Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 9/2014

01-09-2014 | Reports of Original Investigations

ED50 and ED90 of intrathecal hyperbaric 2% prilocaine in ambulatory knee arthroscopy

Authors: Emmanuel Guntz, MD, PhD, Bausard Latrech, MD, Constantin Tsiberidis, MD, Jonathan Gouwy, MD, Yota Kapessidou, MD, PhD

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 9/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Hyperbaric 2% prilocaine (HP) is increasingly used for spinal anesthesia in day-case surgery. The aim of this prospective double-blind study was to determine the effective dose (ED)50 and the ED90 of HP for patients undergoing knee arthroscopy.

Methods

Doses of HP were determined using an up-and-down sequential allocation technique. Sequences were analyzed by isotonic regression analysis. A subsequent observational study was performed with the calculated ED90 in 50 patients to confirm the initial result and to describe the induced blockade effects and side effects. Times corresponding to onset and duration of sensory and motor block, surgical data, and side effects were recorded.

Results

The ED50 was estimated at 28.9 mg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.5 to 35.3) and the ED90 was estimated to be 38.5 mg (95% CI: 35.7 to 39.5). A 40 mg dose of HP provided efficient anesthesia in 46 patients (92%, 95% CI: 82 to 98). The average (SD) time to effective anesthesia was 14.5 (3.9) min. Complete sensory block at level T12 was obtained after ten minutes in 44 of 50 patients. The average (SD) duration of the sensory block was 205 (36.1) min. Maximal level of sensory block was obtained at the T8-T11 levels in 41 of 50 patients without hemodynamic instability. A Bromage 3 score was obtained in 40 of the 46 patients who achieved successful anesthesia after 30 min. Patients did not experience urinary retention, nor were any signs of transient neurologic symptoms observed.

