Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Study protocol

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a physical activity loyalty scheme for behaviour change maintenance: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Authors: Ruth F. Hunter, Sarah F. Brennan, Jianjun Tang, Oliver J. Smith, Jennifer Murray, Mark A. Tully, Chris Patterson, Alberto Longo, George Hutchinson, Lindsay Prior, David P. French, Jean Adams, Emma McIntosh, Frank Kee

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Increasing physical activity in the workplace can provide employee physical and mental health benefits, and employer economic benefits through reduced absenteeism and increased productivity. The workplace is an opportune setting to encourage habitual activity. However, there is limited evidence on effective behaviour change interventions that lead to maintained physical activity. This study aims to address this gap and help build the necessary evidence base for effective, and cost-effective, workplace interventions.

Methods/design

This cluster randomised control trial will recruit 776 office-based employees from public sector organisations in Belfast and Lisburn city centres, Northern Ireland. Participants will be randomly allocated by cluster to either the Intervention Group or Control Group (waiting list control). The 6-month intervention consists of rewards (retail vouchers, based on similar principles to high street loyalty cards), feedback and other evidence-based behaviour change techniques. Sensors situated in the vicinity of participating workplaces will promote and monitor minutes of physical activity undertaken by participants. Both groups will complete all outcome measures. The primary outcome is steps per day recorded using a pedometer (Yamax Digiwalker CW-701) for 7 consecutive days at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months. Secondary outcomes include health, mental wellbeing, quality of life, work absenteeism and presenteeism, and use of healthcare resources. Process measures will assess intervention “dose”, website usage, and intervention fidelity. An economic evaluation will be conducted from the National Health Service, employer and retailer perspective using both a cost-utility and cost-effectiveness framework. The inclusion of a discrete choice experiment will further generate values for a cost-benefit analysis. Participant focus groups will explore who the intervention worked for and why, and interviews with retailers will elucidate their views on the sustainability of a public health focused loyalty card scheme.

Discussion

The study is designed to maximise the potential for roll-out in similar settings, by engaging the public sector and business community in designing and delivering the intervention. We have developed a sustainable business model using a ‘points’ based loyalty platform, whereby local businesses ‘sponsor’ the incentive (retail vouchers) in return for increased footfall to their business.

