Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2012

01-06-2012 | Original Research Article

Effect of different stimulus configurations on the visual evoked potential (VEP)

Authors: Naveen K. Yadav, Diana P. Ludlam, Kenneth J. Ciuffreda

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess changes in the response profile of the pattern visual evoked potential (VEP) using three stimulus configurations simulating visual-field scotomas: central circular and central blank fields increasing incrementally in diameter from 1° to 15°, hemi-field, and quadrant patterns. Five visually normal adult subjects (ages 22–68 years) were tested binocularly at 1 m for each stimulus configuration on 5 separate days. A checkerboard test pattern (64 × 64 black-and-white checks, 85 % contrast, 64 cd/m2 luminance, 20 s of stimulus duration, 2-Hz temporal frequency) was used. The group mean VEP amplitude increased in a linear manner with increase in the central circular diameter (y = 0.805x + 2.00; r = 0.986) and decrease in central blank field diameter (y = −0.769x + 16.22; r = 0.987). There was no significant change in latency in nearly all cases. The group mean coefficient of variability results indicated that the VEP amplitude was repeatable for the different stimulus configurations. The finding of VEP response linearity for the circular stimulus fields, and repeatability for all stimulus configurations, suggests that the clinician may be able to use the VEP technique with the suggested test patterns as a rapid and simple tool for objective assessment for several types of visual-field defects for a range of abnormal visual conditions and special populations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bayer AU, Keller ON, Ferrari F, Maag KP (2002) Association of glaucoma with neurodegenerative diseases with apoptotic cell death: Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Am J Ophthalmol 133:135–137PubMedCrossRef Bayer AU, Keller ON, Ferrari F, Maag KP (2002) Association of glaucoma with neurodegenerative diseases with apoptotic cell death: Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Am J Ophthalmol 133:135–137PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yenice O, Onal S, Midi I, Ozcan E, Temel A, I-Gunal D (2008) Visual field analysis in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 14:193–198PubMedCrossRef Yenice O, Onal S, Midi I, Ozcan E, Temel A, I-Gunal D (2008) Visual field analysis in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 14:193–198PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Newkirk MR, Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Johnson CA (2006) Assessment of false positive with the Humphrey field analyzer II perimetry with the SITA algorithm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:4632–4637PubMedCrossRef Newkirk MR, Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Johnson CA (2006) Assessment of false positive with the Humphrey field analyzer II perimetry with the SITA algorithm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:4632–4637PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Katz J, Sommer A (1988) Reliability indexes of automated perimetric tests. Arch Ophthalmol 106:1252–1254PubMedCrossRef Katz J, Sommer A (1988) Reliability indexes of automated perimetric tests. Arch Ophthalmol 106:1252–1254PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Suter PS, Harvey LH (2011) Vision rehabilitation. Multidisciplinary care of the patient following brain injury. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, New York Suter PS, Harvey LH (2011) Vision rehabilitation. Multidisciplinary care of the patient following brain injury. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, New York
6.
go back to reference Asman P, Fingeret M, Robin A, Wild J, Pacey I, Greenfield D, Liebmann J, Ritch R (1999) Kinetic and static fixation method in automated threshold perimetry. J Glaucoma 8:290–296PubMedCrossRef Asman P, Fingeret M, Robin A, Wild J, Pacey I, Greenfield D, Liebmann J, Ritch R (1999) Kinetic and static fixation method in automated threshold perimetry. J Glaucoma 8:290–296PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, Holder GE, McCulloch DL, Tormene AP, Vaegan (2010) ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009) update. Doc Ophthalmol 120:111–119 Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, Holder GE, McCulloch DL, Tormene AP, Vaegan (2010) ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009) update. Doc Ophthalmol 120:111–119
8.
go back to reference Tello C, De Moraes CGV, Prata TS, Derr P, Jayson P, Siegfried J, Liebmann JM, Ritch R (2010) Repeatability of short duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects. Doc Ophthalmol 120:219–228 Tello C, De Moraes CGV, Prata TS, Derr P, Jayson P, Siegfried J, Liebmann JM, Ritch R (2010) Repeatability of short duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects. Doc Ophthalmol 120:219–228
9.
go back to reference Bradnam MS, Montgomery AMI, Evans AL, Keating D, McClure EA, Damato BE, McFadzean R (1996) Objective detection of hemifield and quadrantic field defects by visual evoked cortical potentials. Br J Ophthalmol 80:297–303PubMedCrossRef Bradnam MS, Montgomery AMI, Evans AL, Keating D, McClure EA, Damato BE, McFadzean R (1996) Objective detection of hemifield and quadrantic field defects by visual evoked cortical potentials. Br J Ophthalmol 80:297–303PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Armington JC (1968) The electroretinogram, the visual evoked potential, and the area-luminance relation. Vision Res 8:263–276PubMedCrossRef Armington JC (1968) The electroretinogram, the visual evoked potential, and the area-luminance relation. Vision Res 8:263–276PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tyler CW, Apkarian P, Levi DM, Nakayam K (1979) Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18:703–713PubMed Tyler CW, Apkarian P, Levi DM, Nakayam K (1979) Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18:703–713PubMed
12.
