Published in:
Open Access 01-12-2023 | Edema | Research
Concealed penis in pediatric age group: a comparison between three surgical techniques
Published in: BMC Urology | Issue 1/2023
Login to get accessAbstract
Background
Comparison between three different surgical techniques in the management of concealed penis.
Methods
This prospective interventional non-randomized study included 150 pediatric patients with a concealed penis. They were distributed equally into three groups; group A; patients treated by anchoring the penile skin dermis to Buck's fascia at the penile base at 3 and 9 o'clock points using PDS 5/0 (phallopexy), group B; patients treated by complete dissection and excision of dartos fascia and group C; patients treated by phallopexy as in group A after complete dissection and excision of dartos fascia. Follow-up at the end of the 1st post-operative week and then monthly for 6 months as regards penile skin congestion and/or necrosis, wound infection, edema, and/or re-retraction was carried out.
Results
Penile edema and re-retraction have a statistically significant difference among the studied groups (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002 respectively). Penile re-retraction was noticed to be lowest in patients of group C, however penile edema was observed to be highest in patients of group B.
Conclusions
Phallopexy after complete dissection and excision of dartos fascia have better results than doing either phallopexy or dartos excision alone in the treatment of concealed penis.
Clinical trial registration: The manuscript was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05565040. Our manuscript was registered on 4/10/2022.