Skip to main content
Top
Published in: PharmacoEconomics 6/2004

01-04-2004 | Original Research Article

Economic Implications of Treatment-Resistant Depression Among Employees

Authors: Paul Greenberg, Patricia K. Corey-Lisle, Maryna Marynchenko, Ami Claxton

Published in: PharmacoEconomics | Issue 6/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Conservative estimates indicate between 10% and 20% of all individuals with major depressive disorders (MDDs) fail to respond to conventional antidepressant therapies. Amongst those with MDD, individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) have been found to be frequent users of healthcare services and to incur significantly greater costs than those without TRD. Given the prevalence of the disorder, it is understandable that MDDs are responsible for a significant amount of both direct and indirect healthcare costs.
Objective: To provide empirical findings for employees likely to have TRD based on analysis of employer claims data, in the context of previous research.
Methods: We conducted a claims data analysis of employees of a large national (US) employer. The data source consisted of medical, pharmaceutical and disability claims from a Fortune 100 manufacturer for the years 1996–1998 (total beneficiaries <100 000). The employee sample included individuals with medical or disability claims for MDDs (n = 1692). A treatment pattern algorithm was applied to classify MDD patients into TRD-likely (n = 180) and TRD-unlikely groups. Treated prevalence of select comorbid conditions and the patient costs (direct and indirect) from the employer perspective by condition were compared among TRD-likely and TRD-unlikely employees, and with a 10% random sample of the overall employee population for 1998.
Results: The average annual cost of employees considered TRD-likely was $US14 490 per employee, while the cost for depressed but TRD-unlikely employees was $US6665 per employee, and $US4043 for the employee from the random sample. TRD beneficiaries used more than twice as many medical services compared with TRD-unlikely patients, and incurred significantly greater work loss costs.
Conclusion: TRD has gained increasing recognition due to both the clinical challenges and economic burdens associated with the condition. TRD imposes a significant economic burden on an employer. TRD-likely employees are more likely to be treated for selected comorbid conditions and have higher medical and work loss costs across all conditions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hirschfeld RMA, Montgomery SA, Keller MB, et al. Social functioning in depression: a review. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61 (4),268–75PubMedCrossRef Hirschfeld RMA, Montgomery SA, Keller MB, et al. Social functioning in depression: a review. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61 (4),268–75PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Greenberg PE, Stiglin LE, Finkelstein SN, et al. The economic burden of depression in 1990. J Clin Psychiatry 1993; 54: 405–18PubMed Greenberg PE, Stiglin LE, Finkelstein SN, et al. The economic burden of depression in 1990. J Clin Psychiatry 1993; 54: 405–18PubMed
3.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994
4.
go back to reference Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51: 8–191PubMedCrossRef Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51: 8–191PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association. Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder (revision). Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157 (4): 1–45 American Psychiatric Association. Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder (revision). Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157 (4): 1–45
6.
go back to reference Greenberg PE, Leong SA, Birnbaum HG. Cost of depression: current assessment and future directions. Exp Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2001; 1 (1): 69–76CrossRef Greenberg PE, Leong SA, Birnbaum HG. Cost of depression: current assessment and future directions. Exp Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2001; 1 (1): 69–76CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mitchell J, Greenberg J, Finch K, et al. Effectiveness and economic impact of antidepressant medications: a review. Am J Manag Care 1997; 3 (2): 323–30PubMed Mitchell J, Greenberg J, Finch K, et al. Effectiveness and economic impact of antidepressant medications: a review. Am J Manag Care 1997; 3 (2): 323–30PubMed
8.
go back to reference Thompson D, Buesching D, Gregor KJ, et al. Patterns of antidepressant use and their relationship to costs of care. Am J Manag Care 1996; 2: 1239–46 Thompson D, Buesching D, Gregor KJ, et al. Patterns of antidepressant use and their relationship to costs of care. Am J Manag Care 1996; 2: 1239–46
