Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC International Health and Human Rights 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Effective implementation of the UNCRPD by Thailand State Party: challenges and potential remedies

Authors: Donruedee Srisuppaphon, Arnon Sriboonroj, Wachara Riewpaiboon, Viroj Tangcharoensathien

Published in: BMC International Health and Human Rights | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Thai government ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) in 2008, and the first progress report by the State Party was issued in 2012. This study assesses and identifies gaps in the Government’s implementation of the Convention.

Methods

Using the Deming Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle as an analytical framework for continuous quality improvement, we reviewed five documents which are: the 2012 State Party report; the list of issues by the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; the 2015 replies to the list of issues by the Thai government; an alternative report produced by Civil Society Organizations (CSOs); and an alternative report produced by the National Human Rights Commission of Thailand. Content analysis is applied to generate the emerging gaps in implementation.

Results

Thailand’s main advantage is the evolving legal frameworks operating in compliance with the convention, although further amendment is still needed, including effective law enforcement. Conflicting information between the Government’s and alternative reports reflects the shortcomings in the information system that intends to support rigorous monitoring and evaluation. Lacking of concrete measures and outcome indicators on certain articles reflects the State Party’s limited understanding of the concept of human rights and participatory approaches and insufficient institutional capacities for effective implementation.

Conclusions

To rectify these implementation gaps, a few actions are suggested. This includes amending the laws which violate the rights of persons with psychosocial disability; reforming governance where the monitoring bodies are truly independent from implementing agencies; strengthening cross-sectoral actions; and improving information systems which facilitate monitoring and evaluation where Disabled People’s Organizations and Civil Society Organizations are recognized as true equal partners. Implementation research can provide evidence for further effective implementation.
Footnotes
1
Reasonable accommodation means necessary and appropriate modification and adjustments not imposing a disproportionate or undue burden, where needed in a particular case, to ensure to persons with disabilities the enjoyment or exercise on an equal basis with others of all human rights and fundamental freedoms [2].
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shanimon S, Rateesh KN. Theoretizing the models of disability philosophical social and medical concepts – an empirical research based on existing literature. Int J Sci Res Public. 2014;4(6):1–6. Shanimon S, Rateesh KN. Theoretizing the models of disability philosophical social and medical concepts – an empirical research based on existing literature. Int J Sci Res Public. 2014;4(6):1–6.
5.
go back to reference Petchkong W. Disability civil society network: identity formation in health system reform process. Nonthaburi: Society and Health Institute; 2005 [in Thai]. Petchkong W. Disability civil society network: identity formation in health system reform process. Nonthaburi: Society and Health Institute; 2005 [in Thai].
6.
go back to reference Kata P. The Biopolitics and disabled body: The history of the construction of ambiguous citizen. Nonthaburi: Society and Health Institute; 2014. [in Thai] Kata P. The Biopolitics and disabled body: The history of the construction of ambiguous citizen. Nonthaburi: Society and Health Institute; 2014. [in Thai]
7.
go back to reference Naemiratch B, Manderson L. Pity and pragmatism: understandings of disability in northeast Thailand. Disabil Soc. 2009;24(4):475–88.CrossRef Naemiratch B, Manderson L. Pity and pragmatism: understandings of disability in northeast Thailand. Disabil Soc. 2009;24(4):475–88.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kranrattanasuit N, Sirirungruang I, Suwannawut N. Understanding CRPD Implementation in Thailand. In: Cogburn DL, Reuter TK, editors. Making disability rights real in Southeast Asia: implementing the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in ASEAN. The United States: Lexington Books; 2017. p. 41–60. Kranrattanasuit N, Sirirungruang I, Suwannawut N. Understanding CRPD Implementation in Thailand. In: Cogburn DL, Reuter TK, editors. Making disability rights real in Southeast Asia: implementing the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in ASEAN. The United States: Lexington Books; 2017. p. 41–60.
10.