go back to reference Sakaue H, Katsumi O, Mehta M, Hirose T (1990) Simultaneous pattern reversal ERG and VER recordings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31:506–511PubMed Sakaue H, Katsumi O, Mehta M, Hirose T (1990) Simultaneous pattern reversal ERG and VER recordings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31:506–511PubMed
13.
go back to reference Junghardt A, Wildberger H, Robert Y, Török B (1993) Pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potentials amplitudes are influenced by different field sizes and scotomata. Doc Ophthalmol 83:139–149PubMedCrossRef Junghardt A, Wildberger H, Robert Y, Török B (1993) Pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potentials amplitudes are influenced by different field sizes and scotomata. Doc Ophthalmol 83:139–149PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bartl G, Van Lith GHM, Van Marle GW (1978) Cortical potentials evoked by a TV pattern reversal stimulus with varying check sizes and stimulus field. Br J Ophthalmol 62:216–219PubMedCrossRef Bartl G, Van Lith GHM, Van Marle GW (1978) Cortical potentials evoked by a TV pattern reversal stimulus with varying check sizes and stimulus field. Br J Ophthalmol 62:216–219PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rover J, Scaubele G, Berndt K (1980) Macula and periphery: their contribution to the visual evoked potential (VEP) in humans. Graefe’s Archive Clin Exp Ophthalmol 214:47–51CrossRef Rover J, Scaubele G, Berndt K (1980) Macula and periphery: their contribution to the visual evoked potential (VEP) in humans. Graefe’s Archive Clin Exp Ophthalmol 214:47–51CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shawkat FS, Kriss A (1998) Effects of experimental scotomata on sequential pattern-onset, pattern reversal and pattern-offset visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 94:307–320CrossRef Shawkat FS, Kriss A (1998) Effects of experimental scotomata on sequential pattern-onset, pattern reversal and pattern-offset visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 94:307–320CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Orban D, Muller W (1991) Amplitudes of visually evoked cortical responses due to full-field stimulation and to stimulation with four half-fields. Ophthalmologica 202:100–104PubMedCrossRef Orban D, Muller W (1991) Amplitudes of visually evoked cortical responses due to full-field stimulation and to stimulation with four half-fields. Ophthalmologica 202:100–104PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lan C, Song G, Zeng L (1996) Quadrant pattern visual evoked potentials in normal eyes. Chinese J Ophthalmol 32:209–211 Lan C, Song G, Zeng L (1996) Quadrant pattern visual evoked potentials in normal eyes. Chinese J Ophthalmol 32:209–211
19.
go back to reference Simon JW, Siegfried JB, Mill MD (2004) A new visual evoked potential system for vision screening in infants and young children. J AAPOS 8:549–554PubMedCrossRef Simon JW, Siegfried JB, Mill MD (2004) A new visual evoked potential system for vision screening in infants and young children. J AAPOS 8:549–554PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (2006) Guideline 5: guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 23:107–110CrossRef American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (2006) Guideline 5: guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 23:107–110CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Osterberg GA (1935) Topography of the layer of rods and cones in the human retina. Acta Ophthalmologica Suppl 13:1–97 Osterberg GA (1935) Topography of the layer of rods and cones in the human retina. Acta Ophthalmologica Suppl 13:1–97
22.
go back to reference Meredith JT, Celesia GG (1982) Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials and retinal eccentricity. Electrocephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 53:243–253CrossRef Meredith JT, Celesia GG (1982) Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials and retinal eccentricity. Electrocephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 53:243–253CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cappin JM, Nissim S (1973) Visual evoked responses in the assessment of field defects in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 93:9–18CrossRef Cappin JM, Nissim S (1973) Visual evoked responses in the assessment of field defects in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 93:9–18CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Halliday AM, Halliday E, Kriss A, McDonald WI, Mushin J (1976) The pattern-evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways. Brain 99:357–374PubMedCrossRef Halliday AM, Halliday E, Kriss A, McDonald WI, Mushin J (1976) The pattern-evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways. Brain 99:357–374PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Blumhardt LD, Barrett G, Halliday AM (1977) The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects. Br J Ophthalmol 61:454–461PubMedCrossRef Blumhardt LD, Barrett G, Halliday AM (1977) The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects. Br J Ophthalmol 61:454–461PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Howe JW, Mitchell KW (1980) Visual evoked potentials from quadrantic field stimulation in the investigation of homonymous field defects. In: Barber C (ed) Evoked potentials. MTP Press, Lancaster, England, pp 279–283CrossRef Howe JW, Mitchell KW (1980) Visual evoked potentials from quadrantic field stimulation in the investigation of homonymous field defects. In: Barber C (ed) Evoked potentials. MTP Press, Lancaster, England, pp 279–283CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yanashima K (1982) Determination of visual field defects by the visually evoked cortical potential (VECP) decoded by fast Fourier transform (FFT). Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 31:427–435 Yanashima K (1982) Determination of visual field defects by the visually evoked cortical potential (VECP) decoded by fast Fourier transform (FFT). Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 31:427–435
28.