9.
go back to reference Sclar DA, Robison LM, Skaer TL, et al. Antidepressant pharmacotherapy: economic outcomes in a health maintenance organization. Clin Ther 1994; 16 (4): 715–30PubMed Sclar DA, Robison LM, Skaer TL, et al. Antidepressant pharmacotherapy: economic outcomes in a health maintenance organization. Clin Ther 1994; 16 (4): 715–30PubMed
10.
go back to reference Simon GE, Revicki D, Heiligenstein J, et al. Recovery from depression, work productivity, and health care costs among primary care patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2000; 22: 153–62PubMedCrossRef Simon GE, Revicki D, Heiligenstein J, et al. Recovery from depression, work productivity, and health care costs among primary care patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2000; 22: 153–62PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference 11. American Psychiatric Association. Depression [online]. Available from URL: http://www.psych.org/public_info/depression. cfm [Accessed 2001 Jan 8] 11. American Psychiatric Association. Depression [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​psych.​org/​public_​info/​depression.​ cfm [Accessed 2001 Jan 8]
12.
go back to reference Sourey D, Amsterdam J, de Montigny C, et al. Treatment resistant depression: methodological overview and operational criteria. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1999; 9 (1–2): 83–91CrossRef Sourey D, Amsterdam J, de Montigny C, et al. Treatment resistant depression: methodological overview and operational criteria. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 1999; 9 (1–2): 83–91CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rush AJ, Crismon ML, Toprac MG, et al. Consensus guidelines in the treatment of major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59 Suppl. 20: 73–84PubMedCrossRef Rush AJ, Crismon ML, Toprac MG, et al. Consensus guidelines in the treatment of major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59 Suppl. 20: 73–84PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Thase ME, Friedman ES, Howland RH. Venlafaxine and treatment-resistant depression. Depress Anxiety 2000; 12 Suppl. 1: 55–62PubMedCrossRef Thase ME, Friedman ES, Howland RH. Venlafaxine and treatment-resistant depression. Depress Anxiety 2000; 12 Suppl. 1: 55–62PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dyck MJ. Treatment-resistant depression: a critique of current approaches. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1994; 28: 34–41PubMedCrossRef Dyck MJ. Treatment-resistant depression: a critique of current approaches. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1994; 28: 34–41PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rosenbaum JF, Fava M, Nierenberg AA, et al. Treatmentresistant mood disorders. In: Gabbard GO, editor. Treatment of psychiatric disorders. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 2003: 1307–88 Rosenbaum JF, Fava M, Nierenberg AA, et al. Treatmentresistant mood disorders. In: Gabbard GO, editor. Treatment of psychiatric disorders. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 2003: 1307–88
17.
go back to reference Thase ME, Rush AJ. Treatment-resistant depression. In: Bloom FE, Kupfer DJ, editors. Psychopharmacology: the fourth generation of progress. New York (NY): Raven Press lid, 1995: 1081–97 Thase ME, Rush AJ. Treatment-resistant depression. In: Bloom FE, Kupfer DJ, editors. Psychopharmacology: the fourth generation of progress. New York (NY): Raven Press lid, 1995: 1081–97
18.
go back to reference Nierenberg AA, DeCecco L. Definitions of antidepressant treatment response, remission, nonresponse, partial response, remission, nonresponse, partial response, and other relevant outcomes: a focus on treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62 Suppl. 16: 5–9 Nierenberg AA, DeCecco L. Definitions of antidepressant treatment response, remission, nonresponse, partial response, remission, nonresponse, partial response, and other relevant outcomes: a focus on treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62 Suppl. 16: 5–9
19.
go back to reference Sackheim HA. The definition of treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62 Suppl. 16: 10–7 Sackheim HA. The definition of treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62 Suppl. 16: 10–7
20.
go back to reference O’Reardon JP, Amsterdam ill. Treatment-resistant depression: progress and limitations. Psychiatr Ann 1998; 28 (11): 633–40 O’Reardon JP, Amsterdam ill. Treatment-resistant depression: progress and limitations. Psychiatr Ann 1998; 28 (11): 633–40
21.
