Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 3/2014

01-09-2014 | Original Article

Early evidence kits in sexual assault: an observational study of spermatozoa detection in urine and other forensic specimens

Authors: Debbie A. Smith, Laurance G. Webb, Angelika I. Fennell, Elizabeth A. Nathan, Christine A. Bassindale, Maureen A. Phillips

Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the detection frequency of spermatozoa in early evidence kit specimens and in subsequent full forensic specimens in alleged sexual assault.

Methods

Observational cohort study of 100 consecutive alleged sexual assault cases, presenting in Western Australia between 19th July 2008 and 6th February 2012, with both early evidence kit and full forensic evidence specimen collections. Eighty-eight cases were included in the study. Smears from all forensic specimens were analyzed by light microscopy to determine the detection frequency and structural characteristics of spermatozoa. Patient demographic features, characteristics of the alleged assault and details and timing of forensic collections were also recorded.

Results

Spermatozoa were detected in early evidence kit specimens in 35 % (31/88) and in full forensic specimens in 42 % (37/88) of all cases (irrespective of type of alleged penetration). In alleged penile-vaginal penetration, spermatozoa were detected in early evidence kit specimens in 40 % (21/53) of cases when both first void urine and vulval gauze wipe were collected. Spermatozoa were detected in full forensic specimens in 45 % (31/69) of cases. Spermatozoa were detected in early evidence kit oral rinse specimens in 6 % (1/18) of cases of alleged penile-oral penetration and in early evidence perianal gauze wipe specimens in 33 % (2/6) cases of alleged penile-anal penetration. Spermatozoa were detected in the early evidence kit first void urine specimen in a single case, 11 % (1/9), in which the nature of the alleged assault was unknown. Spermatozoa were detected in early evidence kit specimens and not in full forensic specimens in 3 % (3/88) of cases.