Trial registration

ISRCTN17975376 (Registered 19/09/2014).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Kohl 3rd HW, Craig CL, Lambert EV, Inoue S, Alkandari JR, Leetongin G, Kahlmeier S, for the Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380:294–305.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Conn VS, Hafdahl AR, Mehr DR. Interventions to increase physical activity among healthy adults: meta-analysis of outcomes. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:751–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Foster C, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M, Kaur A, Wedatilake T. Interventions for promoting physical activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;1:CD003180.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Hutchinson AD, Wilson C. Improving nutrition and physical activity in the workplace: a meta-analysis of intervention studies. Health Promot Int. 2012;27:238–49.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Abraham C, Graham-Rowe E. Are worksite interventions effective in increasing physical activity? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2009;3:108–44.CrossRef
11.
12.
Rongen A, Robroek SJ, van Lenthe FJ, Burdorf A. Workplace health promotion: A meta-analysis of effectiveness. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44:406–15.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
15.
House of Lords Report. Behaviour change. Science and Technology Select Committee, 2nd report of session. 2010–12.
16.
Promberger M, Dolan P, Marteau TM. “Pay them if it works”: Discrete choice experiments on the acceptability of financial incentives to change health related behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:2509–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Marteau TM, Ashcroft RE, Oliver A. Using financial incentives to achieve behaviour change. BMJ. 2009;338:b1415.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
Giles EL, Robalino S, McColl E, Sniehotta FF, Adams J. The effectiveness of financial incentives for health behaviour change: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;11:9:e90347.
20.
Mantzari E, Vogt F, Shemilt I, Wei Y, Higgins JP, Marteau TM. Personal financial incentives for changing habitual health-related behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2015;75:75–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Charness G, Gneezy U. Incentives to exercise. Econometrica. 2009;77:909–31.CrossRef
22.
Johannesson M, Ostling R, Ranehill E. The effect of competition on physical activity: A randomized trial. B E J Econom Anal Policy. 2010;10:1–29.
23.
Johnston M. What more can we learn from early learning theory? The contemporary relevance for behaviour change interventions. Br J Health Psychol. 2016;21:1–10.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Haff N, Patel MS, Lim R, Zhu J, Troxel AB, Asch DA, Volpp KG. The role of behavioral economic incentive design and demographic characteristics in financial incentive-based approaches to changing health behaviors: a meta-analysis. Am J Health Promot. 2015;29:314–23.CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
27.
Hunter RF, Tully MA, Davis M, Stevenson M, Kee F. Physical activity loyalty cards for behaviour change. A quasi-experimental study. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45:56–63.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krlezˇa-Jeric ´K, Hro´ bjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, Dore ´CJ, Parulekar WR, Summerskill WSM, Groves T, Schulz KF, Sox HC, Rockhold FW, Rennie D, Moher D. SPIRIT Guidelines 2013 Statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:200–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Dallat MA, Hunter RF, Tully MA, Cairns KJ, Kee F. A lesson in business: cost-effectiveness analysis of a novel financial incentive intervention for increasing physical activity in the workplace. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:953.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Hamilton MT, Hamilton DG, Zderic TW. The role of low energy expenditure and sitting on obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes. 2007;56:2655–67.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Adams R. Revised Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire. Can Fam Physician. 1999;45:992,995,1004-5.PubMed
33.
34.
35.
Grisolia JM, Longo A, Hutchinson G, Kee F. Trading off dietary choices, physical exercise and cardiovascular disease risks. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:130–8.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, McAteer J, Gupta S. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol. 2009;28:690–701.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Carver CS, Scheier MF. Attention and self-regulation: a control-theory approach to human behaviour. New York: Springer Verlag; 1981.CrossRef
38.
Bandura A. Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.
39.
Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger AL, Lin N, Lewis R, Stave CD, Olkin I, Sirard JR. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298:2296–304.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Bassett DR, Ainsworth BE, Leggett SR, Mathien CA, Main JA, Hunter DC, Duncan GE. Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996;28:1071–7.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Schneider PL, Crouter SE, Lukajic O, Bassett DR. Accuracy and reliability of 10 pedometers for measuring steps over a 400-m walk. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1779–84.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Bull FC, Maslin TS, Armstrong T. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ): nine country reliability and validity study. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6:790–804.CrossRefPubMed
