Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 4/2015

01-04-2015 | Original Article

Effect of endurance for adverse drug reactions on the preference for aggressive treatments in cancer patients

Authors: Naomi Iihara, Takayuki Nishio, Tetsuko Goda, Hideaki Anzai, Masatoshi Kagawa, Hitoshi Houchi, Yutaka Kirino

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy will sometimes conceal their discomfort, but an excessive endurance for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can lead to a poorer prognosis. The aim of this study was to clarify the association between ADR endurance and a preference of cancer patients for aggressive treatments.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was undertaken of inpatients under 75 years of age receiving injectable systemic chemotherapy or oral chronic medications at hospitals in Japan. Subjects were asked to respond to a validated questionnaire to assess the extent of their ADR endurance and whether they would choose a novel, more aggressive therapy if their life expectancy was estimated at 2 years.

Results

Study participants were separated into the chemotherapy group (n = 36) and the non-chemotherapy group (n = 78). In the chemotherapy group, patients who had moderate ADR endurance scores were more likely to choose the new therapy (0–33, 34–67, and 68–100 points: 0.0, 54.5, and 27.3 %; χ 2 test, p = 0.15). Additionally, every patient on long-term chemotherapy (≥3 years) had high ADR endurance scores but did not choose the new, riskier treatment. In the non-chemotherapy group, the proportion of those choosing the new therapy was linearly associated with higher ADR endurance scores (25.9, 38.2, and 64.7 %; p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Cancer patients may prefer aggressive therapies, even when self-estimations of ADR endurance are not very high, especially if they have been receiving chemotherapy for a short period of time. These patients should be observed with great caution.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Simes RJ, Coates AS (2001) Patient preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: how much benefit is needed? J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30:146–152CrossRefPubMed Simes RJ, Coates AS (2001) Patient preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: how much benefit is needed? J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30:146–152CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Zimmermann C, Baldo C, Molino A (2000) Framing of outcome and probability of recurrence: breast cancer patients’ choice of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in hypothetical patient scenarios. Breast Cancer Res Treat 60:9–14CrossRefPubMed Zimmermann C, Baldo C, Molino A (2000) Framing of outcome and probability of recurrence: breast cancer patients’ choice of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in hypothetical patient scenarios. Breast Cancer Res Treat 60:9–14CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ravdin PM, Siminoff IA, Harvey JA (1998) Survey of breast cancer patients concerning their knowledge and expectations of adjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 16:515–521PubMed Ravdin PM, Siminoff IA, Harvey JA (1998) Survey of breast cancer patients concerning their knowledge and expectations of adjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 16:515–521PubMed
8.
go back to reference Slevin ML, Stubbs L, Plant HJ, Wilson P, Gregory WM, Armes PJ, Downer SM (1990) Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public. BMJ 300:1458–1460CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Slevin ML, Stubbs L, Plant HJ, Wilson P, Gregory WM, Armes PJ, Downer SM (1990) Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public. BMJ 300:1458–1460CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kuchuk I, Bouganim N, Beusterien K, Grinspan J, Vandermeer L, Gertler S, Dent SF, Song X, Segal R, Mazzarello S, Crawley F, Dranitsaris G, Clemons M (2013) Preference weights for chemotherapy side effects from the perspective of women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 142:101–107. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2727-3 CrossRefPubMed Kuchuk I, Bouganim N, Beusterien K, Grinspan J, Vandermeer L, Gertler S, Dent SF, Song X, Segal R, Mazzarello S, Crawley F, Dranitsaris G, Clemons M (2013) Preference weights for chemotherapy side effects from the perspective of women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 142:101–107. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-013-2727-3 CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sun CC, Bodurka DC, Weaver CB, Rasu R, Wolf JK, Bevers MW, Smith JA, Wharton JT, Rubenstein EB (2005) Rankings and symptom assessments of side effects from chemotherapy: insights from experienced patients with ovarian cancer. Support Care Cancer 13:219–227. doi:10.1007/s00520-004-0710-6 CrossRefPubMed Sun CC, Bodurka DC, Weaver CB, Rasu R, Wolf JK, Bevers MW, Smith JA, Wharton JT, Rubenstein EB (2005) Rankings and symptom assessments of side effects from chemotherapy: insights from experienced patients with ovarian cancer. Support Care Cancer 13:219–227. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-004-0710-6 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sahm S, Will R, Hommel G (2005) What are cancer patients’ preferences about treatment at the end of life, and who should start talking about it? A comparison with healthy people and medical staff. Support Care Cancer 13:206–214. doi:10.1007/s00520-004-0725-z CrossRefPubMed Sahm S, Will R, Hommel G (2005) What are cancer patients’ preferences about treatment at the end of life, and who should start talking about it? A comparison with healthy people and medical staff. Support Care Cancer 13:206–214. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-004-0725-z CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Donovan KA, Greene PG, Shuster JL, Partridge EE, Tucker DC (2002) Treatment preferences in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 86:200–211CrossRefPubMed Donovan KA, Greene PG, Shuster JL, Partridge EE, Tucker DC (2002) Treatment preferences in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 86:200–211CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lindley C, Vasa S, Sawyer WT, Winer EP (1998) Quality of life and preferences for treatment following systemic adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:1380–1387PubMed Lindley C, Vasa S, Sawyer WT, Winer EP (1998) Quality of life and preferences for treatment following systemic adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:1380–1387PubMed
15.
go back to reference Oken M, Creech R, Tormey D, Horton J, Davis T, McFadden E, Carbone P (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655CrossRefPubMed Oken M, Creech R, Tormey D, Horton J, Davis T, McFadden E, Carbone P (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Iihara N, Nishio T, Okura M, Anzai H, Kagawa M, Houchi H, Kirino Y (2014) Comparing patient dissatisfaction and rational judgment in intentional medication non-adherence versus unintentional non-adherence. J Clin Pharm Ther 39:45–52. doi:10.1111/jcpt.12100 CrossRefPubMed Iihara N, Nishio T, Okura M, Anzai H, Kagawa M, Houchi H, Kirino Y (2014) Comparing patient dissatisfaction and rational judgment in intentional medication non-adherence versus unintentional non-adherence. J Clin Pharm Ther 39:45–52. doi:10.​1111/​jcpt.​12100 CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Fayers P, Machin D (2000) Quality of life: assessment, analysis and interpretation. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef Fayers P, Machin D (2000) Quality of life: assessment, analysis and interpretation. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Stiggelbout AM, de Haes JC (2001) Patient preference for cancer therapy: an overview of measurement approaches. J Clin Oncol 19:220–230PubMed Stiggelbout AM, de Haes JC (2001) Patient preference for cancer therapy: an overview of measurement approaches. J Clin Oncol 19:220–230PubMed
20.
go back to reference Luthy C, Cedraschi C, Pugliesi A, Di Silvestro K, Mugnier-Konrad B, Rapiti E, Allaz AF (2011) Patients’ views about causes and preferences for the management of cancer-related fatigue—a case for non-congruence with the physicians? Support Care Cancer 19:363–370. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-0826-9 CrossRefPubMed Luthy C, Cedraschi C, Pugliesi A, Di Silvestro K, Mugnier-Konrad B, Rapiti E, Allaz AF (2011) Patients’ views about causes and preferences for the management of cancer-related fatigue—a case for non-congruence with the physicians? Support Care Cancer 19:363–370. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-010-0826-9 CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Martin MY, Fouad MN, Oster RA, Schrag D, Urmie J, Sanders S, Pisu M (2014) What do cancer patients worry about when making decisions about treatment? Variation across racial/ethnic groups. Support Care Cancer 22:233–244. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1958-5 CrossRefPubMed Martin MY, Fouad MN, Oster RA, Schrag D, Urmie J, Sanders S, Pisu M (2014) What do cancer patients worry about when making decisions about treatment? Variation across racial/ethnic groups. Support Care Cancer 22:233–244. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-013-1958-5 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effect of endurance for adverse drug reactions on the preference for aggressive treatments in cancer patients
Authors
Naomi Iihara
Takayuki Nishio
Tetsuko Goda
Hideaki Anzai
Masatoshi Kagawa
Hitoshi Houchi
Yutaka Kirino
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2439-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Supportive Care in Cancer 4/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine