life of female patients with acne vulgaris. J Dermatol 33(11):745–752PubMedCrossRef Matsuoka Y, Yoneda K, Sadahira C, Moriue T, Kubota Y (2006) Effects of skin care and makeup under instructions from dermatologists on the quality of life of female patients with acne vulgaris. J Dermatol 33(11):745–752PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Millsopp L, Brandom L, Humphris G, Lowe D, Stat C, Rogers S (2006) Facial appearance after operations for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: a comparison of casenotes and patient-completed questionnaire. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:358–363PubMedCrossRef Millsopp L, Brandom L, Humphris G, Lowe D, Stat C, Rogers S (2006) Facial appearance after operations for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: a comparison of casenotes and patient-completed questionnaire. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:358–363PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Miyata R (1996) Self presentation of patients disfigured by head and neck cancer. Kango Kenkyu 29(6):485–96PubMed Miyata R (1996) Self presentation of patients disfigured by head and neck cancer. Kango Kenkyu 29(6):485–96PubMed
16.
go back to reference Petersen PE (2005) Strengthening the prevention of oral cancer: The WHO perspective. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 33:397–299PubMedCrossRef Petersen PE (2005) Strengthening the prevention of oral cancer: The WHO perspective. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 33:397–299PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rayner VL (2000) Cosmetic rehabilitation. Dermatol Nurs 12(4):267–271PubMed Rayner VL (2000) Cosmetic rehabilitation. Dermatol Nurs 12(4):267–271PubMed
18.
go back to reference Rayner VL (2005) Concealing with camouflage. Plast Surg Products May:7–9 Rayner VL (2005) Concealing with camouflage. Plast Surg Products May:7–9
19.
go back to reference Rumsey NR, Clarke A, White P, Wyn-Williams M, Garlick W (2004) Altered body image: Appearance-related concerns of people with visible disfigurement. J Adv Nurs 48(5):443–453PubMedCrossRef Rumsey NR, Clarke A, White P, Wyn-Williams M, Garlick W (2004) Altered body image: Appearance-related concerns of people with visible disfigurement. J Adv Nurs 48(5):443–453PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference White CA (2000) Body image dimensions and caner: a heuristic cognitive behavioural model. Psychooncology 9(3):183–192PubMedCrossRef White CA (2000) Body image dimensions and caner: a heuristic cognitive behavioural model. Psychooncology 9(3):183–192PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of cosmetic rehabilitation on the body image of oral cancer patients in Taiwan
Authors
Sharen Huang
Hsueh-Erh Liu
Publication date
01-09-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 9/2008
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0417-1

Other articles of this Issue 9/2008

Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2008 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine