Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Ophthalmology 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Effect of Limbal relaxing incisions during implantable collamer lens surgery

Authors: Zhen Li, Yu Han, Budan Hu, Huibin Du, Gengsheng Hao, Xiaoxi Chen

Published in: BMC Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The limbal relaxing incisions (LRIs) technique is a safe and an inexpensive procedure, which is simple for experts to perform. It can effectively reduce astigmatism and result in a rapid visual rehabilitation. But there are few reports about reducing pre-existing corneal astigmatism by LRI in ICL surgery. Our research was aimed to study the effect of limbal relaxing inci sions during implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery.

Methods

A prospective analysis reviewing consecutive cases of corneal astigmatism that had either independent ICL surgery (control group) or combined with LRIs (LRIs group). The study population consisted of 45 patients, 85 eyes, with high myopia and regular corneal astigmatism more than 0.50 diopter (D) and less than 3.00 D. The first group received ICL surgery combined with LRIs (limbal relaxing incisions); the control group received only ICL surgery alone. The outcomes considered were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), refraction, keratometry, slit lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, corneal topography, corneal astigmatism, endothelial cell count, and patient satisfaction. The follow-up period covered 12 months.

Results

The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) demonstrated statistically significant improvement after surgery in both groups. At the end of the follow-up period, the UCVA was statistically better for the patients with LRIs compared with those underwent ICL surgery alone. The LRIs group showed significant reduction in the mean topographic astigmatism from 1.48 ± 0.35 D preoperatively to 0.37 ± 0.14 D postoperatively (P < .0001) after one month. The control eyes did not show a statistically significant change (P > 0.05). The mean magnitude of the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) read 1.10 ± 0.35 D,1.13 ± 0.34D,1.13 ± 0.34D,1.11 ± 0.35D by the end of the 1st, the 3rd, the 6th and the 12th month postoperatively in LRIs group, which was slightly lower than the target-induced astigmatism (TIA). The difference in SIA between the LRI and the control group was statistically significant by the end of the 1st, the 3rd, the 6th and the 12th month postoperatively (P < 0.001). The mean correction index (CI) was less than 1, which indicated undercorrection effect of limbal relaxing incision. No difference was observed in the postoperative endothelial cell count between the two groups. There was no intraoperative and postoperative ocular or systemic complication.

Conclusion

Limbal relaxing incision is an effective method in reducing corneal astigmatism during implantable collamer lens surgery.

