Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Pediatrics 1/2022

01-01-2022 | EBM | Original Article

Early Total Versus Gradually Advanced Enteral Nutrition in Stable Very-Low-Birth-Weight Preterm Neonates: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Authors: Mamta Jajoo, Amitabh Singh, Neha Arora, Vikram Bhaskar, Anirban Mandal

Published in: Indian Journal of Pediatrics | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To assess whether early total enteral nutrition (80 mL/kg/d) started on day 1 of life in hemodynamically stable preterm very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) neonates with the rapid advancement of feeds (20 mL/kg/d) help in the earlier achievement of full feeds (180 mL/kg/d).

Methods

Early total enteral nutrition (intervention) group feeding was started with 80 mL/kg/d on the first day in all hemodynamically stable neonates admitted with birth weight of 1000–1499 grams, born at 29–33 wk of gestation as determined by first-trimester ultrasonography (USG) or expanded New Ballard Score (NBS) and was advanced by 20 mL/kg/d until maximum feeds of 180 mL/kg/d were achieved; while in control group feeding was started with 30 mL/kg/d on the first day and was advanced by 20 mL/kg/d until maximum feeds were achieved. Primary outcome measure was time taken to achieve full feeds; secondary outcomes were duration of hospital stay, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), time to regain birth weight, duration of antibiotics, and death.

Results

Sixty VLBW neonates (1000–1499 g) with comparable baseline demographics were randomized within 24 h of admission to two groups. Early total enteral nutrition intervention group (group I, n = 31) achieved the target of full enteral nutrition at median 6 d; IQR: 0 to 7.8 d, a significantly shorter time compared to the controls (n = 29) (median 10 d; IQR: 9 to 11.0 d; p = < 0.05).