Conclusions

Early evidence kit specimens are effective in recovery of spermatozoa, and in particular urine and vulval gauze wipe are worthwhile early forensic specimens for the detection of spermatozoa. Collection of early evidence specimens led to detection of spermatozoa-positive cases, which were not detected by subsequent full forensic specimen collection.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Criminology. Guilty outcomes in reported sexual assault and related offence incidents, Crime facts info no. 162, 2007. Last modified June 2009. http://www.aic.gov.au. Accessed 16 June 2013. Australian Institute of Criminology. Guilty outcomes in reported sexual assault and related offence incidents, Crime facts info no. 162, 2007. Last modified June 2009. http://​www.​aic.​gov.​au. Accessed 16 June 2013.
4.
go back to reference Lievore D, Commonwealth of Australia. Australian Institute of Criminology. Non-reporting and hidden recording of sexual assault: An international literature review; 2003. http://www.aic.gov.au. Accessed 21 June 2013. Lievore D, Commonwealth of Australia. Australian Institute of Criminology. Non-reporting and hidden recording of sexual assault: An international literature review; 2003. http://​www.​aic.​gov.​au. Accessed 21 June 2013.
5.
go back to reference Astrup BS, Thomsen JL, Lauritsen J, Ravn P. Detection of spermatozoa following consensual sexual intercourse. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;221:137–41.PubMedCrossRef Astrup BS, Thomsen JL, Lauritsen J, Ravn P. Detection of spermatozoa following consensual sexual intercourse. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;221:137–41.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Meakin G, Jamieson A. DNA transfer: Review and implications for casework. Forensic Sci Int Genet [Internet]. 2013;7(4):434–43.PubMedCrossRef Meakin G, Jamieson A. DNA transfer: Review and implications for casework. Forensic Sci Int Genet [Internet]. 2013;7(4):434–43.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Silverman EM, Silverman AG. Persistence of spermatozoa in the lower genital tracts of women. JAMA. 1978;240(17):1875–7.PubMedCrossRef Silverman EM, Silverman AG. Persistence of spermatozoa in the lower genital tracts of women. JAMA. 1978;240(17):1875–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Willott GM, Allard JE. Spermatozoa: their persistence after sexual intercourse. Forensic Sci Int. 1982;19(2):135–54.PubMedCrossRef Willott GM, Allard JE. Spermatozoa: their persistence after sexual intercourse. Forensic Sci Int. 1982;19(2):135–54.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cybulska B, Forster G. Sexual assault: Examination of the victim. Medicine. 2010;38(5):235–8.CrossRef Cybulska B, Forster G. Sexual assault: Examination of the victim. Medicine. 2010;38(5):235–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Newton M. The forensic aspects of sexual violence. Best Prac Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27:77–90.CrossRef Newton M. The forensic aspects of sexual violence. Best Prac Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27:77–90.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wyatt J, Squires T, Norfolk G, Payne-James J, editors. Oxford handbook of forensic medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. Wyatt J, Squires T, Norfolk G, Payne-James J, editors. Oxford handbook of forensic medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
16.
go back to reference McGregor MJ, Le G, Marion SA, Wiebe E. Examination for sexual assault: Is the documentation of physical injury associated with the laying of charges? A retrospective cohort study. CMAJ. 1999;160(11):1565–9.PubMedCentralPubMed McGregor MJ, Le G, Marion SA, Wiebe E. Examination for sexual assault: Is the documentation of physical injury associated with the laying of charges? A retrospective cohort study. CMAJ. 1999;160(11):1565–9.PubMedCentralPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rambow B, Adkinson C, Frost T, Peterson G. Female sexual assault: Medical and legal implications. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(6):727–31.PubMedCrossRef Rambow B, Adkinson C, Frost T, Peterson G. Female sexual assault: Medical and legal implications. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(6):727–31.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tintinalli J, Hoelzer M. Clinical findings and legal resolution in sexual assault. Ann Emerg Med. 1985;14(5):447–53.PubMedCrossRef Tintinalli J, Hoelzer M. Clinical findings and legal resolution in sexual assault. Ann Emerg Med. 1985;14(5):447–53.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gray-Eurom K, Seaberg D, Wears R. The prosecution of sexual assault cases: Correlation with frorensic evidence. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39(1):39–46.PubMedCrossRef Gray-Eurom K, Seaberg D, Wears R. The prosecution of sexual assault cases: Correlation with frorensic evidence. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39(1):39–46.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Grossin C, Sibille I, Lorin de la Grandmaison G, Banasr A, Brion F, Durigon M. Analysis of 418 cases of sexual assault. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;131(2–3):125–30.PubMedCrossRef Grossin C, Sibille I, Lorin de la Grandmaison G, Banasr A, Brion F, Durigon M. Analysis of 418 cases of sexual assault. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;131(2–3):125–30.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Santos J, Neves A, Rodrigues M, Ferrao P. Victims of sexual offences: Medicolegal examinations in emergency settings. J Clin Forensic Med. 2006;13:300–3.PubMedCrossRef Santos J, Neves A, Rodrigues M, Ferrao P. Victims of sexual offences: Medicolegal examinations in emergency settings. J Clin Forensic Med. 2006;13:300–3.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Riggs N, Houry D, Long G, Markovchick V, Feldhaus K. Analysis of 1076 cases of sexual assault. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;35(4):358–62.PubMedCrossRef Riggs N, Houry D, Long G, Markovchick V, Feldhaus K. Analysis of 1076 cases of sexual assault. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;35(4):358–62.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ingemann-Hansen O, Brink O, Sabroe S, Sorensen V, Charles A. Legal aspects of sexual violence: Does forensic evidence make a difference? Forensic Sci Int. 2008;180(2–3):98–104.PubMedCrossRef Ingemann-Hansen O, Brink O, Sabroe S, Sorensen V, Charles A. Legal aspects of sexual violence: Does forensic evidence make a difference? Forensic Sci Int. 2008;180(2–3):98–104.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference McGregor M, Du Mont J, Myhr T. Sexual assault medical forensic examination: Is evidence related to successful prosecution? Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39(6):639–47.PubMedCrossRef McGregor M, Du Mont J, Myhr T. Sexual assault medical forensic examination: Is evidence related to successful prosecution? Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39(6):639–47.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Early evidence kits in sexual assault: an observational study of spermatozoa detection in urine and other forensic specimens
Authors
Debbie A. Smith
Laurance G. Webb
Angelika I. Fennell
Elizabeth A. Nathan
Christine A. Bassindale
Maureen A. Phillips
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1547-769X
Electronic ISSN: 1556-2891
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9562-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 3/2014 Go to the issue