Published in:
01-05-2014 | Original Article
Effect of radical amplified photopolymerization (RAP) in resin-based composites
Authors:
Nicoleta Ilie, Ina Kreppel, Jürgen Durner
Published in:
Clinical Oral Investigations
|
Issue 4/2014
Login to get access
Abstract
Objective
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of irradiation time and specimens thickness on the polymerization kinetic and variation in micro-mechanical properties of two commercial resin-based composites (RBCs) based on radical amplified photopolymerization (RAP) technology™, and to compare them with four camphorquinone (CQ)/amine-based RBCs.
Materials and methods
The materials were analysed by assessing the polymerization kinetic and the degree of cure (DC) at 0.1 mm and 2 mm depth during 5 minutes after photoinitiation, after curing for 10 s, 20 s and 40 s (Elipar Freelight2). The variation in micro-mechanical properties (Vickers hardness (HV), indentation modulus (E), and depth of cure (DOC)) was assessed in 100 μm steps on 6-mm-high specimens irradiated as above and stored in the water for 24 h at 37 °C.
Results
The results were statistically compared using one-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD post hoc test (α = 0.05) and a general linear model. The parameter material exerted the strongest effect on DC (partial eta-squared η
p
2 = 0.83), followed by irradiation time (η
p
2 = 0.27), and depth (η
p
2 = 0.09). The polymerization kinetic, well described by an exponential sum function, showed in all materials a faster decrease in carbon–carbon double bonds at 0.1 mm than at 2 mm depth. The materials based on RAP achieved the highest DC values and a faster polymerization at both depths. The irradiation time exerted the strongest effect on the mechanical properties (DOC, η
p
2 = 0.96; HV, η
p
2 = 0.89; E, η
p
2 = 0.86), followed by depth (HV, η
p
2 = 0.63; E, η
p
2 = 0.54) and material (HV, η
p
2 = 0.40; E, η
p
2 = 0.67). At the most favorable curing conditions (40 s, surface), the mechanical properties of the analyzed materials varied between 11.38 (0.80) GPa in Estelite® Sigma Quick and 20.80 (1.42) GPa in Estelite® Posterior for E, and between 74.33 (3.56) N/mm2 in Tetric EvoCeram® and 120.71 (6.24) N/mm2 in Estelite® Posterior for HV.
Conclusions
RAP-initiated material demonstrated a higher increase in DOC with prolonged irradiation time than the analyzed CQ/amine based materials.
Clinical relevance
An irradiation time of 20 s is also recommended for RAP-initiated RBCs.