go back to reference Maitland CG, Aminoff MJ, Kennard C, Hoyt WF (1982) Evoked potentials in the evaluation of visual field defects due to chiasmal or retrochiasmal lesions. Neurology 32:986–991PubMedCrossRef Maitland CG, Aminoff MJ, Kennard C, Hoyt WF (1982) Evoked potentials in the evaluation of visual field defects due to chiasmal or retrochiasmal lesions. Neurology 32:986–991PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kelly JP, Weiss AH (2006) Comparison of pattern visual-evoked potentials to perimetry in the detection of visual loss in children with optic pathway gliomas. J AAPOS 10:298–306PubMedCrossRef Kelly JP, Weiss AH (2006) Comparison of pattern visual-evoked potentials to perimetry in the detection of visual loss in children with optic pathway gliomas. J AAPOS 10:298–306PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Brannan JR, Solan HA, Ficarra AP, Ong E (1998) Effect of luminance on visual evoked potential amplitudes in normal and disabled readers. Optom Vis Sci 75:279–283PubMedCrossRef Brannan JR, Solan HA, Ficarra AP, Ong E (1998) Effect of luminance on visual evoked potential amplitudes in normal and disabled readers. Optom Vis Sci 75:279–283PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Copenhaver RM, Beinhocker GD (1963) Evoked occipital potentials recorded from scalp electrodes in response to focal visual illumination. Invest Ophthalmol 2:393–406PubMed Copenhaver RM, Beinhocker GD (1963) Evoked occipital potentials recorded from scalp electrodes in response to focal visual illumination. Invest Ophthalmol 2:393–406PubMed
32.
go back to reference Beinhocker GD, Brooks PR, Anfenger E, Copenhaver RM (1966) Electroperimetry. IEEE Trans Bio Med Eng BAME 13:11–18CrossRef Beinhocker GD, Brooks PR, Anfenger E, Copenhaver RM (1966) Electroperimetry. IEEE Trans Bio Med Eng BAME 13:11–18CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Schreinemachers HP, Henkes HE (1968) Relation between localized retinal stimuli and the visual evoked response in man. Ophthalmology 155:2–27 Schreinemachers HP, Henkes HE (1968) Relation between localized retinal stimuli and the visual evoked response in man. Ophthalmology 155:2–27
34.
go back to reference Harding GF, Robertson KA, Holliday I (2000) Field specific visual evoked potentials for assessment of peripheral field defect in a pediatric population. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 53:323–330PubMedCrossRef Harding GF, Robertson KA, Holliday I (2000) Field specific visual evoked potentials for assessment of peripheral field defect in a pediatric population. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 53:323–330PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Harding GF, Robertson K, Spencer EL, Holliday I (2002) Vigabatrin: its effect on the electrophysiology of vision. Doc Ophthalmol 104:213–229PubMedCrossRef Harding GF, Robertson K, Spencer EL, Holliday I (2002) Vigabatrin: its effect on the electrophysiology of vision. Doc Ophthalmol 104:213–229PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Harding GF, Spencer EL, Wild JM, Conway M, Bohn RL (2002) Field-specific visual-evoked potentials: identifying field defects in vigabatrin-treated children. Neurology 58:1261–1265 Harding GF, Spencer EL, Wild JM, Conway M, Bohn RL (2002) Field-specific visual-evoked potentials: identifying field defects in vigabatrin-treated children. Neurology 58:1261–1265
37.
go back to reference Spencer EL, Harding GF (2003) Examining visual field defects in the paediatric population exposed to vigabatrin. Doc Ophthalmol 107:281–287PubMedCrossRef Spencer EL, Harding GF (2003) Examining visual field defects in the paediatric population exposed to vigabatrin. Doc Ophthalmol 107:281–287PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Hood DC, Odel JG, Winn BJ (2003) The multifocal visual evoked potential. J Neuro Ophthalmol 23:279–289CrossRef Hood DC, Odel JG, Winn BJ (2003) The multifocal visual evoked potential. J Neuro Ophthalmol 23:279–289CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Xin D, Greenstein VC, Ritch R, Liebmann JM, De Morales CG, Hood DC (2011) A comparison of functional and structural measures for identifying progression of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:519–526PubMedCrossRef Xin D, Greenstein VC, Ritch R, Liebmann JM, De Morales CG, Hood DC (2011) A comparison of functional and structural measures for identifying progression of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:519–526PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Heravian JS, Jenkins TC, Douthwaite WA (1990) Binocular responses in visually evoked responses and visual acuity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 10:257–261PubMedCrossRef Heravian JS, Jenkins TC, Douthwaite WA (1990) Binocular responses in visually evoked responses and visual acuity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 10:257–261PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of different stimulus configurations on the visual evoked potential (VEP)
Authors
Naveen K. Yadav
Diana P. Ludlam
Kenneth J. Ciuffreda
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-012-9319-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2012 Go to the issue