Conclusion

Early total enteral nutrition started from the first day of life results in significantly less time to achieve full feeds in hemodynamically stable preterm and VLBW infants.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Salhotra A, Ramji S. Slow versus fast enteral feed advancement in very low birth weight infants: a randomized control trial. Indian Pediatr. 2004;41:435–41.PubMed Salhotra A, Ramji S. Slow versus fast enteral feed advancement in very low birth weight infants: a randomized control trial. Indian Pediatr. 2004;41:435–41.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Ehrenkranz RA. Early, aggressive nutritional management for very low birth weight infants: what is the evidence? Semin Perinatol. 2007;31:48–55.CrossRef Ehrenkranz RA. Early, aggressive nutritional management for very low birth weight infants: what is the evidence? Semin Perinatol. 2007;31:48–55.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Klingenberg C, Embleton ND, Jacobs SE, O'Connell LA, Kuschel CA. Enteral feeding practices in very preterm infants: an international survey. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012;97:F56–61.CrossRef Klingenberg C, Embleton ND, Jacobs SE, O'Connell LA, Kuschel CA. Enteral feeding practices in very preterm infants: an international survey. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012;97:F56–61.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hans DM, Pylipow M, Long JD, Thureen PJ, Georgieff MK. Nutritional practices in the neonatal intensive care unit: analysis of a 2006 neonatal nutrition survey. Pediatrics. 2009;123:51–7.CrossRef Hans DM, Pylipow M, Long JD, Thureen PJ, Georgieff MK. Nutritional practices in the neonatal intensive care unit: analysis of a 2006 neonatal nutrition survey. Pediatrics. 2009;123:51–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Morgan J, Young L, McGuire W. Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12:CD001970. Morgan J, Young L, McGuire W. Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12:CD001970.
6.
go back to reference Morgan J, Bombell S, McGuire W. Early trophic feeding versus enteral fasting for very preterm or very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3:CD000504. Morgan J, Bombell S, McGuire W. Early trophic feeding versus enteral fasting for very preterm or very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3:CD000504.
7.
go back to reference Morgan J, Young L, McGuire W. Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;10:CD001241. Morgan J, Young L, McGuire W. Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;10:CD001241.
8.
go back to reference La Gamma EF, Browne LE. Feeding practices for infants weighing less than 1500 G at birth and the pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin Perinatol. 1994;21:271–306.CrossRef La Gamma EF, Browne LE. Feeding practices for infants weighing less than 1500 G at birth and the pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin Perinatol. 1994;21:271–306.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Senterre T. Practice of enteral nutrition in very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight infants. In: Koletzko B, Poindexter B, Uauy R, editors. Nutritional Care of Preterm Infants: scientific basis and practical guidelines. Basel: Karger. World Rev Nutr Diet; 2014. p. 201–14.CrossRef Senterre T. Practice of enteral nutrition in very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight infants. In: Koletzko B, Poindexter B, Uauy R, editors. Nutritional Care of Preterm Infants: scientific basis and practical guidelines. Basel: Karger. World Rev Nutr Diet; 2014. p. 201–14.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Funkquist EL, Tuvemo T, Jonsson B, Serenius F, Nyqvist KH. Milk for small infants. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:596–9.CrossRef Funkquist EL, Tuvemo T, Jonsson B, Serenius F, Nyqvist KH. Milk for small infants. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:596–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zecca E, Costa S, Barone G, Giordano L, Zecca C, Maggio L. Proactive enteral nutrition in moderately preterm small for gestational ageinfants: a randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr. 2014;165:1135–9. Zecca E, Costa S, Barone G, Giordano L, Zecca C, Maggio L. Proactive enteral nutrition in moderately preterm small for gestational ageinfants: a randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr. 2014;165:1135–9.
12.
go back to reference Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K, Wang L, Eilers-Walsman BL, Lipp R. New Ballard score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 1991;119:417–23.CrossRef Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K, Wang L, Eilers-Walsman BL, Lipp R. New Ballard score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 1991;119:417–23.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:59. Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:59. 
15.
go back to reference American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on nutrition. nutritional needs of low-birth-weight infants. Pediatrics. 1985;75:976–86. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on nutrition. nutritional needs of low-birth-weight infants. Pediatrics. 1985;75:976–86.
16.
go back to reference Krishnamurthy S, Gupta P, Debnath S, Gomber S. Slow versus rapid enteral feeding advancement in preterm newborn infants 1000–1499 g: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99:42–6.CrossRef Krishnamurthy S, Gupta P, Debnath S, Gomber S. Slow versus rapid enteral feeding advancement in preterm newborn infants 1000–1499 g: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99:42–6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Corvaglia L, Fantini MP, Aceti A, et al. "Emilia Romagna perinatal network" predictors of full enteral feeding achievement in very low birth weight infants. PLoS One. 2014;9:e92235. Corvaglia L, Fantini MP, Aceti A, et al. "Emilia Romagna perinatal network" predictors of full enteral feeding achievement in very low birth weight infants. PLoS One. 2014;9:e92235.
18.
go back to reference Book LS, Herbst JJ, Jung AL. Comparison of fast and slow feeding rate schedules to the development of necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr. 1976;89:463–6.CrossRef Book LS, Herbst JJ, Jung AL. Comparison of fast and slow feeding rate schedules to the development of necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr. 1976;89:463–6.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rayyis S, Ambalavanan N, Wright L, Carlo WA. Randomized trial of slowversus fastfeed advancements on the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 1999;134:293–7.CrossRef Rayyis S, Ambalavanan N, Wright L, Carlo WA. Randomized trial of slowversus fastfeed advancements on the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 1999;134:293–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Flidel-Ramon O, Branski D, Shinwell ES. The fear ofnecrotizing enterocolitis versus achieving optimal growth inpreterm infants – an opinion. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95:1341–4.CrossRef Flidel-Ramon O, Branski D, Shinwell ES. The fear ofnecrotizing enterocolitis versus achieving optimal growth inpreterm infants – an opinion. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95:1341–4.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bozkurt O, Alyamac Dizdar E, Bidev D, Sari FN, Uras N, Oguz SS. Prolonged minimal enteral nutrition versus early feeding advancements in preterm infants with birth weight ≤ 1250 g: a prospective randomized trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;25:1–7.CrossRef Bozkurt O, Alyamac Dizdar E, Bidev D, Sari FN, Uras N, Oguz SS. Prolonged minimal enteral nutrition versus early feeding advancements in preterm infants with birth weight ≤ 1250 g: a prospective randomized trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;25:1–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nangia S, Vadivel V, Thukral A, Saili A. Early total enteral feeding versus conventional enteral feeding in stable very-low-birth-weight infants: a randomised controlled trial. Neonatology. 2019;115:256–62.CrossRef Nangia S, Vadivel V, Thukral A, Saili A. Early total enteral feeding versus conventional enteral feeding in stable very-low-birth-weight infants: a randomised controlled trial. Neonatology. 2019;115:256–62.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Early Total Versus Gradually Advanced Enteral Nutrition in Stable Very-Low-Birth-Weight Preterm Neonates: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Authors
Mamta Jajoo
Amitabh Singh
Neha Arora
Vikram Bhaskar
Anirban Mandal
Publication date
01-01-2022
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0019-5456
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7693
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-021-03778-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Indian Journal of Pediatrics 1/2022 Go to the issue