Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2018

01-02-2018 | Glaucoma

Early intraocular pressure change after peripheral iridotomy with ultralow fluence pattern scanning laser and Nd:YAG laser in primary angle-closure suspect: Kowloon East Pattern Scanning Laser Study Report No. 3

Authors: Jeffrey Chi Wang Chan, Bonnie Nga Kwan Choy, Orlando Chia Chieh Chan, Kenneth Kai Wang Li

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Our purpose was to assess the early intraocular pressure (IOP) changes of ultralow fluence laser iridotomy using pattern scanning laser followed by neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-gamet (Nd:YAG) laser.

Methods

This is a prospective interventional study. Thirty-three eyes of 33 adult Chinese primary angle-closure suspect subjects were recruited for prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy. Sequential laser peripheral iridotomy was performed using pattern scanning laser followed by Nd:YAG laser. Visual acuity (VA) and IOP were measured before treatment, at 1 h, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after laser. Laser energy used and complications were documented. Corneal endothelial cell count was examined at baseline and 6 months. Patency of the iridotomy was assessed at each follow-up visit.

Results

All subjects achieved patent iridotomy in a single session. The mean energy used was 0.335+/−0.088 J for the pattern scanning laser, and 4.767+/−5.780 mJ for the Nd:YAG laser. The total mean energy was 0.339+/−0.089 J. None of the eyes developed a clinically significant IOP spike (≥ 8 mmHg) at 1 h and 1 day after laser use. Only four eyes developed higher IOP at 1 h and all were ≤3 mmHg compared to baseline. The mean IOP was 13.8+/−2.5 mmHg at 1 h and 11.5+/−2.2 mmHg at 1 day, both were significantly lower than baseline (15.8+/−2.1 mmHg) (P < 0.001). Mean VA (logMAR) was similar at 1 h post laser compared to baseline (0.23 vs 0.26). There was also no statistically significant difference in mean VA at other follow-up visits compared to baseline. Peripheral iridotomy closure was encountered in two (6.1%) eyes, one at 1 month and another at 6 months follow-up. There were no complications including hyphema, peripheral anterior synechia formation nor prolonged inflammation throughout the follow-up period. There was no significant loss in corneal endothelial cell counts at 6 months (2255+/−490) compared to baseline (2303+/−386) (P = 0.347).