43.
44.
EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1991;16:199–208.
45.
Oppe M, Devlin N, van Hout B, Krabbe P, de Charro F. A Program of Methodological Research at the New International EQ-5D-5 L Valuation Protocol. Value Health. 2014;17(4):445–53.CrossRefPubMed
46.
47.
Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, Parkinson J, Secker J, Stewart-Brown S. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Lloyd K, Devine P. Psychometric properties of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) in Northern Ireland. J Ment Health. 2012;21:257–63.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Kessler RC, Barber C, Beck A, Berglund P, Cleary PD, McKenas D, Pronk N, Simon G, Stang P, Ustun TB, Wang P. The World Health Organisation Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ). J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45:156–74.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Chapman LS. Presenteeism and its role in worksite health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 2005;19:1–8.PubMed
51.
Brown HB, Burton N, Gilson ND, Brown W. Measuring presenteeism: Which questionnaire to use in physical activity research? J Phys Act Health. 2014;11:241–8.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Rothman AJ, Baldwin AS, Hertel AW, Fuglestad PT. Self-regulation and behavior change: Disentangling behavioral initiation and behavioral maintenance. In: Vohs KD, Baumeister RF, editors. Handbook of Self-regulation: Research, Theory, & Applications. New York: Guilford Press; 2011. p. 106–22.
53.
Schwarzer R, Schüz B, Ziegelmann JP, Lippke S, Luszczynska A, Scholz U. Adoption and maintenance of four health behaviors: Theory-guided longitudinal studies on dental flossing, seat belt use, dietary behavior, and physical activity. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33:156–66.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Kassavou A, Turner A, Hamborg T, French DP. Predicting maintenance of attendance at walking groups: Testing constructs from three leading maintenance theories. Health Psychol. 2014;33:752–6.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Michie S, Ashford S, Sniehotta FF, Dombrowski SU, Bishop A, French DP. A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: The CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol Health. 2011;26:1479–98.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Baranowski T, Anderson C, Carmack C. Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions. How are we doing? How might we do better? Am J Prev Med. 1998;15:266–97.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Dzewaltowski DA, Owen N. Toward a better understanding of the influences on physical activity. The role of determinants, correlates, causal variables, mediators, moderators, and confounders. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23 Suppl 2:5–14.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Hampton B, Brinberg D, Peter P, Corus C. Integrating the Unified Theory and Stages of Change to create targeted health messages. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2009;39:449–71.CrossRef
59.
Hardeman W, Kinmonth AL, Michie S, Sutton S. Theory of planned behaviour cognitions do not predict self-reported or objective physical activity levels or change in the ProActive trial. Br J Health Psychol. 2011;16:135–50.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJF, Martin BW, for the Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012;380:258–71.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Finch EA, Linde JA, Jeffery RW, Rothman AJ, King CM, Levy RL. The effects of outcome expectations and satisfaction on weight loss and maintenance: Correlational and experimental analyses-a randomized trial. Health Psychol. 2005;24:608–16.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Marcus BH, Selby VC, Niaura RS, Rossi JS. Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992;63:60–6.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1980.
64.
Hunter RF, McAneney H, Davis M, Tully MA, Valente TW, Kee F. "Hidden" social networks in behavior change interventions. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:513–6.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Ogilvie D, Mitchell R, Mutrie N, Petticrew M, Platt S. Perceived characteristics of the environment associated with active travel: development and testing of a new scale. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
66.
Frank LD, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Leary L, Cain K, Conway TL, Hess PM. The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:924–33.CrossRefPubMed
67.
Dalton AM, Jones AP, Panter JR, Ogilvie D. Neighbourhood, route and workplace-related environmental characteristics predict adults’ mode of travel to work. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67575.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
68.
Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, de Vries NK, Brug J, Oenema A. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
69.
Verplanken B, Orbell S. Reflections on past behavior: A self-report index of habit strength. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2003;33:1313–30.CrossRef
70.
Scholz U, Sniehotta FF, Schwarzer R. Predicting physical exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: The role of phase-specific self-efficacy beliefs. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2005;27:135–51.CrossRef
71.
Ball K, Jeffrey RW, Abbott G, McNaughton SA, Crawford D. Is healthy behavior contagious: associations of social norms with physical activity and healthy eating? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
72.