go back to reference Corey-Lisle PK, Birnbaum H, Greenberg PE, et al. Identification of claims data ‘signature’ and economic consequences for treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63: 717–26PubMedCrossRef Corey-Lisle PK, Birnbaum H, Greenberg PE, et al. Identification of claims data ‘signature’ and economic consequences for treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63: 717–26PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Greden JF. The burden of disease for treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62 Suppl. 16: 26–31 Greden JF. The burden of disease for treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62 Suppl. 16: 26–31
23.
go back to reference Fava M, Davidson KG. Definition and epidemiology of treatment-resistant depression. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1996; 19 (2), 179–98PubMedCrossRef Fava M, Davidson KG. Definition and epidemiology of treatment-resistant depression. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1996; 19 (2), 179–98PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Thase M. What role do atypical antipsychotic drugs have in treatment-resistant depression? J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63 (2): 95–103PubMedCrossRef Thase M. What role do atypical antipsychotic drugs have in treatment-resistant depression? J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63 (2): 95–103PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Austin M, Souza F, Goodwin G. Lithium augmentation in antidepressant-resistant patients: a quantitative analysis. Br J Psychiatry 1991; 159: 510–4PubMedCrossRef Austin M, Souza F, Goodwin G. Lithium augmentation in antidepressant-resistant patients: a quantitative analysis. Br J Psychiatry 1991; 159: 510–4PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Nierenberg A, Feighner J, Rudolph R, et al. Venlafaxine for treatment-resistant unipolar depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1994; 14 (6): 419–23PubMedCrossRef Nierenberg A, Feighner J, Rudolph R, et al. Venlafaxine for treatment-resistant unipolar depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1994; 14 (6): 419–23PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sackeim H, Rush A, George MS, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment-resistant depression: efficacy, side effects, and predictors of outcome. Neuropsychopharmacology 2001; 25 (5): 713–28PubMedCrossRef Sackeim H, Rush A, George MS, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment-resistant depression: efficacy, side effects, and predictors of outcome. Neuropsychopharmacology 2001; 25 (5): 713–28PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Rost K, Smith R, Matthew DB, et al. The deliberate misdiagnosis of major depression in primary care. Arch Fam Med 1994; 3: 333–7PubMedCrossRef Rost K, Smith R, Matthew DB, et al. The deliberate misdiagnosis of major depression in primary care. Arch Fam Med 1994; 3: 333–7PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Browne RA, Melfi CA, Croghan TW, et al. Data analysis issues to consider when conducting research using physician-reported antidepressant claims. Drug Benefit Trends 1998, 33–42 Browne RA, Melfi CA, Croghan TW, et al. Data analysis issues to consider when conducting research using physician-reported antidepressant claims. Drug Benefit Trends 1998, 33–42
30.
go back to reference Kornstein SG, Schneider RK. Clinical features of treatmentresistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62 Suppl. 16: 18–25 Kornstein SG, Schneider RK. Clinical features of treatmentresistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62 Suppl. 16: 18–25
31.
go back to reference Burton WN, Conti DJ. Use of an integrated health data warehouse to measure the employer costs of five chronic disease states. Dis Manag Health Outcomes 1998; 2 (1): 17–26 Burton WN, Conti DJ. Use of an integrated health data warehouse to measure the employer costs of five chronic disease states. Dis Manag Health Outcomes 1998; 2 (1): 17–26
32.
go back to reference Barnett A, BirnbaumH, Cremieux PY, et al. The costs of cancer to a major employer in the United States: a case-control analysis. Am J Manag Care 2000; 6 (11): 1243–51PubMed Barnett A, BirnbaumH, Cremieux PY, et al. The costs of cancer to a major employer in the United States: a case-control analysis. Am J Manag Care 2000; 6 (11): 1243–51PubMed
Metadata
Title
Economic Implications of Treatment-Resistant Depression Among Employees
Authors
Paul Greenberg
Patricia K. Corey-Lisle
Maryna Marynchenko
Ami Claxton
Publication date
01-04-2004
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
PharmacoEconomics / Issue 6/2004
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200422060-00003

Other articles of this Issue 6/2004

PharmacoEconomics 6/2004 Go to the issue

Adis Pharmacoeconomic Drug Evaluation

Repaglinide