Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

Effectiveness of a group intervention to reduce the psychological distress of healthcare staff: a pre-post quasi-experimental evaluation

Authors: Jeremy Dawson, Imelda McCarthy, Cath Taylor, Kristin Hildenbrand, Mary Leamy, Ellie Reynolds, Jill Maben

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Work stress and compassion fatigue are prevalent among healthcare staff and their negative effects on staff well-being and patient care are well-known. This paper reports on the implementation and evaluation of Schwartz Rounds® (Rounds) in UK healthcare organizations, predominantly part of the National Health Service (NHS). Rounds are one-hour, typically monthly, multidisciplinary forums during which clinical and nonclinical healthcare staff discuss the emotional and social demands of delivering patient care. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of Rounds attendance on the psychological distress, work engagement, compassion and self-reflection of healthcare staff.

Methods

We used a pre-post control design to assess the effect of Rounds attendance across 10 UK healthcare organizations. This design was most appropriate given the voluntary nature of Rounds and ensured the study had ecological validity. Self-reported data were collected from attenders and non-attenders at baseline and at eight-months follow-up. The outcomes were psychological distress, work engagement, compassion and self-reflection.

Results

During the 8 months’ study duration, regular attenders (N = 51) attended Rounds on average 4 times (2–8). Attenders showed a significantly greater decrease in psychological distress (as measured with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)) than non-attenders (N = 233; odds ratio of 0.197; 95% confidence interval (0.047–0.823)). However, Rounds attendance had no significant effect on work engagement, compassion and self-reflection.

Conclusions

Rounds attendance was linked to a 19% reduction in psychological distress adjusting for covariates. As an organization-wide intervention, Rounds thus constitute an effective, relatively low-cost intervention to assist staff in dealing with the demands of their work and to improve their well-being.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
10.
go back to reference Nørøxe KB, Pedersen AF, Carlsen AH, Bro F, Vedsted P. Mental well-being, job satisfaction and self-rated workability in general practitioners and hospitalisations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions among listed patients: a cohort study combining survey data on GPs and register data on patients. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28:997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009039.CrossRefPubMed Nørøxe KB, Pedersen AF, Carlsen AH, Bro F, Vedsted P. Mental well-being, job satisfaction and self-rated workability in general practitioners and hospitalisations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions among listed patients: a cohort study combining survey data on GPs and register data on patients. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28:997–1006. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmjqs-2018-009039.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Francis R. Report of the mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation trust public inquiry. London: The Stationery Office; 2013. Francis R. Report of the mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation trust public inquiry. London: The Stationery Office; 2013.
24.
26.
go back to reference Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Sanz-Vergel AI. Burnout and work engagement: the JD-R approach. Palo Alto: Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior; 2014. Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Sanz-Vergel AI. Burnout and work engagement: the JD-R approach. Palo Alto: Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior; 2014.
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of a group intervention to reduce the psychological distress of healthcare staff: a pre-post quasi-experimental evaluation
Authors
Jeremy Dawson
Imelda McCarthy
Cath Taylor
Kristin Hildenbrand
Mary Leamy
Ellie Reynolds
Jill Maben
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06413-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Health Services Research 1/2021 Go to the issue