go back to reference Cheausuwantavee T. Comparative study in disability law of Thailand, United Kingdom and United States of America. J Ratchasuda Coll Res Dev Persons Disabil. 2005;1(2):37–58 [in Thai]. Cheausuwantavee T. Comparative study in disability law of Thailand, United Kingdom and United States of America. J Ratchasuda Coll Res Dev Persons Disabil. 2005;1(2):37–58 [in Thai].
11.
go back to reference Royal Thai Government Gazette. Rehabilitation for persons with disabilities Act, B.E. 2534. 1991. Royal Thai Government Gazette. Rehabilitation for persons with disabilities Act, B.E. 2534. 1991.
13.
go back to reference Riewpaiboon W. Interview with Mr. Monthien Bunton on the UNCRPD. Disability politics newsletter. 2008;13(2):29–42. Riewpaiboon W. Interview with Mr. Monthien Bunton on the UNCRPD. Disability politics newsletter. 2008;13(2):29–42.
23.
go back to reference Pensri C. Discourse of the Thai State on development (1961 – 1996). Master of arts in government [thesis]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University; 2000 [in Thai]. Pensri C. Discourse of the Thai State on development (1961 – 1996). Master of arts in government [thesis]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University; 2000 [in Thai].
24.
go back to reference Amenta E. State-centered and political institutional theory: Retrospect and prospect. In: Alford R, Hicks A, Janoski T, Mildred A, editors. Handbook of political sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 96–114. Amenta E. State-centered and political institutional theory: Retrospect and prospect. In: Alford R, Hicks A, Janoski T, Mildred A, editors. Handbook of political sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 96–114.
25.
go back to reference Charoensin-o-larn C. Development discourse: power, knowledge, truth, identity and otherness. 5th ed. Bangkok: Vibhasa; 2011 [in Thai]. Charoensin-o-larn C. Development discourse: power, knowledge, truth, identity and otherness. 5th ed. Bangkok: Vibhasa; 2011 [in Thai].
27.
go back to reference Marano N, Arguin P, Pappaioanou M, King L. Role of Multisector partnerships in controlling emerging zoonotic diseases. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(2):1813–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Marano N, Arguin P, Pappaioanou M, King L. Role of Multisector partnerships in controlling emerging zoonotic diseases. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(2):1813–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Rivers L. No more gaps: combining health, development & environment strategies to eradicate disadvantage in the northern territory of Australia. The United States of America: Xlibris; 2010. Rivers L. No more gaps: combining health, development & environment strategies to eradicate disadvantage in the northern territory of Australia. The United States of America: Xlibris; 2010.
29.
go back to reference United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. ESCAP guide on disability indicators for the Incheon strategy. Bangkok: United Nations Publication; 2014. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. ESCAP guide on disability indicators for the Incheon strategy. Bangkok: United Nations Publication; 2014.
31.
go back to reference Harvey G, Fitzgerald L, Fielden S, McBride A, Waterman H, Bamford D, et al. The NIHR collaboration for leadership in applied health research and care (CLAHRC) for Greater Manchester: combining empirical, theoretical and experiential evidence to design and evaluate a large-scale implementation strategy. Implement Sci. 2011;6:96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harvey G, Fitzgerald L, Fielden S, McBride A, Waterman H, Bamford D, et al. The NIHR collaboration for leadership in applied health research and care (CLAHRC) for Greater Manchester: combining empirical, theoretical and experiential evidence to design and evaluate a large-scale implementation strategy. Implement Sci. 2011;6:96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Joosen MCW, van Beurden KM, Terluin B, van Weeghal J, Brouwers EPM, van der Klink JJL. Improving occupational physicians’ adherence to a practice guideline: feasibility and impact of a tailored implementation strategy. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Joosen MCW, van Beurden KM, Terluin B, van Weeghal J, Brouwers EPM, van der Klink JJL. Improving occupational physicians’ adherence to a practice guideline: feasibility and impact of a tailored implementation strategy. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Effective implementation of the UNCRPD by Thailand State Party: challenges and potential remedies
Authors
Donruedee Srisuppaphon
Arnon Sriboonroj
Wachara Riewpaiboon
Viroj Tangcharoensathien
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC International Health and Human Rights / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-698X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12914-017-0123-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC International Health and Human Rights 1/2017 Go to the issue