Conclusions

Sequential LPI using an ultralow fluence pattern scanning laser, followed by a Nd:YAG laser, is safe and efficacious, and produces no IOP spike in dark irides of primary angle-closure suspects. Further studies to investigate its role in the treatment of other angle-closure conditions are warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Quilgey HA (1981) Long-term follow-up of laser iridotomy. Ophthalmology 88(3):218–24 Quilgey HA (1981) Long-term follow-up of laser iridotomy. Ophthalmology 88(3):218–24
2.
go back to reference Naveh-Floman N, Blumenthal M (1985) A modified technique for serial use of argon and Nd:YAG lasers in laser iridotomy. Am J Ophthalmol 100(3):485–486CrossRefPubMed Naveh-Floman N, Blumenthal M (1985) A modified technique for serial use of argon and Nd:YAG lasers in laser iridotomy. Am J Ophthalmol 100(3):485–486CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Tomey KF, Traverso CE, Shammas IV (1987) Neodymium-YAG laser iridotomy in the treatment and prevention of angle closure glaucoma. A review of 373 eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 105(4):476–481CrossRefPubMed Tomey KF, Traverso CE, Shammas IV (1987) Neodymium-YAG laser iridotomy in the treatment and prevention of angle closure glaucoma. A review of 373 eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 105(4):476–481CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jiang Y, Chang DS, Foster PJ et al (2012) Immediate changes in intraocular pressure after laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle-closure suspects. Ophthalmology 119(2):283–288CrossRefPubMed Jiang Y, Chang DS, Foster PJ et al (2012) Immediate changes in intraocular pressure after laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle-closure suspects. Ophthalmology 119(2):283–288CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference deSilva DJ, Day AC, Bunce C et al (2012) Randomised trial of sequential pretreatment for Nd:YAG laser iridotomy in dark irides. Br J Ophthalmol 96(2):263–266CrossRef deSilva DJ, Day AC, Bunce C et al (2012) Randomised trial of sequential pretreatment for Nd:YAG laser iridotomy in dark irides. Br J Ophthalmol 96(2):263–266CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lee TL, Yuxin NJ, Nongpiur ME et al (2014) Intraocular pressure spikes after a sequential laser peripheral iridotomy for angle closure. J Glaucoma 23(9):644–648CrossRefPubMed Lee TL, Yuxin NJ, Nongpiur ME et al (2014) Intraocular pressure spikes after a sequential laser peripheral iridotomy for angle closure. J Glaucoma 23(9):644–648CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Muraly P, Limbad P, Srinivasan K, Ramasamy K (2011) Single session of Pascal versus multiple sessions of conventional laser for panretinal photocoagulation in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a comparative study. Retina 31(7):1359–1365CrossRefPubMed Muraly P, Limbad P, Srinivasan K, Ramasamy K (2011) Single session of Pascal versus multiple sessions of conventional laser for panretinal photocoagulation in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a comparative study. Retina 31(7):1359–1365CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Muqit MM, Marcellino GR, Henson DB et al (2011) Pascal panretinal laser ablation and regression analysis in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: Manchester Pascal study report 4. Eye (Lond) 25(11):1447–1456CrossRef Muqit MM, Marcellino GR, Henson DB et al (2011) Pascal panretinal laser ablation and regression analysis in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: Manchester Pascal study report 4. Eye (Lond) 25(11):1447–1456CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chappelow AV, Tan K, Waheed NK, Kaiser PK (2012) Panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: pattern scan laser versus argon laser. Am J Ophthalmol 153(1):137–142CrossRefPubMed Chappelow AV, Tan K, Waheed NK, Kaiser PK (2012) Panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: pattern scan laser versus argon laser. Am J Ophthalmol 153(1):137–142CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pei-Pei W, Shi-Zhou H, Zhen T et al (2015) Randomised clinical trial evaluating best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness after 532-nm subthreshold laser grid photocoagulation treatment in diabetic macular oedema. Eye (Lond) 29(3):313–321CrossRef Pei-Pei W, Shi-Zhou H, Zhen T et al (2015) Randomised clinical trial evaluating best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness after 532-nm subthreshold laser grid photocoagulation treatment in diabetic macular oedema. Eye (Lond) 29(3):313–321CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mahgoub MM, Macky TA (2016) The effect of laser panretinal photocoagulation on diabetic macular edema using the PASCAL photocoagulator versus the conventional argon laser photocoagulator. Ophthalmologica 235(3):137–140CrossRefPubMed Mahgoub MM, Macky TA (2016) The effect of laser panretinal photocoagulation on diabetic macular edema using the PASCAL photocoagulator versus the conventional argon laser photocoagulator. Ophthalmologica 235(3):137–140CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Seymenoglu RG, Ulusoy MO, Baser EF (2016) Safety and efficacy of panretinal photocoagulation in patients with high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy using pattern scan laser versus conventional YAG laser. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 32(1):22–26CrossRefPubMed Seymenoglu RG, Ulusoy MO, Baser EF (2016) Safety and efficacy of panretinal photocoagulation in patients with high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy using pattern scan laser versus conventional YAG laser. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 32(1):22–26CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chung CY, Cheung JJ, Ng AL, Gangwani RA, Li KK (2017) Pattern scanning laser Panretinal photocoagulation in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: Kowloon east pattern scanning laser study report no. 1. Ophthalmology retina (In Press) Chung CY, Cheung JJ, Ng AL, Gangwani RA, Li KK (2017) Pattern scanning laser Panretinal photocoagulation in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: Kowloon east pattern scanning laser study report no. 1. Ophthalmology retina (In Press)
15.
go back to reference Chung HJ, Park HY, Kim SY (2015) Comparison of laser iridotomy using short duration 532-nm Nd:YAG laser (PASCAL) vs conventional laser in dark irides. Int J Ophthalmol 8(2):288–291PubMedPubMedCentral Chung HJ, Park HY, Kim SY (2015) Comparison of laser iridotomy using short duration 532-nm Nd:YAG laser (PASCAL) vs conventional laser in dark irides. Int J Ophthalmol 8(2):288–291PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Robin AL, Pollack IP (1984) A comparison of neodymium:YAG and argon laser iridotomies. Ophthalmology 91(9):1011–1016CrossRefPubMed Robin AL, Pollack IP (1984) A comparison of neodymium:YAG and argon laser iridotomies. Ophthalmology 91(9):1011–1016CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Goins K, Schmeisser E, Smith T (1990) Argon laser pretreatment in Nd:YAG iridotomy. Ophthalmic Surg 21(7):497–500PubMed Goins K, Schmeisser E, Smith T (1990) Argon laser pretreatment in Nd:YAG iridotomy. Ophthalmic Surg 21(7):497–500PubMed
19.
go back to reference Lim L, Seah SK, Lim AS (1996) Comparison of argon laser iridotomy and sequential argon laser and Nd:YAG laser iridotomy in dark irides. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 27(4):285–288PubMed Lim L, Seah SK, Lim AS (1996) Comparison of argon laser iridotomy and sequential argon laser and Nd:YAG laser iridotomy in dark irides. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 27(4):285–288PubMed
20.
go back to reference Nagpal M, Marlecha S, Nagpal K (2010) Comparison of laser photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy using 532-nm standard laser versus multispot pattern scan laser. Retina 30(3):452–458CrossRefPubMed Nagpal M, Marlecha S, Nagpal K (2010) Comparison of laser photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy using 532-nm standard laser versus multispot pattern scan laser. Retina 30(3):452–458CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lee JY, Ha SY, Paik HJ et al (2014) Morphologic changes in trabecular meshwork after patterned and argon laser trabeculoplasty in cats. Curr Eye Res 39(9):908–916CrossRefPubMed Lee JY, Ha SY, Paik HJ et al (2014) Morphologic changes in trabecular meshwork after patterned and argon laser trabeculoplasty in cats. Curr Eye Res 39(9):908–916CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Turati M, Gil-Carrasco F, Morales A et al (2010) Patterned laser trabeculoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 41(5):538–545CrossRefPubMed Turati M, Gil-Carrasco F, Morales A et al (2010) Patterned laser trabeculoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 41(5):538–545CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Early intraocular pressure change after peripheral iridotomy with ultralow fluence pattern scanning laser and Nd:YAG laser in primary angle-closure suspect: Kowloon East Pattern Scanning Laser Study Report No. 3
Authors
Jeffrey Chi Wang Chan
Bonnie Nga Kwan Choy
Orlando Chia Chieh Chan
Kenneth Kai Wang Li
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3860-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2018 Go to the issue