Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 11/2016

01-11-2016 | Original Contributions

Effect of Surgeon Volume on Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcomes

Authors: Adam C. Celio, Kevin R. Kasten, Jason Brinkley, Ann Y. Chung, Matthew B. Burruss, Walter J. Pories, Konstantinos Spaniolas

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 11/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Prior studies have shown a relationship between surgeon volume and patient outcomes in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is now the most common bariatric procedure, but there is a little data on surgeon volume and outcomes after SG. We examined the relationship between annual surgeon bariatric volume and 30-day complication rate after SG.

Methods

The Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database for 2011 was used for this study. Using 50 annual cases as a cutoff point, surgeons were classified as low (LV-SG) or high volume SG (HV-SG) and low (LV-RYGB) or high volume RYGB (HV-RYGB) providers. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the effect of surgeon volume on 30-day readmissions, reoperations, and complications following SG while controlling for patient demographics and comorbidities.

Results

We identified 16,547 SG patients. After controlling for baseline characteristics, HV-SG surgeons had lower rates of 30-day complications (OR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.64–0.92), reoperation (OR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.52–0.90), and readmission (OR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.61–0.88) compared to LV-SG surgeons. HV-RYGB surgeons had lower 30-day complication rates (OR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.69–0.92), but were without differences in reoperation (OR 0.82, 95 % CI 0.61–1.10) or readmission (OR 1.06, 95 % CI 0.88–1.27) compared to LV-RYGB surgeons.

Conclusions

High SG volume is associated with improved 30-day readmission, reoperation, and complication rates. Concurrent RYGB volume impacts the 30-day complication rate after SG, but does not affect the readmission or reoperation rate. Our findings suggest that SG-specific volume is important for optimal safety outcomes in SG patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(25):1364–9.PubMedCrossRef Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(25):1364–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chang AC, Birkmeyer JD. The volume–performance relationship in esophagectomy. Thoracic Surgery Clinics. 2006;16(1):87–94.PubMedCrossRef Chang AC, Birkmeyer JD. The volume–performance relationship in esophagectomy. Thoracic Surgery Clinics. 2006;16(1):87–94.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cameron JL. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies and beyond: a personal series. Am J Surg. 2007;194(4, Supplement):S11–5.CrossRef Cameron JL. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies and beyond: a personal series. Am J Surg. 2007;194(4, Supplement):S11–5.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Joseph B, Morton JM, Hernandez-Boussard T, et al. Relationship between hospital volume, system clinical resources, and mortality in pancreatic resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:520–7.PubMedCrossRef Joseph B, Morton JM, Hernandez-Boussard T, et al. Relationship between hospital volume, system clinical resources, and mortality in pancreatic resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:520–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Eckstein HH, Bruckner T, Heider P, et al. The relationship between volume and outcome following elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in 131 German Hospitals. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;34(3):260–6.PubMedCrossRef Eckstein HH, Bruckner T, Heider P, et al. The relationship between volume and outcome following elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in 131 German Hospitals. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;34(3):260–6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wang YR, Dempsey DT, Friedenberg FK, et al. Trends of Heller myotomy hospitalizations for achalasia in the United States, 1993–2005: effect of surgery volume on perioperative outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(10):2454–64.PubMedCrossRef Wang YR, Dempsey DT, Friedenberg FK, et al. Trends of Heller myotomy hospitalizations for achalasia in the United States, 1993–2005: effect of surgery volume on perioperative outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(10):2454–64.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Volume-outcome association in bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2012;256:60–71.PubMedCrossRef Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Volume-outcome association in bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2012;256:60–71.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Smith MD, Patterson E, Wahed AS, et al. Relationship between surgeon volume and adverse outcomes after RYGB in Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(2):118–25.PubMedCrossRef Smith MD, Patterson E, Wahed AS, et al. Relationship between surgeon volume and adverse outcomes after RYGB in Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(2):118–25.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Courcoulas A, Schuchert M, Gatti G, et al. The relationship of surgeon and hospital volume to outcome after gastric bypass surgery in Pennsylvania: a 3-year summary. Surgery. 2003;134(4):613–21.PubMedCrossRef Courcoulas A, Schuchert M, Gatti G, et al. The relationship of surgeon and hospital volume to outcome after gastric bypass surgery in Pennsylvania: a 3-year summary. Surgery. 2003;134(4):613–21.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Weller WE, Rosati C, Hannan EL. Relationship between surgeon and hospital volume and readmission after bariatric operation. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(3):383–91.PubMedCrossRef Weller WE, Rosati C, Hannan EL. Relationship between surgeon and hospital volume and readmission after bariatric operation. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(3):383–91.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Birkmeyer NJ, Dimick JB, Share D, et al. Hospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in Michigan. JAMA. 2010;304(4):435–42.PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer NJ, Dimick JB, Share D, et al. Hospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in Michigan. JAMA. 2010;304(4):435–42.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Spaniolas K, Kasten KR, Brinkley J, et al. The Changing Bariatric Surgery Landscape in the USA. Obes Surg. 2015;25(8):1544–6.PubMedCrossRef Spaniolas K, Kasten KR, Brinkley J, et al. The Changing Bariatric Surgery Landscape in the USA. Obes Surg. 2015;25(8):1544–6.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Young MT, Gebhart A, Phelan MJ, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(5):880–5.PubMedCrossRef Young MT, Gebhart A, Phelan MJ, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(5):880–5.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference DeMaria EJ, Pate V, Warthen M, et al. Baseline data from American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery-designated Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence using the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(4):347–55.PubMedCrossRef DeMaria EJ, Pate V, Warthen M, et al. Baseline data from American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery-designated Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence using the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(4):347–55.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Blondet JJ, Morton JM, Nguyen NT. Hospital Accreditation and Bariatric Surgery. Adv Surg. 2015;49:123–9.PubMedCrossRef Blondet JJ, Morton JM, Nguyen NT. Hospital Accreditation and Bariatric Surgery. Adv Surg. 2015;49:123–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hollenbeak CS, Rogers AM, Barrus B, et al. Surgical volume impacts bariatric surgery mortality: a case for centers of excellence. Surgery. 2008;144(5):736–43.PubMedCrossRef Hollenbeak CS, Rogers AM, Barrus B, et al. Surgical volume impacts bariatric surgery mortality: a case for centers of excellence. Surgery. 2008;144(5):736–43.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC. The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Serv Res. 1987;22(2):157–82.PubMedPubMedCentral Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC. The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Serv Res. 1987;22(2):157–82.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Paya M, Stevens CM, et al. The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):586,93. discussion 593–4. Nguyen NT, Paya M, Stevens CM, et al. The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):586,93. discussion 593–4.
Metadata
Title
Effect of Surgeon Volume on Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcomes
Authors
Adam C. Celio
Kevin R. Kasten
Jason Brinkley
Ann Y. Chung
Matthew B. Burruss
Walter J. Pories
Konstantinos Spaniolas
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2190-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2016

Obesity Surgery 11/2016 Go to the issue