Conclusion

This study determined the ED50 of HP is 28.9 mg and suggests that a 40-mg dose of HP is adequate to provide successful spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Liu SS, Strodtbeck WM, Richman JM, Wu CL. A comparison of regional versus general anesthesia for ambulatory anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 1634-42.PubMedCrossRef Liu SS, Strodtbeck WM, Richman JM, Wu CL. A comparison of regional versus general anesthesia for ambulatory anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 1634-42.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Forster JG, Rosenberg PH. Revival of old local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2011; 24: 633-7.PubMedCrossRef Forster JG, Rosenberg PH. Revival of old local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2011; 24: 633-7.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kopp SL, Horlocker TT. Regional anaesthesia in day-stay and short-stay surgery. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 84-96.PubMedCrossRef Kopp SL, Horlocker TT. Regional anaesthesia in day-stay and short-stay surgery. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 84-96.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zaric D, Pace NL. Transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) following spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anaesthesics. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 2: CD003006. Zaric D, Pace NL. Transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) following spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anaesthesics. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 2: CD003006.
5.
go back to reference Freedman JM, Li DK, Drasner K, Jaskela MC, Larsen B, Wi S. Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia: an epidemiologic study of 1,863 patients. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 633-41.PubMedCrossRef Freedman JM, Li DK, Drasner K, Jaskela MC, Larsen B, Wi S. Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia: an epidemiologic study of 1,863 patients. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 633-41.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gupta A, Axelsson K, Thorn SE, et al. Low-dose bupivacaine plus fentanyl for spinal anesthesia during ambulatory inguinal herniorrhaphy: a comparison between 6 mg and 7.5 mg of bupivacaine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47: 13-9.PubMedCrossRef Gupta A, Axelsson K, Thorn SE, et al. Low-dose bupivacaine plus fentanyl for spinal anesthesia during ambulatory inguinal herniorrhaphy: a comparison between 6 mg and 7.5 mg of bupivacaine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47: 13-9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference De Kock M, Gautier P, Fanard L, Hody JL, Lavand’homme P. Intrathecal ropivacaine and clonidine for ambulatory knee arthroscopy: a dose-response study. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 574-8.PubMedCrossRef De Kock M, Gautier P, Fanard L, Hody JL, Lavand’homme P. Intrathecal ropivacaine and clonidine for ambulatory knee arthroscopy: a dose-response study. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 574-8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Camponovo C, Fanelli A, Ghisi D, Cristina D, Fanelli G. A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 40 mg and 60 mg hyperbaric 2% prilocaine versus 60 mg plain 2% prilocaine for intrathecal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 568-72.PubMedCrossRef Camponovo C, Fanelli A, Ghisi D, Cristina D, Fanelli G. A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 40 mg and 60 mg hyperbaric 2% prilocaine versus 60 mg plain 2% prilocaine for intrathecal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 568-72.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Black AS, Newcombe GN, Plummer JL, McLeod DH, Martin DK. Spinal anaesthesia for ambulatory arthroscopic surgery of the knee: a comparison of low-dose prilocaine and fentanyl with bupivacaine and fentanyl. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 183-8.PubMedCrossRef Black AS, Newcombe GN, Plummer JL, McLeod DH, Martin DK. Spinal anaesthesia for ambulatory arthroscopic surgery of the knee: a comparison of low-dose prilocaine and fentanyl with bupivacaine and fentanyl. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 183-8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hendriks MP, de Weert CJ, Snoeck MM, Hu HP, Pluim MA, Gielen MJ. Plain articaine or prilocaine for spinal anaesthesia in day-case knee arthroscopy: a double-blind randomized trial. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 259-63.PubMedCrossRef Hendriks MP, de Weert CJ, Snoeck MM, Hu HP, Pluim MA, Gielen MJ. Plain articaine or prilocaine for spinal anaesthesia in day-case knee arthroscopy: a double-blind randomized trial. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 259-63.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gebhardt V, Herold A, Weiss C, Samakas A, Schmittner MD. Dosage finding for low-dose spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric prilocaine in patients undergoing perianal outpatient surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013; 57: 249-56.PubMedCrossRef Gebhardt V, Herold A, Weiss C, Samakas A, Schmittner MD. Dosage finding for low-dose spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric prilocaine in patients undergoing perianal outpatient surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013; 57: 249-56.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hampl KF, Heinzmann-Wiedmer S, Luginbuehl I, et al. Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia: a lower incidence with prilocaine and bupivacaine than lidocaine. Anesthesiology 1998; 3: 629-33.CrossRef Hampl KF, Heinzmann-Wiedmer S, Luginbuehl I, et al. Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia: a lower incidence with prilocaine and bupivacaine than lidocaine. Anesthesiology 1998; 3: 629-33.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Konig W, Ruzicic D. Absence of transient radicular irritation after 5000 spinal anaesthetics with prilocaine. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 182-3.PubMed Konig W, Ruzicic D. Absence of transient radicular irritation after 5000 spinal anaesthetics with prilocaine. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 182-3.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Kreutziger J, Frankenberger B, Luger TJ, Richard S, Zbinden S. Urinary retention after spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric prilocaine 2% in an ambulatory setting. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 582-6.PubMedCrossRef Kreutziger J, Frankenberger B, Luger TJ, Richard S, Zbinden S. Urinary retention after spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric prilocaine 2% in an ambulatory setting. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 582-6.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dixon WJ, Massey FJ. Introduction to Statistical Analysis. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1983. p. 426-41. Dixon WJ, Massey FJ. Introduction to Statistical Analysis. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1983. p. 426-41.
16.
go back to reference Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a précis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology 2007; 107: 144-52.PubMedCrossRef Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a précis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology 2007; 107: 144-52.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stylianou M, Flournoy N. Dose finding using the biased coin up-and-down design and isotonic regression. Biometrics 2002; 58: 171-7.PubMedCrossRef Stylianou M, Flournoy N. Dose finding using the biased coin up-and-down design and isotonic regression. Biometrics 2002; 58: 171-7.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Stylianou M, Proschan M, Fournoy N. Estimating the probability of toxicity at the target dose following an up-and-down design. Stat Med 2003; 22: 535-43.PubMedCrossRef Stylianou M, Proschan M, Fournoy N. Estimating the probability of toxicity at the target dose following an up-and-down design. Stat Med 2003; 22: 535-43.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 1998; 17: 857-72.PubMedCrossRef Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 1998; 17: 857-72.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2003 .CrossRef Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2003 .CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fisher A, Bryce-Smith R. Spinal analgesic agents. A comparison of cinchocaine, lignocaine and prilocaine. Anaesthesia 1971; 26: 324-9.PubMedCrossRef Fisher A, Bryce-Smith R. Spinal analgesic agents. A comparison of cinchocaine, lignocaine and prilocaine. Anaesthesia 1971; 26: 324-9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Columb MO, D’Angelo R. Up-down studies: responding to dosing! Int J Obstet Anesth 2006; 15: 129-36.PubMedCrossRef Columb MO, D’Angelo R. Up-down studies: responding to dosing! Int J Obstet Anesth 2006; 15: 129-36.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Powell H, Morgan M, Sear JW. Pregnanolone: a new steroid intravenous anaesthetic. Dose-finding study. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 287-90.PubMedCrossRef Powell H, Morgan M, Sear JW. Pregnanolone: a new steroid intravenous anaesthetic. Dose-finding study. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 287-90.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Inomata S, Watanabe S, Taguchi M, Okada M. End-tidal sevoflurane concentration for tracheal intubation and minimum alveolar concentration in pediatric patients. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 93-6.PubMedCrossRef Inomata S, Watanabe S, Taguchi M, Okada M. End-tidal sevoflurane concentration for tracheal intubation and minimum alveolar concentration in pediatric patients. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 93-6.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Columb MO, Lyons G. Determination of the minimum local analgesic concentrations of epidural bupivacaine and lidocaine in labor. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 833-7.PubMed Columb MO, Lyons G. Determination of the minimum local analgesic concentrations of epidural bupivacaine and lidocaine in labor. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 833-7.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Casati A, Baciarello M, Di Cianni S, et al. Effects of ultrasound guidance on the minimum effective anaesthetic volume required to block the femoral nerve. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98: 823-7.PubMedCrossRef Casati A, Baciarello M, Di Cianni S, et al. Effects of ultrasound guidance on the minimum effective anaesthetic volume required to block the femoral nerve. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98: 823-7.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Duggan E, El Beheiry H, Perlas A, et al. Minimum effective volume of local anesthetic for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009; 34: 215-8.PubMedCrossRef Duggan E, El Beheiry H, Perlas A, et al. Minimum effective volume of local anesthetic for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009; 34: 215-8.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gautier P, Vandepitte C, Ramquet C, DeCoopman M, Xu D, Hadzic A. The minimum effective anesthetic volume of 0.75% ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 951-5.PubMed Gautier P, Vandepitte C, Ramquet C, DeCoopman M, Xu D, Hadzic A. The minimum effective anesthetic volume of 0.75% ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 951-5.PubMed
Metadata
Title
ED50 and ED90 of intrathecal hyperbaric 2% prilocaine in ambulatory knee arthroscopy
Authors
Emmanuel Guntz, MD, PhD
Bausard Latrech, MD
Constantin Tsiberidis, MD
Jonathan Gouwy, MD
Yota Kapessidou, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-014-0189-7

Other articles of this Issue 9/2014

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 9/2014 Go to the issue