Harrington J, Perry IJ, Lutomski J, Fitzgerald AP, Shiely F, McGee H, Barry MM, Morgan K, Shelley E. Living longer and feeling better: healthy lifestyle, self-rated health, obesity and depression in Ireland. Eur J Public Health. 2010;20:91–5.CrossRefPubMed
73.
Ritzwoller D, Sukhanova A, Gaglio B, Glasgow R. Costing behavioural interventions: a practical guide to enhance translation. Ann Behav Med. 2009;37:218–27.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Bockstael NE, McConnell KE. Environmental and resource valuation with revealed preferences. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007.
75.
Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.CrossRef
76.
Cawley J. An economic framework for understanding physical activity and eating behaviors. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(3 Suppl):117–25.CrossRefPubMed
77.
Humphreys BR, Ruseski JE. Participation in physical activity and government spending on parks and recreation. Cont Econ Policy. 2007;25:538–52.CrossRef
78.
Humphreys BR, Ruseski JE. An economic analysis of participation and time spent in physical activity. B E J Econom Anal Policy. 2011;11:1–36.
79.
Brown DS, Finkelstein EA, Brown DR, Buchner DM, Johnson FR. Estimating older adults’ preferences for walking programs via conjoint analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:201–7.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Laury SK, McInnes MM, Swarthout JT. Avoiding the curves: Direct elicitation of time preferences. J Risk Uncertain. 2012;44:181–217.CrossRef
81.
Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
82.
Royston P, White IR. Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE): Implementation in Stata. J Stat Softw. 2011;45:1–20.CrossRef
83.
MacKinnon DP. Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Erlbaum; 2008.
84.
Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavl Res Methods. 2008;40:879–91.CrossRef
85.
Borgatti SP, Evereyy MG, Freeman LC. UCINet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. [computer program]. Cambridge: Analytic Technologies; 2002.
86.
Manca A, Hawkins N, Sculpher MJ. Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ. 2005;14:487–96.CrossRefPubMed
87.
Briggs AH, O’Brien BJ, Blackhouse G. Thinking outside the box: recent advances in the analysis and presentation of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:377–401.CrossRefPubMed
88.
Bending M, Beale S, Hutton J. An economic analysis of workplace interventions that promote physical activity, PHIAC Report. York: York Health Economics Consortium; 2008.
89.
Krol M, Stolk E, Brouwer W. Productivity predictions based on EQ-5D: An explorative study. Zurich: ECHE; 2012.
90.
Brouwer WB, Meerding WJ, Lamers LM, Severens JL. The relationship between productivity and health-related QOL: an exploration. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23:209–18.CrossRefPubMed
91.
Lamers LM, Meerding WJ, Severens JL, Brouwer WB. The relationship between productivity and health-related quality of life: an empirical exploration in persons with low back pain. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:805–13.CrossRefPubMed
92.
Heckman JJ. Shadow prices, market wages, and labor supply. Econometrica. 1974;42:679–94.CrossRef
93.
Heckman JJ. The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Ann Econ Soc Meas. 1976;5:475–92.
94.
Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd edn). Massachusetts: Institute of Technology; 2010.
95.
Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2009.
96.
Ritchie J, Spencer L, O’Connor W. Carrying out qualitative analysis. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage; 2003. p. 199–218.
97.
Prior L. Content Analysis. In: Leavy P, editor. Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.
98.
Stuart P, Cole SR, Bradshaw CP, Leaf PJ. The use of propensity scores to assess the generalizability of results from randomized trials. J R Statist Soc A. 2011;174:369–86.CrossRef
99.
Giles EL, Robalino S, McColl E, Sniehotta FF, Adams J. The effectiveness of financial incentives for health behaviour change: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e90347.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
100.
Finkelstein EA, Sahasranaman A, John G, Haaland BA, Bilger M, Sloan RA, Nang EE, Evenson KR. Design and baseline characteristics of participants in the TRial of Economic Incentives to Promote Physical Activity (TRIPPA): a randomised controlled trial of a six month pedometer program with financial incentives. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;41:238–47.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a physical activity loyalty scheme for behaviour change maintenance: a cluster randomised controlled trial
Authors
Ruth F. Hunter
Sarah F. Brennan
Jianjun Tang
Oliver J. Smith
Jennifer Murray
Mark A. Tully
Chris Patterson
Alberto Longo
George Hutchinson
Lindsay Prior
David P. French
Jean Adams
Emma McIntosh
Frank Kee
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3244-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers

Research article

The association between psychosocial and structural-level stressors and HIV injection drug risk behavior among Malaysian fishermen: A cross-sectional study

Research article

Socioecological factors influencing women’s HIV risk in the United States: qualitative findings from the women’s HIV SeroIncidence study (HPTN 064)

Research article

Prevalence and associated factors of occupational injuries among municipal solid waste collectors in four zones of Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia

Study protocol

Early identification in primary health care of people at risk for sick leave due to work-related stress – study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (RCT)

Research article

Prevalence, correlates, and associated psychological problems of substance use in Korean adolescents