Trial registration

The trial was retrospectively registered in 14 April 2017. (NO:ChiCTR-ONR-17011147).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alfonso JF, Baamonde B, Fernández-Vega L, et al. Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lenses to correct myopia: five-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:873–80.CrossRefPubMed Alfonso JF, Baamonde B, Fernández-Vega L, et al. Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lenses to correct myopia: five-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:873–80.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, et al. Four-year follow-up of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for moderate to high myopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:845–50.CrossRefPubMed Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, et al. Four-year follow-up of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for moderate to high myopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:845–50.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Pérez-Vives C, Domínguez-Vicent A, Ferrer-Blasco T, et al. Optical quality of the Visian implantable Collamer lens for different refractive powers. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251:1423–9.CrossRefPubMed Pérez-Vives C, Domínguez-Vicent A, Ferrer-Blasco T, et al. Optical quality of the Visian implantable Collamer lens for different refractive powers. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251:1423–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schallhorn S, Tanzer D, Sanders DR, et al. Randomized prospective comparison of visian toric implantable collamer lens and conventional photorefractive keratectomy for moderate to high myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:853–67.PubMed Schallhorn S, Tanzer D, Sanders DR, et al. Randomized prospective comparison of visian toric implantable collamer lens and conventional photorefractive keratectomy for moderate to high myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:853–67.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Muftuoglu O, Dao L, Cavanagh HD, et al. Limbal relaxing incisions at the time of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation to reduce astigmatism with or without subsequent laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:456–64.CrossRefPubMed Muftuoglu O, Dao L, Cavanagh HD, et al. Limbal relaxing incisions at the time of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation to reduce astigmatism with or without subsequent laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:456–64.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Leon P, Pastore MR, Zanei A, et al. Correction of low corneal astigmatism in cataract surgery. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015;8:719–24.PubMedPubMedCentral Leon P, Pastore MR, Zanei A, et al. Correction of low corneal astigmatism in cataract surgery. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015;8:719–24.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Mohammad-Rabei H, Mohammad-Rabei E, Espandar G, et al. Three methods for correction of astigmatism during Phacoemulsification. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016;11:162–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mohammad-Rabei H, Mohammad-Rabei E, Espandar G, et al. Three methods for correction of astigmatism during Phacoemulsification. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016;11:162–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Langerman DW. Architectural design of a self-sealing corneal tunnel, single-hinge incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20:84–92.CrossRefPubMed Langerman DW. Architectural design of a self-sealing corneal tunnel, single-hinge incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20:84–92.CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Bullimore MA, Spooner G, Sluyterman G, et al. Correction of low levels of astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1641–9.CrossRefPubMed Bullimore MA, Spooner G, Sluyterman G, et al. Correction of low levels of astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1641–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Freitas GDO, Boteon JE, Carvalho MJ, Pinto RDMC, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between limbal relaxing incisions and toric intraocular lenses in eyes with astigmatic corneas. Rev Bras Oftalmol. 2014;73:11–5. Freitas GDO, Boteon JE, Carvalho MJ, Pinto RDMC, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between limbal relaxing incisions and toric intraocular lenses in eyes with astigmatic corneas. Rev Bras Oftalmol. 2014;73:11–5.
12.
go back to reference Güell JL, Vazquez M. Correction of high astigmatism with astigmatic keratotomy combined with laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:960–6.CrossRefPubMed Güell JL, Vazquez M. Correction of high astigmatism with astigmatic keratotomy combined with laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:960–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ganem S, Sidhoum SB. Surgery in myopic astigmatism: arciform keratotomy and PKR versus PARK. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 1997;266:87–90.PubMed Ganem S, Sidhoum SB. Surgery in myopic astigmatism: arciform keratotomy and PKR versus PARK. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 1997;266:87–90.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Ganekal S, Dorairaj S, Jhanji V. Limbal relaxing incisions during phacoemulsification:6-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:2081–2.CrossRefPubMed Ganekal S, Dorairaj S, Jhanji V. Limbal relaxing incisions during phacoemulsification:6-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:2081–2.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Eliwa TF, Abdellatif MK, Hamza II. Effect of Limbal relaxing incisions on corneal aberrations. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:156–62.CrossRefPubMed Eliwa TF, Abdellatif MK, Hamza II. Effect of Limbal relaxing incisions on corneal aberrations. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:156–62.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nanavaty MA, Dizon M, Malde S, et al. Peripheral corneal relaxing incisions based on anterior keratometry from Scheimpflug tomography versus Placido topography during standard cataract surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254:297–305.CrossRefPubMed Nanavaty MA, Dizon M, Malde S, et al. Peripheral corneal relaxing incisions based on anterior keratometry from Scheimpflug tomography versus Placido topography during standard cataract surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254:297–305.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lim R, Borasio E, Ilari L.Long-term stability of keratometric astigmatism after limbal relaxing incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg .2014; 40:1676–1681. Lim R, Borasio E, Ilari L.Long-term stability of keratometric astigmatism after limbal relaxing incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg .2014; 40:1676–1681.
18.
go back to reference Alió JL, Elkady B, Ortiz D. Corneal optical quality following sub 1.8 mm micro-incision cataract surgery vs. 2.2 mm mini-incision coaxial phacoemulsification. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2010;17:94.PubMedPubMedCentral Alió JL, Elkady B, Ortiz D. Corneal optical quality following sub 1.8 mm micro-incision cataract surgery vs. 2.2 mm mini-incision coaxial phacoemulsification. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2010;17:94.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Elkady B, Piñero D, Alió JL. Corneal incision quality: microincision cataract surgery versus microcoaxial phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:466–74.CrossRefPubMed Elkady B, Piñero D, Alió JL. Corneal incision quality: microincision cataract surgery versus microcoaxial phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:466–74.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lee BS, Lindstrom RL, Reeves SW, et al. Modern management of astigmatism. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2013;53:65–78.CrossRefPubMed Lee BS, Lindstrom RL, Reeves SW, et al. Modern management of astigmatism. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2013;53:65–78.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Moorthy S, Chohan AB, Vajpayee RB, et al. Microbial keratitis after combined phacoemulsification and astigmatic keratotomy. Clin Exp Optom. 2010;93:98–9.CrossRefPubMed Moorthy S, Chohan AB, Vajpayee RB, et al. Microbial keratitis after combined phacoemulsification and astigmatic keratotomy. Clin Exp Optom. 2010;93:98–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hirnschall N, Gangwani V, Crnej A, et al. Correction of moderate corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery: toric intraocular lens versus peripheral corneal relaxing incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:354–61.CrossRefPubMed Hirnschall N, Gangwani V, Crnej A, et al. Correction of moderate corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery: toric intraocular lens versus peripheral corneal relaxing incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:354–61.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of Limbal relaxing incisions during implantable collamer lens surgery
Authors
Zhen Li
Yu Han
Budan Hu
Huibin Du
Gengsheng Hao
Xiaoxi Chen
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2415
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0458-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Ophthalmology 1/2017 Go to the issue